Bush Withholds CIA Leak Records
President Claims Executive Privilege To Keep Congress From Seeing Cheney Interview Report In Plame Case
-
Photo
President Bush, seen during a meeting with Burkina Faso President Blaise Compaore (unseen), July 16, 2008, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Plame Discusses Leak Fallout
Outed CIA operative Valerie Plame speaks with Katie Couric in an exclusive "60 Minutes" interview about the serious impact of her cover being blown.
-
Video
No Prison 'Break' For Libby
A U.S. District Judge has ordered former aide to the Vice President I. Lewis 'Scooter' Libby to prison, while he awaits his appeal in the CIA leak case. Bob Orr reports.
-
Video
Plame Wilson On CIA Career
In an exclusive "60 Minutes" interview, ex-CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson speaks with Katie Couric about being at the center of a White House scandal.
-
Interactive
The Leak
People and events surrounding the leak of a CIA officer's name.
The president's decision drew a sharp protest Wednesday from Rep. Henry Waxman, chairman of House Oversight Committee, which had subpoenaed Attorney General Michael Mukasey to turn over the documents.
"This unfounded assertion of executive privilege does not protect a principle; it protects a person," the California Democrat said. "If the vice president did nothing wrong, what is there to hide?"
Waxman left little doubt he would soon move for a committee vote to hold Mukasey in contempt of Congress.
Bush's assertion of privilege prevented Mukasey from complying with the House subpoena for records bearing on the unmasking of Plame at a time that the administration was trying to rebut criticism from her husband, former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson, of Bush's rationale for going to war in Iraq.
Cheney's chief of staff in 2003, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, was later convicted of perjury, obstruction and lying to the FBI about his role in leaking Plame's name and CIA affiliation to a reporter. Last July, Bush commuted Libby's 2½-year sentence, sparing him from serving prison time.
In grand jury testimony played at his trial, Libby acknowledged he told the FBI early in the Plame probe that "it's possible" he spoke to Cheney about whether to share information with reporters about Wilson's wife.
Other records sought by the House committee include notes about Bush's 2003 State of the Union address, during which he made the case for invading Iraq in part by saying Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was pursuing uranium ore in Africa to make a nuclear weapon. In the spring of 2003, Wilson claimed publicly that he had gone to Africa for the CIA to investigate the report and advised the administration it was false months before Bush cited it in the State of the Union speech.
Waxman held off an immediate contempt citation of Mukasey, but only as a courtesy to lawmakers not present Wednesday and to give all members a chance to read up on the matter. He made clear that he thinks Mukasey, who requested that Bush invoke executive privilege to shield the records, has earned a contempt citation.
"We'll act in the reasonable and appropriate period of time," Waxman said.
In a Tuesday letter to Bush, Mukasey said the assertion of the privilege would not be about hiding anything but rather protecting the separation of powers as well as the integrity of future Justice Department investigations of the White House. Several of the subpoenaed reports, Mukasey wrote, summarize conversations between Bush and advisers.
"I am greatly concerned about the chilling effect that compliance with the committee's subpoena would have on future White House deliberations and White House cooperation with future Justice Department investigations," Mukasey wrote Bush. "I believe it is legally permissible for you to assert executive privilege with respect to the subpoenaed documents, and I respectfully request that you do so."
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., wrote to Mukasey later Wednesday suggesting that the attorney general should have recused himself from the dispute because he is the subject of the subpoena and he gave Bush advice about it.
White House spokesman Tony Fratto said Bush invoked the privilege on Tuesday.
The Bush administration had plenty of warning. Waxman said last week that he would cite Mukasey for contempt unless the attorney general complied with the subpoena. The House Judiciary Committee also has subpoenaed some of the same documents from Mukasey, as well as information on the leak from other current and former administration officials.
Congressional Democrats want to shed light on the precise roles, if any, that Bush, Cheney and their aides may have played in the leak.
State Department official Richard Armitage first revealed Plame's identity as a CIA operative to columnist Robert Novak, who used former presidential counselor Karl Rove as a confirming source for a 2003 article.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 8
- next
See all 391 CommentsBush is a criminal and a traitor.
Isn''t that what the right wing conservative with everyone but themselves global capitalists ask of american citizens who are wiretapped by the private corporate telecoms?-- What do they have to hide?
Bush once said, not all poor people are killers...just because a person is poor says Bush, doesn''t necessarily make them a killer. Now go shop.
Be aware that should McCain be elected the administration will be given pardons for anything illegal or un-constitional they have done. Think about that when you vote.
"These people have no disregard for human life"
Bush at the press conference this week.
George Bush quoting Adolph Hitler verbatim.
Posted by bron-yr-aur
----------------------
BECAUSE THEY HAVE AN EXEMPTION! They are born to a more noble god than the rest of us. It''s so deeply. deeply programmed into them they''re not even concsious of it. They are members of the "elect" (to use a religious term).
Why do they see their political party as an "exclusive club"?
It is utterly natural for a republican to refuse to negotiate or talk with "objectionables".
Why do do you have to be pre-approved to attend a Bush speech.
Get a clue!
This is why FDR called ''em "economic royalists"!
PRECIPITATE A SECOND EINSTEIN?
Dems don''t talk about it.
The public pretends it didn''t happen.
Repubs would just as soon not dwell
on the only thing that not only COULD
but DID get George Bush elected as
the President of the united states.
But now since it''s become recorded
histories'' most expensive one we
deserve the specifics.
(If we dont learn from the mistakes
of history we are doomed to
their repetition.)
Not getting caught in the oval office
in a below-the-desk job seems like it
should''ve been easy. , ,You''re the damm
President people knock before they enter!
We never DID hear the actual mechanics
of the discovery of this historical
presidential mistake that the next
president must learn from to avoid it''s
repetition by either locking the door
or whatever.
So what was the smoking gun?
**Did Bill lose a self video?
**Did repubs have a peephole to learn
what people of the opposite se*x do
when alone with each other?
**Did Bill talk in his varius beds
of sleep?
Curious: an almost prophetic equation
among Einstein''s papers , ,
"BC + ML BJ = GWB"
---------------------
There''s gotta be room in there somewhere for the "RR".
Because now the "RR" plus "GWB" equals "BC" is a saint!
The "RR" is have one devil of a time grappling with that.
now he hides and protects these people behind "executive privledge" -
bushit is a coward and chickenhawk and he''s proved it again - and again - and again
Posted by ajaxtheleast at 02:53 AM : Jul 17, 2008
------------------------
My response:
1. I don''t know which group of whining neocon supporters I dislike more; those who refuse to acknowledge ANY of Bush''s constant mistakes, failures, and crimes, or those who want to relive the ''glory days'' of their discovery of Clinton''s private sexcapades with Lewinsky!? To both I say, GROW UP!
2. Your country is constantly being harmed by a man who acts against the law, and you want to discuss the former president and his private *** life?! Your priorities are really messed up!
3. If I were you, I''d get my head ''out of the sand'' and deal with the immediate subject at hand!
4. There seems to be a lot of neocons worried about how much Clinton ''is getting''! It smacks a lot of jealousy! If you guys got laid more often you wouldn''t be so fixate on Clinton''s *** life. Shame on you!
The hypocrisy of these two stooges is simply unreal.
If he has nothing to hide, then why is he hiding it?
Even the GW Bush arse kissers must be able to see that.
1. Mukasey has acted unethically---if not illegally by advising Bush to use executive privilege to prevent him from having to forward the requested document! This is OUTRAGEOUS misconduct!
2. Bush has violated the law by misusing executive privilege in order to IMPEDE or otherwise OBSTRUCT an ongoing investigation!
3. Henry Waxman, has failed to act promptly to MAKE Mukasey comply! Time is of the essence in these matters, his foot-dragging necessarily will result in all parties NOT being held responsible for their misdeeds! He needs to be replaced as cmte chairman!
4. What D.C. insiders know is this, Cheney apparently engineered the smear of Valerie Pflame, and he said something incriminating in his FBI interview. Mukasey, Bush, and Waxman are all acting to cover it up; Mukasey & Bush directly, and Waxman indirectly!
5. Cheney, Mukasey, and Bush need not worry much about the consequences, because the Democrats are FAILING to act in opposition to them, and hold them accountable to the law!
6. If the public WANTS Cheney held responsible for his actions, THEY''LL have to act. First, by voting Waxman, Schumer, Feinstein, Pelosi, and other ''foot-draggers'' out of office! Then, making to clear to new leaders to move forward and take action! Otherwise, nothing is going to get done!
If there were any real patriots in the Republican Party, they''''d reveal those documents.
Posted by mcdazz
----
They had better be true patriots to do that .. because I am quite sure W would have them "thrown in the dungeon" for aiding the terrorists
Its a whole other ballgame.
Oooh, neato. Did you have a double-O rating, and wristwatch camera, too?
we won''t have to hear a mile long list of "presidential pardons"
the bums will soon be out and hopefully in courts the rest of their blood-stained lives.
Posted by psy_war at 06:29 AM : Jul 17, 2008
Remember Bush''s promise in 2000 to "restore dignity" to the White House?
The ultimate bait-and-switch......
You will never convince me that he thought up all these decisions himself. Although a willing party and certainly full of halfbaked ideas himself, he was led along by others, Cheney in particular.
Both of them can be resign to the halls of the great failures of history.
I know that shrub is hopes that history takes a kinder view of him, much like Harry Truman, it is not only Iraq that will plague him, but the firing of the attornies, the law breaking, ID and schools, religion and schools, PlameGate and a host of other illegal and nefarious activities.
This is all nothing more than political grandstanding .. ask Kucinich ... who has proposed impeachment articles on the house floor 35 times ... and failed to get any traction ..... HAHAHAHA
Dems are just really good liars .. they are not going to do anything but cover thier crooked counterparts and collegues ... and try to pander to the goofs who think they are any better than any other career politician ...
Another political grandstanding event .. with a little red meat ...
VOTE THEM ALL OUT !!!!
Posted by ahrats
Saw a bumper sticker ...
Rather go hunting with *** Cheney ...
Than for a drive on the vineyard with Teddy Kennedy ..
HAHAHAHA
Now thats some funny Sh*& !!! and true too ..
Just exactly HOW is this Political Grandstanding? As I read the Constitution this is EXACTLY what Waxman and the rest of Congress is supposed to be doing. Would you explain to all of us how YOU view the REQUIREMENTS of that Constitution for OVERSIGHT is supposed to be enforced IF the Committees can''t obtain the necessary documents? It''s long been known that YOU fascist do NOT like the Constitution but it is a FACT and it does exist. The people who need to be voted out of office is the LEADER of the Republican Party along with all those who supported their Incompetence and Failure to do their Constitutional Duty. Sieg Heil Bush
NOW OR LATER BUT IT WILL HAPPEN...
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 8
- next
See all 391 Comments