July 13, 2008

New Yorker Obama Cover Sparks Uproar

Politico: Campaign Calls Magazine Cover Art "Tasteless And Offensive"

  • Play CBS Video Video Obamas Portrayed As Terrorists

    The New Yorker calls it satire, but many say there's nothing funny about the magazine's latest cover. It paints Barack Obama and his wife as terrorists. Drew Levinson reports.

  • The cover of the July 21 issue of the New Yorker. Photo

    The cover of the July 21 issue of the New Yorker.  (AP/CBS/The New Yorker)

  • Photo Essay Barack Obama

    A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.

  • Photo Essay Obama Claims Nomination

    Barack Obama secures the Democratic presidential nomination in historic race against Hillary Rodham Clinton.

(The Politico)  This story was written by Mike Allen.

Barack Obama's campaign is condemning as “tasteless and offensive” a New Yorker magazine cover that depicts Obama in a turban, fist-bumping his gun-slinging wife.

An American flag burns in their fireplace.

The New Yorker says it's satire. It certainly will be candy for cable news.

The Obama campaign quickly condemned the rendering. Spokesman Bill Burton said in a statement: “The New Yorker may think, as one of their staff explained to us, that their cover is a satirical lampoon of the caricature Sen. Obama's right-wing critics have tried to create. But most readers will see it as tasteless and offensive. And we agree."

McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds quickly e-mailed: “We completely agree with the Obama campaign, it’s tasteless and offensive.”

The issue, which goes on sale Monday, includes a long piece by Ryan Lizza about Obama’s start in Chicago politics.

At a press availability Sunday afternoon in San Diego, Obama was asked, according to a transcript by Maria Gavrilovic of CBS News: “The upcoming issue of The New Yorker, the July 21 issue, has a picture of you, depicting you and your wife on the cover.

“Have you seen it? If not, I can show it to you on my computer. It shows your wife Michelle with an Afro and an AK-47 and the two of you doing the fist bump with you in a sort of turban-type thing on top. I wondered if you’ve seen it or if you want to see it or if you have a response to it?”

Obama, shrugging incredulously, replied: “I have no response to that.”

The magazine explains at the start of its news release previewing the issue: “On the cover of the July 21, 2008, issue of The New Yorker, in ‘The Politics of Fear,’ artist Barry Blitt satirizes the use of scare tactics and misinformation in the presidential election to derail Barack Obama’s campaign.”

Howard Kurtz of The Washington Post said Sunday on his CNN media show “Reliable Sources” that the cover is arguably “incendiary.”

“I talked to the editor of The New Yorker, David Remnick, who tells me this is a satire, that they are making fun of all the rumors,” Kurtz added.

Clarence Page of the Chicago Tribune defended it as “quite within the normal realms of journalism,” adding that “it's just lampooning all the crazy ignorance out there.”

The panelists agreed it would succeed in its goal of getting attention.

By Mike Allen
Copyright 2008 POLITICO



We cover politics with enterprise, style, and impact.

Video and Galleries from Politico

Add a Comment See all 1466 Comments
by ariel133 July 14, 2008 9:17 AM PDT
How is this any differant than others who poke fun- Saturday Night live, for one- and Reverend Jackson for two- Obama is quick to accept apologies, but if he feels threatened perhaps there is some truth to it.
Reply to this comment
by floydzepp5 July 14, 2008 9:19 AM PDT
Its the New Porker. What does one expect?
Reply to this comment
by ariel133 July 14, 2008 9:20 AM PDT
Obama is not any more a "breath of fresh air" than a man who who believes in fairy tales. He says nothing- and give s good speech. He cannot lead without experiance. Putting your trust in someone unqualified is just plain dumb.
Reply to this comment
by wiccantexan July 14, 2008 9:20 AM PDT
Obama is quick to accept apologies, but if he feels threatened perhaps there is some truth to it.

Posted by Ariel133
---------------------

According to the news story, Obama shrugged it all.
Reply to this comment
by Mccarthyaw July 14, 2008 9:22 AM PDT
Putting your trust in someone unqualified is just plain dumb.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Ariel133 at 09:20 AM : Jul 14, 2008

Exactly why I am not voting for McCain.
Reply to this comment
by zerato-2009 July 14, 2008 9:23 AM PDT
ow a magazine dares to print what all of us good christians think.

Posted by GOP_forever

Don''t think that Christians think this. Only the racists, bigots and ignorant think this. Which means no Christian would think this.

While it is a piece of satire, it seems that its effect is missed on the feeble minded.
Reply to this comment
by greeneyes222 July 14, 2008 9:23 AM PDT
Tasteless? Every politician alive and dead has been caricatured, but somehow Obama is sacrosanct?

If Obama is elected, you can bet there will be more of this. They need to learn to deal with it gracefully instead of acting like whiny little pc children. If they can''t, I seriously doubt he''s/they''re mature enough to run the country.
Reply to this comment
by floydzepp5 July 14, 2008 9:24 AM PDT
Obama is not any more a "breath of fresh air" than a man who who believes in fairy tales. He says nothing- and give s good speech. He cannot lead without experiance. Putting your trust in someone unqualified is just plain dumb.

Posted by Ariel133 at 09:20 AM : Jul 14, 2008
-------------

Such as Bush Supporters?
Reply to this comment
by dirtyharry02 July 14, 2008 9:24 AM PDT
America better WAKE UP!!!!! The truth hurts. Wake Up America!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by fstop100 July 14, 2008 9:25 AM PDT
Right on New Yorker Magazine....Love IT!!!
Reply to this comment
by Mccarthyaw July 14, 2008 9:26 AM PDT
Yeah, its satire. It is supposed to make fun of the scare tatics right wingers are using against Obama. Unfortunately, many people will think it is the truth.
Reply to this comment
by nlm2383 July 14, 2008 9:28 AM PDT
I''m not going to vote because I don''t feel that my choices are what I''m looking for, but this is wrong... Say that you meant it however you want, but it can be taken so many ways and it just looks bad for the magazine.
Reply to this comment
by blackyowe July 14, 2008 9:28 AM PDT
It makes me mad and I don''t even like Obama. It''s really in bad taste and racist. Shame on you, New Yorker!
Reply to this comment
by floydzepp5 July 14, 2008 9:29 AM PDT
I thought RightWingNuts liked Gun Toting Women?
Reply to this comment
by floydzepp5 July 14, 2008 9:30 AM PDT
zerato, everyone at my church thinks this and I visit other churches and they all think that too. A true christian does not want to be led by a muslim.

Posted by GOP_forever at 09:29 AM : Jul 14, 2008
-------------

But then Obama isn''t Muslim and you''re not true Christian.
Reply to this comment
by Mccarthyaw July 14, 2008 9:30 AM PDT
zerato, everyone at my church thinks this and I visit other churches and they all think that too. A true christian does not want to be led by a muslim.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by GOP_forever at 09:29 AM : Jul 14, 2008

Good thing Obama isn''t a Muslim then.
Reply to this comment
by wayne081 July 14, 2008 9:33 AM PDT
Poor, poor, Obama. If he can''t take the heat, get out of the kitchen. It just shows how immature Obama really is and what a elitist, pseudointellect we are finding him to be. Vote for a man of character and a true patriot, vote for McCain.
Reply to this comment
by floydzepp5 July 14, 2008 9:34 AM PDT
Grandpa McDepends with his onset Alzheimer''s won''t even remember he''s running for President by October.
Reply to this comment
by jackie0428 July 14, 2008 9:35 AM PDT
GOP_forever , Obama isn''t a Muslim, but be advised that FloydZepp is.
Floyd also has never seen a terrorist or Jihadist he didn''t love.

Why are all the people who love Obama also the same ones who defend Muslims and terrorists and terror attacks and people who kill Americans and women and children? I don''t know about you guys, but I''d be VERY uncomfortable to be siding with the same people who support our worst enemies.
Reply to this comment
by floydzepp5 July 14, 2008 9:36 AM PDT
Obama isn''t Muslim no matter how much RINOganda is spewed by the McDepends Supporters. McCain Campaign way over....
Reply to this comment
by zerato-2009 July 14, 2008 9:36 AM PDT
erato, everyone at my church thinks this and I visit other churches and they all think that too. A true christian does not want to be led by a muslim.

