Obama Denies Shift On Iraq Policy
Blames McCain Campaign For Suggesting He Would Alter Timetable For Troop Withdrawal
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Obama's Shifting Positions?
Barack Obama is scrambling to quell what critics are calling a shift on his campaign promise to withdraw troops from Iraq. Obama suggested the media frenzy was manufactured. Dean Reynolds reports.
-
Photo Essay
Barack Obama
A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.
-
Photo Essay
Week In Iraq Photos
A daily diary with scenes of the latest attacks and snapshots from the effort to rebuild a nation.
The Illinois senator called a second news conference of the day Thursday to address the Republican criticism of him and resulting questions about where he stands on Iraq.
He said what he learns from military commanders on his upcoming trip to Iraq will refine his policy -- but "not the 16-month timetable" for withdrawing U.S. troops from combat in Iraq. He said what he learns could affect how many residual troops might be needed to train the Iraqi army and police.
"I am going to do a thorough assessment when I'm there," he told reporters on the airport tarmac here. "I'm sure I'll have more information and continue to refine my policy."
During his presidential campaign, Obama has gone from the hard-edged, vocal opposition to Iraq that defined his early candidacy to more nuanced rhetoric that calls for a phased-out drawdown of all combat brigades that, at a rate of one or two a month, could last 16 months. He has said that if al Qaeda builds bases in Iraq, he would keep troops either in the country or the region to carry out "targeted strikes."
Republicans, who have been goading Obama to return to Iraq to see conditions for himself, pounced.
"There appears to be no issue that Barack Obama is not willing to reverse himself on for the sake of political expedience," said Alex Conant, a spokesman for the national Republican Party. "Obama's Iraq problem undermines the central premise of his candidacy and shows him to be a typical politician."
Obama's GOP rival, John McCain, has been a vocal supporter of the Iraq war and war policy has been a central disagreement between the two candidates.
But Obama insisted that his position has not changed at all.
He said he is saying now what he always has: The war was a mistake and needs to be brought to "a responsible end," but "we need to be as careful getting out as we were careless getting in." This means, he said, that his 16-month timeline "was always premised on" not endangering either U.S. troops or Iraq's stability, which he had previously been told by commanders was possible.
"I'm going to continue to gather information to see whether those conditions still hold," he said. "My goal is to end this conflict as soon as possible."
Obama's Web site contains this direct promise about Iraq: "Obama will immediately begin to remove our troops from Iraq. He will remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months. Obama will make it clear that we will not build any permanent bases in Iraq. He will keep some troops in Iraq to protect our embassy and diplomats; if al Qaeda attempts to build a base within Iraq, he will keep troops in Iraq or elsewhere in the region to carry out targeted strikes on al Qaeda."
Although he did not specifically mention his 16-month timeline on Thursday, Obama called it "pure speculation" to suggest he has been softening or even backing off his position as violence lessens in Iraq.
"I continue to believe that it is a strategic error for us to maintain a long-term occupation in Iraq at a time when conditions in Afghanistan are worsening, al Qaeda is continuing to establish bases in areas of northwest Pakistan, resources there are severely strained and we are spending $10 to $12 billion a month in Iraq that we desperately need here at home, not to mention the strains on our military," Obama said.
But for Obama, appearing to take two positions on one issue is not confined to Iraq, reports CBS News correspondent Dean Reynolds.
Last year, he opposed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance act because it bestowed retroactive immunity on telecommunications companies that gave the government data on callers. But last week, Obama endorsed a bill doing just that-suggesting security trumps privacy.
And of course, there is Obama's switch on federal financing for elections, which he once supported.
Obama plans a visit this summer to Jordan, Israel, Germany, France and the United Kingdom. The Illinois senator also has said he intends to visit Iraq and Afghanistan this summer as part of an official congressional trip that would be separate from the campaign-funded Mideast and European tour. It would be his second trip to Iraq.
Obama senior foreign policy adviser Susan Rice told reporters on a conference call that Obama would keep to his commitment to begin removing U.S. forces from Iraq "from the early days of his administration." She said the 16-month timeline was based on "the best military advice that he has received" and that it appears to continue to be "still broadly applicable."
"Obviously if there are fewer brigades or more brigades" there by the time a new administration takes office next year, she said, "that would adjust the timeline."
Obama's position has been that troops should only remain in Iraq to protect the U.S. embassy, engage in humanitarian efforts, and conduct counterterrorism operations. She said Obama would consider having the U.S. continue to train Iraqi police forces if they show some progress, "but he's not interested in training one sector of Iraqi society to kill another."
McCain was an early supporter of increasing the number of U.S. troops in Iraq as President Bush did last year. He wants to pursue the current counterinsurgency tactics to give Iraqis time to work out a political reconciliation. He has said he's willing to see some U.S. troops stay there as much as 100 years but not if they are being wounded or killed in combat. Rather he supports keeping a military presence in that part of the world because of its volatility.
©MMVIII, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.




- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 36
- next
See all 1761 CommentsLooks like another Non-Issue to be exploited.
Want to talk about Flip-Flops or straight up daily lies of McBush ?????
McBush is campainging in 2008 on what he campaigned against the preivious time he ran ---- & he can''t stop Flip-Flopping.
HMM, I wonder.
They''ve got you mirrors sounding like total fools for echoing the ignorance
Obama hasn''t reversed or flip flopped on the issue.
- His latest shake up in his campaign staff just brought in more Bush/Cheney campaign people.
Posted by standlee5 at 06:01 PM : Jul 03, 2008
Yeah, right, because he TELLS the networks how much time that they have to spend on each story and they have no choice of their own. LMAO
More paranoid garbage from the uber-right,
-------
Well I don''t think anyone would argue the media isn''t ga ga eyed over Obama.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by standlee5
======================================================
Pathetic and sad argument......is this ALL the FAR RIGHT has to throw around? Wow.......
Posted by yankeerebel7 at 06:04 PM : Jul 03, 2008
Virtually every candidate, from whatever party, has a history of moving to the center when they go from the primaries to the GE. So your point is...?
And BTW, are you saying that McCain has NO serious and real flip-flops? Ha! Don''t get me started.
definitly backing Obama''s trip to Iraq.
So much so that he is personally paying
all of the 747 expenses of flying Obama
over to Iraq.
And in addition Bush has arranged for
Obama''s security force to fly over
in a Piper Cub J-3 Cub.
-- All they''ve got now is dirty campaigning with exploited sound bites & straight up lies, It''s why the changes in McBush''s campaign staff.
The correct link is www.chicagoreader.com/features/stories/gogoop/
No spaces after slashes.
Posted by ofbyfor1 at 06:20 PM : Jul 03, 2008
Oh, so he is just a normal candidate after all. If that''s agreed can we now take off the gloves or does he still require special handling.
-- All they''''ve got now is dirty campaigning with exploited sound bites & straight up lies, It''''s why the changes in McBush''''s campaign staff.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by j-whitman
------------------------------------------------------
Literally everything that Obama does these right-wing nuts take offense to.......next thing you know when he breathes through his mouth they''ll start screaming that he shouldn''t be breathing through his mouth, but through his nose.....pathetic.
If Obama plays his cards right he may get to stay at his cousins secret Halliburton getaway in Dubai when he visits Iraq and get to see where D!ck Cheaney plans on escaping to when he leaves office to enjoy his wealth!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by captalistpig
======================================================
.....says the little piggy......OINK! OINK!
Posted by standlee5 at 06:19 PM : Jul 03, 2008
And AGAIN, I will ask you if you think that he has SUCH CONTROL OF THE NETWORKS that he can tell them what to focus their attention on. You made the accusation that he had control over it by calling him an attention hog and that somehow it was under his control. The media can choose for themselves what the big stories of the day are. Sorry if you don''t like it.
More paranoia by the uber-right.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 36
- next
See all 1761 Comments