February 11, 2009 2:47 PM

Gingrich: McCain Won't Win On Experience

By
David Morgan
(CBS)  American voters will not reject Senator Barack Obama for president based on his experience but rather on his policies, says a Republican observer, who also predicted that if the GOP insists on campaigning against him on that basis they will lose.

"It won't work, it's a mistake," former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich, appearing on CBS's Face The Nation, said of the McCain campaign's focus on Obama's experience.

"The country may reject Senator Obama because of his relationship to Reverend Wright and his relationship to the hard left, to William Ayres, and because his policies include tax increases, and because there are some big decisions coming on energy, on education, on the court. And Senator Obama may turn out to represent a position so far to the left, the country won't tolerate it."

Gingrich discounted McCain's recent protests that Obama is not ready for the job: "Obama is a very articulate, very intelligent, Harvard law graduate, who is extraordinarily smart, and he's not going to come across in a debate like some guy who's dopey. He's going to come across as fully-prepared. He knows how to study all this stuff. He has the military advisers."

Concurrent with McCain's arguments that Obama is not prepared to be commander in chief are rumors that Louisiana Governor Piyush "Bobby" Jindal is in the running to be McCain's running mate.

Jindal, 37, is almost 10 years younger than Obama.

Gingrich doesn't see Jindal's youth as a problem, though. "You could argue that in fact Jindal's experience in the executive branch and in the legislative branch is greater than Senator Obama's experience. So it strikes me that it's going to be very hard for Obama's campaign to explain that Jindal, as a governor, who has served as an assistant secretary of health and human services, has served as a congressional staffer, has served as a congressman, is not qualified but Senator Obama is qualified."

Gingrich criticized Obama for his support of certain policies and most pointedly for his backing of this week's Supreme Court decision backing the habeus corpus rights of detainees held by the United States in a prison at Guantanamo Bay - a decision he called "worse than Dred Scott.

"He applauded this court decision. This court decision is a disaster, which could cost us a city. And the debate ought to be over whether or not you're prepared to risk losing an American city on behalf of five lawyers - it was a 5-4 decision. Five lawyers had decided that the Supreme Court counts more than the Congress and the president combined in national security.

"That ought to be a principled argument between McCain and Obama, about whether or not you're prepared to allow any random nut-case district judge, who has no knowledge of national security, to set the rules for terrorists."

(CBS)
Jindal, who also appeared on the program (left), also said that policies, rather than race or even age, would be the determining factors for voters.

"I think that [race] will be a topic that will be speculated and talked and written about quite a bit," he told host Chip Reid. "But people try to make my family's background an issue in my election. The reality is, that's not what voters care about. Let's give the American voters more credit. They're worried about rising energy prices. They're worried about overseas threats. They're worried about the cost of health care. They're worried about the economy, the jump in the unemployment rate.

"A candidate's background, it's interesting; it may make you take a second look, but you really are looking for who's the most qualified, whose values, whose opinions, whose policies you agree with."


Read the full "Face the Nation" transcript here.

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
  • David Morgan

    David Morgan is a senior editor at CBSNews.com and cbssundaymorning.com.

Add a Comment See all 389 Comments
by down-ndirty June 17, 2008 5:32 AM EDT
Headline in the Sunday paper: "Study: World''''s View of U.S. better because Bush is leaving office."

"The image of the U.S. has improved slightly in many countries over the past year... But the new optimism appears to be driven largely by the fact that Bush will soon be leaving office."

"The survey also showed that many across the globe blamed the U.S. at least in part for slumping (world)economics and global warming."

"...there are some indications that the world sees the possibility of change with the prospect of a new president."

A 24-nation survey shows that many people have greater confidence in Obama than McCain to "do the right thing" regarding world affairs.

Source: Pew Global Attitudes Project

Reply to this comment
by fake-id-2009 June 17, 2008 3:52 AM EDT

In an op-ed in the Los Angeles Times, James Kirchick lays waste to the liberal meme that "Bush Lied".
Actually, it was the liberals that lied about Bush.
AND IT WAS ONE OF YOU OWN THAT HAS EXPOSED YOUR LIES!
Read it and weep for yourselves
Posted by One-American at 03:09 PM : Jun 16, 2008


Read it but no weeping necessary. It''s no longer a matter of the lies. It''s a matter of why we are still in Iraq.

There''s NOTHING in the article about Iraq, or anyone from Iraq, ATTACKING us on 9/11.

There''s NOTHING in the article about BUSH GIVING UP capturing the one person who masterminded the 9/11 attack. What was it Bush said about bin Ladin??? Something about "NOT CARING ABOUT BIN LADIN??"

There''s NOTHING in the article about the WMD that were NEVER found.

There''s NOTHING in the article about the WMD that Reagan gave Saddam in the 80s that were used to kill Kurds.

So WHY are we still in Iraq? Wasn''t the "war" supposed to be over in a matter of months?

Reply to this comment
by fake-id-2009 June 17, 2008 3:34 AM EDT
AMEN! The RNC looks more like democracy than the DNC mafia gang!
Posted by RowdyWicca at 01:12 PM : Jun 16, 2008


Yeah, right!! We have had almost eight years of "republican democracy" with all its failings.

Reply to this comment
by standlee5 June 16, 2008 8:43 PM EDT
All the syrupy sweet media adoration Obama is receiving shows how people want to get this race thing behind us once and for all. So let the guy win and get it over with then and only then can we say OK racism is over in America now let''s get on with it. We''re all on an even playing field. Done. No more special favortism.
Reply to this comment
by luvusa June 16, 2008 7:04 PM EDT
"Sidney? SIDNEY????" HAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAH HAHAHAHAHA! And people get their pants all up in a bunch over Obama''''s middle name??? "Posted by raflin1

Sidney...Hussein...Sidney...Hussein. Hmmm Hussein... my panties are in a bunch. Sidney...who cares.
Reply to this comment
by one-american June 16, 2008 6:09 PM EDT
In an op-ed in the Los Angeles Times, James Kirchick lays waste to the liberal meme that "Bush Lied".

Actually, it was the liberals that lied about Bush.

AND IT WAS ONE OF YOU OWN THAT HAS EXPOSED YOUR LIES!

Read it and weep for yourselves, liberals:

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-kirchick16-2008jun16,0,7766785.story
Reply to this comment
by walker1209 June 16, 2008 6:06 PM EDT
To some of you Rocket Scientists out there, no vote cast in these United States is a wasted; we are granted the privilege of voting for whomever we please. While I may not agree with who an individual chooses to vote for, it is just that THEIR CHOICE!!!
So much for uniting people - this has been the worst discourse in my 35 years as a registered voter. But then this is what we get when the major candidates are not forced to deal with the issues facing the country. The so-called MSM is hard to distinguish from Entertainment Tonight and some of the other garbage that passes for news in this country.
Reply to this comment
by rowdywicca June 16, 2008 5:14 PM EDT
When McCain wins, it will be because the DNC presented the weakest link in the political chain for a candiate! No more, no less! Not to mention somebody more corrupt than BUSH!
Reply to this comment
by rowdywicca June 16, 2008 5:12 PM EDT
However, from the indictments in Board Games unsealed so far, Obama''''''''s legal culpability at this point anyways, stems from his involvement in setting up and receiving money from the pay-to-play schemes.


Posted by RowdyWicca at 11:51 AM : Jun 16, 2008"


LOL, you''''re cut-n-pasting from a right wing attack blog? Hillary would be so proud of you.

http://nwrepublican.blogspot.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by taddles3 at 12:52 PM : Jun 16, 2008

Once again, ear your heart out! Those were from OpEdNews!!! LMAO!
Reply to this comment
by walker1209 June 16, 2008 5:01 PM EDT
Not really in the habit of answering comments on my comments, but here goes: Former Democrat who can say anything, anyway she chooses!! However you or anyone else think something should be phrased is of no importance to me. But you did not dispute the most important part of that statement - THAT THEY HAVEN''T DONE A *** THING SINCE THEY GOT THE SLIM MAJORITY THE HAVE. The Democrats have been almost as inept as the empty suit we call President now!!!
Reply to this comment
See all 389 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook