OTTAWA, June 21, 2008

Analysis: McCain Hampered By Missteps

Controversy Dogs GOP Candidate As Campaign Pushes Towards General Election

  • Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., boards his campaign jet before leaving Ottawa, Canada, Friday, June 20, 2008. Photo

    Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., boards his campaign jet before leaving Ottawa, Canada, Friday, June 20, 2008.  (AP Photo/LM Otero)

  • Photo Essay John McCain

    Some call him a hero, some a maverick. Will Americans call him Mr. President?

  • In-Depth VP Hot Sheet: McCain

    CBSNews.com ranks the top contenders to be McCain's running mate.

(AP)  By Associated Press Special Correspondent David Espo.

Call it campaign growing pains. Or bad luck. Or a combination of the two.

By any name, Sen. John McCain is hampered by missteps and self-generated controversy in the early days of the general election campaign for the White House.

Take his most recent trip through several states and the Canadian capital, a five-day span during which he courted conservatives and independents alike, raised more than $10 million and began detailing his considerable differences with Sen. Barack Obama on energy policy.

Still, on Tuesday, he criticized his rival for proposing a windfall profits tax on the oil industry. The attack was complicated by McCain's earlier statement that he would consider the same thing.

The following day, he met with a group of Hispanics in Chicago. Aides who had kept word of the event secret were placed on the defensive within hours after one participant criticized some of McCain's comments.

On Thursday, the Arizona senator flew to Iowa, a likely battleground state in the November election, where he expressed sympathy with victims of severe flooding and pledged support for federal recovery aid. The event was overshadowed by President George W. Bush's appearance elsewhere in the same state on the same day.

Friday's trip to Canada brought more controversy.

McCain arrived aboard his chartered campaign jet, yet told reporters at a news conference, "this is not a political campaign trip." The senator added he did not feel it was appropriate to have the government pay "while I am the nominee of my party."

The centerpiece of the six-hour visit was a speech to the Economic Club of Canada that amounted to a cross-border political attack. McCain criticized Obama, without mentioning him by name, for his opposition to the North American Free Trade Agreement.

"Demanding unilateral changes and threatening to abrogate an agreement that has increased trade and prosperity is nothing more than retreating behind protectionist walls," he said.

McCain's schedule also included mention of an unspecified "finance event." While that is customarily campaign jargon for a fundraiser, foreigners may not donate to U.S. candidates, and one aide was quoted in advance as saying that money from $100-per-person event would simply defray the cost of the earlier luncheon.

The non-fundraiser, which may or may not have cost $100 to attend, was held on the top floor of a building with a commanding view of the city skyline. McCain said he knew some of those in attendance had homes in Arizona in the cold weather, and at one point, referred to his campaign themes of "reform, peace and prosperity."

Even some Republicans have cringed in recent weeks at the campaign's efforts to ramp up for the fall campaign, although they will speak only privately.

McCain's aides minimize the difficulties.

One top aide, Mark Salter, said if McCain had not gone to Iowa, he would have looked indifferent to "a great natural calamity and the suffering it has caused." The senator has frequently criticized President Bush for his administration's response to Hurricane Katrina.

Salter also said McCain had told the Hispanic audience nothing about immigration that he hasn't told dozens of town hall audiences. He blamed the dustup on a member of the Minuteman organization that opposes giving illegal immigrants any path to legal status.

Salter noted that the speech in Canada contained no overt mention of Obama.

McCain himself told reporters late in the week he remains opposed to the windfall profits tax.

Not that Obama and the Democrats weren't trying to stir controversy at every step.

By the time the sun fell on the day of the Iowa trip, an aide to Gov. Chet Culver said the Democrat had privately relayed a request to McCain to cancel his plans to avoid diverting law enforcement personnel from recovery efforts. Salter said the visit had been cleared in advance by local officials.

And McCain was still on Canadian soil when the Democratic National Committee announced it was filing a Freedom of Information Act request for State Department records detailing the involvement of Ambassador David Wilkins during the trip.

That sort of guerrilla tactic is routine in any presidential campaign. Republicans spent much of the week, for example, drawing attention to Obama's announcement that he would reject public campaign funding for the general election, a major reversal.

And in truth, no candidate can expect to make it through a grueling presidential campaign without suffering one or two self-inflicted wounds - the most grievous of which are far worse than anything that has happened to McCain.

Republican President Gerald Ford's declaration in 1976, at the height of the Cold War, that there was "no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe" was a memorable one.

Or more recently Democratic Sen. John Kerry's decision to go windsurfing in 2004, an event that Republicans turned into a metaphor for a politician who shifts with the wind.

Obama himself spent days in the Democratic primary race trying to explain away remarks he made at a closed-door fundraiser that small-town Americans who were bitter over their economic plight turned to religion.

Republicans took notice of that one, and Obama can expect to hear more about that moment in the fall.

Arguably, McCain has yet to make that kind of gaffe despite enduring a candidacy of remarkable adversity in which he went from front-runner to the campaign cellar and back again.

And for all the talk his critics like to stir about his temper, he never betrayed a hint of displeasure as he made his campaign rounds during the week.

Not even when one man at a Minnesota fundraiser upbraided him for opposing oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

"Thank you for that question," McCain replied.


David Espo covers presidential politics for The Associated Press.

© MMVIII, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video and Galleries from Politics

Add a Comment See all 250 Comments
by greatdrivew June 21, 2008 3:01 PM PDT
Don''t worry McCain, you don''t have to win the Presidency. Instead, all you have to do is sit back and let the Democrats lose it.

At this time in the 1988 Presidential Election, Mike Dukakis was leading George H W but about the same margins Barack is currently leading. And if memory serves me, Mike lost.

So all McCain has to do is wait for the Democrats to pass this FISA bill. Then, McCain can just sit back and watch as the DNC collapses - yet again.

Pelosi and Clyburn have once again proven they are frauds. Now We the People wait on Reid and Obama.
Reply to this comment
by suet123-2009 June 21, 2008 3:13 PM PDT
McCain said he NEVER LOVED America until he was a POW!! How old was he when he went to Vietnam??? 30 something??? I find this very disturbing. I, for one, have ALWAYS LOVED my country!
Reply to this comment
by von_marko June 21, 2008 3:15 PM PDT
I''m voting Democrat because I''m mad that George W. Bush hasn''t caught Bin Laden. That''s because everybody knows Bin Laden is the only Islamic terrorist in the world.
Reply to this comment
by von_marko June 21, 2008 3:16 PM PDT
I''m voting Democrat because our enemies on the battlefield deserve comfy hotel rooms, Pay-Per-View, prostitutes and all the benefits of American citizenship.
Reply to this comment
by von_marko June 21, 2008 3:19 PM PDT
I''m voting Democrat because the real cure for racism includes preferential policies based on race -- particularly in presidential voting. If you believe that a black candidate ought to be qualified, as well as black, you''re worse than Adolf.
Reply to this comment
by ranakarimi June 21, 2008 3:19 PM PDT
In behalf of milllions of hard working under edjucated!! american women i would like to congrajulate senator McCain az our next president so dont worry senator u are in good hands
Reply to this comment
by von_marko June 21, 2008 3:22 PM PDT
I''m voting Democrat because I believe in minority rights (except in Muslim countries), free speech (with regard to pornography but not conservative talk radio), environmentalism (unless we''re talking about Al Gore''s house), diplomacy (but never backed by the threat of military force) and a woman%u2019s right to kill her baby (but not societies right to execute serial killers.
Reply to this comment
by von_marko June 21, 2008 3:23 PM PDT
I''m voting Democrat because I like the words "hope" and "change." Also "kazoo." That''s a funny word.
Reply to this comment
by von_marko June 21, 2008 3:25 PM PDT
If you learned to read, thank a teacher.
If you learned to read English, thank a soldier.
If you learned the Koran during your first 7 years of schooling, you must be named Obama.
Reply to this comment
by von_marko June 21, 2008 3:29 PM PDT
I''m voting Democrat because it''s my body, and if I want to kill my baby, I''ll do it, even if its head is in the birth canal. If I want to cut out my intestines and feed them to the crocodiles, I''ll do that too. That''s the freedom our forefathers enshrined in the Constitution.
Reply to this comment
by watcher269-2009 June 21, 2008 3:30 PM PDT
Anyone have the picture of John McCain shaking hands with Saddam Hussein? I believe it was taken about the same time that Rumsfeld took his with Saddam. Oh, Where are all the Bush Sr. Pictures of the two together?

