Senate Passes Eavesdropping Bill
Bill Grants Immunity To Phone Companies That Listened In On Americans
-
Photo
(CBS/AP)
-
Interactive
Domestic Surveillance
The debate over the Bush administration's controversial wiretapping program.
The relatively one-sided vote, 69-28, came only after a lengthy and heated debate that pitted privacy and civil liberties concerns against the desire to prevent terrorist attacks. It ended almost a year of wrangling in the Democratic-led Congress over surveillance rules and the president's warrantless wiretapping program that was initiated after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
The House of Representatives passed the same bill last month, and Bush said he would sign it soon.
Opponents assailed the eavesdropping program, asserting that it imperiled citizens' rights of privacy from government intrusion. But Bush said the legislation protects those rights as well as Americans' security.
"This bill will help our intelligence professionals learn who the terrorists are talking to, what they're saying and what they're planing," he said in a brief White House appearance after the Senate vote.
The long fight in Congress centered on one main question: whether to protect from civil lawsuits any telecommunications companies that helped the government eavesdrop on American phone and computer lines without the permission or knowledge of a secret court created by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
The White House had threatened to veto the bill unless it immunized companies such as AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc. from wiretapping lawsuits.
Forty-six lawsuits now stand to be dismissed because of the new law, according to the American Civil Liberties Union. But the fight has not ended. Civil rights groups are already preparing lawsuits challenging the bill's constitutionality, and four suits, filed against government officials, will not be dismissed.
Numerous lawmakers had spoken out strongly against the no-warrants eavesdropping on Americans, but the Senate voted its approval after rejecting amendments that would have watered down, delayed or stripped away the immunity provision.
The lawsuits center on allegations that the White House circumvented U.S. law by going around the FISA court, which was created 30 years ago to prevent the government from abusing its surveillance powers for political purposes, as was done in the Vietnam War and Watergate eras. The court is meant to approve all wiretaps placed inside the U.S. for intelligence-gathering purposes. The law has been interpreted to include international e-mail records stored on servers inside the U.S.
"This president broke the law," declared Sen. Russell Feingold, a Democrat from Wisconsin.
The Bush administration brought the wiretapping back under the FISA court's authority only after The New York Times revealed the existence of the secret program. A handful of members of Congress knew about the program from top secret briefings. Most members are still forbidden to know the details of the classified effort, and some objected that they were being asked to grant immunity to the telecoms without first knowing what they did.
Republican Sen. Arlen Specter compared the Senate vote to buying a "pig in a poke."
But Sen. Christopher Bond, a Republican and one of the bill's most vocal champions, said, "This is the balance we need to protect our civil liberties without handcuffing our terror-fighters."
Just under a third of the Senate, including Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, supported an amendment that would have stripped immunity from the bill. They were defeated on a 66-32 vote. Republican rival John McCain did not attend the vote.
Obama ended up voting for the final bill, as did Specter. Feingold voted no.
The bill tries to address concerns about the legality of warrantless wiretapping by requiring inspectors general inside the government to conduct a yearlong investigation into the program.
The measure effectively dismisses about 40 lawsuits that have been bundled together. But at least three other lawsuits against government officials will go forward.
©MMVIII, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 148 CommentsHow dare they expect us to vote for any of them in the future. They all need to go.
Obama votes yes - sides with the White House and Republicans.
How about that.
It brings the 30 year old FISA up to current times.
It is not a perfect bill, but no comprise EVER suits every one.
The big win is that the BUSH Administration can''t go around the FISA court. There will once again be oversight over all wiretaps.
Grow up kids!
Btw Hillaryin012, the Telecoms had immunity in the OLD bill.
Obama votes yes - sides with the White House and Republicans, and protects the telcoms from frivolous lawsuits.
How about that.
Update: Bush is on CNN crowing about the passage of his FISA bill. Obama did not vote ''present.'' As promised, Barack Obama voted for Bush''s FISA bill. Hillary Rodham Clinton voted against the shredding of the Bill of Rights. Final vote: YAYS 69 NAYS 28. Bush thanks you and the rest of the spineless Dems, Senator Obama.
Bush sends Pelosi and Obama a big wet kiss of thank you...........
......................Obama would be the 3rd Bush term a face a figure head with pom poms that swings which ever way the money comes willing to say or do anything to be Prez.......
....won''t happen the American people are smelling the puppet skunk Lew Pewwe thats French
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by frootloop47 at 04:46 PM : Jul 09,
FACTLY INCORRECT OR A LIE
If you think I''ve broken a law (perhaps because I''ve been bragging to everyone everywhere that I broke the law many times, "for your protection"), then I demand that you change the law to make whatever I and my co-conspirators did legal, and I demand that the change be made retroactive, so it''s as if I never broke the law at all.
In other words: The law does not apply to me. I am my own law. There is no other law. In the words of GW Bush, "The Constitution is just a g-ddammmed piece of paper!"
Civilization is doomed. Democracy is dead. Long live King George the Imbecile! (NOT!!!)
Appropriate and necessary step to improve the Air Force-what more can we say? That America is it!
Either you are with us or against us!
Without the Military we would not be here. I commend & honor those who fight for us and for those support our country.
A War- sometimes is neccessary to keep our FREEDOMS.
God Bless.
Shame on you, Barack Obama, for buckling under political pressure by voting for this piece of un-American legislation. I may have to rethink my current support of you.
Since all Repuglicans always vote numbingly together against all of us all the time, time to reject them ALL.
But what about the Democrat back-stabbers?
There is now a group dedicated to getting real patriots, real Americans elected, and in the process replace DINO''s aka Bush Democrats with REAL Democrats!
They have just identified the first opportunity of the election season to paint our Congress DEEP blue. Not light blue. Not pansy blue. Not fake blue. DEEP blue.
Please provide the funds needed NOW to make this happen.
Please donate what you can to elect a true American who will NOT stab us in the back.
Voting day is imminent. DO IT NOW!
And spread the news!
http://www.democrats.com/regina-thomas-uses-your-money-for-final-ad-blitz
Thanks!
but mr. feingold ... if the president believed he wasn''t breaking the law ... it''s not really breaking the law ... cause he thought he was within the law ... because his lawless lawyers told him so.
at least that''s the argument his supporters will use ... like the one they use for all the other lies ... if he thought it was the truth ... it wasn''t a lie.
so all is ok ... and forgiven, no?
Bushie beat ya again!
No *****....
At least ONE Federal Judge has said it doesn''t matter WHAT legislation they pass, it is Criminal, and therefore Unconstitutional, and will be struck down.
What could make Democratic Reps turn Treasonous against the Citizenry and vote for this Illegal bit of Neocon Nazi Treason???.......They must have lots of mighty embarrassing tapes and e-mails......
US who was convicted with evidence from wiretaps using NSL without FISA may appeal and or go free. That evidence is illegal the judge ruled.- another bush victory
4/national/main4233932.shtml
July 4 (CBS/AP) A federal judge said that President Bush does not have the constitutional authority to overstep the law establishing the government%u2019s ability to conduct warrantless wiretaps on American citizens.
U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker on Wednesday said that when Congress passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in 1978 it established the "exclusive" means for engaging in wiretaps, and that the president in his capacity as commander in chief could not evade that law. The appeals court sent the case back to Walker to determine if the privilege is trumped by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Walker did rule that FISA does trump the state secrets privilege:
"Congress included in the FISA bill a declaration that the FISA regime, together with the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 %u2026 were to be the %u201Cexclusive means%u201D by which domestic electronic surveillance for national security purposes could be conducted. %u2026 This provision and its legislative history left no doubt that Congress intended to displace entirely the various warrantless wiretapping and surveillance programs undertaken by the executive branch and to leave no room for the president to undertake warrantless surveillance in the domestic sphere in the future.
%u201CUnfortunately, nothing will preserve [liberty] but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.%u201D Patrick Henry
%u201CCourage is reckoned the greatest of all virtues; because, unless a man has that virtue, he has no security for preserving any other.%u201D Samaul Johnson
%u201COne of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.%u201D Plato
%u201CThe danger is not that a particular class is unfit to govern. Every class is unfit to govern%u201D
Lord Acton.
I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them. Thomas Jefferson
"The principle for which we contend is bound to reassert itself though it may be at another time and in another form."-Jefferson Davis, President of the Confederate States
Michael Delavar,
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue! --Barry Goldwater
When you can''''t get justice in Court or Congress and your government is has a criminal conspiacy with your phone company, better head over to the Gun store... It''''s now the only way to protect your rights under the constitution. These Dubious "National security letters" are not at all legal and never were.
Mudrose is a complete idiot. I went thought educating him all day friday. It''s hopeless.
"Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the Government''s purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding."
J Louis D. Brandeis, dissenting in Olmstead v United States, 277 US 438, 479 (1928).
When your little fairy tale ends, you''ll finally see that Obama is a complete fraud.
His attempt to explain his FISA flip-flop as a policy "disagreement" is disgusting!!
And his argument that we''re expecting too much when we expect to never disagree with him is offensive!!
Only Obama is calling his flip-flop a disagreement. Informed progressives on the other hand, are calling it what it is: a lying stab in the back.
We already made agreements, Barack: As you put it, we don''t need the government spying on Americans, and we don''t need Scooter Libby justice.
But Obama has already broken both those, and many other, promises, and now seeks to slickly explain it all away. As if we''re a bunch of slack jawed idiots.
He''s a double-talking fraud, who''s going to get eaten-up domestically and on the foreign stage.
And when it happens, I will say I told you so. Just wait.
Vote your conscience, progressives.
Find and vote for a trustworthy third-party candidate.
Are you liberals sure of who you will be voting for?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by zgomer at 06:27 PM : Jul 09, 2008
+ report abuse
You obviously have NO idea of what has just occurred. Further evidence of the low IQ and ignorance of the Mouth Breating Droolers of the Neocon Nazi Reich Wing.
FISA was in force the entire time Shrub has been in office. This was about him IGNORING the Law to ILLEGALLY spy on ALL Americans, every single phone call, every single e-mail, for the last 7 Years, and recieve what amounts to a Pardon for his Crimes, which under Current Law, are FELONIES.
Try getting an education before addressing issues which are beyond your limited ability to understand.
This is the question of the Century that needs to be answered.
4/national/main4233932.shtml
July 4 (CBS/AP) A federal judge said that President Bush does not have the constitutional authority to overstep the law establishing the government%u2019s ability to conduct warrantless wiretaps on American citizens.
U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker on Wednesday said that when Congress passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in 1978 it established the "exclusive" means for engaging in wiretaps, and that the president in his capacity as commander in chief could not evade that law. The appeals court sent the case back to Walker to determine if the privilege is trumped by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Walker did rule that FISA does trump the state secrets privilege:
"Congress included in the FISA bill a declaration that the FISA regime, together with the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 %u2026 were to be the %u201Cexclusive means%u201D by which domestic electronic surveillance for national security purposes could be conducted. %u2026 This provision and its legislative history left no doubt that Congress intended to displace entirely the various warrantless wiretapping and surveillance programs undertaken by the executive branch and to leave no room for the president to undertake warrantless surveillance in the domestic sphere in the future.
Are you liberals sure of who you will be voting for?
This must be what Obama meant when he said "Change"...
This is the question of the Century that needs to be answered.---vnveteran72 at 06:42 PM
I don''t know. I guess the telecoms bought him off or they''ve got some embarassing information on him that they obtained through the illegal wire taps. Watergate is now legal and has been going on at least since 9-11-01 and possibly as early as Feb 2001 because that is when the Bush administration supposedly first approached Qwest about wiretaps. Embarassing information gathered through the illegal wire taps may be why the dems have been so spineless about impeachment also. If so, then we are no longer a democracy.
Are you liberals sure of who you will be voting for?
This must be what Obama meant when he said "Change"...
Or maybe Jesse Jackson really did what he threatened to do to Obama...
Russ Feingold: American Patriot and Hero
Senators who voted for this Legislation: Criminals and Traitors
What a sad day.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 148 Comments