June 18, 2009 6:19 PM

McCain Calls For Nuclear Power Expansion

(AP)  Sen. John McCain called Wednesday for the construction of 45 new nuclear reactors by 2030 and pledged $2 billion a year in federal funds "to make clean coal a reality," measures designed to reduce dependence on foreign oil.

In a second straight day of campaigning devoted to the energy issue, the Republican presidential nominee-in-waiting also said the only time Democratic rival Barack Obama voted for a tax cut it was a "break for the oil companies."

McCain said the 104 nuclear reactors currently operating around the country produce about 20 percent of the nation's annual electricity needs.

"Every year, these reactors alone spare the atmosphere from the equivalent of nearly all auto emissions in America. Yet for all these benefits, we have not broken ground on a single nuclear plant in over thirty years," he said. "And our manufacturing base to even construct these plants is almost gone."

Even so, he said he would set the country on a course to build 45 new ones by 2030, with a longer-term goal of adding another 55 in the future.

"We will need to recover all the knowledge and skills that have been lost over three stagnant decades in a highly technical field," he conceded.

McCain did not say what steps, if any, he would propose to simplify the permitting process for nuclear plants. Nor did he say how he would dispose of the waste, other than to say "we will need to solve complex problems of moving and storing materials that will always need safeguarding."

Shortly after he spoke, a participant in a campaign-organized round-table discussion of energy, retired Marine Corps Gen. James Jones, said obtaining the necessary construction permits can take five years. "We should be able to cut that in half," added Jones, a former NATO commander who is now chief executive officer of the U.S. Chamber Institute for 21st Century Energy. He also is on the board of Chevron.

Jones flew to Missouri aboard the campaign's chartered jet although, ironically, Democrats recently disclosed that his name has figured in Obama campaign discussions of potential Democratic vice presidential running mates.

McCain's motorcade drove by a few dozen sign-carrying demonstrators protesting the Iraq War. One audience member interrupted his remarks by standing and shouting that the Arizona senator had taken millions from the oil industry.

A dramatic spike in worldwide oil prices has pushed the cost of gasoline to $4 a gallon and more, and made energy a domestic political issue in a way it has not been since the days of the Arab oil embargo of the 1970s.

On Tuesday, McCain delivered a speech in Texas in which he made the case for a nationwide effort to reduce dependence on foreign oil, including additional drilling in U.S. coastal waters, and said he would begin laying out specific proposals in the coming days.

With his appearance in Missouri, he began making good on that promise.

The Republican presidential contender said Missouri gets about 85 percent of its electricity from coal, an abundant natural resource in the U.S.

"Perhaps no advancement in energy technology could mean more to America than the clean burning of coal and the capture and storage of carbon emissions," he said.

With the $2 billion in federal funds, he said, "We will build the demonstration plants, refine the techniques and equipment, and make clean coal a reality. This single achievement will open vast amounts of our oldest and most abundant resource. And it will deliver not only electricity but jobs to some of the areas hardest hit by our economic troubles."

It was the second straight day McCain has criticized Obama, the Illinois senator who will collect the Democratic presidential nomination this summer, a few days before McCain lays claim to the GOP nomination.

Obama has said McCain's support for additional offshore oil drilling is evidence that he would effectively give the country another term of the Bush presidency.

"I guess the senator has changed his position since voting for the 2005 Bush energy bill - a grab-bag of corporate handouts that I opposed," McCain said. "Come to think of it, that energy bill was the only time we've ever seen Senator Obama vote in favor of any tax break - and it was a tax break for the oil companies."

McCain opposed the 2005 measure and said at the time it was larded with billions in unnecessary tax breaks for the oil industry.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 72 Comments
by downsteamjim June 20, 2008 12:53 AM EDT
Nuclear power waste is dangerous for hundreds, even thousands of years. The mercury in energy efficient light bulbs remain toxic forever.
Reply to this comment
by zerato-2009 June 19, 2008 7:58 PM EDT
mccain is for nuclear plants this week but just wait until next week, he will have a new position on this issue.
Reply to this comment
by nanc12 June 19, 2008 7:42 PM EDT
Why''''d he let Katrina happen? Posted by obama8years

That''s pretty amazing. The comments supposedly took place at an Operation Push conference in 2004. Katrina happened in 2005. LOL - you are pathetic
Reply to this comment
by nolalou June 19, 2008 6:39 PM EDT
terrorislami ,

If you insist on posting something that is NOT the subject of the article , at least get your facts right, instead of showing the world what an IDIOT you are!

The quote from Obama''s 1/2 brother is "..if elected his brother will be a good president for the Jewish people, despite his Muslim background."

He said "Muslim background", not that Obama is or was a Muslim! His father was a Muslim, so he has a Muslim background! It would be like saying McCain would be a good president for African Americans , despite his slave-owner background! That doesn''t mean McCain ever owned slaves, but one of his ancestors owned slaves in Mississippi!
Reply to this comment
by terrorislami June 19, 2008 6:27 PM EDT
HUSSEIN IS SOME UNITER,,, lol

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=democrats+against obama

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=jews against obama

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=latinos against obama

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=women against obama

hahaha

what a stinking LIAR,,,
Reply to this comment
by terrorislami June 19, 2008 6:27 PM EDT
HUSSEIN IS SOME UNITER,,, lol

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=democrats+against obama

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=jews against obama

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=latinos against obama

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=women against obama

hahaha

what a stinking LIAR,,,
Reply to this comment
by terrorislami June 19, 2008 4:57 PM EDT
HUSSEIN IS SOFT ON FASCIST NAZI TERRORISLAMIST JIHADISTS,,,

HELL HIS KENYAN FAMILY AND TRIBE ARE FASCIST NAZI TERRORISLAMIST JIHADISTS,,,

will hussein stop his radical muslim luo tribe relatives from slaughtering non-muslims???

apparently not,,,

U.S. Troops to African "hotspot"?

Obama Jr. Says ''''Not Yet''''

http://www.usvetdsp.com/jan08/obama_lou%20tribe.htm

Just one day before the Jan. 3, 2008 Iowa caucus, Sen. Barack Hussein Obama Jr. (D-Ill.), who is aiming to be America''''''''s first African-American president, found himself taping a message from Iowa to Kenya for broadcast on the Voice of America.

Kenya, the homeland Obama Jr''''s family''''s Luo tribe, burst into post-election violence after Raila Odinga, a fiery Luo tribe opposition leader and Kenya presidential candidate, alleged the Dec. 27 voting that re-elected President Mwai Kibaki of the Kikuyu tribe was rigged

More than 360 people were killed and over 250,000 displaced provoking a humanitarian crisis in a country previously considered a stable pillar in east Africa.
Reply to this comment
by terrorislami June 19, 2008 4:50 PM EDT
HUSSEIN IS SOFT ON FASCIST NAZI TERRORISLAMIST JIHADISTS,,,

HELL HIS KENYAN FAMILY AND TRIBE ARE FASCIST NAZI TERRORISLAMIST JIHADISTS,,,

Obama''s Cousin Charged With Ethnic Cleansing
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/01/great-obamas-cousin-charged-with-ethnic.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7192958.stm

Obama''s relative linked to Ethnic Cleansing in Kenya
http://libertarianrepublican.blogspot.com/2008/02/obamas-relative-linked-to-ethnic.html

Signs in Kenya That Killings Were Planned
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1957451/posts

Ten Obvious Reasons Why Islam is NOT a Religion of Peace
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/Top-10-Reasons.htm

Kenya Muslim Violence Pictorial *Warning Graphic*

Africa, Kenya, Muslims%u2026nothing more needs to be said%u2026
http://patdollard.com/2008/01/kenya-muslim-violence-pictorial-warning-graphic/

The Kenyan jihad
http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/433766/the-kenyan-jihad.thtml

nothing new,,, more radical muslims ethnically cleansing non-muslims

19 Burned to Death in Violence in Kenya
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1960644/posts
Reply to this comment
by terrorislami June 19, 2008 4:40 PM EDT
HUSSEIN IS SOFT ON FASCIST NAZI TERRORISLAMIST JIHADISTS,,,

HELL HIS KENYAN FAMILY AND TRIBE ARE FASCIST NAZI TERRORISLAMIST JIHADISTS,,,

Obama Sides With Radical Islamists

The magnitude of difference between the two candidates running in our presidential election could not be more stark! After reading the statements of both Obama and McCain regarding the horrible Supreme Court 5-4 decision to allow Gitmo detainees the right to be tried in civilian courts, we can clearly see what a flawed, unfortunate, and terrible direction Obama would take this country if [God forbid!!]elected in November.

Obama''s statement:

Barack Obama statement on the Supreme Court''s 5-4 decision today extending civilian legal protections to terrorist suspects held in Guantanamo Bay:

Um...er...earth to Obama? Foreign terrorists caught in battle against our forces during war have never been eligible for "habeas corpus"! They are not covered by the Constitution of the United States of America. So...what "rule of law" are you referring to?
http://talkwisdom.blogspot.com/2008/06/obama-sides-with-radical-islamists.html
Reply to this comment
by realpatriot1 June 19, 2008 4:15 PM EDT
nuclear reactors have come a long way in their design and safety since 3 Mile Island, but the problems which
remain unresolved are: 1) What do we do with the waste?, and, 2) How do we secure the spent fuel rods from terrorists?

Regarding clean coal, there''s no such thing as clean coal. Cleaner coal is better than dirtier coal and we can''t entirely do away with coal, but it''s not where the crux of our energy investment needs to be focused.

It''s been estimated that 67% of all home energy needs in this country could be supplied by the available wind power in the plains states alone.

We would need to invest heavily to fully tap into it(loans, tax credits, direct government grants,etc.) and also invest along the coasts and Congress would need to stop talking and act on deregulation so that energy could be wheeled to where it was needed.

Europe is already demonstrating what wind power can do.

We need a comprehensive energy plan which utilizes all of these things but which accounts for renewability, air cleanliness, and environmemntal protection so that we don''t shift the burden one problem onto another.

That''s what McCain doesn''t get with this plan.
Reply to this comment
See all 72 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook