From Gridiron To Battlefield?

The Same Technology That Protects Football Players Could Keep Soldiers Safe On The Battlefield

(CBS)  It was one of those Eureka! moments.

Army doctors home from Iraq and Afghanistan were watching NFL players pound it out, and thought, "that's what our soldiers need, helmets like ... that."

Because, believe it or not, the effects on the brain of on-field collisions can be a lot like an IED explosion, CBS News correspondent Kimberly Dozier reports.

Blasts strong enough to shake and even bruise the brain, often leading to traumatic brain injury, known as "TBI."

Today more than 30 percent of troops who have served in combat suffer from TBI after repeated exposures to blasts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Researchers at three major Army hospitals to test - and a marriage between football and the military was born.

"Let's just look and see if we take a football helmet that's designed to prevent concussion and gerry-rig that into an Army combat helmet, and then test it in a standard fashion that helmets are tested to see if we couldn't decrease the incidents of concussion," said Dr. John Holcomb of the Brooke Army Medical Center.

Did it ever. It was 50 percent better.

A blow to the head accelerates the skull inside the helmet, and the brain inside the skull. The helmet's multiple layers of special foam padding absorb most of the energy, especially along the sides of the helmet, where the most dangerous blows occur.

Current military helmets have only a fraction of that padding.

The military has sent out a call to NFL helmet-makers such as Riddell telling them: apply their technology to combat helmets and we'll buy hundreds of thousands of them.

"We're going through an evaluation process right now just to see if we could bring some of our materials and design expertise to the combat helmet," said Thad Ide, vice president of research and development at Riddell.

They've done it before. Founder John Riddell invented World War II's classic web-suspension helmet.

A different war means different challenges.

"We're looking for a pad system that fits in, is compatible with the advance combat helmet; we're looking for pads that meet our requirements of sustaining blunt trauma at 10 feet per second," said Lt. Col. Robert Myles Jr., product manager of Soldier Survivability.

The military hopes to run some of the new designs through their paces this summer.

If they find the right one, military officials say they could field helmets in Iraq and Afghanistan in less than 90 days, tackling the challenges of modern warfare head-on.

[d0cb0b]

Quite a difference in the 10 feet-per-second (FPS) test shown and the 12-14 fps more commonly seen in combat. Have flame tests been done on the vinyl-dipped pads? Can they be worn for 18 hours daily for a 30-day mission instead of being taken off between plays or while sitting on the bench? Do they cause overheating? What effect does sand/sweat have on the scalp beneath the plastic-dipped pads? Lots of questions not addressed in this short segment.

[markfan777]

Along with improved helmet designs, a retainer like mouth guard used by many former and current NFL players may be the next line of defence for soldiers exposed to IED blasts. N.E. Patriot players fitted with this corrective orthodic mouth guard, report less dizzines, the sensation of seeing stars and MTBI in a Harvard MGH researchers abstract study. According to the NFL''s own statistics, the Pats have had two concussions in the past two seasons, where players were required to sit out a game, the Colts have had over twenty documented concussions in the same time span. It''s worth a look, www.mahercor.com has some good stories by ESPN, outlining the introduction of this new innovation.

[helloall34]

Of course there is an even better way to prevent these types of injuries... Stop this worthless "war" and bring our troops home.

[rf35]

I%u2019ll take that padding. It look far less uncomfortable than the current design. The material could be adapted to desert combat environments if change is proven necessary. I like the timeline, too. I%u2019ll be back in Iraq in 6 months and would love to carry a better helmet than I had last time.

[Scooter68]

d0cb0b - Too bad you take the worst case scenario on everything. The article states that they are RESEARCHING the usefullness of the new padding. No where does it say they are taking the exact same material and running with that as a solution. Initial testing is just that - it allows them to see if that exact same padding does provide some benefits and then they go from there with tests to determine answers to questions like yours and more.
The article addresses a need and a potential solution. Ask the soldiers how they feel about this proposal. At least one has already posted a comment. THEY are the ones whose comments matter. Flame tests? Are you kidding? Any flame that is going to melt that foam is going to destroy the human skin around and outside of that helmut.

[Scooter68]

d0cb0b - Perhaps you are part of a company making the current material that are leaving our soldiers at risk now. Hmmm Perhaps you are facing a loss of business for not doing sufficient advance research and staying ahead of the need? Maybe if the current helmut makers were listening to the reports and studying the data from the battlefield that new lifesaving material would already be in the helmuts today. Obviously the ''system; is broken and this is a move to fix it that the current companies should be doing. Publishing it this way lets folks know about the problem, a possible solution and it could spur others to develope even better solutions.

As to bringing the soldiers home from this war now - great idea but that doesn''t solve this problem. It will only give commanders and troops nightmares about the next combat situation they find themselves in.

[middleman8]

The best way to keep soldiers safe is to keep them at home in their own country, not running around terrorising the world.