February 11, 2009 2:53 PM

Innocent Man Cleared Of Rape Charges

(AP)  A calm Dean Cage offered some hard-earned advice Wednesday, hours after being released from prison after serving more than 12 years for a rape he didn't commit.

"If you believe in something, fight for it," the 41-year-old said. "The truth will come out in the end."

Cage, who became the 29th Illinoisan to be exonerated by DNA evidence, was convicted in 1996 and sentenced to 40 years in prison for the rape of a 15-year-old girl. On Tuesday, Chief Criminal Court Judge Paul Biebel dismissed the conviction at the request of the Cook County state's attorney's office.

Cage was released from Illinois River Correctional Center in Canton late Tuesday evening and went straight to his mother's home on Chicago's South Side for an all-night celebration with family.

"It didn't seem like it was real," he said of life on the outside. "It was really scary. At the same time, it was a blessing."

Dressed in baggy jeans and a white T-shirt, Cage told reporters Wednesday that he got through the toughest times in prison with the support of his family, reading novels, playing basketball and faith.

"There's a God up there. He blessed me," Cage said. "I couldn't have done this without him."

The New York-based Innocence Project worked for several years on Cage's case, and said nationally he is the 217th person exonerated by post-conviction DNA evidence. Only Texas, with 31, has more DNA exoneration cases than Illinois.

"The single greatest cause of wrongful convictions is victim misidentification," said attorney Peter Neufeld, a co-founder of the organization.

Cage, who worked at a Chicago supermarket, said he was home at the time the teenager said she was attacked while walking to school in November 1994.

The teenager gave a composite drawing description to authorities and after it was circulated police brought Cage in as a suspect. The girl identified him as her attacker.

Cage was also accused in the rape of a 29-year-old woman, but acquitted of those charges. Evidence at the time discounted Cage as the attacker, Neufeld said.

Cage, who has always maintained his innocence, said he asked numerous times for a DNA test while in jail. He said his family had even tried to pay for it themselves.

He wrote to the Innocence Project and they took his case in 2004.

While in prison, Cage missed his three young boys growing up, both his grandparents' funerals and the 12 surgeries his mother underwent for thyroid and heart conditions.

"They stole my son's life. They stole mine too," Cage's 63-year-old mother Jerley said through tears.

Cage appeared overwhelmed on Wednesday, saying he was amazed by advances in technology, especially all "the little phones." Cage said he wasn't angry or bitter and renewed his faith by reading the Bible.

"We can never know how he got through those years," said Alba Morales, an attorney who worked on Cage's case.

Innocence Project officials made an appeal to Gov. Rod Blagojevich on Wednesday to pardon Cage and others in his same situation, so that they can receive compensation due to them under state law.

Cage, who said he has no money or material possessions, said he will try to look for work.

"I guess I gotta try to take one day at a time," he said.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 22 Comments
by kansas1946 May 29, 2008 11:57 PM EDT
Cage, who has always maintained his innocence, said he asked numerous times for a DNA test while in jail. He said his family had even tried to pay for it themselves.
****************************

Why in God''s name are states not routinely conducting DNA tests for prisoners when it is available and could have bearing on their guilt or innocence. Are prosecutors and state justice systems all so corrupt that all they want is to keep "someone" in prison with not regard as to whether the person is guilty or not. I thought this whole process was call the "Justice System." Where is the justice in only caring about a conviction, not justice.
Reply to this comment
by funkiwiteboy May 29, 2008 9:38 PM EDT
i think if more folks was packin iron to protect themselves and their everything
and laws would protect them,
and lawyers/judges/politicians could''nt get rich manipulating those laws this country would be going in the right direction....AMEN
Reply to this comment
by jeannec3 May 29, 2008 6:04 PM EDT
DaVicar2
I wonder if you would feel the same way if it was you that was sitting in jail for 12years and still had 28 years to go. And all the while YOU knew you didn''t do it !!
Reply to this comment
by kailumego1 May 29, 2008 3:59 PM EDT
I watched a HBO documentary, where in Florida, a young black teen age 15 had been wrongfully accused of murdering an elderly white woman, of which her husband, along with the unlawful urging of police identified him as the shooter.