Posted by GOP_forever

It seems that your churches are racists and bigoted. And perhaps you can read the bible for some direction for these lies people are spreading.
Reply to this comment
by floydzepp5 July 14, 2008 9:37 AM PDT
GOP_forever , Obama isn''''t a Muslim, but be advised that FloydZepp is.
Floyd also has never seen a terrorist or Jihadist he didn''''t love.

Why are all the people who love Obama also the same ones who defend Muslims and terrorists and terror attacks and people who kill Americans and women and children? I don''''t know about you guys, but I''''d be VERY uncomfortable to be siding with the same people who support our worst enemies.

Posted by jackie0428 at 09:35 AM : Jul 14, 2008
-----------

Any proof of that or do you still think that just because you say it people will believe?

That''s so Shrub Failure 1999 dude....
Reply to this comment
by l00ker July 14, 2008 9:37 AM PDT
Sorry folks, but Obama is no more immune from satire, scrutiny, ridicule, or investigation than any other person running for such a high office. I know many of his fans believe otherwise, but they are wrong. Their affinity for Obama has biased and blinded them. Because of this relatively short career and meteoric rise, Obama is a virtual unknown compared to McCain. Because of this the press has finally caught on that they have a lot of "catching up" to do with him. Obama is going to be put thru the ringer the next few months, and that is exactly the way it should be.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by jerr111 at 09:30 AM : Jul 14, 2008


Well, then we should see more satire of the insidious, subversive, cloak and dagger, skullduggery and treacherous AIPAC, B''NAI BRITH, ADL, JDL and any other jew in, around and running for public office, or financing those in the running for such. And any investments of the cancerous sore Israel in our country.
Reply to this comment
by zerato-2009 July 14, 2008 9:38 AM PDT
ccording to Islamic scholars, reciting the Shahada, the Muslim declaration of faith, makes one a Muslim.

Posted by fenner

I guess that makes you a Muslim too.
Reply to this comment
by floydzepp5 July 14, 2008 9:39 AM PDT
FloydZepp5, how dare you suggest I am not Christian! I put $20 in the ciollection plate everytime for all to see. I pay big money to Jesus.

Posted by GOP_forever at 09:38 AM : Jul 14, 2008
--------------

LOL! Now THAT was funny!
Reply to this comment
by pensacola88 July 14, 2008 9:41 AM PDT
Sorry folks, but Obama is no more immune from satire, scrutiny, ridicule, or investigation than any other person running for such a high office. Posted by jerr111 at 09:30 AM : Jul 14, 2008

That''s very true. It comes with the territory. No one can give something they don''t have. Magazines that can''t give respect to high profle individuals, obviously have no respect to give.
Reply to this comment
by floydzepp5 July 14, 2008 9:41 AM PDT
Posted by fenner at 09:39 AM : Jul 14, 2008
-------------

Sort of like Shrub directing all gynecologists to have love with their patients...

Now that''s a classic!
Reply to this comment
by walt1944-2009 July 14, 2008 9:42 AM PDT
Everyone in the country is excited about the cover on the latest issue of The New Yorker.

I do not ever remember the New Yorker having a cartoon showing the Great Emperor Bush II and "Bagdad John McBush" McCain wearing Nazi SS uniforms giving each other a Nazi salute! I do not remember any New Yorker cartoon showing Phil Gramm holding an economics degree in his hand and wearing a "dunce" cap!

I suppose that shows how politically biased The New Yorker is! I would guess that because of that cartoon, Phil Gramm is removing them from his "whiners" list!

SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!!!!
sig heil, TOTALLY MORE OF THE SAME, McCain!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by jeffstersf July 14, 2008 9:43 AM PDT
I am a long-time New Yorker subscriber. I am an Obama supporter. After this horrific mistake I have to give one of them up. The New Yorker has to go!
Reply to this comment
by floydzepp5 July 14, 2008 9:44 AM PDT
Posted by fenner at 09:41 AM : Jul 14, 2008
----------

Oh but we are listening. And he will be President after November. McCain will just be on oxygen.
Reply to this comment
by xmanborg July 14, 2008 9:44 AM PDT
I agree tasteless and offensive and uncalled for. Now if the New Yorker wants to be FAIR they will print a something about McCain similar to this.

Tastless and Offensive I thought the New Yorker was above that kind of Print Trash. My parents use to get the New Yorker for years back in the 70s & 80s & 90s & I use to look at the magazine all the time. I have lost some respect for the New Yorker. If It had been about McCain I would be saything the same thing right now. Just Uncalled for and Tasteless and Offensive.
Reply to this comment
by slader99 July 14, 2008 9:46 AM PDT

We knew things were going to get ugly; and the more they do, they more they remind people of the last 8 years, and the more theyll turn away.

Obama in a landslide :)
Reply to this comment
by prelgovisk July 14, 2008 9:47 AM PDT
Obama is not anti-american, but he does want to change America. The only problem is, what is he going to change and how? He never tells us that.

It is his own fault if we have to use our imaginations to fill in the gaps. I think he is counting on many to fill in these gaps, through hope, with visions that favor him.

But this is a two-edged sword. It is only natural for the gaps to be filled in with images that not favor Obama by people who know that not all change is for the better.

Obama, please tell us the changes you will make and what it will cost us. Then we won''t have to deal with images of fear. We will have something more important to talk about.
Reply to this comment
by zerato-2009 July 14, 2008 9:48 AM PDT
o''''bungler is completely confused as to why anyone could POSSIBLY think of him as Muslim - - - he seems to also have a PROLONGED "junior" moment.

Posted by fenner

mccain accused obama ducking a vote on Iran a vote mccain missed himself
mccain claimed to have given his viet cong interogators the names of the pittsburg steelers but his book states another team
mccain could not remember his vote on whether to allow viagra and not birth control pills
Mccain could not remember he did not support the new GI bill and blamed webb for not making it for a longer time

And taht was in the last 10 days for mcconfused
Reply to this comment
by zerato-2009 July 14, 2008 9:50 AM PDT

do you know the difference between RECITE AND POST OR PRINT?

Posted by fenner

It seems you don''t know that muslim
Reply to this comment
by talkingham July 14, 2008 9:50 AM PDT
U ain''t seen nothing yet. If the New Yorker can stoop to this just imagine what Fox-owned news and publications are going to do right after the Dem convention the dam is going to break on all the junk they are piling up on Obama. In fact, since Obama kicked Hillary out the campaign, the news media have stopped painting all those rosey pictures of his canidacy haven''t they? Now it''s all negative all the time.
Reply to this comment
by floydzepp5 July 14, 2008 9:50 AM PDT
Grandpa McDepends: Rehashing your Grandpa''s Ideas from 1950.
Reply to this comment
by floydzepp5 July 14, 2008 9:51 AM PDT
Vote 1950: Vote for Grandpa McSameTiredOldIdeas
Reply to this comment
by l00ker July 14, 2008 9:52 AM PDT
Obama is not anti-american, but he does want to change America. The only problem is, what is he going to change and how? He never tells us that.

It is his own fault if we have to use our imaginations to fill in the gaps. I think he is counting on many to fill in these gaps, through hope, with visions that favor him.

But this is a two-edged sword. It is only natural for the gaps to be filled in with images that not favor Obama by people who know that not all change is for the better.

Obama, please tell us the changes you will make and what it will cost us. Then we won''''t have to deal with images of fear. We will have something more important to talk about.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Prelgovisk at 09:47 AM : Jul 14, 2008


What if he said that he was a jew, and was for all things jewish, and will make Israel the dejure 51st state, and will promise Israel 100 billion dollars per year, 100 F-22 Raptors, and all of the Tomahawks - nuclear tipped even - that they ask for, would kill every muslim in the Middle East, would that be telling enough?
Reply to this comment
by dirtyharry02 July 14, 2008 9:53 AM PDT
America, have you already forgotten about 9/11, especially New Yorkers. How can we even vote for someone who has affiliations with the Muslim religon, it would be like voting in a Japanese after Pearl Harbor or voting in a Nazi after the Holocaust. When are Americans going to get a freakin'' backbone and stop worrying about being "Politically Incorrect", thank you to the New Yorker for doing this, maybe it will wake some people up!!!!
Reply to this comment
by floydzepp5 July 14, 2008 9:53 AM PDT
What if he said that he was a jew, and was for all things jewish, and will make Israel the dejure 51st state, and will promise Israel 100 billion dollars per year, 100 F-22 Raptors, and all of the Tomahawks - nuclear tipped even - that they ask for, would kill every muslim in the Middle East, would that be telling enough?

