February 11, 2009 2:43 PM

Plants Migrate North As Temperatures Rise

(AP)  Faced with global warming, plants are heading for the hills.

A study of 171 forest species in Western Europe shows that most of them are shifting their favored locations to higher, cooler spots.

For the first time, research can show the "fingerprints of climate change" in the distribution of plants by altitude, and not only in sensitive ecosystems, said Jonathan Lenoir of AgroParisTech in Nancy, France.

His team found "a significant upward shift of species optimum elevation, the altitude where species are the most likely to be found over their whole elevation range."

Indeed, comparing the distribution of species between 1905 and 1985 with their distribution between 1986 and 2005 showed a shift upward of 95 feet per decade, researchers led by Lenoir report in Friday's edition of the journal Science.

The team studied the preferred location of plants from sea level up to more than 8,500 feet in six regions in France. AgroParisTech is the agricultural branch of the Paris Institute of Technology.

This shows that the effects of climate change are being felt in all areas, not just mountain summits and polar regions, explained co-author Pablo Marquet of the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile.

Unlike animals, of course, plants can't just pick up and move in search of a better home.

But plant species do move, as seeds that are spread tend to grow better in one place than another - in this case at higher elevations in preference to lower ones.

Quickest to relocate, not surprisingly, were plants such as herbs, ferns and mosses with shorter life spans and faster reproduction cycles, the researchers said. Not so fleet were large woody plants that reproduce more slowly.

In fact, long-lived plants like trees that reproduce slowly are more threatened by climate change because they can't quickly relocate, Lenoir said.

Herbs, by having a short life cycle, have had several generations while trees have had just one, noted co-author Jean-Claude Gegout of AgroParisTech.

The plants studied tended to be the most common ones in the mountain forests of France, Lenoir said, allowing the researchers to collect the largest possible amount of information.

Of the 171 species studied, 118 moved uphill and 53 edged downward, the researchers said.

"Individual species behave differently, but as a whole the set of species we studied shows a clear and significant response associated to a shift in their distribution upwards," Lenoir said in an interview via e-mail.

There are a number of possible local reasons for some plants to shift downhill, he said, but the aim of the study was to look at large-scale change and not specific plant species.

"The most important result of our study is that among our 171 species, most are shifting upward," Lenoir said.

To calculate the upward advance of 95 feet per decade the team compared optimum plant locations in 1993 and 1971. The average location of plants from 1905 to 1985 occurred in 1971, while 1993 marked the average locations between 1986 and 2005.

Linda Mearns, a senior scientist at the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research, called the study "an important contribution to the growing literature documenting the effects of climate change."

"The fact that the authors are looking at the shift in the spatial core of the range, and not only the shifts at the boundaries of the ranges, makes the research particularly valuable," said Mearns, who was not part of the research team.

In a separate paper, Jeremy Collie of the University of Rhode Island reports that there has been a shift over nearly 50 years in the fish present in Narragansett Bay and Rhode Island Sound.

"While we're catching more fish now, we're also catching smaller fish," said Collie, "and that corresponds with how the preferred temperatures of the fish here have changed. The fish community now is dominated by warm-water adapted species compared with what we started with."

Water temperature in the bay is up about three degrees Fahrenheit since 1959, and the preferred temperature of the fish caught in the trawls has also increased by that amount, he said.

"That seems to be direct evidence of global warming," he said. "It's hard to explain any other way."

His findings appear in the July issue of the Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 35 Comments
by eddynewhope June 29, 2008 6:29 PM EDT
Posted by EndTimes22 at 07:11 PM

You fuggin religious fanatics can eat sh-t. You have damaged this country beyond repair and you have soiled the Christian faith with your hypocrisy. I hate your fuggin religion not because of the religion, but because of the twisted mess you morons have turned it in to. Jesus would be mortified by you and your like. You are as far from a Christian as you are from a patriot, and since you are the big "believer", it is you who are going to hell - which I might add is a fictitious concept created by your leaders to keep you idiots in line. Excuse you but it''s YOUR kind who''s time has come.
Reply to this comment
by jimfinster June 28, 2008 11:51 PM EDT
EndTimes22:

Not arrogance.

I have no training or experience in medicine, therefore I do not presume to tell the doctor how to do his/her work.

You clearly have no training or experience in science. Therefore you should not presume to comment on these types of articles. Your ideological positions are of no consequence.


Reply to this comment
by jimfinster June 28, 2008 10:34 PM EDT
EndTimes22

Move on over to a religious story of some kind, and post there. You are not qualified to make comments on scientific subjects. Thanks.


Reply to this comment
by smurfcrusher June 28, 2008 6:21 PM EDT
Ballooning population. (I hate typos). and no, EndTimes22, by that I don''t mean the population of people that like hot air balloons.
Reply to this comment
by smurfcrusher June 28, 2008 6:20 PM EDT
This is no freakin'' joke. These are serious issues, much of the West gets its drinking water from melting snowpack. As the mountains warm up, less water will be available for the balooning population.

I think EndTimes22 is a victim. Specifically, too much lead paint as a child.

Apparently he or she doesn''t understand that birds can carry seeds, and most of them actually fly. Believe it or not, some birds fly North! Pretty amazing, huh?
And there''s... soil! Soil that can germinate and support plant life.

But in the past, the cold winters would kill off grape plants, hence, no wine. But now, the area is warm enough to support grape plants hundreds of miles inland, when previously it was too cold.

Hopefully EndTimes22 gets it now.

p.s. It may be shocking, but in addition to natural migration north, some people have been known to actually move seeds to other locations and grow plants where the environment will support them. And they can make money after the harvest! Imagine that.

(rolls eyes)
Reply to this comment
by eddynewhope June 28, 2008 2:46 PM EDT
How many people who read this article find it "hilarious" as does EndTimes22? How many of you take this seriously? No judgement what-so-ever intended, just curious to know how people view these stories that appear on a daily basis now.
Reply to this comment
by eddynewhope June 28, 2008 2:39 PM EDT
EndTimes22 - What PR firm pays your salary? What kind of cynical piece of sh-t do you have to be to sit here an tow Exxon and Chevron and Cheney''s line as the North Pole may be ice free for the first time in history this summer, the midwest is under water, and California burns? I hope they pay you well. You are either ignornant beyond words, or you are the worst kind of sellout mother-fu**er on Earth - at least Cheney and his cronies get their millions. What do you get?
Reply to this comment
by newtagagain June 27, 2008 3:30 PM EDT
As I was growing up in England the idea of English wine was non existant. The first English winery started in Kent in the south around 30 years ago. Now grapes are grown as far north as Yorkshire. That''s over 200 miles in 30 years. Hmmmm!
Reply to this comment
by rf35 June 27, 2008 1:27 PM EDT
Posted by MCVet at 09:16 PM : Jun 26, 2008

Sorry to have to tell you this, but as a member of the media, let me assure you that we DO dumb down our stories. We are, after all, dealing with Republicans and Neocons as well as educated Americans.
Reply to this comment
by smurfcrusher June 27, 2008 10:30 AM EDT
YO, MCVET & SMURF, can you believe these comments? Up, North? Wha? I didn''''t see Al''''s name in there anywhere.

Posted by aerhed

See Hypnotoad''s post on the previous page, he includes a reference to Al Gore (but on a first-name basis).

I''ve heard of plants migrating north. And of beetle infestations decimating pines at high northern latitudes that previously were too cold to support such outbreaks. And of bees creating gigantic hives in the southern US because the winters aren''t cold enough to kill them off.
http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/25/nature-on-stunning-new-climate-feedback-beetle-tree-kill-releases-more-carbon-than-fires/

Reply to this comment
See all 35 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook