June 20, 2008
Obama’s Sept. 10th Mindset
National Review Online: The Terrorism Debate Is One McCain Should Welcome, And Win
-
Play CBS Video Video McCain's Focus: War On Terror While the current state of the economy continues to worry many throughout the nation, Republican presidential candidate John McCain has instead centered his campaign on terrorism. Chip Reid reports.
-
Video Domestic Terrorism Fears Rise Three Ohio men have been convicted on terrorist charges, but it turns out their case is not isolated. CBS News has found troubling connections to other terrorist cells in the U.S. Bob Orr reports.
-
Video Five Things About Obama There are five things you may not know about Barack Obama. Jeff Glor speaks to Julie Chen about what they might say about the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate.
-
Interactive Global Terror Major terrorist organizations, the FBI's most wanted and facts and photos from recent attacks.
-
Who's Who The Sept. 11 Defendants The five prisoners, led by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, charged with plotting the attacks.
Barack Obama is the herald of the September 10 Democrats.
On Monday, Obama off-handedly reiterated his fondness for 1990s-style treatment of Islamic terrorists as if they were mere criminals to be managed by prosecution in the civilian criminal-justice system. By now, that should come as no surprise. Pressed on the subject again Wednesday, Obama insisted, “I have confidence that our system of justice is strong enough to deal with terrorists.” Top Obama backer Bill Richardson, a member of the Clinton Cabinet that delegated national defense to our system of justice while radical Islam killed Americans in New York City, Somalia, Saudi Arabia, Kenya, Tanzania, and Yemen, told CNN on Wednesday that he “totally” rejected the Bush administration policy of branding jihadists as enemy combatants because doing so is somehow tantamount to “abridging our own freedoms.”
Appropriately, John McCain has slammed Obama and his fellow wishful thinkers as naïve and beholden to a “September 10th” mindset - the mindset that gave us the mass murder of nearly 3,000 Americans on September 11, 2001.
The occasion for this latest dust-up was the Supreme Court’s ruling last week in Boumediene v. Bush vesting alien enemy combatants detained by our military with a constitutional right to habeas corpus - that is, to review by the civilian courts of the military’s determination that they are enemy combatants. In addition to raising the possibility that jihadists who pose a lethal threat to Americans will be released, Boumediene portends litigation chaos: The justices have dumped potentially hundreds of detainee cases on the federal district courts with no guidance about the rules and procedures that should govern those proceedings.
Naturally, this prospect has prompted intense debate. McCain called the decision one of the worst in American history. Obama, by contrast, is glowing in his praise and yearns for a return to the model of our treatment of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, when, he points out, suspects were apprehended and successfully prosecuted in the civilian courts.
Leaving aside that Obama here is once again not in command of the facts (not all of those responsible for the 1993 bombing were apprehended), the criminal-prosecution approach left America vulnerable. (For a powerful account of why, see our colleague Andy McCarthy’s book, “Willful Blindness.”) The civilian-justice system is incapable of apprehending and neutralizing more than a fraction of the Islamic radicals who target our country. That’s not deduction - it’s empirical fact: Major terrorists such as Osama bin Laden and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed were under indictment for over a decade even as they continued to plot and execute attacks, including 9/11, with the authorities impotent to stop them.
Because of our system’s prohibitive due-process demands - demands that are reasonable for Americans accused of crimes but out of place when the “defendants” are foreign combatants - less than three dozen terrorists could be prosecuted in the eight years between the WTC bombing and the destruction of the Twin Towers. That’s fewer enemy operatives than our military often kills or captures in a single day in Afghanistan and Iraq. The trials of the Nineties, moreover, were a treasure trove for al-Qaeda, providing it with generous discovery of our national-defense secrets as well as insight into our methods and sources for obtaining them.
Worst of all, the September 10 approach was provocatively weak. It told an enemy, so committed to killing Americans that its operatives were willing to sacrifice themselves in the effort, that the world’s only superpower would respond to atrocities with subpoenas and indictments. Without the prospect of a vigorous response to acts of war, the enemy continued to attack. The result was 9/11.
McCain has learned these lessons and maintains that we must stay on offense in the war against radical Islam. That means a real war footing: military and covert operations, aggressive collection of intelligence, and Treasury tracking of terrorism finances. The justice system has a role, but it’s a subordinate one: Instead of prosecutions after Americans have been killed, it now pursues the lower-profile but more effective task of breaking up terror cells before they can attack. Although the U.S. could be hit again at any time, it says something about the success of this approach that seven years after 9/11 we have not suffered another attack on our soil.
This aggressive post-9/11 approach is what an Obama spokeswoman has called “stupid.” The candidate himself says he’s not going be “lectured” on national security by the people responsible for the Iraq war. But he might benefit from some time listening to and learning from McCain on Iraq, since McCain advocated the surge that has beaten back al-Qaeda in Iraq while Obama wanted to pull combat troops out in what would have amounted to a surrender. This is a debate McCain should welcome, and win.
By The Editors
Reprinted with permission from National Review Online.
 | America's Premier Site for Conservative News, Analysis, and Opinion. |
More From Opinion
The secrets of tennis legend 
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 32 CommentsWE ALSO NEED TO NOT LET THIS OBAMA PERSON IN OFFICE BECAUSE IF YOU LISTEN IN CHURCH..... WE ARE GOING TO BE TAKEN OVER FROM THESE THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES FROM WITH-IN OUR OWN GOVERNMENT AND WHAT BETTER WAY THAN TO BE THE PRESIDENT??? WE HAVE ALREADY HAD ONE MAN (IF YOU CAN CALL HIM THAT) THINK HE IS GOD AND NO ONE COULD STOP HIM FOR 8 YEARS ...SO BY ALL MEANS LETS PUT IN ANOTHER ONE... WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO STOP HIM EITHER IF HE GETS ALL HIS PEOPLE OVER HERE.. WE DO NOT NEED OBAMA TO WIN AND HIS WIFE WHO DOES NOT EVEN LIKE BEING AN AMERICAN....THIS HAS GONE ON LONG ENOUGH SO LETS GET REAL PEOPLE.......
whaat happened to real unbiased news in our country?
Oh yes! I remember now,some morons voted for GW Bush and for people like McBushCain, and we got the government that we deserve,
America ruled by the fascist right, news is all propaganda now days
They always pick commentary from the extreme positions. No wonder this country is so divided; division is all we''re exposed to anymore.
And if that wasn''t funny enough...
...they actually believe he has the ability to win! LOL!!!!! Now THAT is rich! 8-)
The Democrats are certainly capable of carrying out evil, using government guns to coerce funding for sick liberal projects. But what exactly is the difference between the war hawks and the terrorists? Let us notice two things:
1. Both will violently attack Americans who disagree with them. They escalate their actions, to murder if necessary, whenever they cannot get what they want. It the war hawks'' case, it is our money they need. Both are proven to murder to get their way. There is no denying it.
2. If either one is "morally right" in their cause, why don''t they, from now on, put down the guns aimed at Americans citizens?
Maybe Iraq war was a good idea? But with the guns at our heads (and not just at the terrorists) there is a more obvious act of violence. The Republican pretend their action is advocacy of necessary war. Instead, it is simply armed robbery and murder.
''Major terrorists such as Osama bin Laden and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed were under indictment for over a decade even as they continued to plot and execute attacks, including 9/11, with the authorities impotent to stop them.''
As opposed to today, in which our steely and manly fearless leader Bush tracked down Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahri and personally killed them with his two bare hands.
Oh, wait a minute - that''s not what happened!
Instead, thanks to the decision to invade the wrong country these two mass murderers are STILL free to continue to plot and execute attacks.
From William Buckley to these clowns - how the mighty have fallen.
They''ve gone so far over the line in their bloodlust and a love of torture so intense that it borders on S&M, that they have finally tilted into the abyss of the ridiculous.
No one with a brain can take this propaganda seriously.
These people should be jailed. Them, and people like them are nothing less than war criminals. I can''t believe that the Free Speech provision of the First Amendment allows these jackasses to incite the abrogation of the very same Constitution.
Oh well, another lost minute-and-a-half.
If the war was to go away today the surplus would make universal health care affordable, we could have real middle class tax breaks, we could invest in alternate energy sources, we could start to clean up the environment, and we could educate, feed, and house our population. But NONE of that matters to the Repubs and Big Business - they are hooked on the blood money that feeds their greed.
Terrorism has been around forever. What Bush has exploited is that he finally got one that was not European or American based .. it is so much easier to fuel the hate of Islamic Arabs than western looking Christians to the Republican base.
The only war around here is NRO''s war on middle class America. Their fake-urgency about ''radical Islam'' has allowed their boy Bush to fool the American people into cheering as he doubled the national debt, and the Fed to fool the American people that house-buying money grew on trees. That spooked the global smart money into dumping dollars and investing in oil. Now middle class citizens who get paid in dollars find they are worth half as much as they were 8 years ago, while their gas and food costs twice as much. And we''re only halfway into this slide. Meanwhile, Americans now owe $10 trillion in Reagan/Bush debt, with another $3 trillion IOU coming for Iraq, on the eve of the Boomer retirement and the taxing of our SocSec system by many trillions of dollars.
There''s a war on, alright. And traitors like NRO are coming very close to winning it!
Yet another neocon wargasm from the hate-mongers at National Review Online.
Karl Rove, are you writing thes op-ed pieces for McSame?
All of this hawkish posturing about security is a cover for the deep desire of the neocons to run society according to their paternalistic vision without interference from legal process founded on principles they despise, but can''t admit as much out loud while waving the flag in our faces...
In the IL state government, and in the U.S. Senate, he did nothing but talk.
I would have voted for Hilary but not for Obama.
Maybe next time around if he has done something by then I would vote for him but not this year.
I may have to sit out this election or vote for a non major candidate for the first time in over 30 years.
Do something besides talk Obama.
HOW MANY OF YOU AND YOUR EMPLOYED AIPAC MEMBERS EVER SERVED IN THE MILITARY OR EVER BEEN IN WAR!
HOW MANY OF YOU MAKE MONEY OFF THE IRAQ WAR OR KEEPING AMERICA MIRED IN THE MIDDLE EAST FOR THE LAST 65 YEARS?!
HOW MANY OF YOU OR YOUR EMPLOYEES MAKE MONEY OFF THE 30 BILLION ISRAEL GETS IN AID FROM AMERICA EACH YEAR?
TRUTH IS THAT YOU ARE SCARED TO DEATH OF OBAMA CAUSE YOUR LOBBY GROUP CANT BUY HIM HE WONT HAVE RELATIONS WITH YOUR WOMEN AND HE IS UNTOUCHABLE BY YOU!
the american nazi, they are nothing but corporatists
they have actually become Anti American
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 32 Comments