June 4, 2008
Five Reasons Obama Won
CBSNews.com's Vaughn Ververs: How The Illinois Senator Stole The "Inevitable" Label From Hillary Clinton
-
Play CBS Video Video Obama Celebrates Big Victory "CBS News Raw:" Sen. Barack Obama thanked his supporters during a victory speech in St. Paul, Minnesota after he secured enough delegates to be declared the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.
-
Video Clinton: No Decision Tonight "CBS News RAW:" Refusing to concede defeat despite the certainty of Obama's nomination, Hillary Clinton told supporters she will not be making any immediate decisions regarding her candidacy.
-
Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and his wife Michelle wave to supporters at a primary night rally Tuesday, June 3, 2008, in St. Paul, Minn. (AP)
-
Photo Essay Barack Obama A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.
-
Timeline Democratic Campaign Trail Notable events in the race for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.
“Inevitable” was a word commonly associated with Hillary Clinton when she launched her presidential candidacy in January of 2007. That title now belongs to Barack Obama. On Tuesday night, the first-term Illinois Senator laid claim to the title of “presumptive nominee” after a historic, hard-fought Democratic primary campaign that went down to the very last day.
Perhaps no candidate in recent memory has entered a presidential primary with the kinds of advantages Clinton held. The former First Lady who has spent six years carving out a political identity of her own had the kind of universal name recognition, institutional support, resources and fond memories of better times for her party that appeared insurmountable.
The reasons for victory in any campaign can be fundamental or marginal and in a race as close as this one, a whole host of elements, moments or changes in the weather could be pinpointed as deciding factors in Obama’s victory. But a trip down memory lane and talks with some Democratic observers offer a look at five major reasons Clinton lost her inevitability to Obama.
The War In Iraq: When Hillary Clinton joined other Senate Democrats in voting to authorize the Bush administration to take military action in Iraq in 2002, it appeared like a political winner - particularly for anyone with presidential aspirations. In fact, of all the Democratic presidential candidates in 2008 who were in a position to cast a vote, only Rep. Dennis Kucinich voted against the authorization.
But as 2007 dawned and the campaign began, Iraq had become a major problem for Clinton. John Edwards, who had voted with Clinton on the war when he was still in the senate, made a public apology for doing so. Pressured to follow suit, Clinton parsed her way through a position that had become extremely unpopular among the base of voters who would energize the primary process. But she refused to flat-out apologize.
Enter Obama, who had already created a tremendous amount of buzz with his entry into the race. Alone among the contenders to challenge Clinton, Obama had been against the war from the beginning and he made sure that was a centerpiece of his campaign. It gave him two advantages over Edwards and others vying to be the anti-Clinton candidate - purity on the war (and thus the sentimental edge on the growing block of anti-war voters) and an entrée into his driving campaign theme of “change.”
Change v. Experience: “People were looking for dramatic change, not just incremental change, and he tapped into that early,” said Democratic strategist Steve Jarding. And in Obama they found it, in ways both big and small. Race was an obvious difference between the Illinois senator and all the candidates who had come before. His very newness combined with Kennedy-esque appeals to put real meat on the rhetoric.
Clinton took a very different approach, presenting herself as the experienced candidate. With eight years as First Lady and just entering her second term in the Senate, some wondered what experience she was claiming. “The irony of all that is that she's been in elected office less time than Barack Obama,” said Democratic strategist Garry South. “There was a way of turning the change thing around on him, and they not only neglected to do it, they didn't understand how to do it.”
Above that, Clinton was slow at responding even once it became clear that Obama’s message was selling. One of the major turning points in the race came at the Iowa Democratic Party’s annual Jefferson-Jackson fundraising dinner. Obama’s speech went below the radar screen of most voters but electrified party activists in the state, signaling a challenge to Clinton that she never pivoted to meet.
Iowa And The Process: In the spring of 2007, a memo was circulated by Clinton’s deputy campaign manager making the argument to skip the Iowa caucuses altogether and concentrate resources instead on states further down the calendar. The actual reasoning of the memo may have been flawed, but the primary recommendation was certainly solid in retrospect.
In the Democratic race, Iowa became ground zero early on. Every single candidate made that the primary focus of their strategy - Clinton, to score a knockout blow on the rest of the field early on, the rest to find a foothold to continue forward. That dynamic raised the stakes immeasurably and when Clinton finished third there to Obama and Edwards, it changed the dynamics of the entire campaign. “When she lost Iowa, everything got put on hold,” said Jarding.
Not only was it a setback for Clinton, it was proof that Obama’s candidacy was not just catching on, it was winning. Despite a comeback victory in New Hampshire, Clinton would go on to lose South Carolina and entered Super Tuesday - with more than 20 contests - in a weakened position. “Hillary Clinton did not take Barack Obama or anyone else seriously as a potential contender for the nomination,” said South. “She made a whole series of serious strategic errors - including thinking it would all be over on February 5th. She had no game plan in place in case it didn't work out that way.”
A failure to seriously contest small caucus states like Alaska and even Colorado left her vulnerable to second guessing and campaign shakeups heading into a crucial stretch that saw Obama reel off a series of wins from Maine to Wisconsin while accumulating a campaign war chest unrivaled in political history.
Cold, Hard, Cash: When all is said and accounted for, Hillary Clinton will have probably raised about $250 million for her presidential campaign, an eye-popping amount by any standard. But Obama has already neared the $300 million mark and appears to have almost unlimited potential should he decide to bypass federal funding for the general election.
As more evidence of Obama’s appeal, the source of his seemingly bottomless wallet was not the big-money networks relied on by Clinton, but small donors harvested at almost no cost over the Internet. And it manifested itself in very tangible ways in the primary campaign. He established a truly national organization which will serve him well this fall, and he was able to spend $75 million on television advertising - more than all the Republican presidential candidates combined.
And it was spent at critical points. According to a study by TNS Media Intelligence/CMAG and the Wisconsin Advertising Project, Obama outspent Clinton by a three-to-one margin in that critical period in February when he was running up his delegate count. In the end, Obama’s money advantage wasn’t a deciding factor, but one that came into play at key points during the campaign and helped Obama build a delegate lead Clinton could not overcome.
Superdelegates: At one point in the campaign, Obama supporters feared the prospect of a Clinton victory gained through the endorsement of the party leaders, or superdelegates, despite his lead in the delegate count. As a practical matter, it became her final strategy once it became clear that she had no hopes of erasing Obama’s delegate lead, despite huge wins in states like West Virginia and Kentucky. (The actual Democratic delegate allocation system is one more reason Obama was able to win, but that’s a whole story unto itself.)
Clinton’s argument, as anyone who’s heard her speak over the past month knows, was two-fold: she was the better qualified and more electable candidate for the party, and she brought a constituency that Obama could not attract: white, lower-income and blue-collar workers in key swing states like Ohio and Pennsylvania.
That argument fell flat for a variety of reasons. One primary reason was simple - Obama’s lead in the pledged delegate count. Without some driving reason to disqualify Obama late in the game, how could Democrats (many up for re-election themselves), risk alienating black voters (one of the most loyal constituencies of the party), and more importantly, the legions of young voters Obama has brought into the process.
For every argument, there is a counterargument. “The superdelegates weren't fooled by it,” South said of Clinton’s approach. “The notion that she was the only one of the two that could be the only viable nominee in the fall simply is not a sellable argument.”
©MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- terrorislami - you are an idiot! we look forward to having the last laugh come november. obama will win in a landslide and none of your bogus links nor inanae giggling can take that away from us!
- Reply to this comment
- Five reasons Obama won (IMHO):
1) Voter fraud/voter disenfranchisement
2) Young vote (bussing in 18 year-olds who voted on emotion, for a ''rock star,'' not on issues)
3) More frequent good press; biased media
4) First AA candidate
5) The good ol boy network couldn''t handle the thought of a woman being President. - Reply to this comment
- how many hussein cabinet posts will be held by nation of terrorislam members???
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=obama+campaign staff nation of islam
DO YOU KNOW THIS MAN???
A Video Portrait Of Barack Hussein Obama
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?RsrcID=2036
FOLLOW THE MONEY
hussein loves those earmarks,,,
Obama funneled a million dollars of federal money with earmarks to Obama''s wife hospital the same year she got a massive raise.
http://redblueamerica.com/blog/2008-03-16/rev-jeremiah-wright-michelle-obama-and-thomas-jefferson-1628
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/14/us/politics/14campaign.html?hp
WHAT SEPARATION BETWEEN CHURCH AND STATE???
Earmarks to St. Sabina
In a Tribune story a year ago, Obama defended special budget earmarks for his district while he was a state legislator, including ones that went to programs associated with Pfleger''s church.
Pfleger gave Obama''s campaigns $1,500 between 1995 and 2001, including $200 in April 2001, about three months after Obama announced at least $100,000 in grants to St. Sabina programs.
http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/politics/blog/2008/05/obamas_pastor_new_problem_apol.html
http://www.kxmc.com/getArticle.asp?ArticleId=243105
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/11/us/politics/11chicago.html?_r=2&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&pagewanted=all&adxnnlx=1212419469-bXy5VAkLmpUPszudAG2pmw - Reply to this comment
- HUSSEIN IS SELECTED BY THE STUPID/SUPER DELEGATES,,,
NOT ELECTED BY THE ELECTED DELEGATES,,, lol
Obama Clinches Dem Nomination
Illinois Senator Surpasses Delegate Milestone; Clinton Delays Decision On Campaign''''s Future
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/03/politics/main4148295.shtml
hahaha
what BS propoganda,,, he clinches nothing,,,
he was selected by the super delegates,,, and they can change their mind by convention time,,, LOL
hahaha
hussein could not win the nomination with the voting demonic-rats,,, could not even beat a woman,,, LOL
hahaha - Reply to this comment
- HUSSEIN IS SOME UNITER,,,lol
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=democrats+against obama
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=jews against obama
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=latinos against obama
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=women against obama
hahaha
what a stinking LIAR,,,
POLL: READY FOR A MARXIST PRESIDENT???
POLL: READY FOR A PRO FASCIST NAZI TERRORISLAM PRESIDENT???
POLL: READY FOR A FOR A PRESIDENT THAT HATES AMERICA???
POLL: READY FOR A PRESIDENT THAT TOOK THE BLACK VALUE SYSTEM PLEDGE TO ONLY REPRESENT AFRICAN AMERICANS???
HUSSEIN IS SELECTED BY THE STUPID/SUPER DELEGATES,,, - Reply to this comment
- RACIST CBS PLAYS THE RACE CARD,,,
CBS Poll: Ready For A Black President?
Poll Finds That Most Americans Believe The Country Is Ready - And They Didn''t Eight Years Ago
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/04/opinion/polls/main4151937.shtml#ccmm
***,,, did we not already have a black president???
did they not say wet willy kkklowntoon was the first black president???
hahaha
are blacks playing the race card on america???
Obama gets 92 percent of the black vote
Clyburn Warns Democratic Party: African Americans Matter
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/04/25/clyburn_warns_democratic_party.html?hpid=topnews - Reply to this comment
- hmmmmmm what does ham-asss, lez-balless(hezbollah), nation of terrorislam and ism(international solidarity movement) know that you do not know???
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=hamas+endorses obama&btnG=Search
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=hezbollah endorse obama
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=nation of islam endorses obama &btnG=Search
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=International Solidarity Movement obama &btnG=Search
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=obama islamic marxist group ISM &btnG=Search
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=obama Audacity of Hope I will stand with the Muslims&btnG=Search
Once upon a time there was a serpent who was badly injured in a fight with another animal. It managed to slither away to safety but would have surely died if a benevolent man had not seen it suffering by the side of the road. The goodly man carefully wrapped the snake up and took it to his house, where he bestowed the kindest and gentlest care on the snake until it was healed and could return to the wild. Just as the man was releasing the serpent back into the grass, the ungrateful snake turned and bit him on the hand.
"What did you do that for?" cried the man, who knew that the bite of this particular snake was usually fatal. "Didn''t I take care of you when no one else would?"
The snake shrugged (no small feat for a snake!) and replied to the benevolent--and now doomed-- man, "What did you expect? You knew I was a snake when you picked me up." - Reply to this comment
- Posted by whatithink at 07:23 PM : Jun 04, 2008
Very good post... - Reply to this comment
- Obamas camp hired 400 bloggers to intimidate people on the blogs..just blog on and ignore the racial detracors.. Posted by nanging3 at 06:33 PM : Jun 04, 2008
Source??
