May 22, 2008
The Company Senator Obama Keeps
National Review Online: When It Comes To The Jewish Vote, Actions Speak Louder Than Words
-
Photo
(AP)
-
Timeline
Obama And Rev. Wright
Key dates in the relationship between Barack Obama and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
-
Photo Essay
Barack Obama
A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.
In 2004, President Bush and the Republican Party made significant inroads with the Jewish community. Bush won 24 percent of the Jewish vote - up from 19 percent in 2000 - primarily as a result of his staunch commitment to Israel.
Four years later, it looks as though the Jewish vote is again up for grabs. Or, so says a recent Gallup poll, which revealed that in a contest between senators Obama and McCain, nearly a third of the Jewish vote would go to the Republican.
Senator Obama has sailed through this primary season in the wind of his words. That’s not to say he hasn’t encountered some rough seas, but his success has largely been a function of style, not substance. And when it comes to seeking Jewish support, he appears to be saying all the right things.
Since his days in the Illinois state senate he has referred to himself as a “stalwart” supporter of Israel. He has been outspoken about Israel’s right to defend itself and the importance of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. According to the Obama ’08 issue paper on Israel, the senator believes “Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state should never be challenged.”
During a recent interview with The Atlantic blogger Jeffrey Goldberg, Obama offered all the right responses. “My position on Hamas is indistinguishable from the position of Hillary Clinton or John McCain,” he told Goldberg. “I said they are a terrorist organization and I’ve repeatedly condemned them. I’ve repeatedly said, and I mean what I say: Since they are a terrorist organization, we should not be dealing with them until they recognize Israel, renounce terrorism, and abide by previous agreements.”
And if what he has said about Israel isn’t sufficient, Obama reminded Jewish voters of the profound effect Jewish culture - especially Jewish literary culture - has had on him. “I always joke that my intellectual formation was through Jewish scholars and writers,” he explained. “Whether it was theologians or Philip Roth who helped shape my sensibility, or some of the more popular writers like Leon Uris.” Obama connects with the Jewish community by drawing comparisons between their experiences and his own.
But with the Democratic nomination all but secured, Jewish voters are likely to start thinking less about the senator’s speeches and more about the company he keeps. As the last two elections reveal, when it comes to the Jewish vote, actions speak louder than words.
While Reverend Wright’s anti-American and anti-Semitic ravings captured the attention of the public for weeks, it’s simply his theatrics that appear to make him the most repellant of Obama’s friends. The senator has tried to dismiss Wright as a “crazy uncle,” but if you take a closer look at the crowd the senator runs with, it appears he has a whole lot of crazy relatives to disinvite from dinner.
It was widely circulated that Wright supported - and even publicly commended - radical black Muslim leader Louis Farrakhan. Yet little has been said about Sen. Obama’s relationship with Rev. Michael Pfleger, a Catholic pastor at St. Sabina, also on the South Side of Chicago. In 2004, Obama told the Chicago Sun Times that Pfleger was one of his three spiritual mentors.
Pfleger’s name became more widely recognizable two years ago when Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich appointed a Farrakhan aide to serve on a hate-crimes commission. When the appointee, Sister Claudette, refused to denounce Farrakhan’s racist and anti-Semitic remarks, three Jewish members on the commission resigned - a situation that prompted Pfleger to respond, “good riddance.”
No less reprehensible than Reverends Wright and Pfleger is the Obama campaign’s national co-chairman, retired Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Merrill “Tony” McPeak, who has made numerous anti-Semitic and anti-Israel comments. While the general has a long blame-Israel-first record, the most repugnant remark came during a 2003 interview, when he blamed the Jewish-American community for the failure of the peace process between Israel and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat.
Despite calls on Senator Obama to remove McPeak as a key adviser, the general continues to serve on the campaign.
Obama’s support among radicals in the Palestinian community - and even from Ahmed Yousef of Hamas - has not gone unnoticed. In fact, in 2003 Obama helped honor Rashid Khalidi, a well-known critic of Israel and advocate of Palestinian rights, at a celebration where anti-Israel poetry was read and the United States was sharply criticized.
That evening, Obama told guests stories about his long relationship with the Khalidis, the meals he had shared with Rashid and his wife, Mona, and the effect they had had on his political thinking.
Last month, another concerning relationship came to light between the Obamas and Hatem El-Hady, former chairman of the Toledo-based Islamic organization Kindhearts for Charitable Human Development - a group shut down in 2006 for raising money for Hamas. Until recently, El-Hady had a personal website on the official Obama campaign site and Michelle Obama was listed as one of El-Hady’s three “friends.”
Perhaps the most alarming Obama relationship - and the one his campaign can do the least about - is the marriage of Barack Obama to his wife, Michelle. As women tend to take the lead in directing household religious affairs, children’s education, and community involvement, it is likely - as Christopher Hitchens suggests - Michelle Obama is the reason Wright married the couple, baptized their children, became a recipient of their donations, and remained their spiritual mentor for two decades.
The Obama campaign continues to stress that the senator is open to understanding multiple points of view, even if he doesn’t agree with them. But, after a while, the crowd you run with starts to say a lot about your own perspective.
In the aftermath of President Bush’s speech to the Israeli Knesset on their 60th anniversary, Obama hopes he can yet again demonstrate his support for Israel simply by saying the right thing. In a statement the Obama campaign issued immediately following the speech, he said, “George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists, and the president's extraordinary politicization of foreign policy and the politics of fear do nothing to secure the American people or our stalwart ally Israel."
The fact is the Jewish community has heard all of these words before.
Obama’s style may win him the Democratic nomination, but as we head into the general election he would be wise to start thinking about changing course. Because in this election, the company he keeps just might be enough to take the wind out of his sails.
By Sabrina Leigh Schaeffer
Reprinted with permission from National Review Online.




- 1
- 2
- next
See all 53 CommentsAnyway where does isreal figure in all this? Are they tax payers? are they are part of the union? Goodness am of jewish descent but can''t stand all these ******* and *** pretending that isreal is part of the united states.
Obama strikes me as one who changes his stance, depending on who''s talking to him. He says he supports Israel''s rights, but
"in 2003 Obama helped honor Rashid Khalidi, a well-known critic of Israel and advocate of Palestinian rights, at a celebration where anti-Israel poetry was read and the United States was sharply criticized.
That evening, Obama told guests stories about his long relationship with the Khalidis, the meals he had shared with Rashid and his wife, Mona, and the effect they had had on his political thinking."
The effect on his political thinking??? Wright had an effect on his political thinking...he is his mentor according to his book, which turned out to be mostly lies. (this has been proven and one of the main reasons you don''t see Oprah speaking up for Obama anymore.)
Nothing he says has substance. This is one scary guy, and many Americans can''t see it for the flowery speeches. Get real.
CBS, honestly, what happened to your sense of ethics?
Why would you publish this kind of Sh*t story?
Just because someone can understand another person''s point of view does not mean that they must share that point of view.
Seriously, please try having a little knowledge before you try having an opinion.
These petty fear tactics just don''t work any more.
OBAMA IS A THREAT TO THIS COUNTRY. WAKE UP AMERICA.
GOD "BLESS" AMERICA. NOT "G D" AMERICA.
All this does is prove how bankrupt the GOP now is. No new ideas, no plan to move forward, just more mud slinging.
To put this in perspective, do me a favor and rank these issues in order of importance: the war, the economy, health care, Supreme Court nominations, comments made by Obama''s former minister.
BTW, another poor job by CBS in failing to identify the source of this Op Ed piece. I have nothing against the National Review, but it should be identified as a conservative magazine. Many of the magazine''s commentators are affiliated with far-right think-tanks like the Heritage Foundation and American Enterprise Institute.
DID YOU EVEN READ THIS ARTICLE?
THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THIS COUNTRY IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE.
GOD "BLESS" AMERICA. NOT "G D" AMERICA.
I am an American Jew and I am proudly voting for Obama! So are all of my family (sister, mother, brother and his wife).
So tell me that Obama doesn''t connect with Jews! And I will laugh in your face!
You are mistaken the ideals and principals, to include human rights and freedom, upon which this nation was founded is the most important issue. Without them we are lost and no better than our enemies.
"Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security." -Benjamin Franklin
CBS, honestly, what happened to your sense of ethics?
Why would you publish this kind of Sh*t story?
Posted by Zendigity at 02:01 PM : May 22, 2008
The regularly post this garbage from NRO and the Weekly Standard. These two raggy tabloids are nothing but fallout shelters for journalists that couldn''t make it at legitimate publications like Newsweek, Time, US News, The Washington Post, etc.
They''re the Faux Noise of journalism.
THERE IS NOTHING IN THE MIDDLE EAST AMERICA NEEDS!
GO BACK TO ISRAEL OR SAUDI OR EGYPT PALISTINE OR WHERE EVER! JUST LEAVE AMERICA OUT OF YOUR THOUSAND YEAR OLD PROBLEMS!
IF THE AUTHOR WAS CONCERNED ABOUT AMERICA HE WOULD WANT ALL DUEL PASSPORT HOLDING ISRAELI NEOCONS WHO HAVE PROMOTED AMERICA INTO THE MIDDLE EAST WARS HELD FOR WAR CRIMES CHARGES!
THIS IS JUST ANOTHER NRO SLAM JOB AGAINST OBABM BECAUSE HE IS NOT BOUGHT BY THE MIDDLE EAST LOBBIES!
AMERICA STAND UP OR SHUT UP!
Obama/YourMama!!
first they hire a hacker, like the national review to write
a bunch of lies about obama
second, they have their idiot computer banks start sending in phony email
from losers, also phoney, Un american fascists,
Obama can do and say anything he wants because in the
end, he WILL ALWAYS BE BETTER FOR AMERICA THAN THE
ANTI AMERICAN BUSH OR McBushSAME
Obama/YourMama!!
first they hire a hacker, like the national review to write
a bunch of lies about obama ......
Posted by joyous88 at 08:06 PM : May 22, 2008
Printing malicious stories that can be proven untrue is called ''SLANDER''. It would make NRO liable to suit. You think they''d take a chance like that? This is AMERICA''s NEW HERO !!! CLINTON ''08!!!!!
What a inane rag - Not worthy to be used as toilet paper.
I think its hard to be black in America and not be associated with thinking black''s who have sympathy for the Palestinians plight (which seems to resemble that of American blacks as well). It doesn''t mean you''re anti-Israel, it just means you''re not a neocon. Neocons, by invading Iraq, have made Israel LESS safe (or didn''t neocons realize that Saddam Hussein was one of Irans major power-checks in the Middle East?).
As such, it would be hard to do worse by Israel than Bush has done the last 5 years.
Posted by ausus
I''m going to take a third perspective, which would be that I''m like 1000% confident that no matter who ends up in the White House, they''re going to feel a moral obligation to look out for Israel given the events which lead to it''s creation. I think we can all appreciate how alarming it must feel to have even so much as rhetoric aimed at Israel let alone attacks.
That being said, Barack''s now got a 50% chance of becoming the next President. So what''s the point of making him jump through hoops and forcing him to answer this and that about his weakest and least meaningful associates? Does it REALLY help to demonstrate his interest in protecting Israel or does this particular person at the NRO not really speak for most Jewish-Americans as far as believing these ''questions'' shed light on to what extent President Obama might feel a sense of duty towards protecting Israel?
This piece comes across as just another excuse to trash Dems with the conclusion being the same as all the other NRO pieces - that Dems are ***. I don''t find it very productive if that''s the true goal.
Mr. Bush apparently doesn''t approve of Israel''s new open diplomatic dialog with the "terrorist Syrians", in their quiet behind-the-scenes talks recently.
Of course, Mr. Bush doesn''t seem to know or care much about "diplomacy" at all, anyway. That stuff is just too repulsively intellectual and weak-seeming for him, it seems.
THERE IS NOTHING IN THE MIDDLE EAST AMERICA NEEDS!
GO BACK TO ISRAEL OR SAUDI OR EGYPT PALISTINE OR WHERE EVER! JUST LEAVE AMERICA OUT OF YOUR THOUSAND YEAR OLD PROBLEMS!
IF THE AUTHOR WAS CONCERNED ABOUT AMERICA HE WOULD WANT ALL DUEL PASSPORT HOLDING ISRAELI NEOCONS WHO HAVE PROMOTED AMERICA INTO THE MIDDLE EAST WARS HELD FOR WAR CRIMES CHARGES!
THIS IS JUST ANOTHER NRO SLAM JOB AGAINST OBABM BECAUSE HE IS NOT BOUGHT BY THE MIDDLE EAST LOBBIES!
AMERICA STAND UP OR SHUT UP!
WITH ASSOCIATIONS WITH THE LIKES OF PFLEGER, "TONY" McPEAK, AHMED YOUSEF, "HAMAS", RASHID KHALIDI, HATEM EL-HADY, AND OF COURSE THE ANTI JEWISH REV. WRIGHT, FARRAKHAN, ONE CAN SEE WHY OBAMA HAS NOT BOUGHT INTO THE MIDDLE EAST LOBBIES. HMMMMMMMMM
GOD "BLESS" AMERICA. NOT "G D" AMERICA.
Obama Seeks Red Cross Help On War Crime Charges Against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld
Posted by Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscr on Wednesday, May 21st at 11:59 AM
May 20, 2008
Obama Seeks Red Cross Help On War Crime Charges Against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers (Traduccisn al Espaqol abajo)
Russian Foreign Ministry reports to President Medvedev are stating today
that US Presidential candidate Barack Obama has sent one of his top aides
named Valerie Jarrett to meet with officials from the International
Committee of the Red Cross, in Geneva, Switzerland, to what is being
described in these reports as the %u2018preliminary stage%u2019 to begin actions in
the International Court of Justice charging the present United States
President, Vice President and former US Defense Secretary with war crimes.
As we had previously written about in our October 15, 2005 report, the
International Committee of the Red Cross opened in that year a War Crimes
Portfolio alleging that President Bush, Vice President Cheney and Defense
Secretary Rumsfeld, and other US Officials, were in violation of Articles 3
and 4 of the Geneva Convention and could be tried for Crimes Against
Humanity.
I was far more open to the Democrats in the last congressional elections. Having now seen the performance of Pelosi, Reed, Kennedy, Dean, et al in action, that door of hope has closed.
This far into an election process I should have a clearer understanding of what Obama stands for on issues not just the buzzword "change." Instead he''s still just a pretty face, and his actions are the same old tired politics, with the same sad cast of characters. He''s running a very Bush-like campaign, if you stop to look at it.
Surely we learned something about vague promises the last time around. I don''t care who it is, the company you keep matters, your record (or lack of one) matters, and real issues matter. To all the candidates: Put up or shut up.
DONT SELL OUT TO THE MIDDLE EAST COUNTRIES!
KEEP AMERICA FIRST!
SEND THE MIDDLE EAST LOBBIEST BACK TO THEIR HOME COUNTRIES IN BAGS!
AMERICA STAND UP OR SHUT UP!
of george bush and john McSame, than I would start to
worry about his character,
as it is, as long as he stears away from the GREED
DRIVEN REPUBLICONS he has my respect
Oh yes, i fully understand now why he had to associat himself with a racist churck, reverand, black panthers, farakhan, renzko, jackson, and michelle. It was all very necessary to obtain coalitions. Oh and i also believe Elvis is alive and well and playing the strip in Vegas.
I ask you again what is your problem telling me to get over myself. After reading your comments on line all i see is you calling everyone names. Maybe you need to get over yourself.
Just like i thought another idiot thqat wants to run their mouth but doesn''t have the guts to back up anything they say.
Why don''t you get a life you ***.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 53 Comments