Want to talk about fraternizing - just look at Bush/McCain they''re the ones that were buddies with Hussein!
Reply to this comment
by von_marko June 21, 2008 3:31 PM PDT
I''m voting Democrat because I believe that America''s founders were rich, white, greedy xenophobes, and that America''s founding principles are hogwash requiring periodic editing from an unelected group of liberal judges.
Reply to this comment
by von_marko June 21, 2008 3:35 PM PDT
IF YOU ARE AFRAID OF MUSLIMS YOU MUST BE VAN_BIGOT
Posted by king_quest at 03:31 PM : Jun 21, 2008

Yeah, Why should I be afraid of Muslims?? It''s not like they have killed over 7,000 Americans just in the last 7 years or anything! Oh, wait, yes they have.
Reply to this comment
by von_marko June 21, 2008 3:49 PM PDT
I''m voting Democrat because I believe that the best strategy in war is defeat. It broadens the mind to learn Japanese, German and Arabic. Talk about multiculturalism!
Reply to this comment
by von_marko June 21, 2008 3:51 PM PDT
In arguing that the country should back off a policy that causes too much pain, Obama adviser Danzig said, Winnie the Pooh seems to me to be a fundamental text on national security. Danzig was expected to meet Wednesday as part of Obamas 13-member Senior Working Group on National Security. It includes former members of Congress and high-ranking Clinton administration officials.
Reply to this comment
by von_marko June 21, 2008 3:52 PM PDT
Obama is a stinky pants pooh pooh head!
There, I communicated in a way that all the young Obama supporters can understand
Reply to this comment
by von_marko June 21, 2008 4:01 PM PDT
"Come on! I just answered, like, eight questions." --Barrack Obama
Like OMG, Like stop bugging me, like I''''m only 12
Reply to this comment
by von_marko June 21, 2008 4:03 PM PDT
Wise man say..
If you are 20 years old and not a liberal, you have no heart!
If you are 40 years old and not a conservative, you have no brain!
If you are 14 years old, drinking red bulls in your Spiderman under roos, then you must be an Obama supporter posting on this blog!
Reply to this comment
by von_marko June 21, 2008 4:11 PM PDT
GOP Rep. John Peterson%u2019s latest bid to lift domestic offshore drilling restrictions, was killed this week by the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior and the Environment. It was a straight, party line vote.

Democrats voting against lowering gas prices:

Chair: Norman D. ***** (WA)
James P. Moran (VA)
Maurice D. Hinchey (NY)
John W. Olver (MA)
Alan B. Mollohan (WV)
Tom Udall (NM)
Ben Chandler (KY)
Ed Pastor (AZ)
Dave Obey (WI), Ex Officio

Republicans voting for lowering gas prices:

Ranking Member:
Todd Tiahrt (KS)
John E. Peterson (PA)
Jo Ann Emerson (MO)
Virgil H. Goode, Jr. (VA)
Ken Calvert (CA)
Jerry Lewis (CA), Ex Officio
Reply to this comment
by staycalm June 21, 2008 4:12 PM PDT
Obama is a celebrity of the Paris Hilton variety. In any other age we would see him for what he is...a pretty face and vapid platitudes but in our media obssessed society his marketers have made himm look like the real thing and we are falling for it.
Reply to this comment
by von_marko June 21, 2008 4:15 PM PDT
Just how much Senate experience does Barack Obama have in terms of actual work days? Not much.

From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United State Senator, to the time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he logged 143 days of experience in the Senate. That%u2019s how many days the Senate was actually in session and working. Of course he has the highest "Not Voting" moral cowardice statistics in Senat history but...

After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World, and fill the shoes of Abraham Lincoln, FDR, JFK and Ronald Reagan.
143 days

%u2014 I keep leftovers in my refrigerator longer than that.
Reply to this comment
by smashwl7 June 21, 2008 4:24 PM PDT
Get real McExxon is talking about honesty, McFlipper, McFlip, McFlop, McFlopper! McChange with the wind. McKill Women and Children with Napalm! McLeave my wife while she was dieing on her death bed! McNAFTA; giving American jobs away.
Reply to this comment
by shawnhussey June 21, 2008 4:39 PM PDT
Senator McCain has demonstrated well that he can weather tough media scrutiny and criticism from opposing campaigns.I think he is doing a good job of reaching out to Independents and disaffected Democrats.He is also working hard to secure his Republican base.As a pro-life conservative, I was heartened to read that if elected President, John McCain will nominate justices to the Supreme Court in the mold of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito.If Senator McCain adheres to the right-to-life principles of the GOP, he has a fine chance of becoming our next President.
Reply to this comment
by smashwl7 June 21, 2008 4:52 PM PDT
My friends I need to change my depends!

My friends we do not need health care, we need to Bomb the the sick with Naplam! It worked well in Vetinam.

My friends my wife is a "C"!
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt June 21, 2008 5:28 PM PDT
Still, on Tuesday, he criticized his rival for proposing a windfall profits tax on the oil industry. The attack was complicated by McCain''s earlier statement that he would consider the same thing.
---
McFeeble can''t even remember his own positions, poor thing....
Reply to this comment
by kenbomc June 21, 2008 5:40 PM PDT
I''m voting for McSame because his wife likes to steal drugs from her own charity.
Reply to this comment
by mr2258 June 21, 2008 5:40 PM PDT
Word on the street is Obama was caught having *** with another man.Michelle is leaving him.I hope someone has it on tape.
Reply to this comment
by jn122736 June 21, 2008 6:04 PM PDT
Prior to McCain%u2019s fervent support of the Iraq fiasco, (lately ALL of the Bush administrations disastrous policies) he enjoyed wide admiration and respect from both side of the political aisle.

Now, however, he has lost most of that respect (from both parties) because of his constant flip-flopping on almost every thing he once stood for.

He sometimes appears to be unaware of the fact that much of what he says today plainly contradicts what he had said previously.

Anyone can, and indeed should, change their mind/opinion when confronted with new information that disproves or contradicts their previously held position on a given subject, but McCain has changed, back and forth, on too many things, just during this campaign, to be attributable to new enlightenment.

The sheer number of incidents can only be attributed to deliberate dishonesty or mental infirmity (senility) and either one should be considered disqualifying for a presidential candidate.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet June 21, 2008 6:19 PM PDT
Senator McCain has demonstrated well that he can weather tough media scrutiny and criticism from opposing campaigns.I think he is doing a good job of reaching out to Independents and disaffected Democrats.He is also working hard to secure his Republican base.As a pro-life conservative, I was heartened to read that if elected President, John McCain will nominate justices to the Supreme Court in the mold of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito.If Senator McCain adheres to the right-to-life principles of the GOP, he has a fine chance of becoming our next President.

Posted by ShawnHussey at 04:39 PM : Jun 21, 2008
+ repo

LOL Yeah right!! LOL I have a chance of becoming the King of England too... About as much chance as John McBush has of becoming President! SIEG HEIL BUSH!!
Reply to this comment
by mcvet June 21, 2008 6:22 PM PDT
%u2014 I keep leftovers in my refrigerator longer than that.

Posted by von_marko at 04:15 PM : Jun 21, 2008

SO YOU think this is a bad thing?? I''ve had enough of the Politician''s like McSame who have been bought and paid for by Lobbiest. It''s time we put one of our OWN in office... someone who''s been out here in the real world and knows what it''s about. Nope sparky! You give the VERY best reason of all, the VERY reason the Government was designed by our Liberal Founders.. to be governed by one of THE PEOPLE!! Sieg Heil Bush
Reply to this comment
by element51 June 21, 2008 6:28 PM PDT
von_marko...You are one of the main reasons that will give Obama my vote. There are many other reasons but you are right up there. Your insulting posts are moronic and show that you do not possess the ability to think for yourself. The threads of Limbaugh rants can clearly be seen in your ramblings. There are issues involved here that are far more important and must be considered. You can vote for who ever you choose, you have that right. But I can take issue with your juvenile posts. That is my right. So we have a stand off. Our votes cancel each other out. But, so help me, I will do everything I can to help Obama win the election. The one thing I won''t do is to clutter up these message boards with smart arse comments.
Reply to this comment
by incog-nito June 21, 2008 6:33 PM PDT
Quote from McCain in his pre-flip-flop days:

%u201CThere%u2019s one big difference between me and the others%u2014I won%u2019t take every last dime of the surplus and spend it on tax cuts that mostly benefit the wealthy. I%u2019ll use the bulk of the surplus to secure Social Security far into the future to keep our promise to the greatest generation.%u201D

%u2014McCain campaign commercial, January 2000.
Reply to this comment
by incog-nito June 21, 2008 6:36 PM PDT
More quotes from McCain against a tax cut for the rich, before he was for it:

%u201CMr. President, the principle that guides my judgment of a tax reconciliation bill is tax relief for those who need it the most%u2014lower- and middle-income working families. I am in favor of a tax cut, but a responsible one that provides significant tax relief for lower- and middle-income families. And I commend Sen. Grassley for moving in that direction. But I am concerned that debt will overwhelm many American households. That is why tax relief should be targeted to middle-income Americans. The more fortunate among us have less concern about debt. It is the parents struggling to make ends meet who are most in need of tax relief.

%u201CI had expressed hope that when the reconciliation bill was reported out of the Senate Finance Committee, the tax cuts outlined would provide more tax relief to working, middle-income Americans. However, I am disappointed that the Senate Finance Committee preferred instead to cut the top tax rate of 39.6% to 36%, thereby granting generous tax relief to the wealthiest individuals of our country at the expense of lower- and middle-income American taxpayers.%u201D

%u2014Senate floor statement during debate over President Bush%u2019s tax relief package, May 21, 2001.
Reply to this comment
by incog-nito June 21, 2008 6:41 PM PDT
McCain''s bashing of the religious right, before he embraced them:

"...Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell and a few Washington leaders of the pro-life movement call me an unacceptable presidential candidate. They distort my pro- life positions and smear the reputations of my supporters.

Why? Because I don%u2019t pander to them, because I don%u2019t ascribe to their failed philosophy that money is our message."

McCain - 2/28/2000
Reply to this comment
by randynason June 21, 2008 6:45 PM PDT
McCain is hampered because he''s a chronic fu*k-up.
Reply to this comment
by taotxzen June 21, 2008 6:45 PM PDT
(CONT)

Webb said that he had been considering changing his bill to include a transferability option. But instead of working with him, McCain and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) went ahead and introduced an opposing bill. While it did have transferability, it also had less generous educational benefits.

This was never the real reason Bush and McCain opposed the legislation. Their constant complaint was that Webb%u2019s version was too generous and would lead to a drop in military retention:

McCain: %u201CI want to make sure that we have incentives for people to remain in the military as well as for people to join the military.%u201D

Bush administration: %u201CThe last thing we want to do is provide a benefit %u2014 or the last thing we want to do is create a situation in which we are losing our men and women who we have worked so hard to train.%u201D

As the CBO concluded, these claims about retention were inaccurate. The Pentagon also argued that it was too generous to confer benefits on troops after %u201Conly%u201D two years of service, and legislation offered by McCain and his Senate allies would have reserved the most generous benefits for those who have served at least 12 years, excluding most servicemembers.
Reply to this comment
by taotxzen June 21, 2008 6:46 PM PDT
Bush And McCain Try To Steal Credit For Webb%u2019s GI Bill That They Consistently Worked To Defeat - Greatness!

Yesterday, House leaders in both parties struck a deal on a war supplemental bill that includes expanded college benefits for veterans. The GI Bill is Sen. Jim Webb%u2019s (D-VA) version, as well as a provision allowing troops to transfer the benefits to family members. President Bush has promised to sign the legislation.

Now, however, Bush and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) %u2014 the two most vocal opponents of Webb%u2019s bill %u2014 are trying to take credit for it. They are claiming that they always supported the generous benefits %u2014 their main concern was just ensuring the benefits%u2019 transferability:

McCain: That has always been my primary concern with respect to the Webb bill. %u2026 With the addition of the transferability provisions sought by Senators Graham, Burr, myself and others to give service members the right to transfer earned G.I. Bill benefits to spouses and children, we will have achieved in offering vastly improved educational benefit.

Bush: Throughout the past five months, President Bush and members of his Administration have worked hard to ensure that an expansion of GI benefits includes transferability. %u2026 The President is pleased that Congress answered his call.

(CONT)
Reply to this comment
by mr2258 June 21, 2008 6:46 PM PDT
Word of Obama having s*x with another man may be cleared up.Seems he was sucking a cigar.It was a honest mistake.sri, smoking a cigar.
Reply to this comment
by Syndicate June 21, 2008 6:48 PM PDT
No one is perfect. I''m only right %75 percent of the time. The way I see it is John McCain seems to make honest mistakes. He may flip flop on issues like drilling. But hey there is a new reality called $5 Gas. Obama seems to be hiding some thing I just don''t trust him. He was to good for a flag pin. Now I think he showers with it. He constantly twist McCain''s words and then cries about it when the tables are turned. Now Obama wants to overturn the immunity for the telecoms?!? This is just smoke and mirrors. Civil rights? If your worried about civil rights there are far better and more important issues than eavesdropping. For Example Sexual profiling. Yes its just like racial but with a twist. Cops like to pull over pretty girls. I use to have long blond hair. I cut it because I was tired of the police stopping me. Although it was entertaining to see there reaction when they realized I was a dude and not a chic. My point is police harassment of the public is far worse than this possible abuse of power, yet you hear nothing about it. Were is this Democratic Congress on such an important civil rights issues? Truth is they are too busy trying to blow smoke up your a$$ to care. I have to say I am proud of the American people for seeing it. Congress has a dismal %19 approval rating. Only Congress could make Bush look good.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet June 21, 2008 6:54 PM PDT
Only Congress could make Bush look good.

Posted by cbscrash07 at 06:48 PM : Jun 21, 2008
+ report abuse

Well tell all of us here WHERE exactly does McSame differ from Bush! If there is ONE thing MOST American''s can agree on it''s that we need to take this nation in a different direction. "Trickle Down" and the Bush Economic Plan was a complete FAILURE!! McSame want''s to continue that! What about Social Security. Since the PEOPLE completely REJECTED the attempt by Bush the whole thing has been dropped. McSame agrees with Bush on "Fixing" Social Security. Then there''s Medicare.. Same thing there... as is the case with Health Care, Iraq and so on! Please do not say the PERSON who IS proposing a CLEAR path out of Trickle Down and Bush''s policies when McSame want''s to keep selling the same tired old lines. IF I hear ONE more Fascist say they are going to Cut Taxes, Cut Spending and Balance the Budget, I''m going to HURT someone. THEY HAVE NEVER DONE IT YET!! Sieg Heil Bush
Reply to this comment
by mr2258 June 21, 2008 6:55 PM PDT
Word has it the cigar that Obama was smoking was Bill Clinton''s brand.Makes you wonder.
Reply to this comment
by incog-nito June 21, 2008 6:57 PM PDT
McCain was against offshore drilling, before he was for it.
Reply to this comment
by incog-nito June 21, 2008 6:58 PM PDT
McCain was anti-ethanol, before he is pro-ethanol.
Reply to this comment
by incog-nito June 21, 2008 6:59 PM PDT
McCain was against presidential candidates campaigning at Bob Jones University before he was for it.
Reply to this comment
by mr2258 June 21, 2008 7:01 PM PDT
The Great Obama...puff puff puff
Reply to this comment
by darkskyabov June 21, 2008 7:02 PM PDT
Obama has changed his stance in the last six months over 635 times? Obama is a flip flopper!
Reply to this comment
by incog-nito June 21, 2008 7:05 PM PDT
%u201CWithout privatization, I don%u2019t see how you can possibly, over time, make sure that young Americans are able to receive Social Security benefits.%u201D

McCain, March 2003

%u201CI%u2019m not for, quote, privatizing Social Security. I never have been. I never will be.%u201D

McCain, June 2006
Reply to this comment
by jmurrieta1 June 21, 2008 7:07 PM PDT
"Obama is a celebrity of the Paris Hilton variety. In any other age we would see him for what he is...a pretty face and vapid platitudes but in our media obssessed society his marketers have made himm look like the real thing and we are falling for it. "--Posted by staycalm


Riigght! That''s how Obama graduated from Harvard law school, editor of law review, because he''s like Paris Hilton.

The only reason McCain was not thrown out of the Naval Academy is that his daddy was a rich admiral and the Naval Academy knows which side its bread is buttered on.

In fact, McCain''s rich admiral daddy may have been the only reason that McCain got into the Naval Academy in the first place.

While Paris Hilton is Republican material--born to an ultra-rich family, never accomplished a thing in her life, graduated from the University of ********.
Reply to this comment
by incog-nito June 21, 2008 7:07 PM PDT
%u201C...most great civilized countries have an income tax and an inheritance tax%u201D and %u201Cin my judgment both should be part of our system of federal taxation.%u201D

%u201C...the estate tax is one of the most unfair tax laws on the books.%u201D

John McCain
Reply to this comment
by mr2258 June 21, 2008 7:15 PM PDT
How much does Obama pay you guys to post all of this BS for him ?
Reply to this comment
See all 250 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs