U.S. Envoy To Meet Iran Nuke Negotiator

Breaking With Past Policy, Senior Diplomat Will Attend Talks "To Listen, Not Negotiate"

(CBS/AP)  A top U.S. diplomat heading to Geneva has no plans to meet separately with Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, but the mere presence of the Bush administration official at talks between the Iranian negotiator and representatives of other world powers will be a sharp break with past administration policy.

William Burns, America's third highest-ranking diplomat, will attend talks with the Iranian envoy, Saeed Jalili, in Switzerland on Saturday. The talks are aimed at persuading Iran to halt activities that could lead to the development of atomic weapons. It will be the first time such a high-ranking U.S. official has attended such talks.

Official contacts between Iran and the United States are extremely rare and although Washington is part of a six-nation effort to get Iran to stop enriching and reprocessing uranium, the administration has shunned contacts with Tehran on the matter.

White House press secretary Dana Perino referred to the weekend meeting as a "one-time U.S. participation."

"We will be there to listen. We are not there to negotiate. And our long-standing principle, that Iran must halt its uranium enrichment before negotiations can take place, remains the same. It's also been referred to as freeze-to-freeze - if they were to freeze their enrichment, then we would not forward with the consequences of not accepting the (incentives) package, which are more sanctions."

Perino said the meeting will serve to sharpen the contrast for the Iranian people of life under the current regime there, compared to the opportunities they could have if Iran accepts the incentives deal. And, she added, the meeting will "further clarify the consequences" if Iran does not accept the incentives.

"What this does show is how serious we are when we say that we want to try to solve this diplomatically," Perino said.

The proposal "gives the Iranians a face-saving way out of the issue by recognizing Iran's right to uranium enrichment for peaceful purposes, gives them support for construction of a light water reactor, support for Iran's admission to the World Trade Organization and the lifting of economic sanctions," says Falk. "And it may calm Israel's fear that Iran will continue its nuclear program to the point where it could develop nuclear weapons."

"Incentives to the Bush administration and to Iran to work out a deal are strong: U.S. financial markets have reeled at the possibility of a new military confrontation and Iran's economy has suffered from the isolation," of strict economic sanctions, adds Falk.

An administration official said "the sanctions are having some effect... they're feeling some heat," reports CBS News correspondent Charlie Wolfson. The administration official noted that some Europeans have imposed additional restrictions of their own and some deals made with European companies have been cancelled.

U.S. contact with Iran has recently been limited only to discussions about the security situation in Iraq, where Washington accuses Iran of supporting insurgents. The two countries have not had diplomatic relations since the hostage crisis at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran after the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran.

Saturday's meeting comes at a time of acutely heightened tensions between the United States and Iran, particularly after Iranian missile tests last week prompted President Bush's top aides to warn that the United States would defend its friends and interests in the Middle East.

The tensions with Iran have spilled over into the U.S. presidential campaign.

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Iran's missile tests highlight the need for direct diplomacy as well as tougher threats of economic sanctions and strong incentives to persuade Tehran to change its behavior. John McCain, the Republican seeking the presidency, said the tests demonstrated a need for effective missile defense, including missile defense in Europe and the defense system the U.S. plans with the Czech Republic and Poland.

The gathering in Geneva will be led by European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana, who is seeking a definitive answer from the Iranians to an offer of incentives that the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and Germany presented last month.

The package of incentives was accompanied by a letter from Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and the foreign ministers of the other five countries and sets out a scenario in which Iran would get a temporary reprieve from economic and financial sanctions in exchange for freezing its enrichment activities.

Preliminary negotiations over a permanent halt could then begin, although the United States would not join them until after Iran agrees to fully suspend uranium enrichment, which can produce the fuel needed to make nuclear bombs.

Iran has responded to the offer through the European Union but has indicated it has no plans to stop enriching uranium - the key demand. But there are hopes that Iran may refine its response at Saturday's meeting.

[smurfcrusher]

Kerry is a much better Liberal than King George ever will be. I give Bush a C-

He should be happy with that...

[smurfcrusher]

You mean, that candidates who change are GOOD???!

I knew we should have elected Kerry.

[ajmarine111]

And indecisive, as shown by his flip-flopping.

Posted by smurfcrusher at 08:06 PM : Jul 16, 2008


Funny, I thought people were all the time saying he was "stubbon" and wouldn''t change.

[smurfcrusher]

I too am struck by the lack of right-wing bloggers on this issue.

Is it possible they finally see they''ve been mislead?

Nah... they''ll whip up a new fantasy world to live in, when they can kill kill kill them all and imagine themselves as heroes.

Maybe Bush is becoming a Liberal! hahahaha.

Nah... he''s too stupid.

And indecisive, as shown by his flip-flopping.

As Bush sees it, a defiant terrorist state (be it Iran, or North Korea) warrants hand-holding and private talks. And many tons of free fuel, or other goodies while Americans suffer.

Worst president ever.

[noloyalisti]

Did the Bushoccio administration flip flop on this? Does McSame know about these cowardly appeasers? Don''t they know that the Grand Oil Party doesn''t talk to terrorists. That is why they won''t talk sense with Dems and Greens.

Something is up with the crime cabal in the Black House. What insidious plot do they have in store to inflict on us and the world? What twisted scheme are they thinking of to finish the job?

[rochest]

so let me get this straight---within 24 hours Senator McCain has decided to adopt Senator Obama position on sending troops to Afghanistan and now President Bush is sending a diplomat to meet with the Iranians like Senator Obama proposed that we negotiate with all---So all I guess that being young and naive and not ready to be Commander in Chief these charges have been debunked.

[tylenol6]

Don''t believe this article for a minute......All smoke &
mirrors by the Bush regime. Bush & Cheney are just DROOLING to attack Iran. That you can bet on........

[yongamerica]

What a waste of TIME. I know how this story ends.

[frootloop47]

MC CAIN "The Iranians continue %u2013 in the view of every objective observer %u2013 continue to pursue the acquisition of nuclear weapons."
John McCain on Tuesday, June 24th, 2008 in a telephone appearance with Florida voters

FALSE Ref: http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/557/

[randynason]

After seven and a half years, I have to say, "Too little, too late."
Bush is more concerned with his legacy than he is in having done the right thing, in the first place. His mom must be proud of his accomplishments. She always said the the best part of him ran down her leg.

[shingles1]

Where are all the right wingnuts screaching about "apeasment"? Have they moved on to the other talking points on their scripts?
Posted by singingrick

It''s simple:

It''s BAD when Democrats do it.
It''s GOOD when Republicans do it.

[Gary Kempf]

William Burns, America''s third highest-ranking diplomat, will attend talks with the Iranian envoy,

It has been reported that Mr Burns will be bringing a gift to the meeting, This gift will consist of Girl Scout cookies with secret ingredient only found in Indiana....

[checkthepast]

If the government doesn''t listen you gripe...
If the government does listen you gripe...
Standing up is reason to complain....
Negotiating is reason to complain...
Do something, don''t do something, do something else....

Whatever, you are going to gripe because America didn''t put your choice in office....

Same ***, different day.

[pvperson]

This is nothing, political pandering only, as their own words say, ""We will be there to listen. We are not there to negotiate." Why, stop doing what has failed for so long. Six more months.

[pointbreak14]

zionist cause is losing its wheels......peace is better than fighting for zionism....awake up america.

[frootloop47]

John McCain "has not led on nonproliferation issues when he had the chance in the Senate."
http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/502/

BOMB, BOMB, BOMB,
BOMB, BOMB, IRAN!!!
VOTE JOHN MC CAIN

IF YOU THINK WE FOULED UP IRAQ,
WAIT TO YOU SEE WHAT I DO WITH IRAN!!!
VOTE JOHN MC CAIN

[frootloop47]

"John McCain decided to stand with George Bush 95 percent of the time (last year)."
http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/512/

FOR MORE OF THE SAME,
VOTE MC CAIN!!!

[singingrick]

Where are all the right wingnuts screaching about "apeasment"? Have they moved on to the other talking points on their scripts?

[hungry1968]

"This is a one-time event and he will be there to listen, not negotiate"

Posted by checkthepast at 10:06 AM : Jul 16, 2008






If he was REALLY going "to listen, not negotiate", then why not just send a page or an intern with a tape recorder?

Posted by hungry1968 at 09:24 AM : Jul 16, 2008

[hotpaulie]

No way! We don''t talk to our enemies! Why is Bush letting this happen? ... There are going to be a lot of changes by the end of the year!