Mass. Aims To Open Gay Marriage Floodgates
State Senate Votes To Allow Same-Sex Couples From Other States; House Expected To Vote This Week
-
Photo
An effort is gaining momentum to repeal a 1913 Massachusetts state law that has banned most out of state gay couples from getting married. (AP / CBS)
-
Photo Essay
Married In Massachusetts
Couples exchange vows in the nation's first state-sanctioned same-sex weddings.
The law prohibits couples from obtaining marriage licenses if they can't legally wed in their home states.
The House is expected to vote on the repeal measure later this week. The Senate action came on a voice vote.
After Massachusetts became the first state to allow gay marriages in 2004 under a court order, then-Gov. Mitt Romney ordered town clerks to enforce the then-little-known 1913 law and deny licenses to out-of-state couples.
That move blocked Maine residents Michael Thorne, 55, and James Theberge, 50, from getting married in Massachusetts four years ago. They were among eight out-of-state gay couples who sued but lost in 2006 when the same court that allowed gay marriage refused to toss out the 1913 law.
Now Thorne and Theberge, who have been together 25 years and have two children, are hoping for an August wedding.
"If Gov. (Deval) Patrick signs the bill, we'll be at the Provincetown City Hall," said Thorne, who called Maine's domestic partnership law a poor substitute.
The governor, whose 18-year-old daughter announced publicly last month that she is a lesbian, supports repealing the law. Patrick, the state's first black governor, and other critics of the 95-year-old statute say it carries a racist taint.
The law dates to a time when the majority of states still outlawed interracial marriages, and backers of repeal said the law was intended to smooth relations with those states. Massachusetts has allowed interracial marriages since 1843.
Dianne Wilkerson, the state Senate's lone black member, said repeal was long overdue.
"This is one of the most pernicious statutes on our books," said Wilkerson, a Boston Democrat. "In some respects this bill puts the final nail in the coffin of those dark days."
Another factor driving the repeal effort in Massachusetts was the recent embrace of same-sex marriage by California, which has no residency requirement for obtaining a marriage license.
Opponents of gay marriage said there was no evidence the 1913 law has a racist heritage. They said keeping the law in place was key to preventing gay marriage from spreading to other states, many of which have passed laws or amended their constitution to bar same-sex marriage.
"The Massachusetts Senate has no right to infringe on the internal issues of how other states define marriage, but that's exactly what they voted today to do," said Kris Mineau, president of Massachusetts Family Institute.
Gay marriage foes including Mineau said activists are deliberately portraying the law as racist to speed its repeal.
"Legislators were pressured unscrupulously by same-sex marriage activists to dismantle this law or be branded racists," he said.
But advocates say the segregation-era law was clearly intended to abet discrimination.
Wilkerson said the law was adopted a time of racial tension including a national scandal over black heavyweight boxer Jack Johnson's marriage to Lucille Cameron, who was white.
The law makes no explicit racial reference, but outlaws marriages by couples from other jurisdictions if the nuptials "would be void if contracted in such other jurisdiction."
An analysis by the state Office of Housing and Economic Development found repealing the law would draw thousands of couples to Massachusetts, boosting the economy by $111 million, creating 330 jobs and generating $5 million in taxes and fees over three years.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 105 CommentsGay marriage will most likely reduce the number of AIDS cases -- I thought this was pretty obvious -- Do people really believe outlawing gay marriage means *** disappear?
Wait...I''m wrong. That was SUPPOSE to happen when inter-racial marriage was made legal. Gay folks getting married doesn''t effect my marriage.
There''s 2 types of marriage ceremonies: 1 legal, 1 religious. If Churches don''t want to perform ceremonies for Gay couples they don''t have to.
Beside why shouldn''t Gay couples be allowed to get married. then go though the pain of divorce, alimony, etc like the rest of us.
Why does anyone want to be married?
Folks need to keep their in-tolerant church views in confined their in-tolerant churches where they belong.
The rest of us folks don''t need those who think their religion is best telling people how to live their lives. Most Americans support g*a*y marriage. Those who don''t please pray for some tolerance and understanding.
Not exactly. Please try READING the bible BEFORE you try QUOTING from it. LOL
*************************************
This is just how ignorant and goofy these people are. Trying to argue that the law was race based. OF COURSE IT WAS. It was illegal in many states for blacks and whites to marry. (Incidentally, it would be this same group of ignoramusus that made that law. God didn''t want the races to mix group)
It is good to see the bigots losing...
If two people love each other
Man-Man Woman - Woman Man and Woman Than they deserve to be together
Let the experiment begin.
Let the experiment begin.
The fact is that this will do nothing more than give these folks an expensive piece of paper ..
Some gay friends of ours from Minnesota came to visit last christmas, and on a whim decided to get married .. they had to pay for the license, pay the court to overrule the resident clause, pay the Jp to actual ceremoney ... it all added up to $450.00 ...
And best of all it does NOTHING for thier legal benefactors or thier taxes ... because federally they do not recognize it and Minnesota does not either ...
So it was a beautiful little rip off ...
HAHAHA you gotta love our democratically controlled state of Massachusetts ...
What a bunch of hacks ...
The rest of us folks don''''t need those who think their religion is best telling people how to live their lives. Most Americans support g*a*y marriage. Those who don''''t please pray for some tolerance and understanding.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by macusweil at 05:24 PM : Jul 15, 2008
+ report abuse
**************
if that is the case,, then why do homos work hard to be accepted EVEN MAKING IT ILLEGAL TO EXPRESS what they think about fa ggots??
I think its called INSECURITY....most homos attack religion..(even after the fact that most DECLARE THEY DONT BELIEVE) maybe because they are racked with guilt??
(btw. it was a serious question and your rather rabid attack instead of answering it pretty much indicate that ''guilt''
The fact is that this will do nothing more than give these folks an expensive piece of paper ..
***************************************************
Sounds like a win/win to me. If you can make people happy AND make money, then that is the best it can get....
I shouldn''t be so apathetic, if the situation wasn''t so ironic.
Let''s talk about tolerance and understanding. It isn''t OK for me to state my belief that I am against gay marriage but I MUST accept the homosexual belief that is OK and keep quiet about it!!! It''s the homosexuals who are intolerant and not understanding. They are also the biggest band of hypocrytes on the planet because they DEMAND that I accept their point of view but won''t even listen to mine.
----------
I''m with you. I''m sick of hearing about this bull$hit!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7504472.stm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by tdcptrm at 06:45 PM : Jul 15, 2008
+ report abuse
****************************
That is not true at all. You can get married if you want to. You can go to what ever church you want to. No one is stopping. you. There is a church that believe blood transfusions are a sin. Would you like your doctor to tell you he can''t save your life with a blood transfusion because that religious group got enough power to make them illegal.
All *** want to do is be treated like other Americans and be able to protect their loved ones and families financially. If every gay in the US got married tomorrow, it would affect your life not one iota. So what exactly are they trying to "push" on you.
---------
Very well said.You are correct.
Gay right is your Priority one.
Boy George just VETO THE GAY RIGHT BILL.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by lovesamerica at 11:36 PM : Jul 15, 2008
+ report abuse
*************************************
Not sure any men can handle it, from my observation of men, straight and g a y.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 105 Comments