The young teen was walking to "Blockbuster Video" store when police officers stopped him, ask if he would come over to the squad car, where the victim''s husband was sitting, and ask him is this the man that shot your wife, which he replied yes.

Immediately they took him into custody, without notifying his parents, or reading him his rights, asking him did he wish to speak to an attorney, etc.

They literally railroaded this kid, because he was black, and the victim was white.

And the plot thickens, the alledged crime, a botched robbery, occurred early in the morning, when the alledged accused was at home.
Reply to this comment
by kailumego1 May 29, 2008 3:59 PM EDT
Some two-three hours later he was walking in the area minding his business going to "Blockbusters Video", when officers approached him.

The victim was murdered by a black male, but not the alledged accused, which detectives did a sloppy job of gathering evidence.
They retrieved her purse, but did not attempte to collect "fingerprints", or DNA.

And to add insult to injury, they found her purse miles from the crime scene, in a dumpster, at a known drug-haven, and never bothered to question residents, accept for harrashing the homeless white male near the scene, which they accused him of taking the gun out of the purse.

The case went to trial, which trial unleashed some disturbing information of police brutality by three officers, two white and one black, the black officer took the suspect into the woods and physically assaulted him, calling him a liar, hitting him in the stomach and face.
Reply to this comment
by kailumego1 May 29, 2008 3:59 PM EDT
To make a long story short, he was found not guilty, by 8 whites and 4 blacks, which his white defense attorney took it upon himself to search for the "real" killer, he found him, it was two black males, the shooter, who looked the total opposite of this young black male, a brownskinned frail black male with Eurocentric features, compared to a darkskinned medium built male with pronounced negroid features.

The lousy police department finally dusted the purse for fingerprints, which matched the "real killer", which they were convicted.


Racism, Judasism, and incompetence, this young man was incredibilly blessed, because he had an excellent defense team [pro-bono], loving parents, and an unbiased jury.

This case demonstrates that "evil" is pervasive within all races, because if it wasn''t for his white attorneys, one male and one female, an unbiased jury, and a tolerant white judge, that saw through the corruption, this young man would have recieved the "death penalty".

I purposefully mentioned the race of all players, to bring home a point, not all white folks are corrupted and evil, while not all blacks are "good".

The black cop that viciously beat this young man, and the two black perpetrators that stood back and let this innocent black teen go the jail for a crime they committed.


Reply to this comment
by isntitobvus May 29, 2008 3:31 PM EDT
DaVicar2: you sound like some other white idiots here in America that I have had the misfortune of meeting.
Oh ... before you make another mistake in judgment - I''m an European-American (that''s the same as ''white'', but without your bigotry)
Reply to this comment
by whatithink-2009 May 29, 2008 3:18 PM EDT
DaVicar2,

It''s unfortunate people like you who they put on juries who are so happy to convict somebody that they''ll convict anybody...even innocent people. You should be ashamed!
Reply to this comment
by chenz66 May 29, 2008 3:08 PM EDT
DaVicar2,

What would you call fair compensation for someone who lost 12 years of their life for a bogus charge? What was your point about being arrested twice? He was acquitted of those charges as well. They only thing that it proves is that this guy was in the wrong place at the wrong time twice or because he''s black he looks like others so it must be him. I feel bad for the guy, he lost out on seeing his kids grow up. I''m not happy about it either but a cool million seems about right. That''s what I''d be going for.
Reply to this comment
by magoo2u1 May 29, 2008 2:45 PM EDT
"I''''m not understanding how this continues to happen in the State of Illinois."
Actually, it happened years ago. And there are more. Prosecutors cannot be held accountable for convicting innocent people. The citizens of the county are held accountable through their taxes.
A prosecutor and investigators admitted to planting evidence to convict an innocent man. In an interview they stated they planted the evidence because they were convinced the man was guilty but couldn''t prove it. Turned out he wasn''t guilty. Their punishment? Nothing, couldn''t be touched.
Reply to this comment
See all 22 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook