WASHINGTON, July 17, 2008

Obama's Foreign Trips Carry High Stakes

Meetings With Foreign Leaders Offer Chance To Brandish Foreign Policy Credentials

  • Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., arrives at Midway International Airport in Chicago, Wednesday, July 16, 2008.

    Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., arrives at Midway International Airport in Chicago, Wednesday, July 16, 2008.  (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

  • In-Depth VP Hot Sheet: Obama

    CBSNews.com ranks the top contenders to be Obama's running mate.

  • Photo Essay Barack Obama

    A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.

(AP)  Sen. Barack Obama's trip to the Middle East and Europe marks his first high-profile step onto the international stage, a campaign-season audition of sorts for a presidential hopeful pledging a new era in diplomacy and an end to the U.S. combat role in Iraq.

"The stakes are very high for Obama," said Lee Hamilton, president of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and a supporter of the Illinois Democrat.

While Obama currently leads in the polls, "foreign policy is one area where they (voters) have their doubts" about him, Hamilton said.

Campaign officials have announced stops in Jordan, Israel, Germany, France and England. Obama also has pledged to travel to Iraq and Afghanistan this summer, but aides have not said whether those war zones will be part of the same trip.

The trip is planned to put Obama into settings often occupied by presidents, including formal meetings with foreign leaders, public speeches and visits to historical sites.

"It's an opportunity for him to sit down with the international leaders with whom he would have to work as president of the United States, and discuss some of the issues," said David Axelrod, the campaign's senior strategist.

Obama has been critical of Bush's foreign policy in his campaign for the White House, but Hamilton said the Democratic presidential nominee-in-waiting must tread lightly. "Criticizing foreign policy in Washington in one thing. Criticizing it in Berlin" is another, he said.

"There will be a lot of eyes on him, and we know that," Axelrod said, when asked about the risk of politically damaging errors.

Less than four months before the election, Obama's trip comes at a time when he leads Republican rival John McCain in many polls but runs no better than even on many foreign policy questions.

In a recent Washington Post-ABC poll, 72 percent of those surveyed said McCain knew enough about world affairs to serve effectively as president, compared to 54 percent for Obama.

The two men were in a statistical tie when voters were asked who was more trusted to handle the situation between Israel and the Palestinians or the war in Iraq.

Whatever he says or does, Obama will be under scrutiny from Republicans eager to raise doubts about his readiness to handle foreign and defense policy.

"This trip is about politics. It's a way for Obama to try and compete on foreign policy," said Jill Hazelbaker, McCain's communications director.

McCain has left the country twice this summer, once for Canada and a second time to visit Colombia and Mexico. In both cases his principal goal was to express support for expanded trade.

At home, Obama has struggled to consolidate his support among Jewish voters wary of his commitment to Israel.

And while Obama is expected to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Ohlmert, Palestinian officials have announced he will visit the West Bank. McCain did not meet with Palestinians in his most recent visit to the Middle East in March.

"We welcome this meeting," Saeb Erekat, a Palestinian negotiator, said recently. He added that if Obama is elected "we hope he will stay the course between Israel and the Palestinians in reaching peace and a two-state solution." Bush is trying to broker a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians before leaving office in January.

Obama stirred controversy in June with a speech before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee in which he endorsed a two-state Israel-Palestine settlement, yet said Jerusalem should remain both the capital of the Jewish nation and undivided.

Palestinian leaders quickly rejected the statement. "...We will not accept a Palestinian state without having Jerusalem as the capital of a Palestinian state," said Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian president, and the next day, Obama backpedaled.

"Well, obviously, it's going to be up to the parties to negotiate a range of these issues. And Jerusalem will be part of those negotiations," he said in a CNN interview. He added that "as a practical matter, it would be very difficult to execute" a division of the city.

Stops in Western European capitals are standard for U.S. politicians seeking to burnish foreign policy credentials, and Hamilton said government leaders are eager to meet the candidate.

Campaign aides have disclosed almost nothing of the European itinerary.

Controversy preceded Obama to Germany when aides sought to use the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin as the site for a speech.

Chancellor Angela Merkel was less than enthusiastic, dispatching spokesman Thomas Steg to say she had "only limited understanding for using the Brandenburg Gate as an election campaign backdrop, as it were, and has expressed skepticism about pursuing such plans."

Obama's campaign spokesman Bill Burton responded that the Illinois senator has "considered several sites for a possible speech, and he will choose one that makes most sense for him and his German hosts."

Constructed in 1791 as a symbol of peace in Germany, the gate stood for 28 years during the Cold War at the heavily fortified Berlin Wall that blocked off communist East Germany's sector of the divided city. Probably the capital's best-known monument, it has been restored as a national symbol for a reunified Germany.


©MMVIII, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Candidate Profiles & RSS Feeds


Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 65 Comments
by johnnyzmee July 18, 2008 9:20 PM EDT
I see "When he (Reagan) chose to invest in "STAR WARS" the Soviets did indeed go broke trying to keep up with it.

Reagan "Chose" to spend on Star Wars defense, which the Soviets tried but were unable to keep up with, But Reagan had nothing to do with it?

Did he "inadvertently'' choose? Accidental like? Did not mean to choose Star Wars? It just kinda happened?

Like I said, I was no fan of Reagan, but his "Cold War" brought down for better or worse, the old Soviet Union.

And soldiers did not die in battle for it.
Reply to this comment
by ioweign July 18, 2008 7:14 PM EDT
What Obama does not seem to understand is that the Brandenburg Gate is something you earn. President Reagan earned the right to speak there ...

Posted by PeterP111 at 11:32 AM : Jul 18, 2008

Must be Ronnie''s performance in "Bedtime for Bonzo", that did it. It certainly wasn''t his running up the National Debt with his "VooDoo Economics"...
Reply to this comment
by raoul12-2009 July 18, 2008 6:40 PM EDT
P.S. Reagan inadvertently was involved in the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Posted by koko98 at 02:35 PM : Jul 18, 2008
_______________________

Exactly, with the emphasis on the word: "inadvertently."
Reply to this comment
by drewsco July 18, 2008 5:24 PM EDT
McCain and the Republicans are getting desperate. They are trying to set a trap for Obama. If he goes to Iraq and changes his position then McCain is going to say Obama is a flip flopper on this issue. If Obama maintains his original position for a troop withdrawal, then McCain is going to say that Obama hasn''t learned a thing after going to Iraq. This is a non-issue just like the Brandenburg gate issue that was started by someone in the Bush administration and promoted by the Republican Party. I won%u2019t be surprised if Obama makes his speech at that huge soccer stadium in Berlin. I''m told that I could hold up to 125,000 people. Can you imagine the impact this would have for Obama. Wait till Obama gets crowds that rival rock concerts. Then the Republicans will say-DO YOU WANT THE EUROPEANS TO PICK YOUR PRESIDENT? They have %u201Cattack%u201D scenarios for every possibility. First, they branded him as being out of touch on foreign policy because he hasn%u2019t traveled, the new mantra will be %u201CWHY IS HE TRAVELING OVERSEAS WHEN THERE ARE SO MANY PROBLEMS HERE AT HOME? (CONTINUED ON NEXT POST)
Reply to this comment
by drewsco July 18, 2008 5:23 PM EDT
(CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST) REALITY- the Republicans are worried that this trip will provide a huge political advantage for Obama. The majority of Britains and Germans are against the war in Iraq, and many of them think Bush espouses an imperialistic perception of the U.S. with the way he threaten countries with economic sanctions. Obama is the anti-thesis of Bush. McCain is more of the same as Bush. Everytime Bush travels to Germany and Britain there are huge protests. You may not see it on American TV but I live in London and have travelled to Munich frequently and the sentiment against Bush is very bad. You will see the opposite when Obama travels over there. The Republicans will attempt to demonize the Europeans if Obama receives a positive reception.
Reply to this comment
by raoul12-2009 July 18, 2008 5:17 PM EDT
The US was spending 3% of GDP on Military, and the equivillent for the Soviets was 25-30% of their GDP or

Posted by Johnnyzmee at 12:53 PM : Jul 18, 2008
_____________________

So you''re saying Reagan made the Soviets spend themselves into oblivion? What garbage! He just happened to be president when in happened. It would have been the same no matter who was president. It was plain luck for Reagan; brilliance had nothing to do with it. By the way, what''s McCain claim to glory other than being shot down?
Reply to this comment
by raoul12-2009 July 18, 2008 4:53 PM EDT
McCain has opposed legislation aimed at helping women sue in cases of pay discrimination on the grounds that it could make businesses vulnerable to frivolous lawsuits. He criticized Barack Obama%u2019s latest woman-friendly proposals %u2014 guaranteed sick days and more family leave %u2014 as %u201Cbig-government%u201D extravagances. He has voted to restrict women%u2019s access not just to abortion but to birth control and affordable prenatal health care, and %u2014 though his own memory failed him in recalling this last week %u2014 he voted against legislation that would have required insurance companies to include contraceptives as part of their prescription drug coverage.
Reply to this comment
by johnnyzmee July 18, 2008 3:53 PM EDT
"TOTAL NONSENSE. Reagan didn''''t do anything to cause the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union came apart because of economic problems that had nothing to do with Reagan." Posted by raoul12

Raoul - I was no fan of Reagan, but I give him credit, he got the Soviets into a Military Spending war, not a Shooting War. And, the Soviet''s Lost.

The US was spending 3% of GDP on Military, and the equivillent for the Soviets was 25-30% of their GDP or ten times the US amount.

The US took on enormous debt, but survived handily.

The Soviets could not sustain that level of spending, and collapsed. The USSR collapse had EVERYTHING to do with Reagan. And not a single shot was fired. Not a single military troop was killed or maimed.

It was BRILLIANT.... I say that and I did not vote for, and did not otherwise like Reagan.
Reply to this comment
by johnnyzmee July 18, 2008 3:33 PM EDT
I did not vote for either Bush. And, i can''t stand W. But that does not make Obama worthy of being President.

That''s some twisted logic you are using there.

No, wait... it''s just Divisive Partisan Politics as usual. Just like from the "Change" and "Uniter" candidate himself.

If you are a Democrat, McCain = Bad and Obama = Messiah.

That is the extent of the Obamabot support.
Reply to this comment
by johnnyzmee July 18, 2008 3:25 PM EDT
IF YOU WANNA BE TALKED DOWN TO, AND PREACHED TO, IN ALL CAPS THEN OBAMA IS YOUR BOY.

If you want to be part of a grown up discussion, you might prefer McCain.
Reply to this comment
by raoul12-2009 July 18, 2008 3:24 PM EDT
Posted by PeterP111 at 11:32 AM : Jul 18, 2008
_____________________

You loser! Who are you; who do you think you are. I think the bottom line is, you''re just a loser who has accomplished nothing in life. I think you are just jealous. The fact is, Obama has accomplished quite a bit in his life, certainly more than Dumbya had before he was selected president. Dumbya was a "C" student at best when he went to Yale. He was only admitted because he was a "legacy" entrant, i.e., he only got in because of his father. He will go down as the worst president this country has ever had. You want to talk about accomplishments? Look at Dumbya''s: he got us into the stupid war; he wrecked our economy; he brought us the biggest deficit in history, and as Nancy Pelosi says, the list goes on.
Reply to this comment
by johnnyzmee July 18, 2008 3:23 PM EDT
Obama, If you paid your blog trolls more money, you might get some with more intellegence. The trolls here are losing the arguments.

First they lose their minds on Obama kool aid and Hopium, and now they lose every argument.

Come on O''boy, wannabe leader of the free world, can''t you get some intellegence into these comments?
Reply to this comment
by raoul12-2009 July 18, 2008 3:14 PM EDT
IF YOU LIKE THIS ECONOMY;

IF YOU LIKE THIS NEVER-ENDING WAR;

IF YOU LIKED HIS VOTE AGAINST A GI BILL FOR IRAQ VETS;

IF LIKE PAYING HIGH GAS PRICES;

IF LIKE THE TAX BREAKS FOR THE RICH;

IF YOU CAN''T WAIT TO INVADE IRAN;

IF YOU LIKE HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT;

IF YOU LIKE A PRESIDENT WHO VOTED AGAINST EQUAL PAY FOR WOMEN;

IF YOU LIKE A PRESIDENT WHO VOTED AGAINST MATERNITY LEAVE FOR WOMEN;

IF YOU LOOK FORWARD TO THE END OF ROE V. WADE;

IF YOU LIKE THE UNFAIR TRADE POLICIES THAT SEND JOBS AND TECHNOLOGY OVERSEAS;

IF YOU LIKE A GOVERNMENT THAT PRACTICES TORTURE;

IF YOU LIKE A GOVERNMENT THAT SPIES ON ITS OWN CITIZEN;

IF YOU LIKE THE FACT THAT THE US IS ONE OF THE MOST REVILED NATIONS ON THE PLANET, THEN YOU''LL JUST LOVE McCAIN.
Reply to this comment
by raoul12-2009 July 18, 2008 3:11 PM EDT
McCain graduated from the US Naval Academy 894th in a class of 899. He wrecked five jets before they finally got rid of him. Obviously he is not the brightest bulb on the tree. He was shot down by an out-of-date Soviet missile by men with no experience in anti-aircraft warfare because he did not follow the rules of evasion taught at the Academy. Let''s just say the man has only one oar in the water.

He disses two in five people on the face of the earth by referring to all Asians as %u201CGooks.%u201D He may be viewed as a %u201Chero,%u201D but I don%u2019t think being shot down qualifies him for the job of president.
Reply to this comment
by raoul12-2009 July 18, 2008 3:10 PM EDT
SENATOR McCAIN SAID TODAY: %u201CI AM GOING TO CAMPAIGN IN ALL THIRTEEN COLONIES. MY CAMPAIGN WILL EMPLOY ALL THE LATEST TECHNOLOGIES: THE TELEGRAPH, THE CARRIER PIGEON AS WELL AS THE PONY EXPRESS.
Reply to this comment
by raoul12-2009 July 18, 2008 3:08 PM EDT
Who is Obama representing? What was his role in the fight against communism?

Posted by PeterP111 at 11:32 AM : Jul 18, 2008
____________________

You idiot! Obama was still in law school What did stupid Bush do to "fight communism"? Not a *** thing.
Reply to this comment
by raoul12-2009 July 18, 2008 2:59 PM EDT
NOT FUNNY McCAIN!

McCain supposedly asked the crowd if they had heard "the one about the woman who is attacked on the street by a gorilla, beaten senseless, raped repeatedly and left to die?"
The punch line: "When she finally regains consciousness and tries to speak, her doctor leans over to hear her sigh contently and to feebly ask, "Where is that marvelous ape?"

Back in 1998, he odiously declared before a GOP crowd: "Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno."

More recently he joked that it might be good for the United States to keep exporting cigarettes to Iran as cancer would prove an effective weapon against that country''s citizens
Reply to this comment
by raoul12-2009 July 18, 2008 2:57 PM EDT
What Obama does not seem to understand is that the Brandenburg Gate is something you earn. President Reagan earned the right to speak there ...

Posted by PeterP111 at 11:32 AM : Jul 18, 2008
______________________
TOTAL NONSENSE. Reagan didn''t do anything to cause the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union came apart because of economic problems that had nothing to do with Reagan. The fact that the Soviet Union came apart while Reagan was president was nothing more than coincidence. In fact, Reagan was losing it: he was citing events in movies as thought they were actual events. I think his Alzheimer set in much earlier than we were led to believe.
Reply to this comment
by abnrgr175bc July 18, 2008 2:55 PM EDT
This is the sort of humor a--holes find funny. When he told the joke, Chelsea Clinton was seventeen years old. Some say when you open an attack like this on the looks of someone who did not ask to be thrust into the public eye, you invite similar attacks in your own direction.
Reply to this comment
by abnrgr175bc July 18, 2008 2:53 PM EDT
more great judgement:
The French remind me a little bit of an aging actress of the 1940s who is still trying to dine out on her looks but doesn''t have the face for it McCain told fox news a few years ago.

mccain responded to a question with the line, "And I stopped beating my wife just a couple of weeks ago," provoking a round of tut-tutting for his reference to the old classic example of a leading question.

Another favorite has been the elderly. He has recalled groveling for forgiveness when, during his 1986 campaign, he referred to a retirement community called "Leisure World" as "Seizure World."

''The nice thing about Alzheimer''s is you get to hide your own Easter eggs.''"

Reply to this comment
See all 65 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: