Big Oil Poised To Do Business With Iraq
Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron, ExxonMobil And BP Could See Advantage Over Others In The Future
-
Photo
(CBS/iStockphoto)
-
Interactive
Iraq: 5 Years At War
Five years after the U.S.-led invasion, the war wears on.
-
Fast Facts
Iraq
Learn about the people, economy and history.
The deals, once signed, are something of a stopgap measure to help Iraq begin to increase production until the country is able to approve a new national oil law - now held up by political squabbles among Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds.
But they also could mark the beginning of an important long-term toehold by big Western companies into Iraq's potentially lucrative oil industry, by giving the companies a bidding advantage over other companies in the future.
Iraq's oil ministry spokesman would not name the companies set to get the deals.
But last December, four major companies - Royal Dutch Shell PLC, BP PLC, ExxonMobil Corp. and Chevron Corp. - submitted technical and financial proposals for the five oil fields and received counterproposals from the Iraqi side.
The New York Times reported Thursday that Shell, BP and Exxon Mobil, plus Total, were the four major companies close to signing deals, along with Chevron and some smaller companies.
Ministry spokesman Assem Jihad told The Associated Press in a telephone interview that the names would be announced June 30, after the proposals are sent to the Iraqi Cabinet for final approval.
BP did not immediately return calls seeking comment, and officials at Paris-based Total SA refused Thursday to comment on the report or on any of the company's activities in Iraq. A London-based spokesman for Shell, Adam Newton, said negotiations were ongoing but he declined to release more details, saying they were confidential.
The other two companies could not immediately be reached.
In March, Iraq's Cabinet gave the nod to the Oil Ministry to sign the deals worth around $500 million each. Baghdad hopes to eventually add another 600,000 barrels per day of output to its current 2.5 million barrels per day.
Jihad, who would not discuss details of the contracts, said the deals will be for two years, renewable for a third. The Times reported that the deals were essentially made for the first two years on a no-bid basis.
In the third year, the contracts would be opened to competitive bidding - but the original holders would have an advantage in that bidding, through a clause that would allow them to match bids from competitors to retain the work, the Times reported. It cited the Iraq country manager for a major firm, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Such a deal would give the original holders of the no-bid contracts an important competitive advantage precisely at the time when Iraq's oil industry would be most likely to take off. It also is occurring at a time when access to undeveloped oil fields is highly prized - as companies seek new sources of production in a tight and expensive oil market.
Oil prices were at about $136 per barrel in trading on Thursday.
The predecessors of the four "majors," as they are called, first had a presence in Iraq in 1920 when they were the original partners in Iraq's Petroleum Company. They lost their licenses when the oil industry was nationalized in 1972.
Iraq sits on an estimated 115 billion barrels and it also has an estimated 112 trillion cubic feet of natural gas reserves, according to the ministry.
Iraq's oil law, one of benchmarks set by U.S. administration to achieve progress toward national reconciliation, will regulate the work of foreign companies in the Iraqi oil sector. But it is stalled over who will have final authority to manage the country's oil and gas fields
Another ministry official, speaking on condition of anonymity because the information is sensitive, said Shell wants to develop the Missan and Kirkuk oil fields, while BP is interested in Rumaila, ExxonMobil in Zubair and Chevron in West Qurna stage 1.
The official added that the Australian BHP Billiton has joined talks through Shell, while French Total has joined through Chevron.
Anadarko, leading a consortium of Vitol Holding and the United Arab Emirates' Dome, has also joined these talks to develop Luhais oil field, he said.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Video and Galleries from Iraq After Saddam
- Latest in Iraq After Saddam
- Bombs Claim 50 in Iraq
- Biden Meets with Key U.S. Leaders in Iraq
- Senate Investigates Blackwater Subsidiary



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 7
- next
See all 326 CommentsPosted by itgrammy
.. .. ..
What are they doing to us grannie?
BUT!!! worst of all, We went to war to get to this point. Hundreds of billions of dollars. 4000+ lives. We''re told that we''re going to be over there for a long time... protecting what? oil interests of rich bast__d''s who have sold us down the crick.
What have you put into this effort bhoogren? My son''s one of the lucky ones, he only lost his hearing, some of the use of one hand and has PTSS because some kid over there driving a truckload of explosives tried blowing him up.
Get your head out of the sand and wake up this is for the oil companies.
Ya, they are going to glady give up their resources to us. LOL...
That''s some good kook aid your drinkin'' their sparky.
RE: "Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron, ExxonMobil And BP"
It is time to move to seize and liquidate the assets of these companies, and use the proceeds as seed money for a reparations fund for the victims of their war profiteering operations, and their executives must be tried and sentenced as accomplices of the criminal global terror network of the Bush regime.
These oil pirates are among the worst of the worst, and they must be held accountable for their heinous crimes against the people of earth.
No "deal" made with the illegitimate stooges that were placed in power in Iraq, can ever be seen as valid.
I''ve long suspected you were from another planet.
And now they march right back in on Bushit''s broad shoulders, financed by the American taxpayer, so they can stick it to us on $5/gallon gas.
thanks, Bushits!
June 19, 2008 11:12 AM / ABC News
Writing the forward to a Physicians for Human Rights study of 11 former detainees who were apparently tortured by US military personnel and later released, Army Maj. General Antonio Taguba (Ret.) writes that "there is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be answered is whether those who ordered the use of torture will be held to account."
Taguba, who led the Army%u2019s official investigation into the Abu Ghraib scandal, says that the report from the doctors'' human rights group based in Cambridge, Mass., "tells the largely untold human story of what happened to detainees in our custody when the Commander-in-Chief and those under him authorized a systematic regime of torture. This story is not only written in words: It is scrawled for the rest of these individuals%u2019 lives on their bodies and minds. Our national honor is stained by the indignity and inhumane treatment these men received from their captors."
Pussyass "lib_crusher" is real brave with other people''s lives.
He''s a Republican.
Ya, they are going to glady give up their resources to us. LOL...
That''''s some good kook aid your drinkin'''' their sparky.
Posted by stevex47 at 02:43 PM : Jun 19, 2008
I guess you didn''t bother to read the story. Not surprising...
Posted by FeelFree4U
.. .. ..
LOL! And just how do you know if their parents were married or not?
Pussyass "lib_crusher" is real brave with other people''''s lives.
He''''s a Republican.
Posted by gkc99 at 02:57 PM : Jun 19, 2008
LOL! Thats might be degrading coming from anyone else besides a pussyass f*ggot lib.
Re: "And then we bomb their azzes! Hard!!!"
Posted by lib_crusher
Shouldn''t these companies be at least given a trial first?
China''s been lending the US money for years...and they''re still a bunch of poor azzes! LOL! You fail libs!
Posted by FeelFree4U at 03:04 PM : Jun 19, 2008
Not if they''re Chinese, Russia, or Iranian. F*ck dat!
Look everybody another dillusional ditto head.
If these companies give us gas for less than $4.00 a gallon, most Americans will want to nominate them for sainthood.
Posted by rudy654 at 03:12 PM : Jun 19, 2008
I''m sorry to here that about you Rudy.
You heard something? Wow. And now you are sorry? Wow, wow.
Hopefully none.
(2) how much of this money will go to help with our costs
My guess is enough to get us to $2.98 per gallon.(the national crying point)
(3) what valid safeguards are in place to ensure that the funds go to where they are intended to go?
Hopefully none.
Posted by rudy654 at 03:17 PM : Jun 19, 2008
It''s dittohead medication hour for you Rudy. Sorry to hear about your ailment.
Such in depth commenting.
Such in depth commenting.
Posted by rudy654 at 03:20 PM : Jun 19, 2008
LOL! Likewise....
It is? Wow.
Why thank you, sweety!
Posted by rudy654 at 03:21 PM : Jun 19, 2008
Wow.
Posted by mitchoncbs at 03:22 PM : Jun 19, 2008
I agree, but low prices are the doing of W.
You love men? Wow.
Yep, Limbaugh style statistics. Hypocrite is right.
Posted by rudy654 at 03:21 PM : Jun 19, 2008
Nope. Wowowowowowowwoowowowowowowwowowowwowwowwowowwwowowowowwowowowwowwowowwoowowowowowowowowwowowwowowowowowowowowow.
Re: "If these companies give us gas for less than $4.00 a gallon, most Americans will want to nominate them for sainthood."
Posted by brianp55
This might delay a trip to the gallows for their executives in the short run, but ultimately they must face hard prison time for their heinous crimes and abuses, and their assets must be seized and liquidated to help pay some restitution for their war profiteering and other serious crimes.
Posted by FeelFree4U
.. .. ..
The Pres and VP haven''t.
Posted by rudy654
.. .. ..
Ahhhh, the rythm method strikes again.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 7
- next
See all 326 Comments