April 14, 2009 12:04 PM

Republicans Block Taxes On Big Oil Profits

By
CBSNews
(CBS/ AP)  Senate Republicans blocked a proposal Tuesday to tax the windfall profits of the largest oil companies, despite pleas by Democratic leaders to use the measure to address America's anger over $4 a gallon gasoline.

The Democratic energy package would have imposed a tax on any "unreasonable" profits of the five largest U.S. oil companies and given the federal government more power to address oil market speculation that the bill's supporters argue has added to the crude oil price surge.

"Americans are furious about what's going on," declared Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., and want Congress to do something about oil company profits and "an orgy of speculation" on oil markets.

But Republicans argued the Democratic proposal focusing on new oil industry taxes is not the answer to the country's energy problems.

"The American people are clamoring for relief at the pump," said Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., but if taxes are increased on the oil companies "they will get exactly what they don't want. The bill will raise taxes, increase imports."

The Democrats failed, 51-43, to get the 60 votes needed to overcome a GOP filibuster and bring the energy package up for consideration.

The American Petroleum Institute, which represents the major oil companies, has been reminding lawmakers that in the early 1980s, when the government imposed windfall profits taxes on oil companies domestic oil production dropped and imports increased.

But Democrats reject the comparison.

"If you don't tell the big oil companies they can no longer run energy policy in America, we will not succeed, plain and simple," Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., told CBS Radio News.






Separately, Democrats also failed to get Republican support for a proposal to extend tax breaks for wind, solar and other alternative energy development, and for the promotion of energy efficiency and conservation. The tax breaks have either expired or are scheduled to end this year.

The tax provisions were included in a broader $50 billion tax measure blocked by a GOP filibuster threat. A vote to take up the measure was 50-44, short of the 60 votes needed.

The windfall profits bill would have imposed a 25 percent tax on profits over what would be determined "reasonable" when compared to profits several years ago. The oil companies could have avoided the tax if they invested the money in alternative energy projects or refinery expansion. It also would have rescinded oil company tax breaks — worth $17 billion over the next 10 years — with the revenue to be used for tax incentives to producers of wind, solar and other alternative energy sources as well as for energy conservation.

The legislation also would:

  • Require traders to put up more collateral in the energy futures markets and open the way for federal regulation of traders who are based in the United States but use foreign trading platforms. The measures are designed to reduce market speculation.

  • Make oil and gas price gouging a federal crime, with stiff penalties of up to $5 million during a presidentially declared energy emergency.

  • Authorize the Justice Department to bring charges of price fixing against countries that belong to the OPEC oil cartel.

    Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has acknowledged that Americans are hurting from the high energy costs but strongly opposes the Democrats' response and has ridiculed those who "think we can tax our way out of this problem."

    "Republicans by and large believe that the solution to this problem, in part, is to increase domestic production," McConnell said.

    A GOP energy plan, rejected by the Senate last month, calls for opening a coastal strip of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska to oil development and to allow states to opt out of the national moratorium that has been in effect for a quarter century against oil and gas drilling in more than 80 percent of the country's coastal waters.
  • CBS/ AP
    Add a Comment See all 1050 Comments
    by bretster7 June 11, 2008 7:19 PM EDT
    funny how this is not news according to cBS

    WASHINGTON %u2014 A House subcommittee has rejected a Republican-led effort to open up more U.S. coastal waters to oil exploration.

    Rep. John Peterson, R-Pa., spearheaded the effort. His proposal would open up U.S. waters between 50 and 200 miles off shore for drilling. The first 50 miles off shore would be left alone.

    But the plan failed Wednesday on a 9-6, party-line vote in a House appropriations subcommittee, which was considering the proposal as part of an Interior Department spending package.

    With record oil prices and gas prices projected to hover around the $4 mark for the rest of the summer, Republicans have ratcheted up their efforts to open up oil exploration along U.S. coastline. But the long-sought change has so far been unsuccessful.

    Oh,I know why, because you can''t blame Republicans

    A-wipe Democrats can only do things for perceived political gain. They knew that the GOP would reject the windfall tax plan. They only want to have a political issue. They know it does not work It was tried in the 80''s and what happened? Thats right the price of fuel went up.
    You Lib''s are so gullible
    Reply to this comment
    by shaggydo-2009 June 11, 2008 6:33 PM EDT
    The democrats may not have the best or correct answer, but compared to what the republicans have done for us and the economy they look like geniuses and the republicans look like perfect candidates for being the theme of a Budweiser real men of genius commercial!
    Reply to this comment
    by creeper00 June 11, 2008 3:22 PM EDT
    Rethuglicans are pandering to their money men. So what''s new?
    Reply to this comment
    by mrright5 June 11, 2008 1:58 PM EDT
    I''''m always amused when I hear people react by using the term ''''socialism''''. Your local police, fire and emergency services, as well as education, infrastructure, highways and military are ''''socialized''''. If you are against that, then answer me this--would you be willing to go without all of the above or should we each get an individual bill for the extent to which we use them?


    Posted by ofbyfor1 at 07:49 AM : Jun 11, 2008

    Now you''re going to confuse the Limbaughbats
    Reply to this comment
    by patriot12436 June 11, 2008 10:58 AM EDT
    Damien McElroy spent a whole week i Iraq ? Gee i wonder how he managed to mak it for such a long period of time ?
    Reply to this comment
    by ofbyfor1 June 11, 2008 10:49 AM EDT
    Posted by maxify55 at 07:21 AM : Jun 11, 2008

    I''m always amused when I hear people react by using the term ''socialism''. Your local police, fire and emergency services, as well as education, infrastructure, highways and military are ''socialized''. If you are against that, then answer me this--would you be willing to go without all of the above or should we each get an individual bill for the extent to which we use them?
    Reply to this comment
    by feelfree4u June 11, 2008 10:37 AM EDT

    Related-

    "Fuel price protest goes global as anger mounts"

    "A global backlash over high fuel prices escalated on Tuesday. Truck drivers were killed in Spain and Portugal while manning picket lines, and violent protests spread to India."

    Come on U.S. truckers!

    What are you waiting for?!!!
    Reply to this comment
    by feelfree4u June 11, 2008 10:29 AM EDT

    Re: "Posted by FeelFree4U at 07:06 AM****************Spoken like a true socialist. Work for what you want. Then come ask if I want to sell you some of what I have."

    Posted by maxify55

    I''m pretty sure that you have nothing that I would be interested in.
    Reply to this comment
    by floydzeppl June 11, 2008 10:28 AM EDT
    I see your Volt and raise you 4 - 3/4 ton 4X4 Suburbans. I''''m not whining abut the cost of fuel. Things cost what they cost. It''s called supply and demand. I''m not a whiner like most here. Socialists cry because they want what their neighbors have without having to work for it. Pretty simple economy and it still doesn''t work. See that word there? It''s called work. Try it sometime.

    Posted by maxify55 at 07:21 AM : Jun 11, 2008
    ------------

    Nobody really appreciates the true artistry of a blithering, uninformed dumass anymore. But I appreciate you maxify55.
    Reply to this comment
    by popstom1 June 11, 2008 10:26 AM EDT
    Big Oil Big Car = Big F-ked
    Reply to this comment
    See all 1050 Comments
    .
    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    CBS News on Facebook