July 11, 2008

VP Prospects Move To Fix Flaws

Politico: Those Who Could Be On A Shortlist Seem To Be Making Adjustments

  • Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty and his wife Mary Pawlenty, clap as Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., is introduced during a stop at the Minnesota campaign headquarters in St. Paul, MInn., Thursday, July 10, 2008.

    Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty and his wife Mary Pawlenty, clap as Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., is introduced during a stop at the Minnesota campaign headquarters in St. Paul, MInn., Thursday, July 10, 2008.  (AP)

(The Politico)  This story was written by Kenneth P. Vogel.


Just as Barack Obama and John McCain are making subtle and not-so-subtle moves toward the center in preparation for the general election, another group of candidates is also repositioning, apparently with an eye toward November - their prospective vice presidential running mates.

In ways both trivial and significant, even as they downplay their interest in the job, the politicians shortlisted for the vice presidential nomination seem to be making the adjustments widely perceived as necessary to preserve and enhance their chances of landing on either the McCain or Obama tickets.

In some cases, the fine-tuning has been as superficial as a new haircut. Minnesotans accustomed to Gov. Tim Pawlenty’s “hockey hair,” noted its replacement by a more conventional, close-cropped cut  this spring amid speculation about the governor’s national profile.

Yet the repackaging usually takes more substantive form, such as the reversal of a long-held but politically disadvantageous position or a bolstering of credentials.

One frequently mentioned vice presidential prospect, Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, an offshore oil drilling opponent in his 2006 campaign, raised eyebrows recently by becoming a convert to the cause not long after McCain’s own conversion on exploratory drilling.

Perhaps not by coincidence, Crist also recently announced his impending nuptials, removing what was widely thought to be one of the main obstacles in his path to the McCain ticket-his bachelorhood.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney is another prospect who finds himself more in tune with McCain these days. Though one of McCain’s sharpest critics during their contentious primary tussle, he is now working the talk show circuit and campaign trail for his former foe.

Romney has even gone out of his way to laud McCain’s economic plan, which his campaign had dismissed as "McCainonomics."

Former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge, whose support for abortion rights is considered an impediment to his chances, recently reconciled his position with McCain’s opposition to abortion.

After Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace said “handicappers” consider abortion rights Ridge’s “biggest problem” in landing on McCain’s ticket, Ridge explained that “the vice president's job is to support - once a decision is made, whether it's on social issues, economic issues or diplomatic issues - the position of the president of the United States.”

Last month, Ridge filed overdue papers disclosing a contract he’s had for two years to lobby for Albania - work that may be just as damaging to his chances as his abortion stance given McCain’s positioning as a reform-oriented candidate.

Meanwhile, South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, a Republican recognized as a leading fiscal conservative, this year has taken more aggressive stances on social issues. He allowed a bill that created Christian "I believe" license plates to become law, signed legislation permitting the public posting of the Ten Commandments and the Lord's Prayer, and signed another bill that required women seeking an abortion to first be told they can view an ultrasound of their fetus.

“Sanford’s never been a Republican who wears his social conservative values on his sleeve,” said Will Folks, a political consultant and blogger who worked on Sanford’s 2002 campaign as his gubernatorial spokesman. “He went someplace that he probably wouldn’t have gone on those social issues were it not for the vice presidential speculation.”

VP Hot Sheet: CBSNews.com Tracks Veepstakes Buzz:
McCain's Top 10 Contenders
Obama's Top 10 Contenders

Republican vice presidential contenders aren’t the only ones making moves that appear calculated to augment their chances.

Former Georgia Sen. Sam Nunn, for instance, led the fight against President Bill Clinton’s push to allow openly gay men and women to serve in the military. The esultant compromise - called “don’t ask, don’t tell” - is opposed by Obama, not to mention influential gay rights activists who are balking at speculation that Obama might tap Nunn.

But Nunn last month took steps to address that political vulnerability by suggesting that the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy might be outdated.

“The policy was the right policy for the right time, and times change,” he told reporters. “I think [when] 15 years go by on any personnel policy, it’s appropriate to take another look at it - see how it’s working, ask the hard questions, hear from the military. Start with a Pentagon study,” he said, according to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

Nunn, who has acknowledged removing two congressional aides for being gay, declined through a spokeswoman to comment to Politico on whether his shift was politically motivated.

Like Nunn, Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius has made moves that, whether intentionally or not, enhance her vice presidential viability. Though often derided for her wooden speaking style, Sebelius has nevertheless emerged as a vigorous campaign trail advocate for Obama. A moderate back home in Republican Kansas-she has twice selected Republicans to run on her ticket as lieutenant governor -Sebelius has taken a sharper tone as an Obama surrogate, going so far as to assert that Republicans would use Obama’s racial background against him.

Yet for all the vice presidential maneuvering in both parties, said John Baick, a modern American history professor at Western New England College in Springfield, Mass., there’s not a lot any of the vice presidential hopefuls can do to boost their chances at this point in the campaign.

In fact, in the near term, it’s more likely V.P. hopefuls will hurt, rather than help, their own chances, he said, citing Obama backer Wesley Clark’s controversial remarks about McCain’s military service-comments that some saw as evidence of Clark’s interest in a spot on the ticket.

“One slip of the tongue, one ill-considered decision or one past act could knock them off the list,” Baick said.

By Kenneth P. Vogel
Copyright 2008 POLITICO



We cover politics with enterprise, style, and impact.

Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 25 Comments
by chrisl45 July 13, 2008 6:58 PM EDT
I have baseball signed by Cindy McCain. Here is my analysis of Cindy''s writing! Vitality and good health: fluid, quick writing, normal pressure, no breaks or amendments, large writing, rhythmic writing. Originality: original forming of letters, pasty writing of high general standard. Special gifts: artistic mind (pasty writing), intuition (disconnected writing of high standard).
Reply to this comment
by chrisl45 July 13, 2008 6:56 PM EDT
Intellectual qualities: (Intelligence) good lay out, clear spacing, simplification, dot over the "i", quick writing, (clearmindedness) good spacing, (Quick-wittedness) no starting strokes or other adjustments at the beginning of words. General inclination: (spiritual and idealistic) large writing, (social) writing slopping to the right, extension of end strokes. Basic individual qualities: (honesty) lack of left tendencies in combination with signs of sincerity, genuineness and discipline, (sympathy) sloping to the right, (self-confidence) large writing, quick writing. Social tendencies: (extravert) sloping to the right. Degree of mental dependence on others: (pride) capital letters getting smaller. Working qualities: (faculty of leadership) large writing, regularity, strong pressure, (organization) good general outlay and long underlengths, (quick intellectual grasp) simplification, words begining without starting strokes, (faculty of observation) break after capital letters), (enterprise) large, broad, quick writing, (memory) connected writing, (good starter) no starting strokes, good outlay, (accuracy) exact dotting of the i, (tidiness) clean, tidy writing, (ability to concentrate) simplified writing, no loops in the underlengths. Moral qualities: (self-sacrifice) writing sloping to the right.
Reply to this comment
by chrisl45 July 13, 2008 6:09 PM EDT
When I compare the leading points of Cindy McCain against Michelle Obama, I see the potential for greatness in Cindy, but only motherlyness in Michelle. The leader of a large company versus a failed professional career.
Reply to this comment
by pjones501 July 13, 2008 12:19 AM EDT
NEWSFLASH....

Kathleen Sebelius is already Obama''s running mate.

The same people who have "made" the Obama are the same people who
"made" the Sebelius.

What the heck am I talking about??
If you can figure it out for yourself, you will see the truth in it. If I post it, the Obama people will bury it in their lies. Or... I''ll get kicked off the website.

One might say that the truth is like a Black Hole. Astronomers can''t see it in space because its Black. But they know its there by the activity going on around it.

and that''s not racist so don''t throw your over used race card at me....
IT''S SCIENCE!!!
Reply to this comment
by chrisl45 July 12, 2008 2:27 PM EDT
I''m begining to warm towards Tom Rich as McCain''s VP choice. I say this because he has a good national security background, was a govenor, will accept McCain''s ideology, and could bring an entire state with him. The only drawback is he does not have the military manipulation know-hows like John has, so he may not be the best to subsequently run for president in 8 years. Thus, I have read some more and keep Lindsey Graham warmly in my pocket for now. The question I''m trying to answer is will the US need another mititary man in 8 years, or will Rich''s knowledge do well.
Reply to this comment
by bdribus July 12, 2008 2:37 AM EDT
Has to be Huckabee or McCain will lose. Oh wait, he''ll lose anyway.
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 July 11, 2008 9:03 PM EDT
Perhaps not by coincidence, Crist also recently announced his impending nuptials, removing what was widely thought to be one of the main obstacles in his path to the McCain ticket-his bachelorhood.

**********************************

Yeah, the gay guy is getting married so the right-wingers will not think he is a nellie. Why he would even consider belonging to such a small-minded bigoted party I can not imagine.
Reply to this comment
by canyoutellme-2009 July 11, 2008 7:45 PM EDT
I Guarantee the VP will be Edwards... It is just the way it is...

Reply to this comment
by sgtrds10-4 July 11, 2008 7:31 PM EDT
It had been rumored that he could be gay.

He flipped on offshore drilling. So now maybe he flipped on being..............


Posted by Flajoe1 at 04:26 PM : Jul 11, 2008

Really? Odd how many closeted gay republicans there seem to be.
Reply to this comment
by flajoe1 July 11, 2008 7:26 PM EDT
He''''s going to get married to increase his chances of being asked to be VP? Not THAT is nuts!
------

Posted by SgtRDS10-4 at 04:16 PM : Jul 11, 2008

It had been rumored that he could be gay.

He flipped on offshore drilling. So now maybe he flipped on being..............
Reply to this comment
by hillarynow July 11, 2008 7:24 PM EDT
There are no "fixing the flaws" Gramm is no ''financial adviser'' Gramm is not at all what America needs and McCain has himself admitted he knows nothing about the economy!! hello??? WHY WOULD ANYONE EVEN THINK OF VOTING FOR MCCAIN WHEN OUR BIGGEST PROBLEM RIGHT NOW IS -- THE ECONOMY! for PRESIDENT no less?? Are Americans really THIS stupid!? Oh wait! half of us voted for Bush, not once but TWICE! is it ANY small wonder why America has gone straight down the toilet?
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds10-4 July 11, 2008 7:17 PM EDT
Obama/Levin or Obama/Clark or Obama Edwards. Any of those would be fine with me.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds10-4 July 11, 2008 7:16 PM EDT
"Perhaps not by coincidence, Crist also recently announced his impending nuptials, removing what was widely thought to be one of the main obstacles in his path to the McCain ticket-his bachelorhood."

He''s going to get married to increase his chances of being asked to be VP? Not THAT is nuts!
Reply to this comment
by chrisl45 July 11, 2008 6:47 PM EDT
Tom Rich as John McCain''s running mate is looking better to me. He was a former governor, has national security know-how, and will adopt John''s anti-abortion ideas.
Reply to this comment
by trbundro1277 July 11, 2008 6:30 PM EDT
still say that getting condoleeza rice on his ticket should be mccain''''s goal. i hate that f''''ing beyotch but from a purely political standpoint, she''''s more reassuring to the conservatives than he is and she''''d give all the white folk the perfect opportunity to feel just fine about voting for him/them over obama. i think they''''re all idiots to ignore this even in light of her not being ''''interested'''' - come off it, condi.
Posted by ccfsdca at 11:46 AM : Jul 11, 2008
+ report abuse
*** Didn''t she run as Pat Buchanon''s running mate in the 2000 election under the Patriot Party, or whatever Ross Perots party was called?
Reply to this comment
by trbundro1277 July 11, 2008 6:28 PM EDT
I follow the money. That leads me to Romney for McCain and Bloomburg for Obama, but I''''m hoping for Edwards.
Posted by lochlan at 12:44 PM : Jul 11, 2008
I''m hoping for Edwards also! Obama should chose someone he can trust that would be loyal. Edwards should be a lock for VP! If Obama was dumb enough to take Richardson as VP, he may win Florida and New Mexico, but then he would lose PA, NJ, Ohio, Michigan, Minnesota and other northeastern states! I don''t hate Richardson because he is hispanic, I hate Richardson because he give illegals free college. I have always made under 30 thousand per year, yet I had to pay 18 thousand for college! Why didn''t he just make it that ANYONE, white, black, hispanic or whatever that made under 25 thousand per year would get free college, that would be fair, rather than him only caring about his fellow hispanics!
Reply to this comment
by flreason July 11, 2008 5:41 PM EDT
"Obama will turn the country into a day-care- and reinforce the deadbeats to lean on him and he will feel powerful only in that way. GROW UP."
Posted by Ariel133

And what deadbeats would those be? The oil companies who hold drilling rights to millions of offshore acres which they choose not to use so that can con the Congress into granting them virtual monopolies on land that belongs to the American people? Or Halliburton and BlackWater for their no bid contracts that funnel taxpayer money to these crooks without any oversight? Or perhaps the billions of dollars in bail out money going to the financial companies who bought up sub-prime loans? I couldn''t agree more if those are the freeloaders you want to crack down on!
Reply to this comment
by pastor1231 July 11, 2008 5:24 PM EDT
I just seen the poll results on Veep Peek, It seems that alot of people are holding out for McCain to Pick Mike Huckabee, As far as Obama Oddly enough Veep Peek has handicapped Wes Clark still near the top of the list. I am partial to Huckabee though. If you want to see the Veep Poll results I will leave the link Http://www.VeepPeek.com
Reply to this comment
by omega39-2009 July 11, 2008 5:24 PM EDT
I hear is whiners here and everywhere- and I don''''t hear how people are standing up and taking responsibility for themselves. They are depending on someone else to give them HOPE. That is the mistake. Dependency.

Posted by Ariel133

You are a perfect dupe and shill for the real elites that are running this country into the ground. One day they will cut you too off at the knees because they might get slightly richer by doing so and I suspect that no one will whine louder than you when that happens.
Reply to this comment
by kennedy7955 July 11, 2008 5:07 PM EDT
"I hear is whiners here and everywhere- and I don''''t hear how people are standing up and taking responsibility for themselves. They are depending on someone else to give them HOPE. That is the mistake. Dependency."

The rich are not whining. They are the very opposite of dependent and If I were rich, I would do what the wealthy are doing; converting their cash into foreign currency and moving out of the country. Now that is taking responsibility for yourself and not being dependent on anyone. Do you feel better now?
Reply to this comment
See all 25 Comments
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: