Taliban Fighters Launch Afghan Attack

Thousands Flee Southern Afghanistan's Largest City As Army Takes On Insurgents

(CBS/AP)  Taliban fighters destroyed bridges and planted mines after overrunning villages outside southern Afghanistan's largest city. Hundreds of farming families fled just before harvest, while the Afghan army rushed in troops.

Afghanistan's Ministry of Defense said Tuesday that between 300 and 400 militants - many of them foreigners - had taken over the Arghandab region 10 miles northwest of Kandahar. Afghan officials, fearing a major battle brewing, told residents to leave.

The Taliban have long sought to control Arghandab and the good fighting positions its pomegranate and grape groves offer. With control cemented, militants can easily cross the countryside's flat plains on a decent road network for probing attacks into Kandahar itself, in possible preparation for an assault on their former spiritual home.

Haji Anas, deputy governor of Kandahar, described the situation in the city as calm. He told CBS News from Arghandab, "It is nothing big, we are used to these kind of things. The operation has not started yet and you will witness that they (Taliban) will be defeated."

Anas also dismissed the Taliban's claim of having their fighters inside the city. "The situation is totally under control," he said, adding, "it is impossible for the enemy to deploy any fighters in the city."

Earlier Tuesday, Gen. Aminullah Pakiani, the Afghan commander in Arghandab district, told CBS News there was "no direct threat to Kandahar." He acknowledged a large buildup of Taliban, but said his forces would "get them out of the entire area within a couple of days."

Meanwhile, NATO's International Security Assistance Force and the U.S.-led coalition offered a strikingly different picture of the Arghandab region than the one Afghan officials portrayed. The U.S.-led coalition said in a statement that it had sent a patrol through Arghandab that met no resistance.

"Recent reports of militant control in the area appear to be unfounded," the statement said.

Coalition spokesman Capt. Christopher Colster said troops patrolled for about five hours on the west side of the Arghandab River - where Afghan officials say the militants are - but didn't make any contact with insurgents. The troops also didn't report seeing civilians fleeing the region, he said.

NATO aircraft, meanwhile, dropped leaflets in Arghandab telling residents to stay in their homes - despite the fact the Afghan Defense Ministry was telling residents to leave.

"Keep your families safe. When there is fighting near your home, stay inside while ANSF (Afghan security forces) defeat the enemies of Afghanistan," NATO spokesman Mark Laity quoted the leaflet as saying.

Despite that message, more than 700 families - meaning perhaps 4,000 people or more - had fled Arghandab, said Sardar Mohammad, a police officer manning a checkpoint on the east side of the Arghandab River.

On the west side of the river, hundreds of Taliban controlled about nine or 10 villages, Mohammad said.

"Last night the people were afraid, and families on tractors, trucks and taxis fled the area," said Mohammad. "Small bridges inside the villages have been destroyed."

The Ministry of Defense - which rushed in some 700 Afghan soldiers, many by air from Kabul - said insurgents got close to a police checkpoint in Arghandab and asked the police to "join them." The ministry said the fact the militants had to use a translator proves that foreign fighters - it didn't say from where - were behind the assault.

Haji Agha Lalai, a provincial council member and the head of the province's reconciliation commission, which brings former insurgents who lay down their weapons back into the folds of society, said the militants were destroying bridges and planting mines as defensive measures in hopes they can repel attacks from Afghan and NATO forces.

"From a strategic military point of view, Arghandab is a very good place for the Taliban," Lalai said. "Arghandab is close to Kandahar city, allowing the Taliban to launch ambushes and attacks more easily than any other place in the province. Secondly, it's covered with trees and gardens - they can easily hide from airstrikes."

The Taliban assault on the outskirts of Kandahar was the latest display of strength by the militants despite a record number of U.S. and NATO troops in the country. The push into Arghandab came three days after a coordinated Taliban attack on Kandahar's prison that freed 400 insurgent fighters.

Police and army soldiers increased security throughout Kandahar and enforced a 10 p.m. curfew.

A Taliban commander named Mullah Ahmedullah called an Associated Press reporter Tuesday and said about 400 Taliban moved into Arghandab from Khakrez, one district to the north. He said some of the militants released in Friday's prison break had joined the assault.

"They told us, 'We want to fight until the death,"' Ahmedullah said. "We've occupied most of the area and it's a good place for fighting. Now we are waiting for the NATO and Afghan forces."

The hardline Taliban regime ousted from power in a 2001 U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan regarded Kandahar as its main stronghold, and its insurgent supporters are most active in the volatile south of the country.

The U.S. and NATO have pleaded for additional troops over the last year and now have some 65,000 in the country. But the militants are still finding successes the alliance can't counter, a blow to international efforts to stamp out the insurgency.

One of the thousands of Afghans fleeing Arghandab said Tuesday that families were being forced out just as grape groves needed harvesting, meaning financial ruin for thousands. Haji Ibrahim Khan said Taliban fighters were moving through several Arghandab villages with weapons on their shoulders.

"They told us to leave the area within 24 hours because they want to fight foreign and Afghan troops," Khan said. "But within a week we should be harvesting, and we were expecting a good one. Now with this fighting we are deeply worried - the grapes are the only source of income we have."

Two powerful anti-Taliban leaders from Arghandab have died in the last year, weakening the region's defenses. Mullah Naqib, the district's former leader, died of a heart attack in October. A second leader, police commander Abdul Hakim Jan, died in a massive suicide bombing in Kandahar in February.

The assault Monday came one day after President Hamid Karzai angrily told a news conference he would send Afghan troops into Pakistan to hunt down Taliban leaders in response to the militants that cross over from Pakistan.

His spokesman, Humayun Hamidzada, said Tuesday that Karzai does not intend to send troops into Pakistan and was only making "a strong point" that Pakistan needs to crack down on militant safe havens.

---

CBS News' Sami Yousafzai in Peshawar, Pakistan contributed to this report.

[darnedsocks]

NOTHING IS GOING TO CHANGE WITH ISLAMOTERRORISTS UNTIL THEY CONVERT TO CHRISTIANITY, EVEN IF IT HAS TO BE UNDER DURRESS! OTHERWISE, THESE WARS WILL CONTINUE INTO ETERNITY, BECAUSE "ISLAM" IS BORNE OUT OF CONTROL, TERROR, AND ETERNAL GRUDGES.

[bobnjersey]

[The name for those far left posters that can''''t stand the fact that Fox News has both a Republican point of view, as well as the usual Democratic point of view, (as every other news media has only the latter.)]
[Posted by hoseobama at 07:00 PM : Jun 17, 2008]

what would that ''usual democratic point of view'' actually be that''s so fairly represented on fox?

i believe ''fds'' actually stands for ''fox delusion syndrome'' ... describing the persepective of those that contibute to and consume the content on fox news and believe it''s actually balanced ... just cause they say so.

haven''t you ever wondered why they found it necessary to explicitly state that they''re so ''fair and balanced'' as part of their tagline? how much truth is there in something if you have to go around repeatedly shouting it to all within earshot?

[rafterman1]

===I''''m sure that our fighting boys will be helping every one of those turbin heads meet their devil god in the next few days. It will be at least a few days before they get going since they will probably have to take sensitivity training first, then brush up on the U.S. constitutional laws that apparently protect foreign terrorists who reside on the other side of the earth. The best thing for them to do to protect themselves from the liberals and ACLU is to take NO prisoners....===
Posted by edintex

It''s not about protecting terrorists, it'' about protecting us and our rights from a government that might get too comfortable abusing people if they are allowed to do it to prisoners. After prisoners, what''s next, Americans off the street? Its a slipery slope, but neocons are too fearful and too cowardly to stick to American principles, even in a time of crisis.

[incog-nito]

Wait a minute! The Taliban are on the OFFENSIVE? Weren''t these supposed to be dead-enders on the run and in their last throes?

[dobbershome]

Kill em'' all!

[edintex]

I''m sure that our fighting boys will be helping every one of those turbin heads meet their devil god in the next few days. It will be at least a few days before they get going since they will probably have to take sensitivity training first, then brush up on the U.S. constitutional laws that apparently protect foreign terrorists who reside on the other side of the earth. The best thing for them to do to protect themselves from the liberals and ACLU is to take NO prisoners....

[j-whitman]

hoseobam,,, Virtual War, like our Virtual Border

[formrusmcsgt]

The Taliban assault on the outskirts of Kandahar was the latest display of strength by the militants despite a record number of U.S. and NATO troops in the country. The push into Arghandab came three days after a coordinated Taliban attack on Kandahar''s prison that freed 400 insurgent fighters....
----

This, after seven years of occupation and there are fools who ask for more....

Go figure....

[hoseobama]

"Afghanistan and Iraq are both Virtual War sponsored by the Republicon Party and the fools that vote Republicon (sic).- Posted by ConDumbism

Impossible. You''ve just defined a null set.

By definition fools are Democrats, and they don''t vote Republican. That is unless you count the attempts to misguide the Republican Primaries.

[stevex47]

Typical hypocritical swift boat nutjobs...Question the King, and you are a Traitor.

That thinking is anti american. Polar opposite of a document called the Constitution.

Nujobs say F the Constitution.

Traitors devulge the identities of CIA agents.

Defying UN mandates.

Hypocrisy is the king boosh kissing the hands and feet of the same people who blew up the Twin Towers.

THAT my nutjob whackjobs is TREASON and Traitorous acts.

BY YOUR OWN PSYCHOTIC RHETORIC.

You should all be deported to Guantanamo.