Not much thought went into that comment. - Reply to this comment
- 3) a whole lot of republicans voted for and contributed to his campaign...
Posted by realtime09 at 06:48 PM : Jun 04, 2008
Ya really think so? LOL!!! In my state republicans can''t vote in a democratic primary, and vice versa.
The reason is obvious... - Reply to this comment
- Elizabeth Ward, the Miss Arkansas who won the Miss America crown in 1982, told friends she was forced by Clinton to have *** with him shortly after she won her state crown.
Posted by BLACKMILITAN at 02:35 PM : Jun 04, 2008
Actually you are only partially correct. Ward publicly admitted to having a brief "affair" with Clinton. As a result of her public statement she was hounded and threatened by the IRS.
Elizabeth Ward, AKA Elizabeth Gracen, played Amanda on the Highlander series.
Paula Jones suffered the same IRS fate after she rejected a "deal" with Clinton. - Reply to this comment
- Howdy, gay times, cloudy gray times....you are now a thing of the past....cause...
Happy days are here again....the skies above are clear again....Let us sing a song of cheer again...happy days are here again.
HRC...Take your 110,000,000 dollar fortune, Bill and your bitter, bashing polictics and just leave. We had enough of your doom & gloom campaign. - Reply to this comment
- Obama will not win in November. If the blacks vote for him it will be because he is black, and not because they know what he stands for.
He does not stand for blacks I can assure you. He will do the same as any other candidate, once in he will forget blacks, or any other group. It is a surprise he got the nomination-so far.
Let''s wait and see what comes out of the closet about him. How many typical White Americans is he going to P off about being stereotypical racist. HE IS THE ONE WHO IS RACIST, NOT THE WHITE PEOPLE!!!
SUCK IT UP AMERICA, DON''T BE FOOLED BY THIS NEGROE!!! - Reply to this comment
- McCain says:
"I don''''t understand how the economy works."
We can''''t afford another 4 years of this.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by david1737
YES of course we can afford that compared to 4 years of Obama Tyrrany. - Reply to this comment
- How could anyone in their right mind vote for a man who can''t even run his own household? How can you vote for a man who''s wife tells him to put on his little pink panties and bake her some pot brownies and he runs and does it? How could you vote for a man who is so whimpy he asks her if he can do this,...if he can do that? Please Michelle? I''ve been good!? I would never vote for someone who is as weak as the little girlie man Obama!!
OBAMA/YOURMAMA!! - Reply to this comment
- McCain is gonna give taxcuts to rich and companies which will invest in China. Obama gives taxcuts to the middleclass who will spend it all here in America! I know who gets my vote!
Ha ha Americans REALLY WANT TO BE F---ED UP THE OL'' ---HOLE by McShame. They voted for bush TWICE!!
Democrats always give REASONS to Americans, only to be beaten by "Flags and Applepie" - Reply to this comment
- McCain is gonna give taxcuts to rich and companies which will invest in China. Obama gives taxcuts to the middleclass who will spend it all here in America! I know who gets my vote!
Ha ha Americans REALLY WANT TO BE F---ED UP THE OL'' ---HOLE by McShame. They voted for bush TWICE!!
Democrats always give REASONS to Americans, only to be beaten by "Flags and Applepie" - Reply to this comment
- "oligraphy?" what the H is that? GoBama!
This election is not about "race" despite what these pseudo-non-racist republicans rant on about. - Reply to this comment
- whatithink
Interesting point. When you look at those who benefit from the policies of stupid liberals you find that it''s Americans. Now why would We the People want to benefit from things like a safe work place, insurance on his bank deposits, or clean inspected/tested food/Water/toys, which our children consume? - Reply to this comment
- "Joe gets up at 6 a.m. and fills his coffeepot with water to prepare his morning coffee. The water is clean and good because some tree-hugging liberal fought for minimum water-quality standards.
With his first swallow of water, he takes his daily medication. His medications are safe to take because some stupid commie liberal fought to insure their safety and that they work as advertised.
All but $10 of his medications are paid for by his employer''s medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for paid medical insurance - now Joe gets it too." - Reply to this comment

Video
The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.



