June 4, 2008

Enough About Them, Make This About Us

The Nation: Spotlight Has Been On Obama And Clinton’s Qualifications, Not Issues Of Campaigns

  • Play CBS Video Video Obama Nails Down Nomination

    Nomination in hand, Sen. Barack Obama's is turning his attention to the main event. Speculation abounds over whether a vanquished Hillary Clinton will be his running mate. Dean Reynolds reports.

  • Video Democratic Race Nearly Over

    With the final primaries over in the 2008 election, Sen. Barack Obama has enough delegates to clinch the nomination. Steve Chaggaris, CBS News Political Director, weighs in on what Hillary Clinton will do next.

  • Video Clinton: No Decision Tonight

    "CBS News RAW:" Refusing to concede defeat despite the certainty of Obama's nomination, Hillary Clinton told supporters she will not be making any immediate decisions regarding her candidacy.

  • Photo Essay Hillary Clinton

    A look at a life and career full of firsts.

  • Photo Essay Hillary Rodham Clinton

    The Democratic Senator from New York and former first lady sets her sights on the White House.

(National Review Online)  This column was written by Laura Flanders.
From primary season, let's move secondary season; from the singular to the plural.

For as long as Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have been battling it out for the Democratic nomination, the spotlight's been on them: their qualifications, their promises, their baggage. According to a Pew Center study, in the first half of last year, only three percent of campaign coverage focused on issues. This year, that's stumbled to a pathetic seven percent. It's no surprise.

Feminists say the personal is political. In our privatized economy neoliberals say it's strictly personal. Your troubles, your chances, the way you're treated, it's all unique to - and determined by - you! So we're told. It's a convenient way to take systems of wealth and power and privilege out of the picture and a happy-for-some way to eradicate history. We've privatized prisons and health-care and education and war and we do the same to our politics and our politicians. It's all about them.

Well, enough about them. We better make this about us. The people I know who rooted for Hillary Clinton did it for a reason. It wasn't her hair, her shoes, her husband… It was out of a stubborn, long-suffering belief that after centuries of being put second, a woman president might put gender justice first. And by gender justice we mean human justice. As Kavita Ramdas of the Global Fund for Women explained on GRITtv Tuesday night, you can't teeter the welfare of the world on that part of society - the female part - that you treat the worst without consequences for the planet.

The Clinton supporters I know long for a president who would reprioritize; a president who would reapportion spending and security and power so that women had our fair share of each. They thought (and many still believe) that it would take a woman to do it -- and maybe it will, but it shouldn't have to. Not if we de-privatize and re-personalize. The problem - it's not about her. And the solution - it's not about him. It's about us.

Watch this commentary and a rollicking conversation among women on race and class and gender in the '08 race on GRITtv. "GRITtv with Laura Flanders" plays on Free Speech TV directly following Democracy Now, and online, atGRITtv.org. Sign up for a video feed.

By Laura Flanders
Reprinted with permission from The Nation.



If you like this article, check out www.thenation.com for more investigative reports, timely editorials and incisive columns

Add a Comment See all 14 Comments
by frankbowers June 6, 2008 5:51 PM EDT
I would have been happy to vote for Mrs Clinton and if H. Dean had not screwed the pooooooooooooooooooch down in Fl and up in Mi I would be voting for here come November. Now that obama has the ticket, I feel sorry for the democrat party down line, here in Texas very much.
I now will be voting for McCain and maybe down line republican as well.
So, America thank H. Dean for leaping on the RNC wagon in Fl. and Mi and allowing this to happen.
The best of good days to Ms. Clinton and to heck with the muslims, never say never, but here I can at the age of 70 I will say I will never vote for a muslim nor a gdblackidiot who follows a pastor who said GD America and the white man.
Reply to this comment
by patriot12436 June 6, 2008 1:10 AM EDT
It doesn''t matter what the working class votes. The rich will retain control of the country and keep *** the working class.I think we are headed for a civil war. I don''t even have the heart to comment anymore. Just am waiting till it all hits the fan. When people lose their jobs, their homes, and can''t feed their families then they will act. It will look like the wrath of God when it happens.
Reply to this comment
by blackwater66-2009 June 5, 2008 7:03 PM EDT
I already know who I am voting for, Big John McCain. We need to stay in Iraq to win this war on terror and to help these people gain their freedom as we have in the USA. Forget about the gas prices and the food prices they will take care of themselves !

Reply to this comment
by aldon61 June 5, 2008 5:07 PM EDT
I thought it was pretty plain. It is time to stop addressing extranious non-issues and start talking about central issues like economy, healthcare, education, budget, environment, national security, infrastructure rebuilding, military rebuilding....

The list is endless. Find a couple of issues you care about and start reading. Then, come Nov, make an INFORMED decision.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by clestes at 10:20 AM : Jun 05, 2008

I totally agree with you. Regardless the candidate, or your position, know the issues and vote your conscience.
Reply to this comment
by clestes-2009 June 5, 2008 1:23 PM EDT
rmsdm4,

try going to his website and reading. He has plenty to say on several issues. There are some that he has not defined as well, but he will.

Try googling an issue you feel strongly about and try READING. Then come back and post something that shows you can actually read. For Obama or against does not matter.

Just have something worthwhile to say.
Reply to this comment
by clestes-2009 June 5, 2008 1:20 PM EDT
menmotoscutr,

I thought it was pretty plain. It is time to stop addressing extranious non-issues and start talking about central issues like economy, healthcare, education, budget, environment, national security, infrastructure rebuilding, military rebuilding....

The list is endless. Find a couple of issues you care about and start reading. Then, come Nov, make an INFORMED decision.
Reply to this comment
by June 5, 2008 12:38 PM EDT
What issue was this article about?
Reply to this comment
by feelfree4u June 5, 2008 8:09 AM EDT

We''re done.
Reply to this comment
by jimfinster June 5, 2008 4:43 AM EDT
The best candidate should become president.

Not the best woman. Not the best man. The best candidate.

Reply to this comment
by o_nolan1 June 5, 2008 3:53 AM EDT
This is what I have been writing about on here for weeks now. I did not realise that the issues were being discussed only 3% of the time. How is the election going to be about change if the side issues are going to be front and centre. We may not know what the changes are until after the election, which defeats the purpose of having a campaign. The media are at fault, because they have learned a long time ago that negativity and shock value sells newspaper and increases ratings. A sad situation.
Reply to this comment
by rmsdm4 June 5, 2008 3:52 AM EDT
It is hard for obama to address issues because he has none. Oh I forgot, change and hope. Typical obama supportor: I "hope" they don''t "change" my welfare check.
Reply to this comment
by patriot12436 June 4, 2008 11:16 PM EDT
I think this article is right. It is time we woke up and said Hey, we need someone who will address the problems here at home.
Reply to this comment
by cyberus-2009 June 4, 2008 10:51 PM EDT
----
Re: "According to a Pew Center study, in the first half of last year, only three percent of campaign coverage focused on issues. This year, that''''s stumbled to a pathetic seven percent. It''''s no surprise."

Sure, OK, but that''''s pretty un-American of you to point that out.

Posted by FeelFree4U
----
Yeah ... pretty un-american to point out that we elect our leaders based based on a popularity contest fueled by millions of lobbyist dollars.
Reply to this comment
by feelfree4u June 4, 2008 10:27 PM EDT

Re: "According to a Pew Center study, in the first half of last year, only three percent of campaign coverage focused on issues. This year, that''s stumbled to a pathetic seven percent. It''s no surprise."

Sure, OK, but that''s pretty un-American of you to point that out.
Reply to this comment
See all 14 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Michelle Obama tells how her role as the First Lady has changed her perspective. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • The Fall Of The Berlin Wall The Fall Of The Berlin Wall

    Looking Back at the Wall that Once Divided Germany On the 20th Anniversary of Its Collapse

  • Patricia Clarkson Patricia Clarkson

    Television and Film Actress, Yale School of Drama Graduate and Academy Award Nominee

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Andre Agassi Andre Agassi

    Former Top-Seeded Tennis Star, Gossip Column Favorite and Philanthropist

  • Yankees Victory Parade Yankees Victory Parade

    The Yankees Celebrate Their 27th World Series Championship with a Ticker-Tape Parade Up Broadway

  • Orlando Office Shooting Orlando Office Shooting

    A Gunman Opens Fire at the Offices of an Engineering Firm Where He Once Worked

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: