The Flak Over Flacks
In The Wake Of Scott McClellan's New Book, Legal Analyst Andrew Cohen Says PR People Are Aghast At The Truth
-
Play CBS Video
Video
On McClellan's Book And Lying
CBS News legal analyst Andrew Cohen provides commentary on Scott McClellan's controversial new book, "What Happened," which alleges intentional deception on the part of the Bush Administration.
-
Photo
Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan reveals in his new book that, shock of shocks, the Bush adminstration was not always truthful, revelations that are being condemned by the community of PR spokespeople. Andrew Cohen says to spare us the mea culpas. (CBS)
-
Blog
Court Watch
CBSNews.com Legal Analyst Andrew Cohen's new blog on the big issues and analyzes important cases of the day.
There is nothing funny about this past week's revelations that former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan lied to the American people about certain vital policy decisions within the Bush Administration.
It's a confession which supports the worst suspicions that millions of Americans have about the current leadership in Washington.
But in every tragic drama comes a moment of comedic Zen. And in L'Affair McClellan, that has come from the public relations community, where some now wonder whether the former flack violated the "ethics" of his craft.
Apparently, an industry the very essence of which is to try to convince people that a turkey is really an eagle has a rule that condemns lying.
The Public Relations Society of America states: "We adhere to the highest standards of accuracy and truth in advancing the interests of those we represent..." This clause strikes me as if the Burglars Association of America had as its creed "Thou Shalt Not Steal."
Show me a PR person who is "accurate" and "truthful," and I'll show you a PR person who is unemployed.
The reason companies or governments hire oodles of PR people is because PR people are trained to be slickly untruthful or half-truthful. Misinformation and disinformation are the coin of the realm, and it has nothing to do with being a Democrat or a Republican.
So McClellan is a liar. Big deal. Thomas Jefferson was a liar, and so was Franklin Roosevelt. John Kennedy lied and so did Richard Nixon.
During the time it took me to write this essay I'll bet dozens of PR people blatantly lied to their audiences, despite the presence of proclamations declaring that they should not.
You can't try to convince someone that a milk cow is really a racehorse without lying. You can't build a profession based a deceit and spin, then create "ethics" rules that call for honesty, and then criticize McClellan.
He did what his predecessors had done and what his successors are doing and will continue to do until no one listens to them anymore from the podium. It's as American as Apple Pie and indictments - as book deals, and perjury.
And that's the truth.
Click here to read Andrew Cohen's follow-up to the response this essay has received.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from Sunday Morning
- Latest in Sunday Morning
- MTV's Bill Flanagan On Jackson's Music
- Michael Jackson's Legacy
- On The Trail Of John Dillinger



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- next
See all 238 CommentsI think Andrew is wrong.
PR people may put the best possible light on something but to outright lie is quite something else entirely. To say that the two things are the same, as this article does, is absurd.
The American people were OUTRAGED when Bill Clinton lied about monica - something that affected them NOT ONE TINY WHIT and had nothing to do with anyone else or governing the country.
Now you''re saying that because we were LIED into a multi billion dollar war with Iraq (to say nothing of the lives lost) it''s just STATUS QUO?
You''re a fool Andrew. It''s not right. It never will be. And there have been far, far more people put to DEATH for far, far less.
Once you lose your sense of proportion, you don''t really have anything left. Or are you simply a Bush administration apologist as well?
This is an undeserved slap in the face to tens of thousands of professionals who put their jobs on the line every day to convince their clients to do the right thing, because it is not only in the best interest of the public, but in the best interest of the client. Cohen forgot to mention that Nixon lied, and we know what happened to him.
Cohen has it all wrong. Public relations by definition must be ethical, that is, fair, accurate and truthful. If a practitioner lies or distorts or manipulates opinion with dishonesty, he or she is practicing the antithesis of public relations.
As a legal analyst, Cohen certainly is aware of the unethical practices of many attorneys. According to his line of argumentation, the entire legal profession also should be labeled as unethical.
The Oligarchs took great care to prepare the minds of the people for abject slavery. A system of education comprising dull repetition, training in obedience and neglect of science enfeebled the critical faculties. By manifold deceptions, the people were brought to identify themselves with their oppressors. They were taught to emulate the haughty disdain for truth, the proud and willful ignorance, and the devious hypocrisy of the Oligarchs.
With such preparation it was inevitable that the people, although heirs to a great republic, swallowed whole the crude fabrications of Dumus designed to justify the conquest of Mesopotamia. Dumus proclaimed that Nur ud Din, the bitter enemy of Al-Ghazna, was the lieutenant of ibn Shaitan and that a country reduced to desperate poverty by the elder Dumus threatened the Hegemon with hyper-lethal weapons. That these myths, so flatly contradicted by the most accessible knowledge, were accepted by every class of citizen cannot be ascribed wholly to credulity. Not a few winked at the fictions of Dumus, conceiving that by his promised conquests, they would, together with the Oligarchs, become lords over all the peoples of the Earth. Little did they foresee that the war of plunder, so lightly embarked upon, would be the grave of their power and of their liberty.
Opposition within the Hegemon cowed, and the opinions of ancient allies spurned, Dumus launched his invasion.
Posted by gorney1515 at 11:40 AM : Jun 01, 2008
Let''s not be too harsh on lawyers. They can lose their license for gross misconduct and violation of ethics. Is there a system in place to insure ethical conduct for PR professionals? Also, in a criminal trial the adversary structure that regulates the presentation of evidence and the oversight of the judge provide some degree of assurance of a fair trial in which inaccuracies and sloppiness in the evidence can be challenged. When a PR person goes to work, who represents the other side of the story and who referees any conflict of views?
