Review: "Sex And The City"

David Edelstein Calls Big-Screen Adventures Of Carrie & Friends Funny, Campy, And Heartbreaking





Text Size:  A  A  A

The girls are back in town: "Sex And The City" hits the big screen.  (Darren Star Productions)



Answers.com

(CBS)  For six seasons "Sex and the City" was a television sensation. Now it's about to make the jump to the silver screen. Our David Edelstein couldn't wait to see it.


Did you like the HBO series "Sex and the City"? I bet half of you said, "Yechhhhhh," and the other half said, "I love it, I love it, I love it!"

I understand both sides. Those self-indulgent, materialistic white girls who depend too much on men and objectify men - they can get very irritating. But what a hoot to see babes, for once, doing the objectifying, talking dirty and sleeping around, and measuring their fantasies against the sobering truth of male emotional insufficiency.

Now there's a movie and what a joyful wallow! It's funny, it's campy, it's heartbreaking; it's a 2½-hour emotional epic.

For one last time, relationship columnist/anthropologist Carrie Bradshaw, played by Sarah Jessica Parker, tests the fairy-tale trappings of modern romance. But now that these women are in their forties, there's even more at stake.

The movie is set three-plus years after the series. Morose Miranda (Cynthia Nixon) lives in Brooklyn with her mousy husband.

Chipper Charlotte (Kristen Davis) and her hubby have adopted a Chinese toddler, whose presence makes it more difficult to babble about sex.

Samantha (Kim Cattrall) is wilting from monogamy with her hunka-burnin'-Hollywood love.

Carrie, of course, finally settled into the arms of rich and powerful Mr. Big and can afford even more designer clothes and shoes. But closet space?

They're not formally hitched, however, which might create housing problems (with him owning their home).

The answer?

I won't spoil what follows, but the day of the wedding is a heart-stopper - a farce without mirth, and a chance to watch Parker pull out the acting stops. She is spectacularly good. She's so fragile beneath her sultry poses - she's like a little girl dressing up, wriggling from one fabulous outfit to the next, enchanted, but apt to whither in the face of rejection and self-doubt.

Those outfits, by the way, are lulus - designers must have fallen all over themselves to get stuff into this movie. Behind me at the screening came whoops of glee, and sometimes horror.

Can I say enough about the women? Cattrall is all high-style vulgarity, Nixon brittle yet with soul. Davis's adorable ditzy double-takes leaven the mood.

If the friendship of Carrie, Miranda, Samantha, and Charlotte is the biggest romantic fantasy of all - they complement one another perfectly, they're never too competitive - it's beautiful and moving, a design for living. "Sex and the City" is existential haute couture.





Text Size:  A  A  A

Comments [ + Post Your Own ]

Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not CBS News stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

The clothes FANTASTIC! The Shoes as always PERFECT! The town.. hey its my NY so.. PERFECT!
The cast, a little sad. They seem to be showing their age. Miranda.. was lacking feeling.. not that she had that much of it on the show but still... Samantha.. MONOGOMY!!! Thats like BUSH and WORLD PEACE!!! PLEASE... I enjoyed the movie because I love the whole idea. It''s not reality and I like that. NO ONE except Housewives of NYC lives like that. SO to see it for more than a half hour is fun....
HOWEVER, WHO edited this thing?? The BLOOPERS were so many they became a distraction for me! I won''t mention them so I don''t ruin it for others. This is one area this film WONT be nominated for an academy. Costumes YES, continuity NO.
Bring the girls back with TEENAGERS!! That will be fun!!!
Posted by arleneinaz at 1:45 AM : Jun 2, 2008
+ report abuse + permalink
It''s a TV series ppl...it''s not real life. They made a movie because the TV show/DVD''s made so much money. Don''t take it so seriously. If you don''t like it, stop wasting your time reading about it. I am sure there are plenty of shows you all watch that are stupid in other peoples'' opinions. For example...what about people who sit and scream at the TV while watching sports? I''m sure some of you do that. The show is fun and people don''t need to be so critical about EVERYTHING.
Posted by nrvolpchik at 8:49 PM : Jun 1, 2008
+ report abuse + permalink
Same old stuff and nothing new. If you like soaps you''ll love this thing as I''m sure the target audience will. The characters are frozen in a time that so far gone people are looking up from the audience wondering how and why do some people shop like that in this day and age. Ridiculous glutony disquised as responsible fun. There''s a lot more to life than a gossiping nerosis. It worked even ten years ago, but now the price is too high to pay. If I have to choose between getting diapers and food for my kids and making sure I''ve got gas in the car over shelling out 12 bucks a pop for a 2 and a half hour TV episode at a theater, I''ll stay home with the kids, adn make sure they know theres more to life when they grow up than sitting around and noodling everyone in places that would bankrupt most people.

---pam



"But like its characters - Samantha, who''s on the verge of 50, and Carrie, who looks like a skeletal transvestite - it''s getting on a bit. This really should be its final hurrah."

---from a previous post

I agree
Posted by pamy5-2009 at 1:01 PM : May 30, 2008
+ report abuse + permalink
Let''s face it real liberation is a lot of work. *** and the City is a woman''s (as directed by a gay man) fantasy about what it''s like to be on top while still believing in your heart that you''re relentlessly victimized and blaming men for all your own self doubt.
Furthermore, I find this review very condescending. He seems to be saying that yes the characters are self absorbed, shallow, and yes they are beautiful and moving as long as they remain childlike and stereo types of real people who are needy.
The romantic friendship that he talks about is really four facets of one big unappealing, superficial ego in love with itself.
Yes, self indulgence is the keyword here. I wonder if a male character could get away with only refering to his girlfriend by her *** parts? Oh, the cries of outrage that would ensue!
We''ve had women''s suppression, liberation, egomanical self indulgence; now it''s time to grow up a little.
Posted by arcangel22-2009 at 2:50 PM : May 28, 2008
+ report abuse + permalink
I will be able to tell by the look on my wifes'' face the minute she comes back from this movie if it was worth the wait. She is counting the days. BIG FAN
Posted by jack3213 at 9:10 AM : May 28, 2008
+ report abuse + permalink
Girls, don''t drag your boyfriends to this. Have mercy. Go with your cutesy pootsy gal pals. Don''t forget to turn off your cellphones.

Enjoyed your comment, jimesmith3. Hollywood CAN''T do anything original. They''re incapable of it.
Posted by keithle1 at 10:25 AM : May 26, 2008
+ report abuse + permalink
I love sequels!! They are so original!! And SITC is so realistic. Maybe if the cast of "Friends" and "SITC" met up, they could make it a docudrama next time!

Let''s see...., Carrie can have a designer colostomy bag attached to her Spade purse and some pampers that match her manolo shoes. The Lesbian could finally come out and marry Anne Heche, only to get left at the alter. The very old *** (Samantha) can **** her way through the retirement center for extra pudding. PLEASE! -- THINK OF SOMETHING ORIGINAL HOLLYWOOD! IT''S LIKE DOING THE LIFE OF "fill in the blank of any young Hollywood star" when they are only 21 -- it''s tiresome, absurd and a big 10 on the vomit scale!
Posted by jimesmith3 at 1:02 AM : May 26, 2008
+ report abuse + permalink
And how is this different from the series? The first couple of seasons were good, but then it got old. It was the same old stuff, but they dragged it on for years because they had a "following."
This is just a sequel for the junkies who can''t wait to get another fix.
Will we be doing another one in a few years when the characters are approaching 50? 60? 70?
Put a fork in it; this one is done.
Posted by gce65 at 5:31 PM : May 25, 2008
+ report abuse + permalink

Back To Top Back To Top