DUBAI, United Arab Emirates, July 16, 2008

Coalition Troops Snatch 30 Tons Of Drugs

Narcotics Including Hashish, Opiates, Cocaine And Amphetamines Could Have Helped Fund Taliban

  • The U.S. Navy said in a statement on July 15, 2008 that coalition warships have seized 30 tons of narcotics over five months on Gulf patrols, cutting off possible funds for insurgents in Afghanistan.

    The U.S. Navy said in a statement on July 15, 2008 that coalition warships have seized 30 tons of narcotics over five months on Gulf patrols, cutting off possible funds for insurgents in Afghanistan.  (AP)

  • Fast Facts Afghanistan

    Learn about the people, economy and history.

  • Special Report War On Terror

    Complete coverage of the military's battle against terrorism.

(AP)  Coalition warships seized 30 tons of narcotics over five months on Gulf patrols, cutting off possible funds for insurgents in Afghanistan, the U.S. Navy said in a statement on Tuesday.

The Navy said the drug busts along the region's so called "Hash Highway" in the Persian Gulf were largely due to successful operations of the U.K. Royal Navy. Its marines and sailors intercepted 70 percent of the total narcotics haul.

Drugs seized over five months included hashish, opiates, cocaine and amphetamines, the statement said.

The U.S. Navy believes that had the illegal substances reached their final destination they "could have helped fund the insurgency fighting the Coalition Forces in Afghanistan."

The British warships involved in the operations were frigates HMS Chatham, HMS Montrose and Fand destroyer HMS Edinburgh. They were supported by the Royal Fleet Auxiliary helicopter support ship Argus and her embarked Sea King aircraft, the statement said.

The commander of Royal Navy in the Middle East Commodore Keith Winstanley said the trafficking of illegal drugs has been "one of the gravest threats to the long term security of Afghanistan and a vital source of funding for the Taliban warlords."

By seizing narcotics, the Coalition forces, patrolling the Gulf and headquartered in Manama, Bahrain, have dealt "a significant blow to the illegal trade," Winstanley said.


© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 14 Comments
by eggy1620 July 17, 2008 3:07 PM EDT
I%u2019d like to see the path of logic followed by the Navy to conclude that Persian hash equals Afghan cash.
Reply to this comment
by liberalme July 16, 2008 7:12 PM EDT
Hooray! Now they wont fall into the hands of liberals who will use them for the purpose of escaping reality.

Posted by GOP_forever

Isn''t that what the coward Bush did to get out of serving his country? You know who I mean? AWOL George?
Reply to this comment
by xmanborg July 16, 2008 5:55 PM EDT
OneAmerican

Your statement #2 was pretty funny.
Reply to this comment
by oneamerican- July 16, 2008 5:24 PM EDT
This is certainly good news, for two good reasons.

1. The Taliban lose their source of funding.

2. The Liberals in America lose their source of what makes them think like liberals.
Reply to this comment
by missingamerica July 16, 2008 4:58 PM EDT
They can "believe" anything they like, that doesn''''t make it a fact! chances are excellent the money would have gone to a handfull of drug cartels having nothing to do with insurgents OR Afghanistan.

Posted by newster1 at 01:46 PM : Jul 16, 2008

lolll...but if they were to admit that possibility, they would be admitting that capitalism spreads way faster than Democracy...
Reply to this comment
by nothappyatall July 16, 2008 4:46 PM EDT
The U.S. Navy believes that had the illegal substances reached their final destination they "could have helped fund the insurgency fighting the Coalition Forces in Afghanistan."

They can "believe" anything they like, that doesn''t make it a fact! chances are excellent the money would have gone to a handfull of drug cartels having nothing to do with insurgents OR Afghanistan.
Reply to this comment
by loneeagle57 July 16, 2008 4:44 PM EDT
Hey You never know may be this was a shipment to the girl scouts
Reply to this comment
by marcpcbs July 16, 2008 4:39 PM EDT
Is this legal if in international waters?
Posted by jackobyte

-Good point. My guess would be... no. But, since we''''re the great and powerful U.S. who is going to say, "NO?" Maybe George Sr. should have been in on this deal, since it was he who was involved so deep with the Iran-Contra deal, some years ago. Kinda brings back the memories, doesn''''t it?! ...sniff...
Posted by RandyNason
______________________________
RandyNason your guess would be wrong.

The laws against illegal drugs in international waters are very straight forward and very strict.
Reply to this comment
by jgallaway81 July 16, 2008 4:14 PM EDT
No.. it was the Girl Scouts of Afghanistan''s Hydroponics Badge.
Reply to this comment
by loneeagle57 July 16, 2008 4:12 PM EDT
I got to ask, did they find it at a girl scout camp
Reply to this comment
by randynason July 16, 2008 4:04 PM EDT
Is this legal if in international waters?
Posted by jackobyte

-Good point. My guess would be... no. But, since we''re the great and powerful U.S. who is going to say, "NO?" Maybe George Sr. should have been in on this deal, since it was he who was involved so deep with the Iran-Contra deal, some years ago. Kinda brings back the memories, doesn''t it?! ...sniff...
Reply to this comment
by impeach__w July 16, 2008 3:21 PM EDT
This will keep the CIA Shipments over priced.
You did know we are smuggling drugs from SA to Africa to fund our cladestine wars again don''t you? We had air america in Veitnam and Iran -contra and the same thing is happening now in the very same bases Ollie north set up in central and south america. they are Smuggling drugs and weapons to fund activites congress won''t under the guise of counter narcotics, Chavez and FARC.
Reply to this comment
by questionnews July 16, 2008 3:01 PM EDT
Instead of destroying these drugs, why don''t we just sell the crapp to Amsterdam. Word is it''s a retail item there.
Reply to this comment
by jackobyte July 16, 2008 2:45 PM EDT
Is this legal if in international waters?

What if fundamentalist muslims sent dhows off the coast to interdict alcohol shipments that are funding the industrial military complex dropping bombs on them (ignore the fact that they''d be smashed into driftwood)?

That would also be legal no?
Reply to this comment
See all 14 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Sarah Palin's Book: The Fact Check

    (413 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: