LOS ANGELES, June 29, 2008

Hollywood's Latest Sequel: "Strike II"?

Movie Industry Braces For Possible Walkout By Screen Actors Guild

  • Members and supporters of the Screen Actors Guild rally outside the organization's headquarters Monday, June 9, 2008, in Los Angeles. It was a solidarity rally in support of their television/theatrical contract negotiation team.

    Members and supporters of the Screen Actors Guild rally outside the organization's headquarters Monday, June 9, 2008, in Los Angeles. It was a solidarity rally in support of their television/theatrical contract negotiation team.  (AP Photo/Ric Francis)

(AP)  Hollywood loves a good sequel, but here's one it could do without: Another union strike just months after the town got up and running again from a devastating walkout by writers.

The contract between the Screen Actors Guild and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers expires Monday, and negotiations have dragged on for weeks with no apparent headway.

SAG leaders have said they are willing to continue talking beyond the contract deadline. Yet their hard-line rhetoric and a squabble with another actors union could put performers on the sidelines, taking electricians, set-builders, caterers and other Hollywood working stiffs along with them.

"If you're a below-the-line worker, your blood is probably running cold, because they're the ones that took the biggest hit from the writers strike," said Jack Kyser, chief economist for the Los Angeles Economic Development Corp., which estimates the WGA walkout cost the town $2.5 billion in lost wages and other revenue.

A strike in July - or a potential actors lockout if producers decided to play tough - could delay the return of many fall TV shows, which normally would be going back into production then.

With a longer lead time, big-screen movies generally are in good shape through the early part of summer 2009, with studios rushing to finish production on most films before the actors' contract expired.

A few films such as "The Hannah Montana Movie" and Tom Hanks' "Angels & Demons" could be forced to shut down if a strike occurred. A long walkout could postpone movies scheduled to start shooting late this summer and fall, including Russell Crowe's "Nottingham."

"The possibility of another strike, especially in this economy, has the town on edge, including the thousands of guild and crew members who are still recovering from the last strike," said Jesse Hiestand, spokesman for the producers alliance.

Big action films could ride out a short strike by turning to other work while actors were off. Lorenzo di Bonaventura, producer of next summer's sequel "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen," said the filmmakers factored in a hiatus where they can get by without actors, working on visual effects instead.

But it would be another blow to an industry that remains in a stall after the writers strike.

"It's not been a complete shutdown, but everybody's been working at pretty minimal capacity the last nine months," di Bonaventura said. "The pain everybody felt over the last nine months certainly makes the prospect of another strike even more foreboding."

While the Writers Guild of America went on strike in general solidarity among members, SAG is a house divided. Its 120,000 members include 44,000 who also belong to the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, and leaders of the two unions are at each other's throats.

AFTRA, with 70,000 total members, negotiated a contract similar to ones writers and directors accepted this year. SAG is holding out for a better deal that many in Hollywood say it cannot realistically achieve in a business stung first by losses from the 100-day writers strike and now by studio stinginess amid the weak economy.

"Militancy has its moments," said James Cromwell, a former SAG board member who is among members of both unions urging AFTRA to approve the deal.

"Under the circumstances, with this town having just gone through a writers strike, militancy is useless," Cromwell said by phone from Shreveport, La., where he is co-starring as George H.W. Bush in Oliver Stone's "W."

While the unions traditionally have negotiated side by side, they split this time, and SAG leaders are actively campaigning to defeat AFTRA's contract, whose results are due July 8.

SAG is pushing for more money on DVD residuals, a raise producers have refused to give other Hollywood unions. Leaders of SAG also say the AFTRA contract shortchanges actors on potential revenue from Internet programming.

"When unions compete with different contract terms, actors lose. It starts a race to the bottom that SAG doesn't want to win," SAG chief negotiator Doug Allen said in a June 23 message asking actors who belong to both unions to vote against AFTRA's deal.

Along with Cromwell, actors such as Tom Hanks, Alec Baldwin, Kevin Spacey and Morgan Fairchild are among hundreds who have signed an agreement encouraging AFTRA members to approve the deal.

SAG, which accounts for about 90 percent of TV production and all of the film industry, insists it can strike a better bargain. But if the AFTRA deal goes through by a wide margin, it could undermine SAG's leaders, who might not be able to drum up the votes should they decide to ask members to authorize a strike.

"The worst thing you can do is to try to get it and fail," AFTRA President Roberta Reardon said. "It's hard to imagine a performer voting yes for one contract then voting to put himself out on the street for the other one."

Alexandra Leighton, a 28-year-old actress who appears in two episodes of the new CBS drama "Swingtown," said she is voting for the AFTRA deal and would oppose a SAG strike.

Leighton backs SAG's demand for tougher consent rules over use of an actor's image in online clips, but she said it was not worth losing her job - her first acting gig outside of commercials.

"Too many people would be put out of work," Leighton said. "It's just not worth it. The economy is already iffy, and it would just crush the local economy."

It also could ruin some TV series. Audiences did without new episodes on many shows for months while writers were on strike. If actors walk and new episodes vanish again, fans could lose interest for good.

When writers returned in February, the feeling in Hollywood was that cooler heads among actors and producers would avert another strike. Optimism gradually eroded as the two actors unions began beating up on each other.

While SAG has struck deals to allow work to continue with many independent producers, studio production that accounts for most of Hollywood employment has been hurled into limbo.

By AP Movie Writer David Germain. AP Business Writer Ryan Nakashima contributed to this report.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 21 Comments
by July 2, 2008 11:42 AM EDT
can you say more reality tv, think it''s bad now? we will be inundated to say the least.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey June 30, 2008 2:48 PM EDT
[Who gives a sheit about these union pukes]
[Posted by b48151 at 04:57 PM : Jun 29, 2008]

all those that would transact w/ them ... since they might be a bit short on funds if the strike goes thru.
Reply to this comment
by mbcsmith June 30, 2008 12:37 PM EDT
The unions have killed the goose that laid the golden egg in Detroit, maybe thay can do the same for Hollywood.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet June 30, 2008 9:59 AM EDT
Who gives a sheit about these union pukes

Posted by b48151 at 04:57 PM : Jun 29, 2008
+ report abuse

Strange attitude toward your neighbors and fellow countrymen! Do you have a "superior" complex or something or do you think that ONLY the "Special" Class deserves a Contract? Just what are you trying to say swastika breath! Since Bacon''s rebellion, before the nation was a nation, workers have been withholding their labor for fair and better treatment. ONLY Nazi''s have ever objected to such the way you do... Could there be a reason for that?? Now stand... let''s sing it out!! SIEG HEIL BUSH!!
Reply to this comment
by element51 June 29, 2008 11:53 PM EDT
A film like From Here To Eternity would never get made today. Why? There was no swearing or nudity. Most people today want to hear dirty words and see boobs and butts. I have many of the classics in my collection and still enjoy them every time I watch them. Films like Picnic, Network, Of Mice and Men, West Side Story, are just not saleable to the younger generation. The increasing number of "reality shows" on TV are so bad that I don''t see how anyone can stay interested past the first commercial. There is some good TV but not very much. I Love Lucy, The Honeymooners, The Carol Burnett Show, Gunsmoke..that was good TV. How I miss them. To bad we''ll never have those kinds of shows again.
Reply to this comment
by element51 June 29, 2008 11:43 PM EDT
Wow....You guys are really being hard on the entertainment industry. While some of your comments are valid you have to realize that a lot of working class folks depend on that industry to make their living. The problem with entertainment today is that it is now run by a board of directors who know nothing about making good TV and movies. It''s all about the bottom line. In the old days the people who made movies knew what the public wanted. That''s why their product was so much better. There are still some great films made today but they are independent films and do not get the attention that the big studios can provide. As a result, most aren''t seen by many people and end up in the bargin section at WalMart. Also, entertainment is so subjective. What one may hate, some one else loves. Finally, since most movie goers are kids, (they have the money) Hollywood tries to appeal to them and most of the stuff is crapp. There are still some very talented people out there and a good performance is still a pleasure to see.
Reply to this comment
by prairiefox1 June 29, 2008 8:33 PM EDT
HAVE YOU SEEN WHO IS STARRING AS BATMAN? HE LOOKS LIKE SOMEONE JUST RELEASED FROM PRISON! JUST WHO IN THE HECK IS HE ANYWAY? PATHETIC!
Reply to this comment
by prairiefox1 June 29, 2008 7:59 PM EDT
WAS IT THE 1953 MOVIE, OR THAT PATHETIC REMAKE FEATURING THAT PATHETIC ACTOR FROM A COUPLE YEARS AGO?

(And please turn off your CAPS LOCK key, unless you''''re using a Timex ZX-80, in which case you don''''t have the option...)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by hypnotoad72
################
I WISH IT WAS THE 1953 ONE! THAT I WOULD HAVE KEPT!
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 June 29, 2008 7:48 PM EDT
I ACCIDENTALLY BOUGHT THE WAR OF THE WORLDS AND WATCHED IT FOR 10 MINUTES! I THEN REMOVED IT FROM THE DVD PLAYER AND DROPPED IT INTO THE TRASH! I HAD MADE A BAD MISTAKE WHICH WILL NOT BE REPEATED!

Posted by prairiefox1
-----------------------

WAS IT THE 1953 MOVIE, OR THAT PATHETIC REMAKE FEATURING THAT PATHETIC ACTOR FROM A COUPLE YEARS AGO?

(And please turn off your CAPS LOCK key, unless you''re using a Timex ZX-80, in which case you don''t have the option...)
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 June 29, 2008 7:46 PM EDT
I hope enough people now see how they have been taken advantage of to pay the salaries of a priveledged few. These actors and Hollywood types are out of touch with reality. Stop watching TV and movies. Stop giving this industry your money. Stop emulating and idoilizing these fakers. Find yourself and build your own adventure with friends and family.

Posted by u-r-right
----------------------

I did that recently, after adopting a couple of parrots. Friends were supportive and family turned into a cheesy, maudlin soap opera that nearly drove me to suicide. Escapism to far alien worlds via a time machine and pretty women running up and down corridors, mentioning how all the corridors looked the same to them was far more uplifting, I must say...

Of course, I''m a geek and loathe mainstream entertainment all the same, but that''s not entirely relevant to your comments... :) But I would add, many politicians and corporate executives are out of touch too. Or in touch far more than we can ever comprehend, but whatever.
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 June 29, 2008 7:43 PM EDT
Don''''t you remember the days of Moses and Gone With The Wind? Don''''t you remember the setups? The stunt men? The models? The artificially manufactured landscapes? Don''''t you remember all that stuff in movie make? That made movies so.. incredible?

Posted by sidvicious89
------------------------

Again, model work is always best -- and constrained use of CGI makes backgrounds look more authentic, but I agree - star wars and other franchises love to ramp up the amount of action and turn things into a pedantic video game on screen. Gee, most people have a video game system at home and see the same thing already. Movies are supposed to be big events. But it''s obvious society forgot that aspect...

And don''t forget actors like Charleton Heston -- actually a good actor whose occasional use of "ham" only added relish to the scenes he was in, and going into sci-fi in the late 1960s in roles that were sheer opposites of roles he used to play was a stroke of genius. And he''s not a bad actor to boot, though when you mentioned Moses, that''s always the one character he slipped up on. "Let my people go!" seemed to lack something. Now he knew his stuff, but everyone has an off day too.

Of course, Charleton was a VERY decent guy outside the cinema too. I simply cannot imagine him doing the slimy things today''s big name actors readily get away with.
Reply to this comment
by u-r-right June 29, 2008 7:41 PM EDT
I hope enough people now see how they have been taken advantage of to pay the salaries of a priveledged few. These actors and Hollywood types are out of touch with reality. Stop watching TV and movies. Stop giving this industry your money. Stop emulating and idoilizing these fakers. Find yourself and build your own adventure with friends and family.
Reply to this comment
by prairiefox1 June 29, 2008 7:39 PM EDT
I ACCIDENTALLY BOUGHT THE WAR OF THE WORLDS AND WATCHED IT FOR 10 MINUTES! I THEN REMOVED IT FROM THE DVD PLAYER AND DROPPED IT INTO THE TRASH! I HAD MADE A BAD MISTAKE WHICH WILL NOT BE REPEATED!
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 June 29, 2008 7:38 PM EDT
Look, you guys gotta stop the CGI. It really looks stupid. Too many dumbies are making dumby movies. Back in the old days of big big stage setups, ya weeded out the unbelievable by the sheer scope of the undertakings. Nowadays anybody with an idiots idea just puts it on a computer, and its getting rediculous.

Posted by sidvicious89
------------------------

Granted, model work tends to look more authentic and computer graphics, when not used excessively, can add realism -- but they cannot replace plot. Re-making old television is not very innovative either... Unless they try to remake "My Mother The Car". And I fear they actually will try doing that too. (In 2001, somebody was daft enough to shove a new "ElectraWoman and DynaGirl" onto the public, so anything''s possible...)
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 June 29, 2008 7:35 PM EDT
Posted by elicatlover
---------------------

Oh, come on. Without those millions of dollars to stand in front of a microphone and look pretty and hawk scientology, what will Tom Cruise and John Travolta do? Sell Band-Aid brand bandages?
Reply to this comment
by prairiefox1 June 29, 2008 7:33 PM EDT
I DO HOPE THEY ARE STRIKING FOR LOWER WAGES! AND THEN THEY WILL STILL BE GROSSLY OVER PAID!
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 June 29, 2008 7:32 PM EDT
You know how much these cats make, right? Many people are losing their jobs and livelihoods right now, and they don''t make a hundredth of what one famous actor does in a movie.

Granted, they should have DVD residuals, and maybe the CEOs won''t make the customers pony up the difference either. Of course, we''re more likely to wake up tomorrow and see the sky turn a lovely shade of plaid, with the offspring of zebras and kangaroos welcoming us to the galaxy of Xanadu, which has nothing to do with Scientology might I add. Note, I doubt that''s going to happen, but we can always pretend to hope.

Also granted, those who aren''t big name stars are probably more capable AS actors, but only big names get any work in the first place.

Still, with more and more jobs being lost to ''preserve profits'' (which starts a vicious circle that nobody wins), or offshoring, to actually go on strike right now is going to make them look very, very bad.
Reply to this comment
by prairiefox1 June 29, 2008 7:29 PM EDT
JUST LOOK AT WHAT THEY PUT ON TV! SHOWS THAT DON''T NEED ANY WRITING FROM SEQUEL TO SEQUEL! SAME THING WITH DIFFERENT PEOPLE AND THEY ROBBED THE OLD TED MACK AMATEUR HOUR AND THEY WILL NOT HAVE TO DO ANY WORK! JUST GET DIFFERENT PEOPLE! THEY ARE SQUEEZING OUT THE BETTER SHOWS LIKE THE CSI AND LIKE SHOWS! THE WAY THEY ARE GOING I GET JUST ABOUT ALL I NEED FROM THE COMPUTER! NEWS, WEATHER AND COMMUNICATION!
MIGHT WELL THROW OUT THE TV! IT IS NOW WORTHLESS!
Reply to this comment
by prairiefox1 June 29, 2008 6:44 PM EDT
THEY WILL WALK OUT ON STRIKE! I HOPE THEY KEEP ON WALKING! HAVING THE GREATS OF THE PAST YOU WOULD THINK THEY WOULD SEARCH FOR EQUAL OR BETTER BUT NO! THE TALENT OR THAT IS WHAT THEY CALL IT IS MOST TIMES IS REALLY NOT WORTH A 10th RATED FLICK! (STARRING TWO TOES!) WHO??? HAVE YOU NOTICED THE REMAKES AND HOW IT IS TURNED INTO LAND FILL OBJECTS? NOTHING IS TURNED OUT UNLESS IT IS VULGAR, *** OR GORY! AND NOTHING NEW EITHER! JUST COPYING OLD STORYS! WORTHLESS!
Reply to this comment
by hoseobama June 29, 2008 4:30 PM EDT
If we were to pay these people what they were worth, they would be forced to quit for better paying jobs at McDonalds.

Frankly - I hope they go on strike forever. Zip talent. We haven''t seen anything new and worthy of watching anyway.

Who knows - maybe Hollywood will become benign in the coming election.
Reply to this comment
See all 21 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: