Court Rejects Bush's Air Pollution Rule
A federal appeals court unanimously struck down a signature component of President Bush's clean air policies Friday, dealing a blow to environmental groups and likely delaying further action until the next administration.
The regulation, known as the Clean Air Interstate Rule, required 28 mostly Eastern states - including Virginia - to reduce smog-forming and soot-producing emissions that can travel long distances in the wind. The Environmental Protection Agency predicted it would prevent about 17,000 premature deaths a year.
North Carolina and some electric power producers opposed aspects of the regulation and President Bush found himself with unusual allies.
"This is the rare case where environmental groups went to court alongside the Bush administration," said Frank O'Donnell, president of Clean Air Watch, a group that has criticized other Bush administration policies.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled Friday that the EPA overstepped its authority by instituting the rule. It said the Clean Air Act did not give the EPA the authority to change pollution standards the way it did. Citing "more than several fatal flaws," the court scrapped the entire regulation.
"The Bush administration's environmental agenda has been gravely disappointing and damaging in many ways," John Walke, clean air director for the Natural Resources Defense Council told CBS News. "This was one bright exception. Unfortunately, the court ruling yesterday meant that even this exception did not survive."
The EPA said the rule would dramatically reduce sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions, saving up to $100 billion in health benefits. Besides the reduction in premature deaths, the EPA also said the rule would have prevented millions of lost work and school days and tens of thousands of nonfatal heart attacks.
The handful of companies that brought the suit said Friday's ruling caught them by surprise. A spokesman for Duke Energy told CBS News the company had not intended to overturn the Clean Air Interstate Rule, and that the court had thrown the baby out with the bathwater.
While North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper said he was glad the court agreed "we need tougher rules to clean up and protect the air we breathe," his spokeswoman, Noelle Talley, said the attorney general's office disagreed that the entire rule needed to be scrapped.
William M. Bumpers, an attorney representing Entergy Corp., said a few electric companies flatly opposed the regulation but most generally favored it because it included cap-and-trade provisions. Such provisions allow companies that exceed emissions caps to buy credits from companies that do not.
"The power-generating industry had already invested billions and billions of dollars in anticipation of the trading market," Bumpers said. "They're not happy with this development."
The EPA said it was reviewing the 60-page opinion and would issue a response later Friday. The Bush administration can appeal the decision but environmental groups called for Congress and the EPA to quickly begin working on a new law or replacement regulation.
CBS/ AP The regulation, known as the Clean Air Interstate Rule, required 28 mostly Eastern states - including Virginia - to reduce smog-forming and soot-producing emissions that can travel long distances in the wind. The Environmental Protection Agency predicted it would prevent about 17,000 premature deaths a year.
North Carolina and some electric power producers opposed aspects of the regulation and President Bush found himself with unusual allies.
"This is the rare case where environmental groups went to court alongside the Bush administration," said Frank O'Donnell, president of Clean Air Watch, a group that has criticized other Bush administration policies.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled Friday that the EPA overstepped its authority by instituting the rule. It said the Clean Air Act did not give the EPA the authority to change pollution standards the way it did. Citing "more than several fatal flaws," the court scrapped the entire regulation.
"The Bush administration's environmental agenda has been gravely disappointing and damaging in many ways," John Walke, clean air director for the Natural Resources Defense Council told CBS News. "This was one bright exception. Unfortunately, the court ruling yesterday meant that even this exception did not survive."
The EPA said the rule would dramatically reduce sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions, saving up to $100 billion in health benefits. Besides the reduction in premature deaths, the EPA also said the rule would have prevented millions of lost work and school days and tens of thousands of nonfatal heart attacks.
The handful of companies that brought the suit said Friday's ruling caught them by surprise. A spokesman for Duke Energy told CBS News the company had not intended to overturn the Clean Air Interstate Rule, and that the court had thrown the baby out with the bathwater.
While North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper said he was glad the court agreed "we need tougher rules to clean up and protect the air we breathe," his spokeswoman, Noelle Talley, said the attorney general's office disagreed that the entire rule needed to be scrapped.
William M. Bumpers, an attorney representing Entergy Corp., said a few electric companies flatly opposed the regulation but most generally favored it because it included cap-and-trade provisions. Such provisions allow companies that exceed emissions caps to buy credits from companies that do not.
"The power-generating industry had already invested billions and billions of dollars in anticipation of the trading market," Bumpers said. "They're not happy with this development."
The EPA said it was reviewing the 60-page opinion and would issue a response later Friday. The Bush administration can appeal the decision but environmental groups called for Congress and the EPA to quickly begin working on a new law or replacement regulation.
Popular in Health
- A test for throat cancer caused by HPV?
- Scientists grow new organs on scaffolding 12 Photos
- Facebook organ donor status option upped number of donors
- Skin cancer self-exam: What to look for (PHOTOS)
- Deep vein thrombosis: Don't ignore these silent symptoms
- Eating red meat may boost Type 2 diabetes risk
- Japanese "eyeball licking" trend carries blindness risk
- Air pollution exposure while pregnant linked to autism risk
didn''t mr. addington write a signing statement for this bill ... something like ... ''despite what the law says, the president can do what he pleases''.
Make some stupid rules that will never stand up in court, waste time, then have thr rules thrown out in court...
Doing all this eliminated the embarrassment of Bush doing nothing for the environment...allowing him to say he did something...
And you don''''t even "have guns or religion to cling to" like Barack Obama says.
Posted by OneAmerican- at 11:39 AM : Jul 13, 2008
For some reason I don''t think this Nazi has a clue as to what this is all about. To him anything that doesn''t fit his VERY small brain isn''t good and is the fault of "Liberals". It''s sad to see people like this in 2008.. No, it was sad to see people like this all decked out in their hood''s and sheets in 1964, it''s downright UNBELIEVABLE to see them TODAY! Sieg Heil Grand Wizard!!
And you don''t even "have guns or religion to cling to" like Barack Obama says.
I plan to celebrate in Washington the day he leaves office, anyone care to join me?
Bring your own eggs!!!
Posted by nrgmizer at 07:56 PM : Jul 12, 2008
I have some sh...it juice for him and Cheney, the 1st and 2nd corrupted thugs in the US.
So, it''s clear they told them to proceed---remember, he''s the decider-in-chief---knowing that the court would rule against it because the EPA isn''t the law-writing body---that''s Congress!
Therefore, he can pretend to be---or not---for it. All the while, he''s set it up to be shot down, prevented, thus protecting the polluting interest of his business buddies!
Bush torpedoed this just as surely as there are rocks on the moon!