HUNTSVILLE, Texas, June 18, 2008
Death Row Inmate Spared At Final Hour
Texas Grants Charles Hood A Reprieve Amid Flurry Of Appeals Over Judge's Alleged Affair
-
Photo
Texas prison officials halted Tuesday night's scheduled execution of Charles Dean Hood, a former topless-club bouncer condemned for a double slaying almost 20 years ago as the clock ticked down on their deadline. (AP)
-
Interactive
Capital Punishment
Learn about the death penalty in the United States. Check out statistics, history, famous trials and more.
After winning a reprieve earlier in the day, Charles Dean Hood spent much of the evening in a cell not far from the death chamber as a flurry of appeals played out in the courts.
Shortly after 11 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court rejected three appeals and Hood appeared headed to the death chamber. But prison officials faced with a midnight deadline to administer lethal drugs feared they could not follow the proper procedures before the execution warrant expired. Gov. Rick Perry then issued a 30-day reprieve.
Hood initially won a reprieve just over an hour before he could have been put to death when State District Judge Curt Henderson lifted the death warrant. Hood cried tears of relief at the news.
According to legal analysis from CBS News Analyst Andrew Cohen, the wrinkle in the Hood case came two weeks ago when Matthew Goeller, an assistant district attorney during the time in question, filed an affidavit stating under oath that it was “common knowledge” that Hood’s prosecutor, Tom O’Connell, was engaged in a sexual relationship with Hood’s judge, Verla Sue Holland, during Hood’s capital trial. It is a fluke, apparently, that Hood’s lawyers got this information when they did. But the law accounts for such flukes, and allows them to become appellate issues.
Henderson's order set off a volley of appeals by prosecutors. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals rescinded the order, saying Henderson didn't have the authority to withdraw the warrant that appeared to stop the punishment.
Hood, 38, was convicted of murder for the 1989 slayings of Ronald Williamson and Tracie Lynn Wallace at Williamson's home in the Dallas suburb of Plano.
When arrested in Indiana, Hood was driving Williamson's $70,000 Cadillac but insisted he had Williamson's permission. Hood says he's innocent. Tuesday's was his fifth execution date.
Normally, inmates are returned to death row in Livingston once their execution is called off. But state officials kept Hood in Huntsville as the appeals played out.
Meanwhile, Oklahoma executed its first death row inmate since August.
Terry Lyn Short, who was convicted of killing 22-year-old Japanese exchange student Ken Yamamoto in 1995, was put to death by lethal injection Tuesday evening.
Short was pronounced dead at 6:08 p.m., said Oklahoma Department of Corrections spokesman Jerry Massie.
Yamamoto, a student at Oklahoma City University, lived one floor above Short's ex-girlfriend and died after Short threw a gasoline-filled bottle into her apartment that ignited the building.
Short acknowledged during a clemency hearing last month that he threw the firebomb, but claimed he did not intend to kill Yamamoto, whom he did not know.
A de facto moratorium on executions was lifted when the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of lethal injection procedures in April.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Video and Galleries from U.S.
-
Video
'Thanks USA'
-
Video
Vacation Visa
-
Video
Cheney's Top Secret Plan
Posted by reedtaz73 at 12:16 PM : Jun 18, 2008
SO????
Why not? Probably get fewer innocent people that way.
Regards,
Posted by Nancy_Naive
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
if that is the case you would night be typing these comments because that is common with most pictures.
Posted by bdrlnt4rl
Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Naive is a compliment in your case. If it were not for your past postings, I might assume your comment about executing all people whose eyes appear red to be tongue-in-cheek. Unfortunately, this fits in a pattern with other extreme and prejudiced comments.
The red-eye phenomenon is the result of light reflecting on blood vessals in peoples'' or animals'' eyes. It is a common problem with photos, which is why camera manufacturers feature cameras that automatically edit out red-eye.
The founding fathers are rolling over in their grave after your statement.
They designed this country and quote "It is better for 100 guilty men to go free than for 1 innocent man to face the gallows." Or is that the way the conservatives view the founding fathers?
Have a nice day. That is why we have laws so the innocent are not put to death.
if you want this to be resolved....take these liberal lawyers and judges out..
Posted by libsluv2spit at 02:49 PM : Jun 18, 2008
Of course what happens when you are the INNOCENT person. That is why we have laws.
Naive is a compliment in your case. If it were not for your past postings, I might assume your comment about executing all people whose eyes appear red to be tongue-in-cheek. Unfortunately, this fits in a pattern with other extreme and prejudiced comments.
The red-eye phenomenon is the result of light reflecting on blood vessals in peoples'''' or animals'''' eyes. It is a common problem with photos, which is why camera manufacturers feature cameras that automatically edit out red-eye.
Posted by flreason at 01:00 PM : Jun 18, 2008
It is called satire.
one good example..a convict is already found guilty WITH OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE..after exhausting every trickery and loophole tactis..they found another one..IMPLEMENTING AN EXECUTION IS A ''''CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT''''..you tell me mr george washington...isnt that a low down manipulation of our laws BY BLEEDING HEART LIBERALS???????
Posted by libsluv2spit at 03:26 PM : Jun 18, 2008
YOU would make Hitler PROUD!! You know NOTHING about American History that''s for sure! Do you know that EVERY right contained in that WONDEROUS Document called the CONSTITUTION is because of not just Liberals... but RADICAL LIBERAL''s. It was LIBERALS who walked for the Woman''s right to Vote and Liberals who spoke out for and fought to stop Child Labor. PLEASE stop with the Fascism and get an EDUCATION!
They designed this country and quote "It is better for 100 guilty men to go free than for 1 innocent man to face the gallows." Or is that the way the conservatives view the founding fathers?
Have a nice day. That is why we have laws so the innocent are not put to death.
Posted by antoniof123 at 02:58 PM : Jun 18, 2008
I have often wondered how people like this can possibably live and enjoy all the wonderous rights provided them by those LIBERALS who founded this nation. No! I should say it like the KING said it... those RADICALLY LIBERAL founders!!
Add this to your neo-con resume:
right to kill american soldiers for political gain
right to put record amount of babies into poverty
Well, the real trash or scum are people walking around free who do not understand that this man is entitled to a fair trial. Or who think reconsidering a crooked judicial process is a "loophole."
Posted by frankie2
What is amazing to me is that most liberals believe that some scumbag on death row who has committed a heinous crime, or more than one has the right to live, but an innocent, unborn, potential human being is so much garbage that it is okay to dispose of millions of them in a modern day holocaust under the name of Roe vs. Wade.
If you really love all of those unborn fetuses, why don''t you offer to adopt some? Using your own words, "OF COURSE YOU DECIDE TO TAKE THE EASY WAY OUT" AND MAKE ABORTION ILLEGAL. "spare me your sh*t"
What were the judge and the prosecutor talking about when they were not busy doing "the deed"? What misconduct was the prosecutor able to get away with because he had the ear (and presumably other body parts) of the final arbiter in the trial?
You''re making a lot of assumptions here. If my "arse" was in the hands of someone like myself, I''d live a long and prosperous life. I wouldn''t have an abortion. Why did you assume that I would?
Regarding "adopting a death row inmate". Why on earth would I want to do that? You attacked redhopper for "taking the easy way out" on the abortion issue. The point I was trying to make to you is that it looks like you''re taking the easy root yourself. If you''re indeed someone who isn''t opposed to investing a little effort to solve a problem, then why don''t you consider an adoption? It involves a huge commitment, but it sounds like you''re willing to do it. Besides, if you invested your time adopting one of these unwanted fetuses (or soon to be children), you would be setting a great example regarding "responsibility". Go for it! It sounds like you''d make a good parent! Besides, wouldn''t it be a better way to spend your time than making lots of posts on this board?
I would like to knit him a sweater with bunnies on the front & send him some homemade fudge brownies with walnuts. Address?
Again you''re changing the point. Your expense has nothing to do with it. Your love for unborn children has everything to do with it. Remember, Jesus gave it all to live his beliefs. "Foxes have lairs, and birds have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to rest His head". People will always party. Unwanted children will often result. Why don''t you adopt one? Remember, it''s for the child.
I applaud you on your diligence for responsibility. I try to be responsible too. However, I see no way that criticizing un-wed mothers (and many of the mothers-to-be who want abortions are un-wed) is being responsible. It only gives them one more reason to want an abortion - to avoid your scorn. Remember, a lot of these people are just girls, and they haven''t yet developed confidence in their self immage. It is my firm belief that, one thing people opposed to abortions must do is show praise and great honor to those girls and young women who decide to go forward and carry their child to birth. Remember, many of them are doing it alone, and it takes a lot of courage, and strength to do that. But, this creates one religious paradox: You''d be seen as honoring and praising their "promiscuity" as well. Look, God created the world. He also creates un-wed pregnancies. Maybe it''s not all that bad or scornful afterall.
I would like to see you take one of these killers home and rehabilitate them with your forgiveness.
I am not sure which statement you are referrig to that i made. I looked back and didn''t find it so assume i has been removed from the web. I consider myself a liberal as i want to look at all sides of an issue before deciding whci way i agree with. I also am a strong supporter of the death penalty. I see nothing in yoiur statements i really disagree with.
-
by keithle1
June 20, 2008 3:25 AM PDT
- Prove to me that "God created the world", omded. I need proof not faith.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 34 CommentsI''m sick of Christians/Jesus freaks/bible punchers preaching The Word here. Acting like everyone thinks the way they do. Save it for Sunday. I don''t want to hear it. Enough already. PLEASE. I beg you.