AP/ February 11, 2009, 2:45 PM

Husband Charged With Honeymoon Murder

An American tourist was charged with murder in Australia on Friday for allegedly drowning his wife during a honeymoon dive on the Great Barrier Reef.

Police immediately began preparing a warrant for the arrest of the suspect, Daniel Gabriel Watson of Birmingham, Alabama - the first step in what are likely to be drawn-out extradition proceedings.

Watson faces a maximum penalty of life in prison if convicted of murder. His lawyer did not immediately enter a plea, but he has argued that the evidence does not support any criminal charge and that police have seemed intent on blaming him anyway.

The suspect was not present in court and his exact whereabouts were unclear. The charge was formally made by a coroner who conducted a months-long inquest into whether there were suspicious circumstances in the death of Christina Mae Watson on Oct. 22, 2003.

The 26-year-old woman, known as Tina, drowned while diving on a historic shipwreck near the northeastern city of Townsville as her husband of 11 days looked on.

Watson, usually called Gabe, declined to testify at the inquest, although videotaped interviews with police formed a key part of evidence before it.

In the interviews, Watson said his new bride apparently had trouble a few minutes into the dive, panicked and clutched at his mask, pushing it off his face. He described seeing her, with her eyes wide and arms outstretched toward him, sinking into the deep.

The groom, an experienced diver who had completed a dive rescue course, was acting as a so-called dive buddy for his less-experienced wife. He told police he decided to go for help rather than following her to the sea floor and attempting a rescue.

One of the dive leaders pulled Tina Watson to the surface. Efforts to resuscitate her failed.

Queensland state coroner David Glasgow's inquest heard that police, who initially believed the death to be an accident, started to become suspicious when Watson changed some details of his account.

An autopsy found no pre-existing medical condition that could have explained Tina Watson's death. Tests showed there was nothing wrong with her diving gear.

In his findings handed down Friday, Glasgow said the exact circumstances of Tina Watson's fate may never be known, but there was enough evidence of foul play to justify a murder charge against her husband.

"There are only two persons who know what in fact actually occurred," Glasgow said. "One is Tina, who cannot tell us, and the other is Gabe."

He formally indicted Watson on a charge of killing his wife.

"I am satisfied there is evidence of sufficient reliability ... that a properly instructed jury could make a finding of guilt against David Gabriel Watson on a charge of murder," Glasgow said.

Watson's lawyer, Steve Zillman, did not enter a plea on behalf of his client, or offer any other statement.

Zillman argued during the inquest that Watson had no motive to kill his wife and that the evidence did not support a criminal charge. He accused police of being determined to blame Watson for the death, no matter what the evidence showed.

But Glasgow said Tina Watson's father, Tommy Thomas, had given evidence of a possible motive. Thomas said his daughter told him that shortly before they were married, Gabe Watson asked his fiancee to increase her life insurance and change the policy to make him the sole beneficiary. Thomas said his daughter decided to lie to Watson that she had made the changes.

Tommy Thomas, Tina Watson's mother Cindy Thomas and other family members watched Glasgow read out his findings in court via a live video link to the U.S. state of Alabama.

Tommy Thomas was quoted by the Australian Broadcasting Corp. as saying the family welcomed Friday's result as backing their suspicions about Watson.

"We're actually relieved to hear the coroner's findings," Thomas said. "It's something that we have dealt with for quite some time and it validated our beliefs."

Police Detective Inspector Warren Webber said a warrant would be issued in Queensland state for Watson's arrest. This would be handed to prosecutors, who would in turn approach Australian government lawyers, who would prepare and lodge an extradition request with the U.S. government. If that process goes ahead without problems, Watson may still be able to fight any extradition order in U.S. courts.

"There are lengthy legal procedures that are involved, but obviously we are keen they will be done as quickly as possible," Webber told reporters in Townsville.
© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
37 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mariemeade says:
Hamiltongrad: What did you graduate from? You can't spell! It's "panic," "equipment," "prosecutor," "headlines (one word)". And it would be "Leave him alone," not "Let."
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hamiltongrad says:
The poor man has just lost his bride. When bad things happen, people panick, but that is not a crime, no more than seeing an accident happen in slow motion. Our bodies are only tuned into the daily routine, not a catastrophe. And , where is the blame for who ever rented them the eqipment ? What kind of training do you have to have to use ? obviously there are more people that need looking at.
Look, people drown everyday. People get hit by boaters, who are drunk. That does not mean that anyone one person is to blame.
This is just an anti- MAN try to "even the score". I bet that the prosecuter is a woman, and so, is out to make head lines for herself.
Let the poor man alone.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
chalres-2009 says:
I afraid I, not being a Rescue diver, would not of let my wife sink to her death. Rescue diver, really. Busted...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lewiston14 says:
Rescue divers go through a whole lot more training then us sport divers, they train in techniques to try to calm a panicked person and how to hold a diver in trouble so they can do more simple things underwater like buddy breathing without getting themselves in danger of having their equipment damaged. I don%u2019t recall how deep they were when the trouble happened but im sure it was way less the 100 feet. If I was going down to 100 feet I would want some extra training from Deep dive instructor Texan because the rules change the deeper you go and so does the equipment. What works at 20 feet does not always work at 100 feet. Do they have her body because they can determine many things like the means depth and time of death along with other facts such as scrape marks or other body hits. This guy was no rescue diver. Rescue people train and do what they were trained to do Rescue people and even critters. Its in their blood to help. VERY SPECIAL PEOPLE
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
runningralph says:
I wish they had a picture of Gabe Watson. I saw a guy with diving gear getting on a bus to Mobile, Ala, yesterday. My wife thought he was acting strange, nervous.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cusefanjapan says:
I don''''t think you people understand what marriage is.

Posted by sidvicious99 at 05:28 AM
I couldn''t agree more! It seems to me that there may have been trouble before/during the relationship. I don''t understand why the man you plan to marry would ask you to increase your coverage and put him as the beneficiary unless he had other motives. Even now, almost 20 years later, my wife''s mom is still the beneficiary and it''s alright with me. But even more mind-boggling was the fact that she lied to him. That means she didn''t trust the guy and may have suspected he was up to no good. Why would you then marry him? It was doomed from the start even if he really isn''t responsible for her death. Without trust, you have no real relationship. Sad story.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
oneworldusa says:
To be trained in diving rescue and leave someone helpless at the bottom of the ocean (there are pictures) to ''go get help'' is ridiculous.

BTW, did someone really name a baby (now the bride''s father) Thomas Thomas???
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nothappyatall says:
"Going to the surface like a rocket without a weight belt? That is insane unless you are trying to get imbolized or bent. Going to the surface like a rocket is THE single number one no-no in scuba."

Well, the alternative if you are deep enough is DROWNING- meaning you go unconscious and are dead, so in that case you take your only chance.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jghutto says:
If she was suspicious of him when he asked her to name him beneficiary and lied, she should have been intelligent enough to see signs and not marry him. She could have told him that she could not; that her Dad paid for the policy (which he probably did.)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dobbershome says:
Smurfcrusher:

Thank''s for the info. That would make this whole ordeal make more sense.
reply
See all 37 Comments