I think the government should not be allowed any PR personnel on payroll but that if it does any information and news they issue on behalf of the administration should be unequivocally labeled as preliminary until confirmed from other sources.
"tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and for exposing the country to danger"
Posted by LBW111 at 01:56 PM : Jun 01, 2008
############
I bet Mr. Cohen one day complains about the lack of civility in the world and the next day calls thousands of decent people liars.
############
Mr. Cohen is not Karl Rove.
#####
I have never lied and never will.
#####
Then the 935 false statements and lies from this regime should be irritating the hell out of you....
#####
Perhaps only in the morass of lies in Washington DC can an adequate curtain be drawn, allowing blatant lies, and liars, to flourish. These are good cases of "what not to do" in PR 101 -- but are hardly representative on an entire industry.
For Cohen to so flatly air his ill-informed insults against an entire profession of hard-working professionals -- it makes me wonder how a CBS news producer could rise high enough in the media ranks to allow such tripe to be aired. The attack on PRSA''s tenets was particularly offensive -- those principles are nothing short of sacred to thousands of careers.
I will not, however, make Cohen''s mistake and characterize all TV news producers as lacking journalistic integrity or intelligence, based on one very ill-informed, ignorant, so-called "professional''s" opinion. I''ll leave that kind of idiotic logic to the crew at the "Sunday Morning" program -- a program I will be very unlikely to watch again in future.
Posted by LBW111
For the second time within a week:"The lady doth protest too much, methinks". - W.Shakespeare
Re: "There is nothing funny about this past week''s revelations that former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan lied to the American people about certain vital policy decisions within the Bush Administration."
Oh, I don''t know about that, Mr. Cohen.
I got a few laughs out of it.
Re: "The Public Relations Society of America states: "We adhere to the highest standards of accuracy and truth in advancing the interests of those we represent..."
Well, as Hitler said, if you are going to lie, you are better off making it a big one, and the regime seems to agree, as they have told a series of non-stop whoppers!
Re: "My job is to represent the truth, as seen through the eyes of the public, to the company I work for, and to represent the truth, as the company sees it, to the public."
In other words, lies all around.
Show my a PR person that claims that they have never lied, and I''ll show you one that posts the same dubious nonsense, 12 times.
I am ashamed of McClellan, his mainstream media enablers and this shameful chapter of American history. You can''t make this stuff up.
"I have been a public relations professional for 37 years. I have never lied and never will. Why in the world would I do such a thing?"
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
In business, PR people lie to make their employer more money. In politics people lie to buy votes.
Perhaps you DO lie (maybe just a little, maybe a lot) but, just as McClellan says Bush is able to do: you somehow convince yourself FIRST that whatever it is you are saying (or believing) IS actually true, even when it isn''t?
Maybe all PR people (and politicians) possess a natural, innate ability to lie directly to THEMSELVES and ''truly'' believe their own lies. Self-deception first, then mass deception afterward, in other words.
As long as your own self-delusional version of "the truth" - as you see it - remains intact, you''re perfectly free to claim (and actually believe) that you always operate entirely from a position of absolute honesty. "Truth" becomes relative.
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave: When first we practice to deceive!"
You are correct, some PR people lie. So do lawyers, journalists, producers, executive producers, our kids and the garbage man. But let''s not set an industry standard by a Bush flak who sold his soul and now wishes to express regret by writing a %u201Ctruthful%u201D account of his foibles.
We are both in professions with vulnerable reputations. Let%u2019s make sure you don%u2019t sound too judgmental of an entire profession that is based on truth and telling honest, compelling and truthful stories, just because you have the luxury of the pulpit.
And, don%u2019t forget, Mr. Cohen, truth is always the ultimate spin.
Simply put far too many folks in the media continue to have illusions of grander. It%u2019s sad that once again a reporter at CBS has shown just how little the profession of journalism understands about the real world.
Oh, I guess it%u2019s too easy to point out that CBS%u2019 Cohen is a lawyer%u2026I%u2019m sure there is a snide comment to be made there, but that would be unprofessional %u2013 Mr. Cohen you should take note of that.
Unlike lawyers, who regularly represent the guilty and proclaim their innocence on the record and in courts of law, PR professionals succeed by telling the truth and providing what is known as authentic counsel -- guiding clients in the right direction based on the highest principles. Thousands and thousands of very successful and employed PR professionals help clients grow their reputations and businesses accordingly. It is positive and accomplished through fact-based PR, not spin or hype. Facts and good stories are the coin of the realm. As a former financial journalist (and Pulitzer Prize nominee), I''m very pleased to have joined the PR profession some 25 years ago and watched it grow in many positive ways. One can''t say the same for the legal profession.
I invite you to reconsider your condemnation of the entire public relations profession.
In my experience as a public relations professor and former practitioner, I do not teach students to tell lies, nor have I lied as a communicator.
The previous comment on this post that claims that perhaps practitioners unknowingly lied is both condescending and a poor excuse to account for the other comments in which practitioners attest to their records of telling the truth.
As described in one of the most popular public relations textbooks by Cutlip, Center, and Broom, public relations is defined as the process of establishing mutually beneficial relationships between an organization and the people it depends on to succeed. Long-term relationships depend on cultivating trust, which means that lying is out of the question.
I challenge you to read "Gaining Influence in Public Relations" by Bruce Berger and Bryan Reber and report back to your readers whether you have changed your position:
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&id=Bmsj9Ev83xsC&dq=reber+and berger&printsec=frontcover&source=web&ots=a0rpWadyPn&sig=TGUBFBscvBwUn-NLIw5AABva7iw
The last part of the book contains a public relations manifesto, which is discussed in a blog by Staci Stringer, a University of Oregon student:
http://stacistringer.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/the-truth-about-public-relations/
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- next
See all 238 Comments