February 11, 2009 2:47 PM

Ireland Shoots Down EU Reform Treaty

(AP)  Ireland's voters have rejected the European Union reform treaty, a blueprint for modernizing the 27-nation bloc that cannot become law without Irish approval, electoral officials said Friday.

In a major blow to the EU, 53.4 percent of Irish voters said no to the treaty. Irish Prime Minister Brian Cowen now will join other EU leaders at a summit next week to try to negotiate a new way forward.

Anti-treaty groups from the far left and right mobilized "no" voters by claiming that the treaty would empower EU chiefs in Brussels, Belgium, to force Ireland to change core policies — including its low business tax rates, its military neutrality and its ban on abortion.

"This is a very clear and loud voice that has been sent yet again by citizens of Europe rejecting the anti-democratic nature of Brussels governance," said Declan Ganley, leader of Libertas, the most prominent anti-treaty campaign group in Ireland.

The euro common currency fell to a one-month low on the news.

An EU constitution failed after French and Dutch voters rejected it in 2005. Ireland was the only member that subjected its would-be successor, the Lisbon Treaty, to a national vote. The Irish constitution requires all EU treaties to be ratified by referendum.

Ireland's minister for European affairs, Dick Roche, said the country was constitutionally barred from passing the treaty now. He predicted it would be difficult, if not impossible, for EU leaders to find a solution that would permit a second Irish referendum.

"As far as I'm concerned, this treaty is a dead letter," Roche said, adding that Ireland's voters have "made life very difficult for us going out to Brussels. We are in completely uncharted territory here, a very strange position."

In the EU's power base of Brussels and other European capitals, leaders vowed to complete ratification of the Lisbon Treaty through the governments of the other 26 members — even though, legally, the treaty cannot come into force because of the Irish rejection.

At the major ballot-counting center in Dublin, Finance Minister Brian Lenihan struggled to speak to reporters as anti-treaty activists jubilantly drowned him out with songs and chants of "No!" He eventually gave up and walked out, as one activist waved a sign reading "No to foreign rule" over his head.

Rural and working-class areas were almost universally anti-treaty. Better-off parts of Dublin registered stronger support for the EU. In suburban south Dublin, a largely wealthy and highly educated district, the "yes" camp triumphed with 63 percent of the vote. But a neighboring, scruffier district voted 65 percent "no."

The Lisbon Treaty and the failed constitution before it sought to reshape EU powers and institutions in line with the bloc's rapid growth in size and population since 2004.

Both documents proposed to strengthen the roles of the EU's president and foreign policy chief, reduce the areas where individual nations could veto policy changes and increase the powers of the European Parliament to scrutinize EU laws.

Ireland views itself as a pro-EU state that has broadly benefited from 35 years of membership. Yet even here, a majority of voters appeared determined to register their opposition to the growth of a continental government that would erode Ireland's sense of independence.

Anti-treaty pressure groups warned that the EU would use treaty powers to reduce Ireland's ability to control its own tax rates and maintain a ban on abortion. Such claims were vociferously rejected by the government and major opposition parties, all of whom campaigned for the treaty's ratification.

"People felt a convincing case for the treaty had not been made, and they felt hectored and bullied into supporting it while the wool was being pulled over their eyes," said Richard Boyd Barrett, leader of a hard-left pressure group called People Before Profit.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment
by toolmangler-2009 June 15, 2008 1:20 AM EDT
The EU shouldn''t worry, it will become a fact. The books in the Bible tell of what must happen for the Anti-Christ to emerge. They will get their one government when everything is ready for the final battle. It has been foretold and no one can stop it. All that is left is for people to choose who they will follow, (GOD) or (whatever his name is). As for me and mine, We will follow GOD.
Reply to this comment
by cfin5 June 14, 2008 5:52 PM EDT
......and the Czechs definitely have their act together also! COOL!
Reply to this comment
by cfin5 June 14, 2008 5:36 PM EDT
Good for the Irish! What they''re doing now works for them. No matter what any news media spins these days,...people just want to be left alone in their own country. We faired best when we stayed within our own "Constitutional Neutrality" concerning foreign policy. Why wouldn''t they also? Nothing wrong with minding your own business from the individual clear up to the state level. Globalist just can''t do that there or here.
Reply to this comment
by terrorislami June 14, 2008 12:12 PM EDT
idiot eu does not listen to the people,,,

they should worry more about fascist nazi terrorislam in their midst,,,

While Europe Slept: How Radical Islam is Destroying the West from Within by Bruce Bawer
http://www.**********/While-Europe-Slept-Radical-Destroying/dp/0385514727/ref=pd_sim_b_2_img/002-8081703-9164051

America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It by Mark Steyn

first europe and then the world

Islam: Muslims will Conquer and Rule Europe!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6SDpblB0Bc&feature=related

Eurabia2007
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3B623NB2HM&feature=related

Out of time: Radical Islam Taking Over Europe & West
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocU5x_03MDM&feature=related
Reply to this comment
by spadeisspade June 13, 2008 11:10 PM EDT
It''s so amazing to see this take shape; the EU is finally deciding to firm up its union and is going through the same growing pains as the US did. I wonder if they will actually respect laws of individual countries, much as our states have different laws/taxes/etc. Some things should be unified on a "federal" level, but each country should have the right to pursue their own level of government without a downfall of the whole thing.
Reply to this comment
by cdfoxtrot June 13, 2008 10:04 PM EDT
All this should have been done before the Eastern Bloc countries were admitted to the EU in 2004. This effort to reform the EU is necessary because of these new members.
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook