Fla. To Spend $1.8B On Everglades Rescue
State Will Buy 300 Miles Owned By Polluting Sugar Processing Plant
-
U.S. Sugar, which owns nearly 300 square miles in the Everglades, may sell its land to the state so that it can be restored to its natural state. (AP)
-
Interactive Eye On The Environment Find out how global warming, air pollution and alternative forms of energy impact our world.
- Stories
- State Fast Facts: Florida
The deal with U.S. Sugar Corp. results from a convergence of interests: The state is trying to restore the Everglades and clean up pollution caused by Big Sugar and other growers, while the American sugar industry is being squeezed by low-price imports.
Republican Gov. Charlie Crist declared the agreement "as monumental as the creation of our nation's first national park, Yellowstone."
Under the deal, the state would buy U.S. Sugar's holdings in the Everglades south of Lake Okeechobee, including its cane fields, mill and railroad line. U.S. Sugar would be allowed to farm the 187,000 acres for six more years, after which it would go out of business.
The state would then protect the land from development, which has been encroaching on the Everglades for decades.
State officials would also build a network of reservoirs and marshes to filter water flowing into the Everglades and help restore the River of Grass to a cleaner, more natural state. For generations, farming and development have blocked the natural flow of water and allowed fertilizers and other pollutants to spill into the wetlands.
Negotiations are still going on, and officials hope to sign a final agreement by September.
David Guest, a lawyer with the environmental group Earthjustice and a longtime foe of U.S. Sugar, gloated over the announcement. "In the old days, you didn't just beat your opponent, you also ate them," he said. "Today, we're eating U.S. Sugar."
The deal would not end sugar production in the Everglades. Some 300,000 acres of land, or close to 500 square miles, used by other companies would remain in production.
"But it makes it a lot more manageable," said Ken Ammon, deputy executive director of the South Florida Water Management District, the state agency overseeing restoration efforts. "It totally changes the face of Everglades restoration ... No one ever thought that a whole corporation like U.S. Sugar would up and potentially leave the Everglades."
Ammon said that considering the land and the other equipment on the property, the sale price "looks like a tremendous deal" for the state.
U.S. Sugar chief executive Robert Buker called the deal "monumental" but said he was saddened to see the demise of his company. Its 1,700 employees, including those who work in the mill and operate the cane-cutting machinery, will lose their jobs, though the state is offering them retraining.
"We built a company that right now is the pillar of the agriculture community in Florida," Buker said. "Because of that, I stand here today with mixed feelings. ... On the other hand, I'm excited about what we're doing here today."
The entire American sugar industry has struggled with stiff competition from imported sugar.
At least 33 mills have closed nationwide in the past decade as producers try to remain competitive in a market flush with sugar from the likes of Brazil and Thailand, which have lower labor costs than U.S. producers, and, unlike the United States, subsidize their sugar growers, said Phillip Hayes of the American Sugar Alliance.
"Sugar producers are receiving less for their product now then they did when Jimmy Carter sat in the Oval Office," he said.
Last year, U.S. Sugar - which grows and refines sugar and sells it wholesale or packages it under private labels for about 60 customers, including Publix and Albertsons supermarkets - shut down its other mill, blaming foreign competition.
In recent years, U.S. Sugar has also had to bear the higher costs of cleaning up its water before it enters the Everglades.
The company's vice president, Robert Coker, said U.S. Sugar began talks with the governor last year "to make sure our business for the long-term was sustainable."
"Out of those discussions with the governor, he put on the table that maybe we should just buy U.S. Sugar out," Coker said. "After we caught our breath and picked ourselves up off the floor ... we all decided that this was a good deal for the people of Florida, for the Everglades and the environment, and a good deal for our employees and our shareholders."
The Everglades restoration effort is the largest of its kind in the world. It is aimed at undoing or rerouting decades of flood-control projects that were built to make way for houses and farms.
A key component was approved by Congress in 2000. The project was originally estimated to cost $7.8 billion and take 30 years. The price tag has since ballooned by billions because of rising construction and real estate costs, and it is unknown how long it will take. The state and federal governments are supposed to share the costs 50-50.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- p51driver said, "Listen to the tree huggers cry when the price of sugar triples and more is added to our trade deficit...."
---
Actually, the joke is US sugar is one of the most subsidized industries in the world, and this under a nominally "free trade" Bush regime. Were federal price supports dropped, sugar prices would drop as well.
And you would be a tree hugger, yourself, if you understood how important preserving the environment is to what you like to call "quality of life". Put down the manual to your toy airplane, and try understanding how the environment matters.
Meanwhile, Gov. Crist and the state of Florida should have sued US Sugar for destroying a wetlands. There is ample precedent under federal law. But Crist is a GOP governor, and that simply requires too much understanding. - Reply to this comment
- WE need nature.all the gas,malls,pizza joints,starbucks,banks, factories,mansions,ect...won''t mean nothing when e have no air to breaath,water to drink or soil to grow food.
- Reply to this comment
- Sniffing glue this evening?
- Reply to this comment
- You redneck kneejerks need a cranial ***! P51, I assume you''re some kinda aviator wannabe, why don''t you honk on my augmented exhaust?
- Reply to this comment
- the article said the company was closing anyways due to cheap overseas sugar. There are still hundreds of plants spuing gunk. The everglades are a vital part of the Florida water system, and if even a little bit can be turned back into what it once was, GOOD! Being a tree hugger isn''t a bad thing ya know, where do you think you get your oxygen from? ethenol plants?
- Reply to this comment
- The timing could not be better! 1700 jobs or so down the tubes in this economy. Excellent! BTW, you ignorant, misguided tree huggers, when it comes to the production of Ethanol, cane sugar is the most efficient use of arable land. I have visited plants that, different from the corn ones, actually pump electricity back into the grid, since absolutely nothing is lost. The pulp, once free of the juice, is dried and then used as fuel, used in the distillation process. Just when we need alternatives to towel head oil, we choose to blow away an amazing resource!!! Great job, you amazing cluster of misguided idiots!!!!
- Reply to this comment
- Yahoo! someone is finally doing something right!!!! The company was going under anyways, how cool for them to give it back to the glades!
- Reply to this comment
- Bad for food prices, good for conservation.
- Reply to this comment
- Listen to the tree huggers cry when the price of sugar triples and more is added to our trade deficit.
- Reply to this comment
- Good for the environment but not so good for the 1700 people whose jobs are being lost. Mixed feeling being mostly positive.
- Reply to this comment