Posted by l00ker at 09:52 AM : Jul 14, 2008
-----------

Well then he would be RINOpublican.
Reply to this comment
by aldon61 July 14, 2008 9:54 AM PDT
I recognize the cover as satire; that said, it is totally in-appropriate! What could the editor(s) be thinking?
Reply to this comment
by floydzepp5 July 14, 2008 9:54 AM PDT
Posted by dirtyharry02 at 09:53 AM : Jul 14, 2008
-----------

Sort of like Bush kissing the Saudis right on the lips - where 15 of the 19 9/11 hijackers came from.
Reply to this comment
by floydzepp5 July 14, 2008 9:56 AM PDT
we will vote for an in tact brain with loyalty to country and a proven achiever, not a "community organizer."

YES, WE VOTE JOHN MCCAIN!!!!

Posted by fenner at 09:55 AM : Jul 14, 2008
------------

John McOnsetAlzheimer''s: Rehashing your Grandpa''s Ideas from 1950.
Reply to this comment
by l00ker July 14, 2008 9:58 AM PDT
...Finally, to see a political cartoon being denounced these days makes me uneasy. There are indeed plenty of political cartoons that are truly tasteless and offensive, but in a world in which Islamic organizations are making concerted efforts to compel Western countries to limit free speech because of a few political cartoons, it would have been much wiser for the Obama camp to have laughed this one off.
---Robert Spencer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by michaelt302 at 09:47 AM : Jul 14, 2008


Okay, let''s see that same cartoon on the front page of the Jew Yorker again, but with the Israeli flag in the fire place, or a yarmulke wearing head instead? Then we''ll see who laughs that one off.
Reply to this comment
by zerato-2009 July 14, 2008 9:59 AM PDT
America, have you already forgotten about 9/11, especially New Yorkers. How can we even vote for someone who has affiliations with the Muslim religon, it would be like voting in a Japanese after Pearl Harbor or voting in a Nazi after the Holocaust. When are Americans going to get a freakin'''' backbone and stop worrying about being "Politically Incorrect", thank you to the New Yorker for doing this, maybe it will wake some people up!!!!

Posted by dirtyharry02

Satire does not effect the feeble minded with its message.
Reply to this comment
by floydzepp5 July 14, 2008 9:59 AM PDT
fenner, I hear John McCain was a communist sympathizer while he was vacationing in Hanoi.
Reply to this comment
by wiccantexan July 14, 2008 10:00 AM PDT
America, have you already forgotten about 9/11, especially New Yorkers. How can we even vote for someone who has affiliations with the Muslim religon,

Posted by zerato
-----------------

Well, it''s a good thing then that no Muslims with terrorist connections are running.
Reply to this comment
by zerato-2009 July 14, 2008 10:00 AM PDT
America, have you already forgotten about 9/11, especially New Yorkers. How can we even vote for someone who has affiliations with the Muslim religon, it would be like voting in a Japanese after Pearl Harbor or voting in a Nazi after the Holocaust. When are Americans going to get a freakin'''' backbone and stop worrying about being "Politically Incorrect", thank you to the New Yorker for doing this, maybe it will wake some people up!!!!

Posted by dirtyharry02

Satire does not effect the feeble minded with its message.
Reply to this comment
by floydzepp5 July 14, 2008 10:01 AM PDT
fenner, I hear John McCain was a communist sympathizer while he was vacationing in Hanoi.


Posted by FloydZepp5 at 09:
==================
SURE SWEETIE.... SURE.

Posted by fenner at 10:00 AM : Jul 14, 2008
-------------

I''m sure its true. Just like Obama is a Muslim.
Reply to this comment
See all 1466 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs