KABUL, Afghanistan, June 21, 2008

Afghan Fatalities Rise; Deadlier Than Iraq

Surge In Violence Makes Country Deadlier For Foreign Troops

  • Play CBS Video Video Corruption Plagues Afghanistan

    Hopes for socioeconomic progress have been diminished in Afghanistan, as U.S.-led coalition forces witnessed their deadliest month in the war-torn region. Mark Phillips reports from London.

  • An Afghan soldier stands guard at a check point, as the Arghandab district is seen in the back ground after it was recaptured from the Taliban militants in Kandahar province, south of Kabul, Afghanistan on Friday June 20, 2008. Photo

    An Afghan soldier stands guard at a check point, as the Arghandab district is seen in the back ground after it was recaptured from the Taliban militants in Kandahar province, south of Kabul, Afghanistan on Friday June 20, 2008.  (AP Photo/Musadeq Sadeq)

  • Special Report War On Terror

    Complete coverage of the military's battle against terrorism.

  • Fast Facts Afghanistan

    Learn about the people, economy and history.

(CBS/ AP)  Roadside bombs killed five more foreign troops and five government soldiers in Afghanistan, part of a surge of violence that has made the country's battlefields deadlier for foreign forces than those in Iraq.

The U.S. administration has already highlighted the statistic to lobby its NATO allies - with limited success - to commit more forces to Afghanistan - a conflict likely to test the West's stomach for a long, grinding war.

Marvin Weinbaum, a former State Department official and now an Afghan expert at the Washington-based Middle East Institute, said the rising casualties would sharpen the focus on Afghanistan in the U.S. presidential race.

"What's being brought home is the nature of the conflict. It's in the true fashion of a guerrilla operation and we're not prepared for it," Weinbaum said Saturday.

The Taliban's tactics have been changing - fewer direct confrontations with coalition forces and more roadside bombs, reports CBS News correspondent Mark Phillips.

A bold attack on a prison in which 350 Taliban fighters were freed earlier this month was another sign of the insurgency's growing confidence.

Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai says the insurgency is being organized out of border regions of Pakistan and is threatening to carry the fight back.

"Afghanistan has the right of self-defense when they cross the territory from Pakistan to come and kill Afghans and kill coalition troops. It exactly gives us the right to go back and do the same," he said.

Violence continues unabated, despite the more than 60,000 foreign troops in the country and fresh pledges of financial aid to Karzai's struggling government.

Last year, more than 8,000 people were killed in insurgency-related attacks - the most since the 2001 U.S.-led invasion - and violence has claimed more than 1,700 lives so far this year.

In Saturday's deadliest incident, a roadside bomb hit a coalition convoy west of the southern city of Kandahar, killing four troops and wounding two others.

Coalition spokesman Lt. Col. Paul Fanning said gunmen opened fire on the damaged vehicles and three Afghans were also hurt.

He declined to release the nationality of the troops, who were involved in training Afghan forces.

To the east, a Polish soldier from the separate NATO-led force died when a bomb hit his patrol after midnight in the Dila district of Paktika province. Jacek Poplawski, a Polish military spokesman in Warsaw, said four other soldiers were wounded.

The bombings capped a bloody week.

NATO and Afghan troops backed by warplanes on Wednesday attacked up to 400 Taliban militants who had seized the strategic Arghandab valley, within striking distance of Kandahar.

Lt. Gen. Sher Mohammad Karimi, chief of operations for the Afghan Defense Ministry, said Afghan troops had counted the bodies of 94 insurgents and were holding 29 suspects.

About three-quarters of the militants were foreigners, and villagers said they heard them speaking Arabic and Urdu - the main language of Pakistan, Karimi told reporters in Kabul.

A total of 31 foreign troops have died this month, including four British soldiers, four American troops and another member of the U.S.-led coalition killed earlier this week, according to an Associated Press tally.

In Iraq, where violence has decreased in recent months, 19 have died, though the 200 killed there so far this year is double Afghanistan's total.



© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Video and Galleries from World

Add a Comment See all 285 Comments
by sgtrds-e4 June 21, 2008 10:09 PM PDT
Afghanistan was the right war in the right place at the right time. It''s a shame that too the Bush regime it was only a ruse to get troops into the area for the war he really wanted. A war on invasion, conquest, occupation and oppression in Iraq because it was more profitable and with his own personal basis of wanting to show up his dad.
Reply to this comment
by dobbershome June 21, 2008 10:34 PM PDT
Bomb them back to the stone age. Oops,there already their.
Reply to this comment
by randynason June 21, 2008 11:06 PM PDT
Before she died, my sister knit an afghan once. It was awfully warm and picked up lint likes nobobdy''s business. I kept it. Barney sleeps on it, now.

Excerpt from George Bush''s big fat diary of lies
Reply to this comment
by randynason June 21, 2008 11:14 PM PDT
Laura told me I spelled "nobody" wrong. Dang!

George Bush, the Precedent of the Knighted Steaks
Reply to this comment
by babooph June 21, 2008 11:15 PM PDT
The war is going great-the rich have enough from their years of massive tax cuts to never pay for it,or fight in it. The middle class will rot on the vine paying for it with their reduced funds-all is going to plan.While the lower classes plan their funerals we can watch the rich at the Bush White House reception.
Reply to this comment
by hermitdave June 22, 2008 1:30 AM PDT
The Afghan crusade humans die for the drug kings. The Iraq crusade humans die for the oil kings.
Reply to this comment
by jerr11 June 22, 2008 1:38 AM PDT
Afghanistan was the right war in the right place at the right time.

Posted by SgtRDS-E4 at 10:09 PM : Jun 21, 2008


Good post!

Yeah, I was happy to see the Taliban defeated and on the run.

Unfortunately Halliburton''s not into camel dung and poppy.

That''s why Bush decided to invade Iraq.

And why we lost the war in Afghanistan.

I predict President John McCain will decide to pull out our troops from Afghanistan in late 2009 and focus the country''s efforts in Iraq.

It''s part of Halliburton''s master plan for the region.

And why President McCain?

The neocons will pull out all the stops in November.

The swiftboat veterans for lies will emerge shortly.

Harold Ford ads will also begin to run in the summer.

We might have a slam dunk invasion of Iran in October!

And if all else fails, steal the elections once again in November!








Reply to this comment
by sgtrds-e4 June 22, 2008 2:17 AM PDT
Posted by jerr11 at 01:38 AM : Jun 22, 2008


Let them try. The only real way to stop Barack is an assassins bullet and the secret service knows it and is capable of stopping Cheney and his cronies from pulling it off. If something happens to barack you can be sure it''ll be passed off as racial, but that Di*cky Boy Cheney and his kind will be the monsters that would really be behind it.

As for stealing the election, by the time November rolls around the only way they can steal the election is to be so blatant that even just the average citizen will be so outraged that they''ll riot in the streets. If there is even a hint that the GOP stole this election there will be armed insurrection and revolution in the streets. Some Americans may not want Barack, but no real American wants his or her vote taken away. they won''t stand for it and I''ll be proud to be one of the first to shed blood and spill blood if that happens. After Novemeber one of two things will have happened. The people''s voice will have been heard in an honest election or it will be heard through gunfire in the streets.
Reply to this comment
by trishab4 June 22, 2008 2:17 AM PDT
-Actually it''s all non necessary war. All this blood letting is a real spillage. It''s done on purpose to make the military industry work and run for more taxpayers'' money collecting and keep the government afloat! It''s actually the most militarised government in the World.

-We have never really been in danger of attacks over our nation. If everything was correct, the hollywood senario has been successful. And we have been duped all the way by the Monkey Liar935Bush. www.zeitgeistmovie.com

-My best regards!
Reply to this comment
by trishab4 June 22, 2008 2:17 AM PDT
-Actually it''s all non necessary war. All this blood letting is a real spillage. It''s done on purpose to make the military industry work and run for more taxpayers'' money collecting and keep the government afloat! It''s actually the most militarised government in the World.

-We have never really been in danger of attacks over our nation. If everything was correct, the hollywood senario has been successful. And we have been duped all the way by the Monkey Liar935Bush. www.zeitgeistmovie.com

-My best regards!
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 June 22, 2008 2:52 AM PDT
Bush ignored this war-- the original, legitimate "war on terror"-- for most of his first and second terms.

Asked about the search for bin Laden, Bush once casually commented that he did not spend a lot of thing thinking about the fugitive.

Bush thought obsessively, however, about how to shovel more assets into his Iraq debacle.

The result? Seven years of misdirected policy has produced higher US casualties and a stalemated war. The Taliban is resurgent, and the prospect of a massive effort against the Taliban all but out of the question.
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 June 22, 2008 2:53 AM PDT
Bush ignored this war-- the original, legitimate "war on terror"-- for most of his first and second terms.

Asked about the search for bin Laden, Bush once casually commented that he did not spend a lot of time thinking about the fugitive.

Bush thought obsessively, however, about how to shovel more assets into his Iraq debacle.

The result? Seven years of misdirected policy has produced higher US casualties and a stalemated war. The Taliban is resurgent, and the prospect of a massive effort against the Taliban all but out of the question.
Reply to this comment
by kretos-2009 June 22, 2008 3:34 AM PDT
bush is prophet o%u0131f satan !!!
Reply to this comment
by dobbershome June 22, 2008 5:45 AM PDT
How can we win this war? Any suggestions.
Reply to this comment
by harpoot June 22, 2008 6:52 AM PDT
This is a war the west will not win. Nobody has ever conquered Afghanistan, even the Soviets who were about as brutal as they come. Bring ''em all home, same for Iraq and let them sort out the issues themselves and in their own way.
Reply to this comment
by hunterdon6 June 22, 2008 8:11 AM PDT
Talk about riots and killing if obama isn''t elected president. Whats with you people? Try growing up and getting a life.
Reply to this comment
by downsteamjim June 22, 2008 8:24 AM PDT
"Afghan Fatalities Rise" Last year more than 8,000 killed, so far this year more than 1,700. Call the Math Police or the proofreaders. June 21 is over half way through the year. Half of 8,000 would be 4,000. Data presented shows a substantial drop.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet June 22, 2008 8:27 AM PDT
"Afghan Fatalities Rise" Last year more than 8,000 killed, so far this year more than 1,700. Call the Math Police or the proofreaders. June 21 is over half way through the year. Half of 8,000 would be 4,000. Data presented shows a substantial drop.

Posted by downsteamjim at 08:24 AM : Jun 22, 2008

This from a Bootlicker who actually BELIEVED Saddam attacked us on 9/11!! That''s all that needs to be said about this post! These poor fools didn''t have a clue then and they still don''t. Sieg Heil Bush
Reply to this comment
by mcvet June 22, 2008 8:31 AM PDT
What gets me is - if the Afghani and the Iraqi people DISLIKE the taliban SOOOO much, why don''''t THEY do something about it besides sitting there whining about it? If the "men" over there are so proud of that thing hanging between their legs, why don''''t they GROW A PAIR and defend their own country?

**sarcasm off now**

Posted by Demongirl60 at 07:18 AM : Jun 22, 2008
+ report abuse

Ummm! Maybe because that''s their cousin or uncle? ROFLMAO It''s NO DIFFERENT than the situation we found ourselves in during the early 60''s. It''s a problem that ONLY the folks in the Middle East can solve and THEY must be willing to fight for it themselves... we can NOT "Give" our system to them... WE can not force them at gun point to honor the seperation of Church and State, which in the end is the ANSWER to the whole problem. By the way the Taliban is NOT in Iraq. Sieg Heil Bush
Reply to this comment
by downsteamjim June 22, 2008 8:39 AM PDT
McVet: Since you must be are a kindergarten drop out, I knew that fourth grade math would be too much for you. Just imagine momma put 4 cookies in one plate and 2 in another plate. Which plate has the most cookies? P.S. I hope the words aren''t too big for you.
Reply to this comment
by dudeky June 22, 2008 9:16 AM PDT
OBAMA GETS HIS MONEY FROM THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES ...IT CAN BE IN ONE HUNDRED DOLLAR INCREMENTS BUT I STILL SAY IT COMES FROM IRAQ AND ELSE WHERE OVER SEAS.....NO WAY HE IS GETTING SMALL FUNDS FROM PEOPLE OVER HERE AND RAISING MONEY LIKE HE HAS...HE IS A THIRD WORLD MAN AND THAT IT THAT PRAY FOR ALL OF US WE NEED HELP FROM ABOVE WITH THIS ONE....HE IS A FREAKY PERSON WE KNOW NOTHING ABOUT
Reply to this comment
by liberalme June 22, 2008 9:34 AM PDT
everyone listen to mcvet he has an inside track on the taliban

Posted by jamesm12341 at 09:08 AM : Jun 22, 2008

Great input there jwind11--well thought out, intelligent and to the point---idiot, you are
insignificant.
Reply to this comment
by liberalme June 22, 2008 9:37 AM PDT
because afghan and iraqi people are just cowardly as americans like mcvet......they would rather *** and moan than do anything constructive.....sad

Posted by jamesm12341 at

You call Mcvet a coward? What branch of the military did you serve in jwind1? huh? Come on tell us==coward.
Reply to this comment
by geneonlbk June 22, 2008 9:40 AM PDT
I wonder how many Americans believe that their vote makes any difference at all. We vote for candidates hand picked by the rich and powerful so we end up voting for ''A'' or ''A''. War is good for those who profit from suffering. Fear and propagandized enemys enable the rich people controlled government to exact even more money from the working class with causing a revolution.

Just try forming a third or multi-party political system in America and see how the government and the corporate controlled media will pound on the movement and kill it at all costs.

Alas we live in an oligarchy called democracy. Its a place where classism abounds and the rich are slowing driving the working rabble into subjugation. There are many who feel that democracy is a four letter word.
Reply to this comment
by liberalme June 22, 2008 9:47 AM PDT
another coward here folks.....may i introduce you to the one and hopefully only Liberalme...what I am about to post is true because it is from her previous posts.....liberalme posted that she needs the president to make her "all better"...i ask you this, isnt it up to everyone to make themselves "all better"? next...and you wont believe me but she actually posted this....couple of months ago, liberalme posted that she sits around and worries about what cindy mccain looks like without makeup on....i am not kidding!! she posted that!! now...with all the problems in the world...what in the hell does it matter what another person looks like without makeup on?

Posted by jamesm12341 at 09:42 AM : Jun 22, 2008

Your blather sounds like someone who has been over -psychoanalyzed and institutionalized.
You are a transparent angry person and how''s this?

The WORLD will be better once Bush is out of office and Cindy McCain? I bet she''s butt ugly without makeup..
Reply to this comment
by rowdywicca June 22, 2008 10:00 AM PDT
Obama pissed off the Arabs and Jews in one speech
Obama gave three different stances on Venezuela in two days
Obama pissed off a whole nation by calling them typical white people
Obama pissed off rural people by basically calling them ignorant
Obama pissed off half the country by insinuating everybody the criticizes him are racists
Obama lied about his ancestors, his stances on half the issues, his associates and mentors, his legislative prowess which is NIL
Obama promoted public financing, then killed his own stance by being greedy
Obama pissed off half the voters by buying the nomination and threatening his opponent into backing him or else
Obama''''''''s grumpass wife hasn''''''''t done anything for anybody but herself, says she''''''''s never been proud of her country, and calls America mean...what the hell?
Obama''''s just pissed because McCain suggested a solution before he got to it...I mean that''''s what his oil and energy people PAID him to do...

I mean how many passes are Obama supporters going to give this idiot before they wake up!!!???
Reply to this comment
by hotpaulie June 22, 2008 10:04 AM PDT
It is an embarrassment that a big powerful country like the U.S. can''t take care of business in Afghanistan.
Reply to this comment
by hoseobama June 22, 2008 10:14 AM PDT
"It is an embarrassment that a big powerful country like the U.S. can''t take care of business in Afghanistan. - Posted by hotpaulie



OR, it is a footnote to those now silent, far left idiots that claimed the surge would never work. More people are being murdered in Illinois than service men/women are dying in Iraq.

Civilian casualities are WAY down in Iraq. The Iraquis people have joined us in ridding their country of insurgents which have been targeting them. Now, they are able to create a just government for themselves.

And Obama wants to throw away what 4000 of or brave men and women have given their all for.

This man is NOT qualified to be a leader of our country. He makes decisions based upon polls rather than what is the correct course of action.

It takes a brave man to lead, not just anyone.
Reply to this comment
by mcdad27 June 22, 2008 10:20 AM PDT
My son is putting his life on the line for people like you to call it an embarrassment!!! What is embarrassing is that people like you live in the U.S.
Reply to this comment
by mcdad27 June 22, 2008 10:23 AM PDT
My son is putting his life on the line for people like you to call it an embarrassment!!! What is embarrassing is that people like you live in the U.S.
Reply to this comment
by downsteamjim June 22, 2008 10:24 AM PDT
Once again the math does not match the headline.
Reply to this comment
by rowdywicca June 22, 2008 10:32 AM PDT
It will always be strange to me that the Taliban was a great US ally in helping fight the Russians out of Afghanistan, and all of a sudden they''re enemy #1!

If the US wants to pull out of Iraq and let them settle their differences, then my vote is to pull out of Afghanistan and let these people settle their own differences!

You can''t have it both ways! It''s ridiculous!
Reply to this comment
by hoseobama June 22, 2008 10:34 AM PDT
mcdad27 - Please, Thank your son for his service to our country. We need fine men like himself.

May God protect and watch over him.
Reply to this comment
by babooph June 22, 2008 10:36 AM PDT
You in the propaganda system should have shown our troops the Bush wedding ;so they see what they''re fighting for.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt June 22, 2008 10:36 AM PDT
When standing amies are used to combat guerilla forces, you get the "balloon'' effect.

Squeeze here, and it swells there.

Geurillas always operate most where defenses are weakest.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt June 22, 2008 10:37 AM PDT
My son is putting his life on the line for people like you to call it an embarrassment!!! What is embarrassing is that people like you live in the U.S.

Posted by mcdad27 at 10:23 AM : Jun 22, 2008

It is not your son''e fault he was ordered into a boondoogle.

Same thing happened to me in Vietnam.

Those of us who see insanity in this mess are not ungrateful for your son''s service.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt June 22, 2008 10:43 AM PDT
Posted by RowdyWicca at 10:32 AM : Jun 22, 2008

What the US should do is involve the neighboring Arab countries in settling Afghanistan and Iraq, as opposed to the high and mighty "we''ll do it our way" approach that has been maintained for the last 6 1/2 years now.

Arabs can and should settle their own differences without being dictated to by the west.

It''s more than obvious that the neocon strategy is a dead failure if, after 6 1/2 years in Afghanistan now, we''re still at square one.

It completely amazes me that there are those who see no advance with the strategy, year after year, and say "let''s keep doing it forever even though it obviously doesn''t work"....

Insanity.
Reply to this comment
by Latrocinor June 22, 2008 10:44 AM PDT
I see the know-it-all morons are out today. LOL!!

Bush is counting the days to get away from you losers.

You got better government and better soldiers that you''ll ever deserve.
Reply to this comment
by downsteamjim June 22, 2008 10:45 AM PDT
Rowdy Wicca: We supported Afghans who fought the Soviets who invaded Afghanistan after Iran went from a strong prowest force to what it is today [thanks to Jimuh Carter]. After the Soviets left there was civil war. The Pakistani govt. was most responsible for the Taliban and their rise in the 1990''s.
Reply to this comment
by Latrocinor June 22, 2008 10:47 AM PDT
These morons would blame Timothy Mcveigh on Bush if they could.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt June 22, 2008 10:47 AM PDT
You got better government and better soldiers that you''''ll ever deserve.

Posted by bhoogren at 10:44 AM : Jun 22, 2008

Warriors, yes.

But 74% of the counry completely disagrees with you abut Bush....not to mention most of the free world, BTW.
Reply to this comment
by hoseobama June 22, 2008 10:47 AM PDT
RowdyWicca, so let me explain it to you.

Things are relative in the world. For example: What is being rich ?

Bill Gates ? There are Millions of people in India that are certain you and I are rich beyond belief.

Ever hear of the saying The enemy of my enemy is my friend. It has been described as an Arabic proverb. And, while not always the most efficatious way to approach a problem, it is one route.

This is how the Taliban became first our friend, then our enemy. Their evilness was relatively small when compared to the USSR. Once that issue was gone, the Taliban''s evilness got out of hand and provided a training ground for Al Qaeda.

So now they pay the price, so we can be safe.

Does this little history lesson not ring bells for you ?
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt June 22, 2008 10:48 AM PDT
These morons would blame Timothy Mcveigh on Bush if they could.

Posted by bhoogren at 10:47 AM : Jun 22, 2008

I can see why you''re so bitter.

Even you realize that neoconism is now merely the fringe movement it so richly deserves to be.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt June 22, 2008 10:50 AM PDT
Posted by hoseobama at 10:47 AM : Jun 22, 2008

Good post.

But, I would add, the US has a history of backing despots for short term convenience and always has to pay the piper after the fact for that expediency.
Reply to this comment
by downsteamjim June 22, 2008 10:54 AM PDT
To forumsu... Speaking of support for despots. Look how many poster here love Cuba, N. Korea, Iran, the Taliban, Sudan, Saddam''s Iraq, Russia etc.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt June 22, 2008 10:57 AM PDT
To forumsu... Speaking of support for despots. Look how many poster here love Cuba, N. Korea, Iran, the Taliban, Sudan, Saddam''''s Iraq, Russia etc.

Posted by downsteamjim at 10:54 AM : Jun 22, 2008

I assume that you refer to those who don''t see war as the preferred way to settle differences.
Reply to this comment
by hoseobama June 22, 2008 10:58 AM PDT
formrusmcsgt, I understand your balloon analogy, but would like to point out that the reason Iraq is now slowing down, is because the people there are starting to assume the responsibility to keep insurgents out for themselves.

They have finally gotten to the point where they understand that it is people from the outside that want to terrorize them. Yes, there is a potential for civil war, but it will stand a much better chance of not happening, if the insurgents are kept out of Iraq.

The Iraquis are finally accepting that we are not there to hurt them, but to protect them. They are starting to realize the insurgents almost always want to hurt them to get the civil war unrest going. It is only thru this unrest that the insurgents can operate freely.

The insurgents, al qaeda, taliban, or what ever you want to call them are all the same - jihadists trying to gain popularity thru power. In this case, they are unwelcome and their numbers swell where ever they can operate.

It is simply easier to operate in Afganistan now than in Iraq.
Reply to this comment
by Latrocinor June 22, 2008 10:59 AM PDT

But 74% of the counry completely disagrees with you abut Bush....not to mention most of the free world, BTW.

Posted by formrusmcsgt
.. .. ..
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

This was a quote from President Clinton during a presentation at the Pentagon defending a decision to conduct military strikes against Iraq.
Reply to this comment
by hoseobama June 22, 2008 11:01 AM PDT
"But, I would add, the US has a history of backing despots for short term convenience and always has to pay the piper after the fact for that expediency.

Posted by formrusmcsgt


It would seem so, formrusmcsgt.


I''m not sure at the time we saw any alternative.


In the case of the Taliban I think it seemed the correct thing to do to put USSR in a bad place.

I wonder how we could have supported the Taliban and not have the problem we have today. It would be good to learn from these mistakes.
Reply to this comment
by Latrocinor June 22, 2008 11:02 AM PDT
"Iraq is a long way from USA but, what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

This is a quote from Albright during an appearance at Ohio State University by Albright, who was Secretary of State for Bill Clinton.
Reply to this comment
See all 285 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs