WASHINGTON, May 21, 2008

Finance Reports Show Clinton's $20M Debt

Obama, McCain Have Millions In Hand Following Strong Fundraising Month While Clinton Finds Herself In The Red

  •  (CBS/AP)

  • Interactive The Money Race

    See the latest campaign finance tallies from Obama and McCain.

  • Interactive Campaign 2008

    Profiles of the candidates, polls, fund-raising, blogs, video and more.

(CBS/AP)  The money tells the tale. Democrat Barack Obama entered May sitting comfortably atop more than $37 million in the bank. Republican John McCain had nearly $22 million in hand. Hillary Rodham Clinton, once the Democrats' presidential front-runner, was in the red.

The Money Race
Check out April tallies for Obama, McCain and Clinton - including how much they've raised and spent since the campaign began.
“With just two weeks and three contests remaining in the Democratic race, money concerns alone aren’t likely to drive Clinton out of the race,” said CBSNews.com senior political editor Vaughn Ververs. “But it’s one more reminder - along with the delegate count - of Clinton’s near-extinct hopes of winning the nomination.”

Obama, moving closer to his party's nomination, let his fundraising slow only slightly last month and collected $31 million. Clinton raised more than $21 million, but was saddled with debts. And McCain, in his best monthly performance yet, hauled in $18 million.

Financially, the month tracked the three candidates' political fortunes. Clinton beat Obama in Pennsylvania on April 22 and saw a $10 million surge in donations in a 24-hour period. But money and the delegates needed for the nomination still flowed primarily to Obama.

McCain, lacking rivals and assured the GOP nomination, spent little and worked on consolidating his fundraising base.

The three candidates filed their financial reports Tuesday with the Federal Election Commission.

Together, the reports reinforce what is increasingly evident in the campaign: Obama and McCain are equipping themselves to confront each other, while Clinton, risking a personal financial hit, is quixotically hanging on to the end.

In a continued expansion of Obama's fundraising network, his campaign reported nearly 1.5 million donors since he started raising money for his presidential race. With such extraordinary numbers behind him, Obama appears to have access to a continuing flow of money, though his April total was his smallest haul this year. Overall, he has raised close to $265 million in his White House bid.

Obama spent $36 million in April, half of it on advertising. For the first time, his spending exceeded his monthly fundraising. Clinton, too, spent more than she raised. Both vigorously competed in Pennsylvania and he also spent heavily during April in Indiana and North Carolina, which held their primaries on May 6. Obama lost Indiana narrowly and won in North Carolina.

But Clinton reported only about $8 million cash on hand for the primary. (She has $22 million set aside for the general election that she can't use.) She also reported $19.5 million in debts, including $10 million she has lent her campaign. Even without the loan, Clinton was in negative cash position. The loan amount also did not include an extra $1.4 million she put into her campaign in May.

Clinton did not add to her debt to vendors, who include such campaign consultants as Mark Penn and Mandy Grunwald. But she had to ramp up her spending, with a majority of it devoted to traveling and getting her message to voters. She spent more than $9 million on ads alone.

Still that paled in comparison to Obama. He spent more than $20 million on ads, including nearly $2 million on advertising on the Internet.

Clinton campaign chairman Terry McCauliffe said donors continued to contribute though the Internet and that she had fundraisers planned this week.

"We have the money to play in all the remaining states," he said. He said Clinton offered to put in more of her own money but "we have not had to use it."

McCain's finances are an important marker as he moves into direct competition with Obama, who has shown himself to be a fundraiser without equal. McCain has been taking advantage of his status as the all-but-nominated Republican candidate, embracing the big donors from his former GOP rivals and putting allies in charge of raising money at the Republican National Committee.

The RNC, which is the party's main political arm, had nearly 10 times more cash on hand than its Democratic counterpart at the end of April, a notable GOP advantage in what has otherwise been Democratic fundraising dominance this election.

The committee on Tuesday reported having $40.1 million in the bank. The Democratic National Committee had $4.4 million.

The RNC raised $15.7 million in April compared to $4.7 million by the DNC.

Significantly, the financial disparity comes in a presidential election year when the candidates rely on the parties to mobilize voters and promote their message. Overall this year, the RNC has raised more than $52 million, the DNC has raised more than $22 million.

McCain has put his own team at the RNC to operate a Victory Fund Committee that is corralling top Republican donors. Earlier this month, McCain and the party raised $7 million at a fundraiser hosted by New York Jets owner Woody Johnson. The proceeds of that event were not included in the RNC's latest report.

Obama has taken his own quiet steps to take over the DNC and assemble a multistate team for the general election, several Democratic officials said Tuesday. With such a team in place, the DNC would be able to tap into Obama's prodigious fundraising.

The DNC has lagged in fundraising for some time, a condition made all the more difficult by the Democrats' protracted presidential primary. Last week, the DNC announced agreements with Obama and Clinton to begin raising money together.

In their Senate and congressional accounts, Democrats were faring much better. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign committee reported $37.6 million in the bank to the National Republican Senatorial Committee's $19.4 million. The GOP's Senate campaign arm, however, slightly edged the Democrats in fundraising for the first time this election cycle.

Similarly, the National Republican Congressional Committee outraised the Democrats' House campaign committee. But the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee reported more than $45 million in the bank to the GOP committee's nearly $7 million.

©MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Candidate Profiles & RSS Feeds


Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 275 Comments
by sjc_1 May 23, 2008 1:13 PM EDT
Caucuses are an odd form of primary. They are not a primary election at all. They are a gathering of the faithful and as such do not reflect democracy in its purest sense.
Reply to this comment
by rufisgufis May 22, 2008 4:26 PM EDT
CLINTON WANTS TO COUNT EVERY VOTE,

EXCEPT THOSE SHE DIDN''T WIN

LIKE THE CAUCUSES

Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 May 22, 2008 4:23 PM EDT
Writing off the delegates from four caucus states, just to try and steal the election, is beyond absurd.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by hungry1968 at 10:20 AM : May 22, 2008


Nobody''s writing off the caucuses! Tell them to prove up their votes and let''s bring ''em on! We can add HIllary''s votes from those states too!
Reply to this comment
by rufisgufis May 22, 2008 4:23 PM EDT
HILLARY WILL SPIN IT TO WIN IT!

AT LEAST UNTIL SHE CAN GET ENOUGH SUCKERS SO SHE CAN TAKE HER OWN MONEY BACK OFF THE TABLE.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 May 22, 2008 4:22 PM EDT
They''''ll get counted.It just won''''t be the way that the wicked witch of the east and her flying monkeys want,LOL!



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by jesterbelle at 10:28 AM : May 22, 2008


If they don''t count them the way the voters want them counted, then there''s always the option of taking the vote elsewhere.

We''re tired of this bull *****! And we''re NOT TAKING IT ANYMORE!

Clinton OR McCain 08!!!
Reply to this comment
by jesterbelle May 22, 2008 1:37 PM EDT
Oh won''t you send me twenty million dollars,

That is what I really,truly nee eee eed!

Please,suckers send me twenymillion dollars,

I''ll quit and leave Barrack the nominee!
Reply to this comment
by joecoolswat May 22, 2008 1:35 PM EDT
Are you even following what is going on?
----------
Posted by hungry1968

No....I am not following whats going on in the Democrat party...Its kind of like a ball team waiting in the dugout for the other team to come out to play the game, and the other team is still sleeping at home, and haven''t even arrived at the ball field...
Reply to this comment
by jesterbelle May 22, 2008 1:28 PM EDT
jesterbelle.....Interesting...Kind of sounds like Howard Dean, not counting the large amounts of Votes in Michigan and Florida, in order to get Obama nominated....What was so wrong with a re-vote? there was plenty of time....Reason: discounting these states was the only way to get Obama nominated.....AAAAAAHHHHHH!!!! Howard Dean


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by JoeCoolSwat at 10:17 AM : May 22, 2008

They''ll get counted.It just won''t be the way that the wicked witch of the east and her flying monkeys want,LOL!
Reply to this comment
by joecoolswat May 22, 2008 1:28 PM EDT
hungry1968....Thanks for the information...I don''t completely understand how your crazy Democrat Machine works, with respect to delagates, caucauses, super-Del, etc....I thought Howard Dean wanted to get Obama nominated all along, and clearly Hillary and Obama were the front runners, even that long ago...the other were window dressings....Does it bother you that they have been campaigning so long (2+years), without a conclusion?
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 May 22, 2008 1:26 PM EDT
What about the senario, where at the convention, the delagates arrive at a tie, or don''''t come to a conclusion....Do the super-delagates then decide the winner?...In that case, Hillary could win? Am I wrong?

Posted by JoeCoolSwat at 10:21 AM : May 22, 2008






Obama has already won the most pledged delegates, and he can''t be caught, so the point is moot.


Are you even following what is going on?
Reply to this comment
by jesterbelle May 22, 2008 1:26 PM EDT
Let the caucus states prove up their votes, and let''''s count ''''em...nobody wants to deny their votes! Bring ''''em on!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 10:16 AM : May 22, 2008

Sounds to me as if Hillary doesn''t want to count them.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 May 22, 2008 1:24 PM EDT
jesterbelle.....Interesting...Kind of sounds like Howard Dean, not counting the large amounts of Votes in Michigan and Florida, in order to get Obama nominated....What was so wrong with a re-vote? there was plenty of time....Reason: discounting these states was the only way to get Obama nominated.....AAAAAAHHHHHH!!!! Howard Dean

Posted by JoeCoolSwat at 10:17 AM : May 22, 2008






Those votes were deemed "unofficial" back in August and Florida, when there were still 10 or 12 candidates in the running.

How can you REASONABLY sit here and say that they killed those delegates 5 and 9 months ago, to benefit Obama, when they didn''t even know if he would still be around in the second week of January? (Note the key word "REASONABLY").


By the way, it was the STATES that decided NOT to have a re-vote. Not the DNC, not Hillary, not Obama, or anyone else. It was THE STATES that made the decision.
Reply to this comment
by joecoolswat May 22, 2008 1:21 PM EDT
What about the senario, where at the convention, the delagates arrive at a tie, or don''t come to a conclusion....Do the super-delagates then decide the winner?...In that case, Hillary could win? Am I wrong?
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 May 22, 2008 1:20 PM EDT
Let the caucus states prove up their votes, and let''''s count ''''em...nobody wants to deny their votes! Bring ''''em on!

Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 10:16 AM : May 22, 2008





They''re already there - they are called "delegates".

"Delegates" are the ONLY measure of success in the democratic nomination process. Her crying "popular vote, popular vote, popular vote" is only pandering to the super delegates, as a reason to overrule the elected delegates, and vote for her instead. Nothing more.



Writing off the delegates from four caucus states, just to try and steal the election, is beyond absurd.
Reply to this comment
by joecoolswat May 22, 2008 1:17 PM EDT
jesterbelle.....Interesting...Kind of sounds like Howard Dean, not counting the large amounts of Votes in Michigan and Florida, in order to get Obama nominated....What was so wrong with a re-vote? there was plenty of time....Reason: discounting these states was the only way to get Obama nominated.....AAAAAAHHHHHH!!!! Howard Dean
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 May 22, 2008 1:16 PM EDT
Speaking of manipulation.what''''s this I hear about Hillary not counting some of the caucas states in order to perpetuate her popular vote myth?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by jesterbelle at 10:13 AM : May 22, 2008

Let the caucus states prove up their votes, and let''s count ''em...nobody wants to deny their votes! Bring ''em on!
Reply to this comment
by jesterbelle May 22, 2008 1:13 PM EDT
They think the the democrats can''''t see this manipulation is HILARIOUS!

A FRESH new voice with same old dirty rotten politics, is the most HILARIOUS hoax on the people this century!




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 10:01 AM : May 22, 2008

Speaking of manipulation.what''s this I hear about Hillary not counting some of the caucas states in order to perpetuate her popular vote myth?
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 May 22, 2008 1:05 PM EDT
The point is, you can''''t win the general election without the majority vote! It''''s that simple.

And Obama promoting himself as being the winner without obtaining a win without PLEDGED state delegates...is HILARIOUS!

So what does the mafioso DNC do...goes out and bullies the superdelegates to start sounding off before the votes are in to try to bully the voters into voting for Obama and his oil and energy money!

It''''s HILARIOUS....(pardon the pun)

They think the the democrats can''''t see this manipulation is HILARIOUS!

A FRESH new voice with same old dirty rotten politics, is the most HILARIOUS hoax on the people this century!


Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 10:01 AM : May 22, 2008






He has already achieved the MOST pledged state delegates, and she can''t catch him. By your own benchmarks in this post, she''s already lost.

And how is the DNC bullying anyone? By urging them to make up their minds as soon as possible?

Your posts get more and more bizarre by the day!!!
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 May 22, 2008 1:01 PM EDT
The point is, you can''t win the general election without the majority vote! It''s that simple.

And Obama promoting himself as being the winner without obtaining a win without PLEDGED state delegates...is HILARIOUS!

So what does the mafioso DNC do...goes out and bullies the superdelegates to start sounding off before the votes are in to try to bully the voters into voting for Obama and his oil and energy money!

It''s HILARIOUS....(pardon the pun)

They think the the democrats can''t see this manipulation is HILARIOUS!

A FRESH new voice with same old dirty rotten politics, is the most HILARIOUS hoax on the people this century!

Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 May 22, 2008 1:01 PM EDT
PA, TX, OH, CA, OK, AK, NY, MA, NJ, FLA, MI, WV, KY...

ALL key states in the election, HIllary has beaten the SNOT out of Obama...

Where did Obama win? IL, GA, NC, SC, MS, VA...and the rest with only marginal wins...and caucus states where they can''''t even prove up the votes...and where Hillary got votes also.

I just love the freaking media...

They''''re HILARIOUS! (pardon the pun)

Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 09:51 AM : May 22, 2008






I like how you post ALL the states that Hillary wins, and then you call them "key states".


So you think she''s going to win the general election by winning 1/3 of the electoral college states too?

How absurd!!!
Reply to this comment
See all 275 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Health Care Bill Clears 1st Senate Hurdle

    (266 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.
Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: