WASHINGTON, May 21, 2008

House Overrides Bush Veto Of Farm Bill

$290B Legislation Includes Election-Year Subsidies For Farmers And Food Stamps For The Poor

  • Photo

     (AP / file)

  • Interactive Bush Presidency

    The president's agenda, plus facts, figures, major events and key personalities.

(AP)  The House quickly rejected President Bush's veto Wednesday of a $290 billion farm bill and the Senate was poised to follow suit, a stark rebuke of a president overridden only once in his two terms.

Only hours before the House's 316-108 vote, Mr. Bush had vetoed the five-year measure, saying it was too expensive and gave too much money to wealthy farmers when farm incomes are high.

The legislation includes election-year subsidies for farmers and food stamps for the poor - spending that lawmakers could promote when they are back in their districts over the Memorial Day weekend.

The Senate could turn to the bill as soon as Wednesday night; there were expected to be enough votes to overturn the veto.

The veto was the 10th of Mr. Bush's presidency. Congress so far has overridden him once, on a water projects bill.

With Mr. Bush at record lows in the polls in the waning months of his term, it was fellow Republicans who joined with majority Democrat in rejecting the veto. GOP lawmakers are anxious about their own prospects less than six months from the Election Day.

About two-thirds of the bill would pay for nutrition programs such as food stamps; about $40 billion is for farm subsidies; and additional $30 billion would go to farmers to idle their land and to other environmental programs.

Congressional Republicans overwhelmingly abandoned Mr. Bush in voting to pass the bill last week. They overlooking its cost amid public concern about the weak economy and high gas and grocery prices. Supporters praised the spending on food stamps and emergency food aid.

"Twenty-five percent of my state is now in need of food assistance," said Rep. Thaddeus G. McCotter, R-Mich. "I work for them, not for the president."

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said the bill could make the situation worse for struggling families.

"Members are going to have to think about how they will explain these votes back in their districts at a time when prices are on the rise," she said. "People are not going to want to see their taxes increase."

Mr. Bush said the legislation needlessly would expand government. He cited one new program in the bill that would pay more to corn farmers and others if agriculture revenue were to drop significantly in the next five years. This program, he said, could add billions of dollars to the cost of the bill.

He added that minor cutbacks to subsidies for wealthy farmers were not sufficient.

"At a time when net farm income is projected to increase by more than $28 billion in 1 year, the American taxpayer should not be forced to subsidize that group of farmers who have adjusted gross incomes of up to $1.5 million," the president said in his veto.

Congressional negotiators tried to make some last-minute changes in the bill to come closer to the White House on that issue.

The bill would make small cuts to direct payments, which are distributed to some farmers no matter how much they grow. It also would eliminate some payments to individuals with more than $750,000 in annual farm income - or married farmers who make more than $1.5 million. Previously, negotiators were considering a $950,000 income cap for individuals on farm income.

Individuals who make more than $500,000 or couples who make more than $1 million jointly in nonfarm income also would not be eligible for subsidies.

Under current law, there is no income limit for farmers, and married couples who make less than one-fourth of their income from farming will not receive subsidies if their joint income exceeds $5 million.

The administration originally proposed a cap for those who make more than $200,000 in annual gross income, but later indicated it could accept a limit of $500,000.

The chairman of the House Agriculture said the version of the bill vetoed by the president was missing one section by mistake. But Rep. Collin Peterson, D-Minn., said he expected that issue to be resolved. Aides said the section, which includes international food aid, might have to be passed separately or as part of a different bill.

The farm bill also would:

  • Boost nutrition programs, including food stamps and emergency domestic food aid, by more than $10 billion over 10 years. It would expand a program to provide fresh fruits and vegetables to schoolchildren.

  • Increase subsidies for certain crops, including fruits and vegetables excluded from previous farm bills.

  • Extend and expand dairy programs.

  • Increase loan rates for sugar producers.

  • Urge the government to buy surplus sugar and sell it to ethanol producers for use in a mixture with corn.

  • Cut a per-gallon ethanol tax credit for refiners from 51 cents to 45 cents. The credit supports the blending of fuel with the corn-based additive. More money would go to cellulosic ethanol, made from plant matter.

  • Require that meats and other fresh foods carry labels with their country of origin.

  • Stop allowing farmers to collect subsidies for multiple farm businesses.

  • Reopen a major discrimination case against the Agriculture Department. Thousands of black farmers who missed a deadline would get a chance to file claims alleging they were denied loans or other subsidies.

  • Provide the first-ever infusion of federal farm dollars - more than $400 million - to clean up the Chesapeake Bay.

  • Pay farmers for weather-related farm losses from a new $3.8 billion disaster relief fund.



    © MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

    Video and Galleries from Politics

    Add a Comment See all 49 Comments
    by oscarez May 21, 2008 1:57 PM PDT
    The president believes the legislation is fiscally irresponsible and gives away too much money to wealthy farmers. Bush would like to spend this money in Iraq or as a tax break for the wealthy.
    Reply to this comment
    by darnedsocks May 21, 2008 2:39 PM PDT
    THIS SOUNDS GREAT IF YOU GET THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS AND THEIR ANCHOR BABIES OUT OF THE U.S.! I SURE DON''T WANT TO PAY FOR FEEDING ILLEGALS!
    Reply to this comment
    by DaveGress May 21, 2008 2:49 PM PDT
    LOL. Yet another group of American voters with buyers remorse over electing Bush.
    Reply to this comment
    by bobbyduck1 May 21, 2008 2:51 PM PDT
    darnedsocks - if it wasn''t for the illegals you wouldn''t have any food to eat. Or it would cost 3 times as much.

    I agree with straightening out the immigration mess but the reality is that our economy rides on the backs of these illegals.

    I don''t know what the answer is but blaming the poorest and hardest working sector of the American working population does nothing for anyone.
    Reply to this comment
    by leftyintexas May 21, 2008 3:08 PM PDT
    This bill is bloated.

    White House spokeswoman Dana Perino

    I do believe MS. Perino has her head up her a$$. The Iraq war budget is bloated... kinda like bush''s head.
    Reply to this comment
    by macusweil May 21, 2008 3:26 PM PDT
    Bush is a total failure across the board and so is the Republican party.

    The only hope for the GOP is to come clean and strongly denounce Bush, Cheney, Delay, Foley, Ney, Cunningham, Craig and the protracted list of assorted racketeers and criminals that made up their "lasting" majority until it ended in Nov 2006.

    Congressman Ron Paul got laughed off the stage at the Republican debates earlier this year for calling a spade of his own party. Come Nov 2008 it will be the entire GOP itself that is laughed off the stage.
    Reply to this comment
    by gopack443 May 21, 2008 3:36 PM PDT
    To bad the democrats don''t have the guts to veto bush. Don''t think I could ever waste another vote on a democrat or a Republican, as if there not the same party!
    Reply to this comment
    by lorinkundert May 21, 2008 3:41 PM PDT
    Bush needs to veto the defense spending bill, it contains provisions ala Pelosi granting amnesty to nearly 2 million illegal aliens.

    What the illegals have to do with military appropriations is still a mystery.
    Reply to this comment
    by itgranny May 21, 2008 4:05 PM PDT
    PRT 2:
    If the system was fair, it would be different, but it favors the ones that really shouldn''t be getting it. I''m not seeing too many cafi%u2019s, gas stations, hardware stores or grocery stores getting that kind of money to stay in business.

    I for one would like to see how they fare when the playing field was level and they had to play by the rules every one else have to play by. %u201CNo freebies. If you can''t pencil it out you won''t stay in business%u201D. Nobody''s mentioning the funky math involved in the farming sector. It''s every bit as creative as what we''re seeing housing market. We should be scared.
    Reply to this comment
    by itgranny May 21, 2008 4:07 PM PDT
    PRT 1:
    This is the only thing I actually agree with bush about.

    I''m in farm country Minnesota. I did a little research and put some figures together. My county has 704 square miles and a population of approximately 8800. The median income per HOUSEHOLD was $38299 per year and 9.3% of the county lives below the poverty level. In my county in 2004, 18 farmers received government checks in excess of $100,000 and the highest received $485,000. Is it any wonder why some of us in rural America don''t like the subsidies either?

    The large farmers are using the money to compete against the smaller ones and are running them out of business. They are paying $3000+ an acre for land in an effort to get bigger and bigger. They get breaks for volume in seed, chemicals, feed and farm equipment etc. Then, in the end, companies pay more for their products (yes, that''s right. Farm Corporation A gets more per lb of milk and pork than Farmer Brown and it doesn''t have anything to do with transportation, it%u2019s simply size).
    Reply to this comment
    by jack3213 May 21, 2008 4:20 PM PDT
    So those who support this bill sound like they are made out of money and want to pay more in taxes? Can you pay mine too?
    Reply to this comment
    by itgranny May 21, 2008 4:54 PM PDT
    the article disappeared. hmmmm.
    Reply to this comment
    by noloyalisti May 21, 2008 5:03 PM PDT
    Can you believe this white trash bushoccio complaining about the cost of the farm bill? He who is happy spending $12 billion/month on his illegal and unnecessary occupation in Iraq for ever. He is almost as big an embarrassment to America as John McSame, the war profiteers selection for the pResident puppet.
    Reply to this comment
    by randynason May 21, 2008 6:56 PM PDT
    Bush is against spending on anything domestic but has no problem spending billions on an illegal occupation. To add insult to injury, he gives tax breaks to the wealthiest of Americans, while cutting food stamps to the poorest. What is wrong with the grey matter in this pink monkey''s head?
    Reply to this comment
    by randynason May 21, 2008 6:59 PM PDT
    So those who support this bill sound like they are made out of money and want to pay more in taxes? Can you pay mine too?


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Posted by Jack3213

    George Bush said that he''d be glad to pay your taxes. All you have to do is sign up for Iraq.
    Reply to this comment
    by tawpdawg11 May 21, 2008 7:12 PM PDT
    the stupid GREEDY fugs broke our backs. shipped out our jobs.... jacked the cost of EVERYTHING...all for the almighty bottom line.....forced millions onto assistance.....then have the gall to whine about tax increases. PAY UP OR GET OUT! YOU BROUGHT THIS ONTO YOURSELVES!
    Reply to this comment
    by down-ndirty May 21, 2008 7:42 PM PDT
    LOL!!! More money into the pockets of non-farmers like David Letterman. LOL!!! More perks for the wealthy. LOL!!!

    I''m not a Bush fan but I have to agree with him on this one.
    Reply to this comment
    by gce65 May 21, 2008 7:54 PM PDT
    I certainly hope Congress adds its own signing statement to this override: Fvck You, Bush!
    Reply to this comment
    by payasyougo May 21, 2008 8:26 PM PDT
    "About two-thirds of the bill would pay for nutrition programs such as food stamps; about $40 billion is for farm subsidies; and additional $30 billion would go to farmers to idle their land and to other environmental programs."

    ----------------

    This isn''t a farm bill when 15% is for farm subsidies and 85% is for social programs. More deceit from both sides.

    Just keep the spending going...

    I wish someone would pay me not to work.
    Reply to this comment
    by cbsblogger May 21, 2008 8:43 PM PDT
    Jeez...the first time Bush was ever concerned about the wealthy receiving benefits at the expense of average taxpayers.
    Reply to this comment
    by itgranny May 21, 2008 8:47 PM PDT
    http://farm.ewg.org/sites/farmbill2007/mappage.php?lat=42.7834&lng=-76.8231&custnumber=&z=11

    a map with all the farmers on manhattan island.
    Reply to this comment
    by Markus May 21, 2008 8:54 PM PDT
    THIS COMMENT SAYS IT LIKE IT IS.I COULDN''T AGREE MORE WHOLEHEARTEDLY WITH EVERY WORD!!!!

    "Posted by RandyNason
    Bush is against spending on anything domestic but has no problem spending billions on an illegal occupation. To add insult to injury, he gives
    tax breaks to the wealthiest of Americans, while cutting food stamps to the poorest. What is wrong with the grey matter in this pink monkey''''s head?"

    THANKS, RandyNason FOR YOUR STANCE.IT IS EXACTLY MINE AS WELL.

    REGARDS,
    ...MIKETNT303
    Reply to this comment
    by payasyougo May 21, 2008 8:56 PM PDT
    This is the continuation of the government trying to spend into economic improvement. Last wuarter was the tax check redistribution of wealth.

    Unfortunately, only credit cards have limits.

    This government is out of control.
    Reply to this comment
    by mcvet May 21, 2008 9:20 PM PDT
    Me thinks the Swastika Huggers are getting the Message FINALLY!! LOL Sieg Heil Bush
    Reply to this comment
    by mcvet May 21, 2008 9:21 PM PDT
    aheadache: You are on both sides of the issue. This farm bill is pure PORK.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Posted by downsteamjim at 08:25 PM : May 21, 2008
    + report abuse

    What is it with you Nazi''s? YOU have NO problem sending BILLIONS to Iraq for their health care.. rebuilding their country and the such... but give an AMERICAN a dollar and you freaks start marching around with your burning crosses. I just can''t figure it out!! Sieg Heil Bush
    Reply to this comment
    by walt1944-2009 May 21, 2008 9:24 PM PDT
    Reading the comments about this article I am amazed at the number of neocon Fascist Nazis that have come out against the bill.

    Apparently, all these neocons think is that farming is a nine to five job, with the weekends off. All the farmer does is drive around a tractor all day, throw some feed at the livestock, then at five hurries home to eat and watch "Ugly Betty"!

    The closest these idiots have come to a farm is a children''s petting zoo! As with all the neocon "armchair generals" and the military, how about getting off your lazy "arses", shutting that sewer you call a mouth, and REALLY WORK a farm for even 3 months! See if you can survive that long and think about doing the job 24/7, sunup to sundown for YEARS and NOT getting a steady paycheck, only relying on what the market and the government pay you, when and IF they pay you while the middlemen get all the profits!

    You neocon Fascist Nazis are pathetic!

    SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!!
    sig heil, DEFINITELY MORE OF THE SAME, McCain!!!!




    Reply to this comment
    by stevex47 May 21, 2008 9:36 PM PDT
    "it was fellow Republicans who joined with majority Democrats in rejecting the veto. GOP lawmakers are anxious about their own prospects less than six months from the Election Day."

    Jumping ship to save their own arses are they? Are these toe tappin'' mutineers going to start their own party?

    Proves the Dixie Chicks were right all along, ha.

    Mission Accomplished.

    Reply to this comment
    by itgranny May 21, 2008 9:49 PM PDT
    Walt 1944:
    I make a living farming. Chances are I''ve milked more cows than you''ve even seen in your lifetime. I''ve also probably had my arm up the backside of more sows than you or i can even count. I''ve gotten up before the chickens, had sleep interupted and walked a mile in -300 weather to take care of my animals. There''s not a lot you can teach me about hard work. It''s been a big share of my life.

    I''m ok with the social end of it, food stamps, school lunches etc, i have no problem giving it to people who need it. Nor do I have a problem seeing it go to farmers down on luck. Drought, tornadoes, all that,,, give them a hand by all means. but when we''ve had year after year of record harvests and we''re still giving them hundreds of thousands of dollars??? maybe we need to take a closer look at how we''re spending our money.




    Reply to this comment
    by itgranny May 21, 2008 9:50 PM PDT
    sorry, the degrees sign didn''t work in their forums. -30 degrees.
    Reply to this comment
    by itgranny May 21, 2008 9:56 PM PDT
    BTW: my son was also wounded Sept 14, 2006 in a suicide bombing of an electric station in iraq. I''ve had ringside seats to this war and hate it!
    Reply to this comment
    by stevex47 May 21, 2008 10:01 PM PDT
    Neocon Fascist Nazis idea of success:

    Dollar equals zero.

    $20.00 a gallon gas.

    Make jobs leave America by the thousands.

    Reveal the identities of CIA agents.

    Break all Amendments of the Constitution while saying F-the Constitution.

    Home sales and new construction eauals zero.

    Mission Accomplished nutjobs.
    Reply to this comment
    by aldon61 May 21, 2008 10:07 PM PDT
    walt1944: You''re right about the trials of the american farming families. It''s a hard life that nature often disrupts. I am 100% for this veto override, even though there is some pork in it. "itgrammy" points out that the bill needs more careful scrutinizing, maybe it does, but we have the hammer on this one and for a change "the brush" will have to live with it. Just five+ months until this nightmare administration is over, thank God!
    Reply to this comment
    by jack3213 May 21, 2008 10:28 PM PDT
    Where do you think that 300 billion is coming from? That''s right- your pocket you rich ***.
    Reply to this comment
    by May 21, 2008 10:56 PM PDT
    What is it with you Nazi''''s? YOU have NO problem sending BILLIONS to Iraq for their health care.. rebuilding their country and the such... but give an AMERICAN a dollar and you freaks start marching around with your burning crosses. I just can''''t figure it out!! Sieg Heil Bush

    Posted by MCVet at 09:21 PM : May 21, 2008

    I''ll tell you what it is...you hippocrit democrats always got plenty to say when you want to accuse Bush of lining the pocket of oil companies...but somehow you don''t see anything wrong with big handouts to farming corporations. That''s the mantra of democrats...situational ethics. If farmers weren''t paid to NOT grow crops...that would result in more food being grown and lower costs for people who are stuggling with higher food prices. Don''t bother to respond with your usual yada, yada , yada Nazi, yada, yada, yada bootlicker, yada, yada, yada
    swastika. Just finish drinking yourself to sleep you old fool.
    Reply to this comment
    by bretster7 May 21, 2008 11:34 PM PDT
    To stevex47

    Neocon Fascist Nazis idea of success:

    Dollar equals zero.
    THANK THE FED AND ALAN GREENSPAN WHO WAS THE FED CHAIR FOR THE LAST FOUR ADMINISTRATIONS. cAN''T LAY BLAME TO A SINGLE ADMINISTRATION FOR THAT ONE.

    $20.00 a gallon gas.
    OUR DOMESTIC OIL PRODUCTION HAS DECREASED BY 50% SINCE 1985,WHILE CONSUMPTION HAS GONE UP 40%.THE DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP HAS DECIDED THAT THEY ARE GOING TO BLOCK ANY LEGISLATION THAT ALLOWS DOMESTIC DRILLING FOR MORE OIL. IN FACT THEY JUST BLOCKED A BILL THAT WOULD HAVE ALLOWED ACCESSING A TRILLION BARRELS OF OIL SHALE. THEY HAVE BLOCKED DRILLING OFF THE GULF COAST, AS WELL AS ANWAR. IF YOU THINK THAT BUSH WHOM YOU SO QUICKLY POINT OUT AS BEING A DUNCE, C
    HAS ANY SAY ON WHAT A BARREL OF OIL COSTS, YOU ARE NOT ONLY IGNORANT TO SUPPLY AND DEMAND, BUT ARE DELUSIONAL IF YOU THINK THE PRICE WILL MAGICALLY DROP WHEN A DEM GETS ELECTED.
    Make jobs leave America by the thousands.
    NAFTA....SIGNED INTO LAW BY CLINTON

    Reveal the identities of CIA agents.
    JUST MORE IDIOTIC LIBERAL TALKING POINTS
    Break all Amendments of the Constitution while saying F-the Constitution.
    ???????
    Home sales and new construction eauals zero.
    ANYONE WITH ANY COMMON SENCE KNOWS THAT HOUSING IS CYCLICAL. THERE WAS OVERBUILDING AND OVER INFLATION OF THE PRICES. GO CHECK YOUR HISTORY
    Mission Accomplished nutjob
    Reply to this comment
    by bretster7 May 21, 2008 11:39 PM PDT
    the oil companies that are making 15 billion in a QUARTER.


    AND PAYING ABOUT NINE BILLION A QUARTER IN TAXES.
    THE PART YOU YOU DON''T HEAR ABOUT
    Reply to this comment
    by down-ndirty May 22, 2008 12:28 AM PDT
    Reading the comments about this article I am amazed at the number of neocon Fascist Nazis that have come out against the bill.
    You neocon Fascist Nazis are pathetic!
    SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!!
    sig heil, DEFINITELY MORE OF THE SAME, McCain!!!!
    Posted by walt1944 at 09:24 PM : May 21, 2008


    ...neocon Fascist Nazis????

    LOL!!! I am a liberal who grew up on a farm in a time when NON-FARMER John Wayne was getting farm subsidies that he didn''t need. Actor John Wayne took farm subsidies from other farmers who needed them more than Wayne did.

    LOL!!! I''m now living in a time when NON-FARMER David Letterman is getting farm subsidies that he doesn''t need. Why does an extremely wealthy entertainer like Letterman need to take farm subsidies from another farmer who needs them?

    Your caustic remarks and name-calling are not necessary, however, they ARE an indication of your intelligence level.

    But I won''t argue with you. Arguing with an untelligent fool only lowers one to the fool''s level.

    Reply to this comment
    by mainedoggie May 22, 2008 12:40 AM PDT
    ya know, I cannot even stand to read this article, about shortages of money for america, considering the 4 billion we are spending a MONTH in iraq. ***? This is absolute insanity. Oh, and do not forget to vote republithug come election time for more of the same.
    Reply to this comment
    by mainedoggie May 22, 2008 12:41 AM PDT
    Dear Dana Perino, you whitehouse ***** you... let us talk about taxes, and compare that to what we are dumping into iraq.. talk?
    Reply to this comment
    by mainedoggie May 22, 2008 12:47 AM PDT
    ------------------
    I''''ll tell you what it is...you hippocrit democrats always got plenty to say when you want to accuse Bush of lining the pocket of oil companies...but somehow you don''''t see anything wrong with big handouts to farming corporations. That''''s the mantra of democrats...situational ethics. If farmers weren''''t paid to NOT grow crops...that would result in more food being grown and lower costs for people who are stuggling with higher food prices. Don''''t bother to respond with your usual yada, yada , yada Nazi, yada, yada, yada bootlicker, yada, yada, yada
    swastika. Just finish drinking yourself to sleep you old fool.
    -------------------

    Another rethug idiot. You just do not get it. The farming subsidies are coming from sorts like you, you knuckle-head!

    Reply to this comment
    by whofhearted0 May 22, 2008 12:47 AM PDT
    SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!!
    sig heil, ...
    Posted by walt1944 at 09:24 PM : May 21, 2008

    ---------------------------------

    sig heil.... Hmmmmmmm... Sounds familiar...

    The login name has changed but the rhetoric and name-calling are the same. According to his narrow-minded way of thinking, we don''t have a right to disagree. Sound familiar?? Sound like Hitler? Hmmmmmm.... Who is the nazi here?



    Reply to this comment
    by mainedoggie May 22, 2008 12:58 AM PDT
    Dearest Dana (whitehouse *****) Perino -- Last I checked, 23,000.00 per American family is being yanked from us, and dumped into Iraq. Correct me if I''m wrong neo-nazi *****!

    Reply to this comment
    by mainedoggie May 22, 2008 1:03 AM PDT
    ------------------
    the oil companies that are making 15 billion in a QUARTER.


    AND PAYING ABOUT NINE BILLION A QUARTER IN TAXES.
    THE PART YOU YOU DON''''T HEAR ABOUT

    Posted by bretster7 at 11:39 PM : May 21, 2008
    ---------------------------------------


    Apparently the bretster7 is part of the crew that is cashing in here...
    Reply to this comment
    by rudy654-2009 May 22, 2008 1:07 AM PDT
    This is just corporate welfare, because the real family farmers will get nothing. But hey, more food stamps! Thanks Congress!
    Reply to this comment
    by rudy654-2009 May 22, 2008 1:08 AM PDT
    I sure get tired of the oil industry painting themselves as victims while they rake in a new lottery of millions weekly.
    Reply to this comment
    by lorinkundert May 22, 2008 1:19 AM PDT
    Too bad they overrode the wrong bill, what a bunch of incompetents this Democrat led congress has become
    Reply to this comment
    by May 22, 2008 6:52 AM PDT
    The farming subsidies are coming from sorts like you, you knuckle-head!

    Posted by mainedoggie at 12:47 AM : May 22, 2008

    Say what????? Coherence please if you''re going to post here!
    Reply to this comment
    by libh8er May 22, 2008 9:33 AM PDT
    Ted, after you go, can I have your jet ski?
    Reply to this comment
    by whofhearted0 May 23, 2008 1:57 AM PDT
    I don''''t know exactly how that works. ... Posted by tuffone3 at 11:27 AM : May 22, 2008


    ...or how it relates to this story...

    Reply to this comment
    See all 49 Comments
    • MOST POPULAR
    • Viewed
    • Commented
    Latest News
    Featured Blogs