Audit: Iraq Contracts Skirted Fraud Rules
Probe Finds Pentagon Paid Nearly $8 Billion With Little Or No Oversight, Or Even Proof Of Work
-
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, right, listens to Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Michael G. Mullen testify before the Senate Appropriations Committee, Tuesday, May 20, 2008, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari)
-
Interactive Battle For Iraq The government, the insurgency, key players, background and photos.
Of the money paid during a five-year period - from 2001 through 2006 - $7.8 billion in payments skirted billing rules with some violations egregious enough to invite potential fraud, warned the Defense Department's inspector general.
The findings provided fresh fodder for anti-war Democrats, who say President Bush's administration has turned a blind eye to the problem of corruption and fraud by relying too heavily on contractors to manage the war.
"There is something very wrong when our wounded troops have to fill out forms in triplicate for meal money while billions of dollars in cash are handed out in Iraq with no accountability," said Rep. Henry Waxman, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
Results of the investigation were released at a committee hearing on Thursday, the same day the House approved legislation by Waxman intended to strengthen anti-fraud measures and increase transparency in contracting. Waxman's bill was passed as part of a major military policy bill, which authorizes $601.4 billion in defense spending.
In its report, the IG estimated the Army made more than 180,000 commercial payments from stations in Iraq, Kuwait and Egypt in the five-year period. The payments were made for various supplies and services, including bottled water, food and trucks.
In one example, $11 million was paid to a U.S. company without any record of what goods or services were provided, the IG wrote.
Overall, investigators estimated that the Army made some $1.4 billion in commercial payments that lacked even minimum supporting documentation, such as a certified voucher or invoice.
"Payments that are not properly supported do not provide the necessary assurance that funds were used as intended," the IG concluded.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 9
- next
See all 165 Comments--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by cornbiker
Brilliant and thoughtful commentary. Thank you for your contribution!
Or is this your own fantasy cornhollio?
* US military spending accounts for 48 percent, or almost half, of the world%u2019s total military spending
* US military spending is more than the next 46 highest spending countries in the world combined
* US military spending is 5.8 times more than China, 10.2 times more than Russia, and 98.6 times more than Iran.
* US military spending is almost 55 times the spending on the six %u201Crogue%u201D states (Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Sudan and Syria) whose spending amounts to around $13 billion, maximum. (Tabulated data does not include four of the six, as the data only lists nations that have spent over 1 billion in the year, so their budget is assumed to be $1 billion each)
* US spending is more than the combined spending of the next 45 countries.
* The United States and its strongest allies (the NATO countries, Japan, South Korea and Australia) spend $1.1 trillion on their militaries combined, representing 72 percent of the world%u2019s total.
* The six potential %u201Cenemies,%u201D Russia, and China together account for about $205 billion or 29% of the US military budget.
http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/ArmsTrade/Spending.asp#InContextUSMilitarySpendingVersusRestoftheWorld
With one hand they give tax cuts to the rich and with the other they wave in their thieving friends to rob the American taxpayer blind.
It is absolutely amazing to see how Bush fell for it. How in the world do you end up spending trillions of dollars in the pursuit of a criminal matter???
Because, after all, what Bin Laden and his bunch of Arab hillbillies did was a CRIMINAL act and not a war act.
Can you imagine if the UK decided to invade Pakistan after the terror bombings they suffered at the hands of Pakistanis?
Good ol'' police work is all that''s needed to capture Bin Laden and dismantle his organization.
(fm story)
-------------
My response: This war is an affront to the American public! Besides the massive waste, Congress''s failure to end it and continual funding of it, is only slightly less insulting!
If things continue to get worse here, govt has NO right to expect ANY cooperation, support, or allegiance from the public!
---
Guess which administration declared open season on whistleblowers, for all too obvious reasons?
However, on May 5, 2008, the US Senate (whose committee machinery is now run by the Democrats) won praise from government accountability critics for passage of S274-- a bill to resurrect protections of the Whistleblower Protection Act for federal employees.
See http://www.whistleblower.org/content/press_detail.cfm?press_id=1259
From 2001 to 2006, whistleblower protection was the red-headed stepchild no senator in a GOP congress wanted to sponsor. In contrast, S274 is now a bipartisan package whose key sponsors include Lieberman, Collins, Grassley, Akaka, Durbin and Levin.
The various states are still a predictable patchwork quilt of whistleblower protections, and many states have little or no protection at all-- illogically enough-- for courageous citizens who want to do the right thing.
For the sake of our country, that must change.
The only thing left possibly to be desired is the attribution (source).
Attribution is not normally done in a free-wheeling forum discussion, but you went to so much trouble (?) to research this, this information surely would benefit others if supplied with source for each point.
Attribution is made by scholars (and others) for scholars (and others) in the open spirit of inquiry.
Besides, You-Know-Who will say, "Ah, well, there they go again! Statistics show 50 percent of Americans don''t believe statistics."
They are war profiteers.
Henry, Henry.....It''s the Neocon way of doing things, don''t ya'' know.....now get Nancy to take any investigations off the table and let''s have some jello!!!!
Minnery, a former Marine turned whistle-blower, is risking his job by speaking out for the first time about the millions he noticed were missing from one defense agency''s balance sheets. Minnery tried to follow the money trail, even crisscrossing the country looking for records.
"The director looked at me and said ''Why do you care about this stuff?'' It took me aback, you know? My supervisor asking me why I care about doing a good job," said Minnery.
He was reassigned and says officials then covered up the problem by just writing it off.
"They have to cover it up," he said. "That''s where the corruption comes in. They have to cover up the fact that they can''t do the job."
The Pentagon''s Inspector General "partially substantiated" several of Minnery''s allegations but could not prove officials tried "to manipulate the financial statements."
Darth: "So"???
Militarily, politically, economically, ethically; it has no hope of ever being anything but an utter failure.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 9
- next
See all 165 Comments