Ex-Aide: Cheney Nixed CDC Report Testimony
Findings On Climate Change's Health Effects Dropped At VP Office's Urging, Former EPA Official Says
-
Photo
A former adviser to the head of the Environmental Protection Agency said Vice President Dick Cheney's office and the White House Council on Environmental Quality worried that if key health officials provided detailed testimony about global warming's consequences on public health or the environment, it could make it more difficult to avoid regulating carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
-
Interactive
The Bush Cabinet
A look at departures, new nominees and long-standing members of the president's staff.
-
Interactive
Eye On The Environment
Find out how global warming, air pollution and alternative forms of energy impact our world.
When six pages were cut from testimony on climate change and public health by the head of the Centers for Disease Control last October, the White House insisted the changes were made because of reservations raised by White House advisers about the accuracy of the science.
But Jason K. Burnett, until last month the senior adviser on climate change to Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Stephen Johnson, says that Cheney's office was deeply involved in getting nearly half of the CDC's original draft testimony removed.
"The Council on Environmental Quality and the office of the vice president were seeking deletions to the CDC testimony (concerning) ... any discussions of the human health consequences of climate change," Burnett has told the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
The three-page letter, a response to an inquiry by Sen. Barbara Boxer, a Democrat and the panel's chairwoman, was obtained Tuesday by The Associated Press. Boxer planned a news conference later in the day.
Burnett, 31, a lifelong Democrat who resigned his post last month as associate deputy EPA administrator because of disagreements over the agency's response to climate change, describes deep political concerns at the White House, including in Cheney's office, about linking climate change directly to public health or damage to the environment.
Scientists believe manmade pollution is warming the earth and if the process is not reversed it will cause significant climate changes that pose broad public health problems from increases in disease to more injuries from severe weather.
Senate and House committees have been trying for months to get e-mail exchanges and other documents to determine the extent of political influence on government scientists, but have been rebuffed.
The letter by Burnett for the first time suggests that Cheney's office was deeply involved in downplaying the impacts of climate change as related to public health and welfare, Senate investigators believe.
Cheney's office also objected last January over congressional testimony by Administrator Johnson that "greenhouse gas emissions harm the environment."
An official in Cheney's office "called to tell me that his office wanted the language changed" with references to climate change harming the environment deleted, Burnett said. Nevertheless, the phrase was left in Johnson's testimony.
Cheney's office and the White House Council on Environmental Quality worried that if key health officials provided detailed testimony about global warming's consequences on public health or the environment, it could make it more difficult to avoid regulating carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, Burnett believes.
The EPA currently is examining whether carbon dioxide, a leading greenhouse gas, poses a danger to public health and welfare. The Supreme Court has said if it does, it must be regulated under the Clean Air Act.
Nowhere were these White House concerns more apparent than when CDC Director Julie Gerberding, the head of the government's premier public health watchdog, testified about climate change and public health before Boxer's committee last October. The White House deleted six of the original 14 pages of Gerberding's testimony, including a list of likely public health impacts of global warming.
The White House, at the urging of Cheney's office, "requested that I work with CDC to remove from the testimony any discussion of the human health consequences of climate change," wrote Burnett.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 102 CommentsIndustrial rights of pollution = important
Human health = not important
Sheesh.
and keep intellecent people from learning that a natural phenomenon in the weather is not going to cause chaos, Thats the Dems job.
Global Warming is a Swindle. By the end of this year when the World is in a deep economic recession the last subject on everyones lips will be climate change, it will be buried as the scam it is.
Of course Cheney will still have complete deniability
because all emails (if emailed) will evaporate. And since no one actually spoke to Cheney, he can claim no knowledge of the request. Isn''t it wonderful how the corrupt have no fear....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There is something very wrong with the above statement.
If CDC Director Julie Gerberding testified BEFORE Boxer''s committee, how was the Whitehouse able to delete six of fourteen pages of her testimony?
Why would boxer%u2019s committee allow that to happen?
The only possible answer I can think of would be that;
Director Julie Gerberding did not actually appear before the committee at all.
Rather, Gerberding had made a written testimony; presented it to the Whitehouse for censoring/editing and then only the modified version was presented to the committee.
If that is what happened, it was not actually her testimony by any stretch of the word.
Isn''t this the p*ssing contest that the White House got into with CA, where CA wants to put caps on CO2 emissions? More subverting the law in DC, I suspect.
Scientists also predict many many extinctions. CBS, please stop reporting as if humans were going to be the most affected. Humans can move to Canada and Siberia. Yes, some will die, and many will be inconvenienced, but we will not go extinct like many other species.
Posted by JSmithCSA at 01:35 PM : Jul 08, 2008
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If it were a lifelong republican making the charge you would be expressing your outrage by demeaning his/her personal character and claiming he/she had never really been a republican.
You bush apologists have had to resort to that a lot lately, haven%u2019t you?
Posted by drinuk
Yeah, sure! A scam on global proportions. Must be the coral reefs (now about 50% depleted partly due to temp change), the polar bears, melting of the perma frost, northern expansion of invasive species, decline of the lobsters as they move north, are all in on the big scam and swindle. That''s a truly amazing conspriracy theory you have and of course, none of this is man made.
What do you and shot gun Dickey care? You''ll have enough time to spend your money and eat sea food in your lifetime. To he11 with the next generation right! I have a little secret for you...only 1% of the population will line their pockets by denying this problem and I bet you aren''t going to be on Dickey''s hand out list.
They both persecuted and prosecuted their opposition to strengthen their grip on power. They both hold great sway over the media and its propaganda.
It''s a shame to use the word propaganda as a noun describing today''s US news media outlets. Show me one US news source that doesn''t have any propaganda in it, just straight unbiased journalism. Please.
Was that before or after his little stint in "rehab"?
Was that before or after his little stint in "rehab"?"
________________________
Yes
In true likeness of the ancient Egyptian god of chaos, Seth.
What were his "priorities" for starting the War in Iraq?
"Formerly a heavy smoker, Cheney sustained the first of four heart attacks in 1978, at age 37"
THERE''s a definite "con" for the wonders of modern medicine!
Posted by JSmithCSA
It is strange taht when you have a member of the admin covers up and hides information about a death concern, a republican thinks it is not news. I guess he has heard so many stories about cover ups from this admin, it probabally is old news for him
BUT if it could be shown that Cheney is acting on behalf of big oil for his own enrichment, in the position of a public official, shouldn''t he then be personally liable and subject to lawsuits for damages? If he violated laws doing this, it should be an easier case.
Nah...he''ll pull a "Ken Lay" and croak before he sees a cell.
Nah...he''''ll pull a "Ken Lay" and croak before he sees a cell.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by TastePolice at 02:45 PM : Jul 08, 2008
+ report abuse
I would be happy with that, dead or in prison works for me.
[Posted by watcher269 at 02:48 PM : Jul 08, 2008]
no need to worry ... they''re just changing a few choice words. it will be available shortly.
[Posted by dragonwagon5 at 01:43 PM : Jul 08, 2008]
he gets others to do it for him. it works wonders for your time management issues. and it completely solves that pesky ''responsibility and accountability'' thing that everyone cries so loudly about.
Dr. Gerberding has cooperated with the Bush administration plan to get rid of CDC doctors, scientists and researchers who are in their way, simultaneously shifting the budget to reduce pay for those who actually do the work while dramatically increasing pay for appointed management.
This enables the White House to direct a claim of incompetence toward anything one of its own agencies produces, even if the White House staff is directly involved. It creates a ''having your cake and eating it too'' sort of result where it''s always unclear where the greatest fault lies...thereby allowing the White House to get away with just about anything they do while pointing their fingers at others. This is a foolproof method for converting any organization into one which is utterly incompetent and ultimately irrelevant...and THAT is the actual plan.
Horse$hit, the deletions were made by Cheney to save his cronies from having to pay for CO2 scrubbers on their power plants. There''s no question about the science from any credible source, just false questions being raised by oil and coal industry.
Must be nice for the power industry to own the VP, too bad all the rest of us are going to pay for their greed in the end.
Posted by cbscrash07
It is apparent you do not know anything about climate cahnge and the effects of climate change are. Perhaps read a book.
Posted by cbscrash07 at 03:09 PM : Jul 08, 2008"
Too bad you don''t have a clue, you''d realize how stupid your comment is .
Posted by cbscrash07
And if it wasn''t nothing then why did cheney alter the final copy?
A 1 degree increase in the AVERAGE temperature. That means that you could easily have a 10 degree increase in the most extreme high temperatures in any given year. So, if you live in an area where your highest daytime summer temperature is 106, you''re looking at future highs of 116.
Of course, that 1 degree average increase is now appearing to be a complete pipe dream. We''ll probably see at least twice that.
Posted by aldon61
I would love to see taht tahn keep hearing "taht we can not comment on taht issue because of the on going investigation."
New evidence deep beneath the Arctic ice suggests that a series of underwater volcanoes have erupted in violent explosions in the past decade.
Hidden 2.5 miles (4 kilometers) beneath the Arctic surface, the volcanoes can range up to more than a mile (2 kilometers) in diameter and a few hundred yards (meters) tall. They formed along the Gakkel Ridge, a lengthy crack in the ocean crust where two rocky plates are spreading apart, pulling new melted rock to the surface.
The eruptions discharge large amounts of carbon dioxide, helium, trace metals and heat into the water over long distances, he said.
The research, detailed in Thursday''s issue of the journal Nature, was funded by NASA, the National Science Foundation and Woods Hole.
BAN THE VOLCANOES!
Oh Really ??
They`ve almost put Charmin out of Biz,..They use Our US Constitution for their biz !
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 102 Comments