Ex-Aide: Cheney Nixed CDC Report Testimony
Findings On Climate Change's Health Effects Dropped At VP Office's Urging, Former EPA Official Says
-
A former adviser to the head of the Environmental Protection Agency said Vice President Dick Cheney's office and the White House Council on Environmental Quality worried that if key health officials provided detailed testimony about global warming's consequences on public health or the environment, it could make it more difficult to avoid regulating carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
-
Interactive The Bush Cabinet A look at departures, new nominees and long-standing members of the president's staff.
-
Interactive Eye On The Environment Find out how global warming, air pollution and alternative forms of energy impact our world.
When six pages were cut from testimony on climate change and public health by the head of the Centers for Disease Control last October, the White House insisted the changes were made because of reservations raised by White House advisers about the accuracy of the science.
But Jason K. Burnett, until last month the senior adviser on climate change to Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Stephen Johnson, says that Cheney's office was deeply involved in getting nearly half of the CDC's original draft testimony removed.
"The Council on Environmental Quality and the office of the vice president were seeking deletions to the CDC testimony (concerning) ... any discussions of the human health consequences of climate change," Burnett has told the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
The three-page letter, a response to an inquiry by Sen. Barbara Boxer, a Democrat and the panel's chairwoman, was obtained Tuesday by The Associated Press. Boxer planned a news conference later in the day.
Burnett, 31, a lifelong Democrat who resigned his post last month as associate deputy EPA administrator because of disagreements over the agency's response to climate change, describes deep political concerns at the White House, including in Cheney's office, about linking climate change directly to public health or damage to the environment.
Scientists believe manmade pollution is warming the earth and if the process is not reversed it will cause significant climate changes that pose broad public health problems from increases in disease to more injuries from severe weather.
Senate and House committees have been trying for months to get e-mail exchanges and other documents to determine the extent of political influence on government scientists, but have been rebuffed.
The letter by Burnett for the first time suggests that Cheney's office was deeply involved in downplaying the impacts of climate change as related to public health and welfare, Senate investigators believe.
Cheney's office also objected last January over congressional testimony by Administrator Johnson that "greenhouse gas emissions harm the environment."
An official in Cheney's office "called to tell me that his office wanted the language changed" with references to climate change harming the environment deleted, Burnett said. Nevertheless, the phrase was left in Johnson's testimony.
Cheney's office and the White House Council on Environmental Quality worried that if key health officials provided detailed testimony about global warming's consequences on public health or the environment, it could make it more difficult to avoid regulating carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, Burnett believes.
The EPA currently is examining whether carbon dioxide, a leading greenhouse gas, poses a danger to public health and welfare. The Supreme Court has said if it does, it must be regulated under the Clean Air Act.
Nowhere were these White House concerns more apparent than when CDC Director Julie Gerberding, the head of the government's premier public health watchdog, testified about climate change and public health before Boxer's committee last October. The White House deleted six of the original 14 pages of Gerberding's testimony, including a list of likely public health impacts of global warming.
The White House, at the urging of Cheney's office, "requested that I work with CDC to remove from the testimony any discussion of the human health consequences of climate change," wrote Burnett.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 6
- next
See all 102 Comments#####
Cheney can do that but they will come after me for taking those "DO NOT REMOVE" tags off my mattress.
Something isn''t right here...
[Posted by lovegetpeace at 06:19 PM : Jul 08, 2008]
photoshop by adobe software is likely to be your best bet.
They must be IM-PEACH-ED for war crimes and for shredding the consitution time and time again.
Yet the democrats in congress have said that "im-peach-ment is off the table"!!!! I thought we put them in congress to stop the war in iraq, stop the patriot act and violations of the consitution.
to date they have re-authorized funding for iraq multiple occaisions, they voted immunity for telecom companies, they voted to re-authorize the patriot act etc. When a few weeks ago Dennis Kucinich submitted 35 articles of im-peach-ment to congress and again nancy pelosi said "impeachment if off the table"!!!
These acts are criminal, we must take our democracy back, vote for third party canidates NADER or BARR
-----------------------------------
Normally I''m against more domestic drilling, but in this case I''ll make an exception.
Disgusting.
How sad is it that "unsafe hunter" doesn''t have the severity to make that list?
-----------------------------------------
...If you make it that long, it''s not over yet. And then they''ll look at you as the stupid and naive generation that chose him over all others to be president. Even though you (probably, as the odds predict) didn''t vote for him.
Imagine that, Cheney manipulating information to suit his views.
Commit a white-collar federal crime.....you''ll be sent to Club Fed. "Karmic Destiny" should have Dickey-boy and his cronies making reservations some time soon. Your biggest hurdle will be smuggling in the Instamatic!
Vote em all out on their ears.
Posted by martel_v at 05:50 PM : Jul 08, 2008
AMEN TO THAT!!
I think you''re on to something there! If you post that widely enough, some ''holy evangelist'' is bound to pick up on it and in short order we''ll end up with another issue about which the religioso''s can say that "our god-inspired opinion is worth just as much as some godless geological theory".
Religion 101: It''s not about God or any similar concept or being. It''s all about who is INTERPRETING for us what we MUST believe that some god thinks!
No god has ever created a religion. Religion is created by humans, specifically by humans who wish to take advantage of other humans who don''t feel up to the task of survival (good fortune = "God gave it to us" while bad fortune = "God is punishing us for our sins").
No ''religious'' leader, though, will EVER admit any of that. Which leaves us with the odd spectacle of many different religions which are in basic disagreement with one another, all of which were ''created'' by some god or another.
So it''s no miracle that ''religious'' believers have often had their heads filled with utter nonsense that they''ve been taught to believe in order to be ''faithful to God''; and they can''t change those beliefs because those who fed them the beliefs can''t change THEIR opinions without risking a loss of influence and authority over their minions.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 6
- next
See all 102 Comments