June 26, 2008 5:00 PM

Troubling Trend In HIV/AIDS Diagnoses

(WebMD)  HIV diagnoses in the U.S. are on the rise among men who have sex with men, especially among males aged 13-24.

That news comes from the CDC, which tracked HIV/AIDS diagnoses reported by 33 states from 2001 to 2006.

During that time, those states had 214,379 HIV/AIDS diagnoses. Men who have sex with men account for almost half - 46 percent - of those diagnoses.

Every year from 2001 to 2006, HIV diagnoses among men who have sex with men rose by 1.5 percent overall. But that figure doesn't tell the whole story.

The youngest men, those aged 13-24, had the steepest estimated annual increase - 12 percent in HIV/AIDS diagnoses. And the increase was higher - 15 percent per year - for African-American men aged 13-24 who have sex with men, compared to 9 percent among white and 8 percent among Hispanic men of the same age who have sex with men.

Men who have sex with men were the only high-risk group to show an increase in HIV diagnoses during 2001-2006. HIV diagnoses dropped during that time among heterosexuals who have high-risk sex, injection drug users, and men who are injection drug users who also have sex with men.

The findings appear in the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

'Troubling' Trend

The CDC's new report is about HIV/AIDS diagnoses, not infection rates. Many people with HIV don't know they're infected.

But the new HIV/AIDS diagnosis statistics may be a red flag that HIV infection is rising among men aged 13-24 who have sex with men.

"Because these men probably have not been sexually active for a very long period of time, there's reason to believe that these diagnoses probably represent fairly recent infections and so it's an indication that infections may be increasing in this population," Richard Wolitski, PhD, acting director of the CDC's division of HIV/AIDS Prevention , tells WebMD.

Increased HIV testing probably doesn't explain the trend, according to the CDC.

'Sero-Sorting' Risk

The increase in HIV diagnoses among young men who have sex with men may partly be due to "sero-sorting," in which men who have sex with men choose monogamous relationships with partners whom they believe have the same HIV status as them. But they may be mistaken about their HIV status.

Some men, especially younger men, have "begun to shift from using condoms consistently as their primary risk-reduction strategy to sero-sorting," says Wolitski. He explains that while sero-sorting works theoretically in a monogamous relationship, it's risky in the real world because some men may be HIV positive and not know it.

"Most men who have sex with men have been tested at least once before," says Wolitski. He notes that in a 2005 CDC study conducted in five U.S. cities, 84 percent of the men who were HIV positive and didn't know it had been tested at least once before, but 58 percent hadn't had an HIV test in the past year.

"CDC recommends that all sexually active men who have sex with men be tested for HIV on at least an annual basis, and we recommend that [men who have sex with men] who are engaging in risky sexually practices be tested more frequently," says Wolitski.

June 27 is National HIV Testing Day, notes the CDC, which has posted a list of HIV testing sites online.

"It's not the case that men who have sex with men no longer care about getting HIV or are intentionally seeking HIV infection," says Wolitski. "The vast majority of men who have sex with men still are actively taking steps to avoid contracting HIV, and we know that HIV prevention interventions continue to be effective for this population."

Generation Gap

HIV prevention messages still work, but it can be hard to reach males as young as 13, says Wolitski, who sees the Internet as one potential way to get HIV prevention messages to young men.

Growing up decades after HIV/AIDS started may also be a factor.

"There seem to be some additional challenges in trying to introduce regular condom use among younger men, perhaps because they haven't had the experience of seeing the impact of the AIDS epidemic in the earlier years of the epidemic," says Wolitski.



By Miranda Hitti
Reviewed by Brunilda Nazario
©2005-2008 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved

© 2008 WebMD, LLC.. All Rights Reserved.
Add a Comment See all 19 Comments
by oigen June 29, 2008 8:50 AM EDT
Gaye5 writes......
"American.... AIDS deaths in 2007 2.1 million" ?????
Where did you get these numbers from? Out of your rear ***? The CDC is claiming only some 15,000 so-called AIDS deaths.
Reply to this comment
by gaye5 June 28, 2008 11:54 AM EDT
spadeisspade, I feel that it is you who is narrow minded you are not admitting that there homosexuality is a very dangerous life threatening life style, whic through bisexuals will effect us and our children in the future..
You said that We engage in risky behavior on a daily basis-getting into a car is risky, of course it is, but one doesnt set out to be killed in a car accident but homosexuals life expectency is only 50 yeats because of most homosexuals having diseases that can kill received from their many partners every week.. Oh yes I know that some have a semi permanate partner but most just roam around..

American.... AIDS deaths in 2007 2.1 million
Adult....... AIDS deaths in 2007 1.7 million
AND
Child....... AIDS deaths in 2007 0.33 million
What were the deaths from car accidents in America...
Reply to this comment
by gaye5 June 28, 2008 11:23 AM EDT
ConcernedMD, It is no longer just Aids that is the problem, as you would know, disease amongst homosexuals is on the increase 70% fold, plus there is now at least 8 new sexually transmitted germs were identified between 1980 and 1997. Dr. Max Essex, chair of the Harvard AIDS Institute, warned Congress in 1992 that "AIDS has already led to other kinds of dangerous epidemics, which of course will flow over into hetrosexuals through bisexuals.. But hetrosexuals deserve this as they have not put a stop to homosexuality, they have turned a blind eye to it..

Reply to this comment
by gaye5 June 28, 2008 11:17 AM EDT
Wolitski says, HIV prevention messages still work, but it can be hard to reach males as young as 13.. HEY, these are boys not young males, and why are the animals who are raping them not in jail.. how else does a boy get aids if they are that young they have to be manipulated into the act or raped both are rape.
Doesnt America do anything about *** offenders of children now, has America sunk that low...???
I am not American so I dont know... and am beginning to be glad that I dont live there if this is the way Americans think of their kids, where is the outrage from parents, schools, leaders, and especially religious leaders..
Reply to this comment
by gaye5 June 28, 2008 11:12 AM EDT
rushman71, so true.. Homosexual behavior is lethal. Nearly 1,000,000 Americans have been infected with HIV.
Sexual diseases are self inflicted and if people knew that homosexuals do they would hunt these blighters out of the city.. eg..
The typical sexual practices of homosexuals are a medical horror story - imagine exchanging saliva, feces, (which is ingested when homosexuals use their tongue around the ***), *** and/or blood with dozens of different men each year. Imagine drinking urine, and experiencing rectal trauma on a regular basis.

Given the evidence above, and just as we do with Drugs etc, a loving person, or legislators, would say "No" to homosexual behavior especially as the homosexual lifestyle is extremely high-risk and often leads to disease and even death so "in light of the irrefutable medical facts, it should be considered criminally reckless for educators to teach children that homosexual conduct is a normal, safe and perfectly acceptable alternative form of sexual expression (or ''sexual orientation'').
Reply to this comment
by concernedmd June 28, 2008 3:58 AM EDT
The medical community condemns the promotion of teen sexual activity and sexual exploitation of children and adolescents. Male childhood sexual abuse has dire consequences, esp. psychological trauma associated with difficulty bonding with one partner for a lifetime (Holmes, 2005)

Promiscuity is antithetical to health and wellness.

I am old enough to recall the first AIDS patients at our hospital. My compassion was not enough to save them from the ravages of this burgeoning epidemic.

Healthy choices and self-discipline CAN prevent AIDS. Practice chastity until marriage and monogamy in marriage. Renounce the exploitation of youth. Act with personal responsibility. Build a future with dignity.

Journal of Urban Health. 2005
"Men''s pathways to risky sexual behavior: role of co-occurring childhood sexual abuse, posttraumatic stress disorder, and depression histories."
Holmes WC, Foa EB, Sammel MD.

"Recent reports of sexually transmitted infection-rate increases among men indicate the need for renewed study of male sexual risk behavior to aid development of...risk reduction interventions. Men who have childhood sexual abuse (CSA) histories consistently report frequent sexual risk behavior. "Sexual partnership patterns unique to men with CSA histories and comorbid PTSD/depression appear to lead to substantially higher numbers of ''lifetime sexual partners''..."
Reply to this comment
by mr_totten June 27, 2008 11:03 PM EDT
You''''re a homophobe.

Posted by spadeisspade
... ... ...
What is a homophobe?
Reply to this comment
by spadeisspade June 27, 2008 9:50 PM EDT
RF35:

You''re being incredibly narrow minded about paying "your share" of insurance premiums. We engage in risky behavior on a daily basis-getting into a car is risky, and we have insurance to cover that. People choose to eat and get fat, which skyrockets health problems, yet you focus on homosexuality? Out with it (no pun intended). You''re a homophobe.
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 June 27, 2008 8:57 PM EDT
I''m sure that new marriage law will help... (I doubt it; words vs actions and all that...)

I shouldn''t be cynical. They either wanted to die, or decided it felt so good it didn''t matter.

Pity this article came out during ''Pride Month''(tm) too.

I''ve lived a long life and have seen a lot... all I know is, those saying it''s a disease-ridden lifestyle do have some merit.
Reply to this comment
by rf35 June 27, 2008 8:11 PM EDT
I figure, if they want to risk their lives having unprotected gay seks, let them! BUT, deny them any publicly funded health care for any ailments associated with their homosexuality, right down to hemorrhoids. Private insurance pays or the cost comes out-of-pocket. I have no problem with people who choose this lifestyle so long as I don%u2019t wind up paying for it. I see it like paying for care for a whitewater rafter who broke a leg while on the rapids...why pay for his choice to engage in a risky activity?

As far as the ages go, I love how society has designated 18 as the magic age of adulthood. What total krap! I was more mature at 14 than most 21-year olds I know today! Physical and mental maturity, especially in regards to sexual activity, need to be determined in a different way. I don%u2019t know exactly what the best way would be other than going on a case-by-case basis (not very practical), but it sure isn%u2019t designating an arbitrary magic age.
Reply to this comment
See all 19 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
Better Information. Better Health.
CBS News on Facebook