Hawaii Natives Want Their Kingdom Back
Quiet Factions In The Island State Peacefully Demand The Overthrow Of The U.S. Government
-
-
Mahealani Kahau sits outside of Iolani Palace, home to the last Hawaiian monarch, in Honolulu, June 5, 2008. Kahau and her followers are members of the self-proclaimed Hawaiian Kingdom Government, which is devoted to restoring the Hawaiian monarchy overthrown in 1893. (AP Photo/Ronen Zilberman)
-
In this April 30, 2008 file photo, a sign is posted on the gate of the Iolani Palace in Honolulu. A Native Hawaiian group that advocates sovereignty locked the gates of the historic palace April 30, saying it would carry out the business of what it considers the legitimate government of the islands. (AP Photo/Marco Garcia)
-
Kahau and her followers are members of the self-proclaimed Hawaiian Kingdom Government, which is devoted to restoring the Hawaiian monarchy overthrown in 1893. Nearly two months ago, they stormed the gates of the old Iolani Palace, and they have politely occupied the grounds ever since, operating like a government-in-exile.
"We're here to assume and resume what is already ours and what has always been ours," said Kahau, who is a descendant of Hawaii's last king and was elected "head of state" by the group.
The Hawaiian Kingdom Government, which was founded seven years ago and claims 1,000 followers, uses its own license plates and maintains its own judicial system. In recent years, members have voted to dissolve the state of Hawaii, its land titles, welfare programs and public schools. They also claim the right to confiscate all bank assets in Hawaii.
The organization's actions do not carry the force of law, and the state has mostly taken a hands-off approach. It has not confiscated any of the license plates, for example, or arrested anyone for using them.
Hawaii has about 200,000 Native Hawaiians out of a population of 1.3 million. The Hawaiian Kingdom Government is just one of several native organizations that claim sovereignty over the islands, tapping into a strong sense among Native Hawaiians that they were wronged by history.
More than a century ago, a group of sugar planters and other businessmen, most of them Americans, overthrew the Hawaiian monarchy with the support of U.S. military forces. Queen Liliuokalani was imprisoned at the ornate Iolani Palace, built in 1882 by her brother, King Kalakaua. Hawaii was annexed by the United States in 1898 and became a state in 1959.
"We are definitely trying to correct a wrong that we feel has been done to us as a people," said Hawaiian Kingdom Government spokesman Orrin Kupau.
The essence of sovereignty under international law is people living on their land and asserting their rights, and that's what the Native Hawaiians are doing.
Francis Boyle, International Law ProfessorEvery day, Kahau and about a dozen of her government officials meet in the tent. Every evening they fold up their tent and go home, returning in the morning.
State officials have largely ignored them, and police have made no arrests. The Hawaiian Kingdom Government has said it has no intention of resorting to violence.
Every week, the Hawaiian Kingdom Government obtains a public-assembly permit that allows it to occupy the grounds of the palace, a museum and popular tourist attraction next door to the state Capitol.
As far as the state is concerned, the Hawaiian Kingdom Government is treated the same as any other group that wants to conduct activities on public ground, said Deborah Ward, spokeswoman for the Department of Land and Natural Resources.
"As long as they comply with the permit conditions, they may continue to request permits to meet," she said.
Those conditions prohibit the Hawaiian Kingdom Government from interfering with access to the palace, harassing pedestrians, collecting money, posting banners or entering several government buildings. State authorities gave Kahau a warning when she went inside one of the buildings to collect her mail.
It is unclear how the organization's members intend to oust the state government. They also want reparations in the form of housing, low-cost health care and cash. The kingdom slapped a $7 trillion fine on the Hawaii state government in 2007.
A professor of international law who favors Hawaiian independence, Francis Boyle, said he believes the Hawaiian Kingdom Government has a valid claim.
"The essence of sovereignty under international law is people living on their land and asserting their rights, and that's what the Native Hawaiians are doing. They've made a lot of progress," said Boyle, a professor at the University of Illinois. "This is the way to go."
A state agency, the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, is pursuing something far short of a restoration of the monarchy. It is pressing for federal legislation that would give Native Hawaiians a degree of self-government similar to what many American Indian tribes have. The hope is that Native Hawaiians will also regain some of their ancestral land.
The legislation has passed the U.S. House and is pending in the Senate.
"There's got to be a legal way in which to try to get these issues resolved," said OHA Administrator Clyde Namuo.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- I think this is going to open a whole new can of worms for them and the U.S. I can see the Hawaians poit of view. If we allow them to succeed from the union and revoke citizenship, would obama then still be eligible to be president ? Who would end up paying restitution to who ? I am surprised bush has not delcared war on Hawaii for trying to succeed from the union. I also think we should adapt like other coutries who do not allow anyone who is not a U.S. citizen from buyig properties in the U.S. It maintains our sovern.ty
- Reply to this comment
- What they don''t tell you is all these idiots are welfare lifers drinking beer and sticking out and rubbing their bellies saying wat bra....
None of their elevators go all the way to the top and they cannot make a full six pack between them, and even the majority of the Hawaiians look at them in disbelief.
Want to really upset them? Ask them how they are the true Hawaiians, when they stole the land from those occupying it before they arrived. They were not the first! - Reply to this comment
- WOW! where can i get a t- shirt? This is as big as when the rolling stones hired the *** angels for body gaurds.we all know how that worked out.Oh and i want a sun visor also,and maybe a piece of lava rock. hech throw in a g.i. joe with a kung -u grip.
- Reply to this comment
- I suppose the USA could give Hawaii back to the Hawaiian Kingdom Government as long as they are willing to pay for all the improvements that have been made over the decades.
- Reply to this comment
- Pleeease..I can''t believe this garbage. Quit ******* about the past and move on. The natives can *** all they want, they ain''t gettin it back. The U.S. military pumps way to much money into those islands, it is a strategic launching point for pacific forces. Not sayin it is right...just a fact.
As for the white trash comment, I didn''t get crazy about Tibet, but I also realize that we live in a different world and time. What was accepted hundreds of years ago (hostile takeover, this is now mine) is kinda frowned upon in today''s world. Just because people of my same skin color did some bad stuff in the past I am held accountable for it? Pleeease.
So "WangBang747" you can kiss my white a**. Tired of always bein blamed for others problems...I didn''t invade sh**, so stick your racist comments where the sun don''t shine. - Reply to this comment
- they should wait until Bush leaves office
he''ll claim they''re part of the axis of evil and bomb the *** out of Maui - Reply to this comment
- And when the Volcanos erupt and Ocean waters rise, will their "kingdom" look to us for handouts and pick them up?
- Reply to this comment
- THe USA isn''t perfect, and maybe in the beginning our motives weren''t "pure" but the kingdom of Hawaii could have done a lot worse if some other opportunistic government had acquired them. I say keep the culture and try to make the best of living in 2 worlds.
- Reply to this comment
- The Kamehameha School''s admissions policy is to give preference to applicants of Hawaiian ancestry not Punahou. Punahou School (Barack Obama''s alma mater) was designed originally to provide education to the children of Congregational missionaries, allowing them to stay in Hawai''i with their families, instead of being sent away to school.
The missionaries did not do well. They arrogantly imposed their religion, morality, and lifestyle on the proud native people. They exposed them to smallpox, venereal disease, liquor, etc. The population went from around 300,000 at the time of Cook''s arrival to about 135,000. How is any of this good? I will give them credit for creating an extensive public school system - education is always a good thing.
Unfortunately the US will no more give the Kingdom back to the Hawaiian people than China would give Tibet back to the Tibetans. - Reply to this comment
- "Quiet Factions In The Island State Peacefully Demand The Overthrow Of The U.S. Government"
They''re not alone. Let''s start with GWB and work our way down to Congress. - Reply to this comment
- WE STOLED IT FAIR AND SQUARE!
- Reply to this comment
- As an american indian I offer my sympathy........but
Good luck with that "kingdom" non-sense.
I now demand all europeans to get out of MY country and give us your bank account while you are at it....
Dummies........ - Reply to this comment
- Ridiculous! Where does it stop? History is a series of take-overs all around the world. Why revert to the last century? Why not go back and undo everything in the last 200 years or 400 years? Maybe we should give the U.S. back to England or to native Americans. Why not redraw the world map as it was in 1400?
- Reply to this comment
- It would not bother me to see the poor *** kill every politician and foreign looking person in sight.
- Reply to this comment
- It turns out that the real goal was to destroy the viability of that community. Why? So the present buildings could be destroyed and new condos could go up at about 2 million a pop. Posted by toldyouso12
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Bishop Estate, which has zillions of dollars in it, was established to finance native Hawaiians. Little by little these By-laws have been ignored. Punahoe School, for instance was established to educate Hawaiian children locally and from out-lying islands. It offered the finest education in Hawaii and to attend you had to be part native (I think at least 1/8th, but I can''t remember). In recent years, lawsuit after lawsuit has been won to put the children of the rich white residents in the school. I am not surprised about the condos and apartments. Bernice Biship must be turning over in her grave. - Reply to this comment
- The Missionaries came to Hawaii to do good. They did well.
The Hawaiians have sure enjoyed the income from tourism and military spending for well over a half century. Having lived on Oahu for 3 years, I know what I''m talking about.
Having said that, now that we have all but destroyed the Hawaiian culture, I guess it''s time to get out - isn''t that our track record globally? - Reply to this comment
- "They also claim the right to confiscate all bank assets in Hawaii."
Aloha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!! - Reply to this comment
- We Americans should not act so smug in our acceptance that "we won" and the natives should just get over themselves...because a similar thing is about and is slowly happening to us--and maybe that is just Karma.
We scoff at the lives of the locals being exploited and their countries being turned into so much real estate fodder that others with more money eat up, while the locals have to give up their homes and land and become the servants and welfare recipients of their own country. But it is happening here. People from the ME, Canada and Asia are buying up American property and coming to take American jobs, while a good chunk of American jobs go overseas and others are given to people with H-1B visas. Meanwhile, our colleges are making it as hard as they can for Americans to get degrees in engineering, nursing and other fields by forcing incredible GPA''s (like a minimum of 3.75 to get into nursing) and crazy limits to classes (like less than 20 new students per yr for nursing at many schools) Then they can cry shortage and higher the cheaper, imported immigrant.
When all is said and done--a lot of middle class Americans will be losing their homes to people from other countries who may flock here for vacation homes --and the irony is that these families and their descendants will be working in and for their own homes and being paid peanuts and crumbs that the foreign vacationers throw them. - Reply to this comment
- The bottom line is that America treats the local pop. abysmally and Hawaii is really a Japanese owned, American state. It has become (like the Carribean islands) a retreat for the wealthy and other countries while the locals function as serfs and backdrop. Colonization rarely benefits the actual indigenous people--it primarily enriches the occupier and the collaborators among the locals who help them--witness Iraq--and who has the new vacation homes in Jordan. It is not the avg Shia or Sunni. Ask Al Maliki.
- Reply to this comment
- In 2006, while in Hawaii, we noted a story in the news where people of native descent and other residents of a large state subsidized housing complex were given the boot in Oahu. The city had allowed the charter for the hotel to be taken over by a private interest who was supposed to run it better. Instead, that interest has secured enough votes to remove the subsidization and began charging rents of those poor people that they could not pay. Their rents went from like 325.00/month to 3000.00/month in a matter of months.
As if that was not bad enough, the group then decided to rout anyone who could pay the 3000.00/month (they would not allow new tenants who could pay to move in) and those who paid the 3000.00 a month did so by many families crowding into one apartment.
It turns out that the real goal was to destroy the viability of that community. Why? So the present buildings could be destroyed and new condos could go up at about 2 million a pop. And where were all the people (over 400 families) to go? Given that they lacked the income for apartments and all other poor housing was filled up, they were in tent cities on the beach and maybe, they are still there). - Reply to this comment
The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.



