July 11, 2008

Is Obama's Money Machine Wearing Down?

Washington Post: Internet Contributions Slow As Clinton's Lingering Debt Adds to Obama's Burden

  • Barack Obama has maintained a frenetic schedule of fundraising events this week, courting top bundlers for Hillary Clinton and soaking up millions of dollars for the DNC.  (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

  • Play CBS Video Video Obama: I Have Been Consistent

    Russ Mitchell talks one-on-one with Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama about Iran's war games, refining his Iraq policy and taking his kids on the campaign trail.

  • Interactive The Money Race

    See the latest campaign finance tallies from Obama and McCain.

  • In-Depth VP Hot Sheet: Obama

    CBSNews.com ranks the top contenders to be Obama's running mate.

From Our Partner:
(Washingtonpost.com)  This story was written by Matthew Mosk.


The fundraising machine Sen. Barack Obama is relying on to overwhelm Sen. John McCain this fall has shown signs of wear in recent weeks, as Internet contributions have slowed and efforts to recruit top donors to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign have been beset by lingering tensions.

In a conference call Wednesday night, a top Obama adviser told members of the senator's national finance committee that "there's a huge amount of money we need to raise, and we have to be aware of that," according to one person on the call, who said the campaign, combined with the Democratic National Committee, hopes to have raised $450 million by Election Day.

Several of Obama's top fundraisers said yesterday that they don't think trend lines showing three straight months of declining donations to the candidate are cause for concern. But they said the campaign has recognized it will need to expand efforts to raise money from high-dollar donors in order to meet budget projections.

"It's one of the reasons why the Clinton people are so important," said Kirk Wagar, Obama's Florida finance chairman. "Most of us have beaten our Rolodexes pretty badly."

To that end, Obama maintained a frenetic schedule of fundraising events this week, courting top Clinton bundlers and soaking up millions of dollars for the DNC.

On Monday, Obama spent 90 minutes at an event at the Atlanta area home of Michael Coles, who had led fundraising efforts in Georgia for Clinton. The dinner for roughly 40 people was so oversubscribed that billionaire Ted Turner was on a waiting list until several longtime Obama supporters gave up their seats.

The same day, Penny Pritzker, a Chicago hotel heiress and Obama backer, held a gathering hosted by several of Clinton's Florida finance chairs. For several hours on Tuesday, Obama was at the Washington estate of Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV (W.Va.) before launching a series of major fundraisers in New York at which he and Clinton appeared jointly with supporters. Those events, all of which fetched in the neighborhood of $28,500 per person, concluded yesterday morning with a less costly "Women for Obama" event, at which he shared the stage with Clinton.

Clinton regaled about 2,000 women gathered in New York with stories about her post-campaign life, saying she is "kind of" rested after the long primary campaign. "I'm trying to exercise a little bit, which I'm told does wonders for a person," she joked.

Obama heaped praise on Clinton and gave a policy-laden speech, promising to appoint federal judges who would defend access to abortion, to expand the Family and Medical Leave Act and to make sure women receive equal pay.

This latest fundraising push is, in part, a race against the clock as the summer wears on and wealthy donors leave town for vacations. And the demands on members of Obama's National Finance Committee have never been greater.

Each of the hundreds of members of the senator's main fundraising team has been asked to raise at least $100,000 for the Victory Fund, which spreads money among Obama's general-election account, state party accounts and the DNC. Those joining the committee from the Clinton camp have been asked to raise another $250,000 in money Obama can continue to spend before the party's late-August nominating convention. And each finance committee member has been asked to collect checks from at least five donors to help Clinton retire more than $10 million of her campaign debt.

McCain Camp: Our Budget Is $400 Million
The Money Race: Tallies For Obama And McCain
That task, in particular, has created heartache among longtime Obama supporters who believe any effort to retire Clinton's debt should take a back seat to gathering money for Obama's fall campaign.

"It's a challenge," said James Hudson, a Washington lawyer and Obama fundraiser who said he's already asking his friends and colleagues to write checks to Obama's Victory Fund. "Now you have to make two asks instead of one. In my mind, the primary goal here should be to raise money for Barack's campaign."

Mark Gilbert, a financier and Obama supporter who has been raising money in Florida and Utah, agreed that the request to help Clinton has been a challenge.

"What's a good way to put this? There's a feeling that the money she spent at the end may not have needed to have been spent," he said. "You want to help because it's important to Senator Obama. The flip side is, you don't want to take money away from what's needed in November, which is the more important goal."

Clinton supporters who have joined Obama's effort said his work to help retire Clinton's debt is an important olive branch and will more than offset any burden it places on Obama's fundraising team.

Richard L. Shiffrin, a Philadelphia lawyer who backed Clinton but has now committed to helping Obama, said he has been closely monitoring the debt-retirement effort.

"They have made a bunch of promises, which I have no reason to believe they won't fulfill, but you want to see results," he said.

Lindsay Gardner, a partner with MediaTech Capital Partners who is raising money for Obama, said he thinks the widespread talk of friction between Obama and Clinton fundraisers has been overstated.

"I think they represent a minority, but they're getting disproportionate attention," Gardner said. "The view among the people who really are pivotal in the campaign is that it's slowly but surely working itself out."

Staff writer Perry Bacon Jr. and researcher Alice Crites contributed to this report.

By Matthew Mosk
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 816 Comments
by baldwin2008 July 14, 2008 12:42 AM EDT
America, TAKE YOUR COUNTRY BACK!
www.constitutionparty.org
CHUCK BALDWIN 2008!
Do your research and WRITE THE VOTE IN!!!
Obama and McCain will both pull us further into this HOLE and away from our spirit and our roots.
THE CONSTITUTION AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS
Reply to this comment
by nanc12 July 13, 2008 9:42 PM EDT
35% OF REGISTERED VOTERS ARE STILL UNDECIDED!!!
Notice how this figure is left out of most polls...
Posted by pjones

LOL - there''s a reason it''s not in the polls, because it''s a lie. Here''s the latest Pew Research polls.

Pew Research - RV 48 40 Obama +8.0

You will perhaps notice that the numbers add up to 88, which would not be 35% undecided.
Reply to this comment
by rowdywicca July 13, 2008 5:14 PM EDT
LMAO! I wondered why he had to be hitting up Hillary''s fund raisers! Guess he''s used up all his oil and energy bigshots money already! They already tapped out at top money!

Let the Islamofast shill hunt under rocks for money!
Reply to this comment
by wardoglrs July 13, 2008 4:16 AM EDT
To pjones501
Look i don''t know what part you don''t get about the Clinton''s tell us what you like about this Women
she has the worst voting record
#1 McCain
#2Obama
#3Clinton



http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/110/senate/vote-missers/
Reply to this comment
by wardoglrs July 13, 2008 4:10 AM EDT
Hillary Will not support the constitution why would any one vote for that?. The Clinton''s are as corrupt as can be.
This is your last chance to get informed or face the worst crisis in history Clinton''s do not support you

The white house is all about corruption.
Dr Paul is your best hope.
Reply to this comment
by allmymarbles July 13, 2008 2:11 AM EDT
Further to below. If he is really thinking of choosing Clinton as his vice president then I won''t even vote in November. We supported him to get rid of corruption. The Clintons are corrupt.
Reply to this comment
by allmymarbles July 13, 2008 2:08 AM EDT
I have been expecting his donations to decrease. Why? In courting Clinton''s women and romancing the religious right, he has turned his back on his core supporters who far outnumber these fringe voters. I gave twice to Obama but will not give another dime. There must be lots of people of me.
Reply to this comment
by pjones501 July 12, 2008 11:43 PM EDT
Chitown,

REMEMBER!! Obama is just the "presumptive"

Democratic Candidate. The Super

Delegates, who can change their votes right up until

the last minute, can

still make Hillary Clinton the Democratic Candidate

at the Democratic National

Convention in August.

As far as Obama''s money supply, its endless!!!!

Too bad money doesn''t go as far as the truth:)
Reply to this comment
by chitown639 July 12, 2008 6:34 PM EDT
LET THEM KNOW YOU WANT HILLARY!!!!!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by pjones501

GIVE IT UP!!! Hillary had her chance and she blow it!!! Move on or seek therapy!!!
Reply to this comment
by pjones501 July 12, 2008 4:46 PM EDT
35% OF REGISTERED VOTERS ARE STILL UNDECIDED!!!
-Pew Research Institute

Notice how this figure is left out of most polls...

In this time of crisis, we need the Best.
We need Experience. We need Hillary and Bill.
Under the Clinton administration, the average income went from $43,000 to $49,000 a year. The budget was balanced and inflation, including oil and gas prices, were kept in check.

We can still have Hillary.

It IS up to US. All we have to do is let it be known
that Hillary backers are NOT going to vote for Obama under any condition. Thats all it takes. If we don''t play thier game with them, there is no game and the candidate that most Democrats cast their votes for in the Primary will be the next President of the United States.

REMEMBER!! Obama is just the "presumptive"

Democratic Candidate. The Super

Delegates, who can change their votes right up until

the last minute, can

still make Hillary Clinton the Democratic Candidate

at the Democratic National

Convention in August.

LET THEM KNOW YOU WANT HILLARY!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by indyvet66 July 12, 2008 1:00 PM EDT
Wishful thinking from the neoconservative crowd and the media that would like to keep the contest close.

Senator Obama opted out of public financing for a good reason. He knows that the conservative attack machine will raise $400M through all sources and he would have been at a severe competitive disadvantage.

That ain''t gonna happen now.

Speculate all you want to until the actual numbers come out for this month. Then you will have to try to spin Obama''s record-breaking fundraising performance another way.

The fact is that we Obama supporters are serious and committed to getting him elected...which is more than we can say for McCain''s tepid support among those who prefer him.

Oh, by the way, I just contributed another $100 to the Obama campaign. Thanks for the motivation
Reply to this comment
by obama8years July 12, 2008 10:54 AM EDT
Mccain is now only behind by 4 points and closing in. I think the American Idol Obama is starting to fade like most Fads. Also with Obama being a Marxist doesnt help. America is the only true free country and with Obama we might be no diffrent than Cuba.
Reply to this comment
by pjones501 July 12, 2008 5:38 AM EDT
The REAL CHANGE Obama has planned for us, Who''s really running his campaign and the answers to dozens of questions you think you already have the answer to, can easily be found on Google. Find out who is manipulating the press amd why the Delegates ran over to Obama''s side as soon as Hillary started winning the popular vote. Whats really behind the Mich. and FL. fiasco and why Kathleen Sebelius has already been choosen to be Obama''s running mate.Be prepared to be shocked. These aren''t propaganda websites. These are groups that have existed for years without being revealed by the media. The membership will absolutly stagger you, leaders of countrys all over the world, corperate leaders, billionairs, media mogals, the rich, and the powerful. You''ll be amazed at how many names you recognize. The kind of change Obama has in mind for us is the same change they idealize. Obama is their candidate...and you really should meet them.
Here''s how.
Google these in combination or however you want. Once you start, you won''t want to stop.
Obama, Trilateral Commission, Sebelius, Bilderberg, membership....
Reply to this comment
by andor3 July 12, 2008 5:12 AM EDT
"Obama saying that kids should learn to speak Spanish and that he is ashamed that most Americans can only speak one language?"

And even that one not so well. Obama is absolutely right--this has long been a national embarrassment in an increasingly multi-lingual world. Our educational system has not kept pace with other countries. Should we be proud of that or embarrassed enough to fix it?

Tired of people trying to make Obama look like a bad guy for telling the truth. Fortunately most Americans see it as a refreshing change... real change.
Reply to this comment
by rosieod4prez July 12, 2008 4:41 AM EDT
radiob - all good points. Our elected officials are much too worried about politics and staying in office, rather than those issues which should be expedited. Conservatives, when they act in the true definition, tend to be re-elected. I would be happy to re-elect a Representative of Senator, if they would only do their jobs.

But, as of right now, Fire''m all is what I say. Now THAT would be real change.

My earlier point, which you disassembled to responded to was that Presidents don''t write bills, they only get to sign or veto them. So to blame Presidents for our national debt is rather asinine and disingenuous.
Reply to this comment
by radiob-2009 July 12, 2008 4:14 AM EDT
I think it is time to remove the idiots. 9% of you talking heads still like them, the rest of the 91% think they have fooled you.

%


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by RosieOD4Prez

Fact is neither party is for the American public, the increase in the cost of gas belongs to both parties as we have known about a oil shortage since 1980 and have continued to rely on it, instead of natural/propane/methane gas which when converted from BTU''s to gallons equals .83 a gallon, we have failed to develop economic alternative energies which have contributed to our current economic conditions, high unemployment, high inflation similiar to the early 80ties and neither party has done anything to correct it only make it worse for the majority of Americans.
Reply to this comment
by greatdrivew July 12, 2008 3:02 AM EDT
The only thing Obama truly stands for is self promotion. And it''s very presumptuous for him to assume We the People are going to finance his ego-trip. Besides, why would anyone want to donate to a candidate they cannot rely on to keep his/her word???

These appear to be simple concepts, but Obama doesn''t get it. It''s scarey to think someone so unenlightened would follow Bush into the Oval office. Oh well, at least we can all be pacified by Michelle''s glamourous fashion trends.
Reply to this comment
by rosieod4prez July 12, 2008 3:01 AM EDT
taotxzen - I''m a middle class citizen of the US. Are you aware that the richest top 10% pay more taxes than the bottom 90% ?

So, the question is, when do we decide to call ourselves communists ?



As far as the national debt is concerned, who decides what is in the bill that gets sent to the President ?

Would that be the same nice folks that haven''t done squat about oil independence since 1970 ? OR Social security ?


I thought Pelosi and the idiot from Nevada were going to do something once they took over the House and Senate. I belive the cost of gasoline has doubled since there has been a majority for the Democrates.


I think it is time to remove the idiots. 9% of you talking heads still like them, the rest of the 91% think they have fooled you.

%
Reply to this comment
by brain1014 July 12, 2008 2:41 AM EDT
Sounds like all the dems out there are getting a little worried! You should be. This whack job don''t know what to say or even when to say it. Bush may mix words sometimes but dope-bama makes him look like a pro! I can''t believe you accually think this Anti-American (not even a flag pin can change that) could get your party where it needs to be, THANK YOU!!!! That decision will cost you at least another 4 years. Dopes!
Reply to this comment
by taotxzen July 12, 2008 1:48 AM EDT
For Richer or for Poorer

Inequality widens under Republicans and shrinks under Democrats.

By Larry M. Bartels

The most important issue rarely mentioned on the campaign trail this year is the gap between rich and poor in America. It is important for two reasons: The gap has been growing, and the choice between John McCain and Barack Obama likely will affect whether it narrows or expands.

(cont)
Reply to this comment
See all 816 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: