February 11, 2009 2:42 PM

Hollywood's Latest Sequel: "Strike II"?

(AP)  Hollywood loves a good sequel, but here's one it could do without: Another union strike just months after the town got up and running again from a devastating walkout by writers.

The contract between the Screen Actors Guild and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers expires Monday, and negotiations have dragged on for weeks with no apparent headway.

SAG leaders have said they are willing to continue talking beyond the contract deadline. Yet their hard-line rhetoric and a squabble with another actors union could put performers on the sidelines, taking electricians, set-builders, caterers and other Hollywood working stiffs along with them.

"If you're a below-the-line worker, your blood is probably running cold, because they're the ones that took the biggest hit from the writers strike," said Jack Kyser, chief economist for the Los Angeles Economic Development Corp., which estimates the WGA walkout cost the town $2.5 billion in lost wages and other revenue.

A strike in July - or a potential actors lockout if producers decided to play tough - could delay the return of many fall TV shows, which normally would be going back into production then.

With a longer lead time, big-screen movies generally are in good shape through the early part of summer 2009, with studios rushing to finish production on most films before the actors' contract expired.

A few films such as "The Hannah Montana Movie" and Tom Hanks' "Angels & Demons" could be forced to shut down if a strike occurred. A long walkout could postpone movies scheduled to start shooting late this summer and fall, including Russell Crowe's "Nottingham."

"The possibility of another strike, especially in this economy, has the town on edge, including the thousands of guild and crew members who are still recovering from the last strike," said Jesse Hiestand, spokesman for the producers alliance.

Big action films could ride out a short strike by turning to other work while actors were off. Lorenzo di Bonaventura, producer of next summer's sequel "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen," said the filmmakers factored in a hiatus where they can get by without actors, working on visual effects instead.

But it would be another blow to an industry that remains in a stall after the writers strike.

"It's not been a complete shutdown, but everybody's been working at pretty minimal capacity the last nine months," di Bonaventura said. "The pain everybody felt over the last nine months certainly makes the prospect of another strike even more foreboding."

While the Writers Guild of America went on strike in general solidarity among members, SAG is a house divided. Its 120,000 members include 44,000 who also belong to the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, and leaders of the two unions are at each other's throats.

AFTRA, with 70,000 total members, negotiated a contract similar to ones writers and directors accepted this year. SAG is holding out for a better deal that many in Hollywood say it cannot realistically achieve in a business stung first by losses from the 100-day writers strike and now by studio stinginess amid the weak economy.

"Militancy has its moments," said James Cromwell, a former SAG board member who is among members of both unions urging AFTRA to approve the deal.

"Under the circumstances, with this town having just gone through a writers strike, militancy is useless," Cromwell said by phone from Shreveport, La., where he is co-starring as George H.W. Bush in Oliver Stone's "W."

While the unions traditionally have negotiated side by side, they split this time, and SAG leaders are actively campaigning to defeat AFTRA's contract, whose results are due July 8.

SAG is pushing for more money on DVD residuals, a raise producers have refused to give other Hollywood unions. Leaders of SAG also say the AFTRA contract shortchanges actors on potential revenue from Internet programming.

"When unions compete with different contract terms, actors lose. It starts a race to the bottom that SAG doesn't want to win," SAG chief negotiator Doug Allen said in a June 23 message asking actors who belong to both unions to vote against AFTRA's deal.

Along with Cromwell, actors such as Tom Hanks, Alec Baldwin, Kevin Spacey and Morgan Fairchild are among hundreds who have signed an agreement encouraging AFTRA members to approve the deal.

SAG, which accounts for about 90 percent of TV production and all of the film industry, insists it can strike a better bargain. But if the AFTRA deal goes through by a wide margin, it could undermine SAG's leaders, who might not be able to drum up the votes should they decide to ask members to authorize a strike.

"The worst thing you can do is to try to get it and fail," AFTRA President Roberta Reardon said. "It's hard to imagine a performer voting yes for one contract then voting to put himself out on the street for the other one."

Alexandra Leighton, a 28-year-old actress who appears in two episodes of the new CBS drama "Swingtown," said she is voting for the AFTRA deal and would oppose a SAG strike.

Leighton backs SAG's demand for tougher consent rules over use of an actor's image in online clips, but she said it was not worth losing her job - her first acting gig outside of commercials.

"Too many people would be put out of work," Leighton said. "It's just not worth it. The economy is already iffy, and it would just crush the local economy."

It also could ruin some TV series. Audiences did without new episodes on many shows for months while writers were on strike. If actors walk and new episodes vanish again, fans could lose interest for good.

When writers returned in February, the feeling in Hollywood was that cooler heads among actors and producers would avert another strike. Optimism gradually eroded as the two actors unions began beating up on each other.

While SAG has struck deals to allow work to continue with many independent producers, studio production that accounts for most of Hollywood employment has been hurled into limbo.
By AP Movie Writer David Germain. AP Business Writer Ryan Nakashima contributed to this report

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 19 Comments
by jerriemc23 July 2, 2008 11:42 AM EDT
can you say more reality tv, think it''s bad now? we will be inundated to say the least.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey June 30, 2008 2:48 PM EDT
[Who gives a sheit about these union pukes]
[Posted by b48151 at 04:57 PM : Jun 29, 2008]

all those that would transact w/ them ... since they might be a bit short on funds if the strike goes thru.
Reply to this comment
by mbcsmith June 30, 2008 12:37 PM EDT
The unions have killed the goose that laid the golden egg in Detroit, maybe thay can do the same for Hollywood.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet June 30, 2008 9:59 AM EDT
Who gives a sheit about these union pukes

Posted by b48151 at 04:57 PM : Jun 29, 2008
+ report abuse

Strange attitude toward your neighbors and fellow countrymen! Do you have a "superior" complex or something or do you think that ONLY the "Special" Class deserves a Contract? Just what are you trying to say swastika breath! Since Bacon''s rebellion, before the nation was a nation, workers have been withholding their labor for fair and better treatment. ONLY Nazi''s have ever objected to such the way you do... Could there be a reason for that?? Now stand... let''s sing it out!! SIEG HEIL BUSH!!
Reply to this comment
by prairiefox1 June 29, 2008 8:33 PM EDT
HAVE YOU SEEN WHO IS STARRING AS BATMAN? HE LOOKS LIKE SOMEONE JUST RELEASED FROM PRISON! JUST WHO IN THE HECK IS HE ANYWAY? PATHETIC!
Reply to this comment
by prairiefox1 June 29, 2008 7:59 PM EDT
WAS IT THE 1953 MOVIE, OR THAT PATHETIC REMAKE FEATURING THAT PATHETIC ACTOR FROM A COUPLE YEARS AGO?

(And please turn off your CAPS LOCK key, unless you''''re using a Timex ZX-80, in which case you don''''t have the option...)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by hypnotoad72
################
I WISH IT WAS THE 1953 ONE! THAT I WOULD HAVE KEPT!
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 June 29, 2008 7:48 PM EDT
I ACCIDENTALLY BOUGHT THE WAR OF THE WORLDS AND WATCHED IT FOR 10 MINUTES! I THEN REMOVED IT FROM THE DVD PLAYER AND DROPPED IT INTO THE TRASH! I HAD MADE A BAD MISTAKE WHICH WILL NOT BE REPEATED!

Posted by prairiefox1
-----------------------

WAS IT THE 1953 MOVIE, OR THAT PATHETIC REMAKE FEATURING THAT PATHETIC ACTOR FROM A COUPLE YEARS AGO?

(And please turn off your CAPS LOCK key, unless you''re using a Timex ZX-80, in which case you don''t have the option...)
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 June 29, 2008 7:46 PM EDT
I hope enough people now see how they have been taken advantage of to pay the salaries of a priveledged few. These actors and Hollywood types are out of touch with reality. Stop watching TV and movies. Stop giving this industry your money. Stop emulating and idoilizing these fakers. Find yourself and build your own adventure with friends and family.

Posted by u-r-right
----------------------

I did that recently, after adopting a couple of parrots. Friends were supportive and family turned into a cheesy, maudlin soap opera that nearly drove me to suicide. Escapism to far alien worlds via a time machine and pretty women running up and down corridors, mentioning how all the corridors looked the same to them was far more uplifting, I must say...

Of course, I''m a geek and loathe mainstream entertainment all the same, but that''s not entirely relevant to your comments... :) But I would add, many politicians and corporate executives are out of touch too. Or in touch far more than we can ever comprehend, but whatever.
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 June 29, 2008 7:43 PM EDT
Don''''t you remember the days of Moses and Gone With The Wind? Don''''t you remember the setups? The stunt men? The models? The artificially manufactured landscapes? Don''''t you remember all that stuff in movie make? That made movies so.. incredible?

Posted by sidvicious89
------------------------

Again, model work is always best -- and constrained use of CGI makes backgrounds look more authentic, but I agree - star wars and other franchises love to ramp up the amount of action and turn things into a pedantic video game on screen. Gee, most people have a video game system at home and see the same thing already. Movies are supposed to be big events. But it''s obvious society forgot that aspect...

And don''t forget actors like Charleton Heston -- actually a good actor whose occasional use of "ham" only added relish to the scenes he was in, and going into sci-fi in the late 1960s in roles that were sheer opposites of roles he used to play was a stroke of genius. And he''s not a bad actor to boot, though when you mentioned Moses, that''s always the one character he slipped up on. "Let my people go!" seemed to lack something. Now he knew his stuff, but everyone has an off day too.

Of course, Charleton was a VERY decent guy outside the cinema too. I simply cannot imagine him doing the slimy things today''s big name actors readily get away with.
Reply to this comment
by u-r-right June 29, 2008 7:41 PM EDT
I hope enough people now see how they have been taken advantage of to pay the salaries of a priveledged few. These actors and Hollywood types are out of touch with reality. Stop watching TV and movies. Stop giving this industry your money. Stop emulating and idoilizing these fakers. Find yourself and build your own adventure with friends and family.
Reply to this comment
See all 19 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook