May 20, 2008
GOP Fails To Recruit Minority Candidates
Politico: The Republican Party Is Fielding Only A Handful Of Minority Candidates For House, Senate And Gubernatorial Races
-
(CBS/96Rock)
-
Interactive 110th Congress The balance of power shifts and new leadership takes control as the latest session convenes.
At a time when Democrats are poised to knock down a historic racial barrier with their presidential nominee, the GOP is fielding only a handful of minority candidates for Congress or statehouses - none of whom seem to have a prayer of victory.
At the start of the Bush years, the Republican National Committee - in tandem with the White House - vowed to usher in a new era of GOP minority outreach. As George W. Bush winds down his presidency, Republicans are now on the verge of going six - and probably more - years without an African-American governor, senator or House member.
That’s the longest such streak since the 1980s.
Republicans will have only one minority governor, Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, an Indian-American, when the dust settles on the ’08 elections. Democrats have three minority governors and 43 African-American members of Congress, including one - Illinois Sen. Barack Obama - who is their likely presidential nominee. Democrats also have several challengers in winnable House races who are either black or Hispanic.
Despite having a Spanish-speaking “compassionate conservative” in the White House, Republicans’ diversity deficit seems to have only widened.
“In 1994, when I first ran, we had 14 African-American Republicans running for Congress. ... I was the only one that won that year, but we had 14, and we had some good candidates,” said former Oklahoma Rep. J.C. Watts, one of the party’s most recognized African-American voices. “I am grateful for what Ken Mehlman did when he was RNC chairman, but I knew that wouldn’t last - that was one person. I’ve never gotten the impression that it was institutionalized.”
So who’s to blame for this diversity deficit?
Jack Kemp, the former Republican congressman and vice presidential nominee, says the culprit is clear: a “pitiful” recruitment effort by his party. “I don’t see much of an outreach,” he said. “I don’t see much of a reason to run.”
A former black GOP candidate who declined to be identified by name offered a slightly more charitable explanation. He said the party is so broke and distracted that wooing strong minority candidates is a luxury it simply cannot afford right now.
Congressional staffers contacted for reaction on this issue did not want to comment but were clearly uneasy with the party’s all-white slate of viable candidates.
In all fairness, Republicans have never been very good at attracting strong minority candidates, especially African-Americans. Only four black Republicans - Watts, former Massachusetts Sen. Edward Brooke, former Connecticut Rep. Gary Franks and the late Illinois Rep. Oscar Stanton De Priest - have been elected to Congress since Reconstruction.
The party has done slightly better with Cuban-Americans and Hispanics in recent years - Cuban-American Sen. Mel Martinez of Florida recently served as RNC chairman. But the GOP remains a white-dominated party elected overwhelmingly by white voters.
Another mitigating factor for the party is that this has been a terrible year overall for GOP recruitment, as exemplified in the 0-for-3 Republican streak in special elections in recent weeks. The dilemma is simple: Who wants to run when the Republican brand is so unpopular and money is so scarce?
Still, the recruitment failure is striking when you consider the recent history of the GOP on this issue. It was not long ago - 2005, to be precise - that Mehlman, then the RNC chairman, grabbed headlines with a major speech on diversity before the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
“Republicans are committed to inclusion,” he told the group’s national convention. “I’m here four years before the next presidential election asking for your help. Inclusion means you work together to recruit candidates, not surrogates to speak on their behalf.”
Mehlman was far from alone. President Bush dedicated significant time in the early years of his presidency to reaching out to African-Americans with countless speeches on education and faith-based initiatives directed at minority communities. He aggressively appointed prominent blacks to his Cabinet, including two secretaries of state: Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice.
Bush sometimes broke into Spanish as he called for immigration laws providing illegal immigrants a pathway to citizenship, a hot topic in Hispanic communities.
The efforts, of course, were designed to attract voters - not just candidates - into the GOP fold. And the moral of the story is that the party clearly failed.
Some party insiders point to 2006 as the specific proof that diversity efforts may sound great but are still impractical and electorally unrewarding for the GOP.
During that cycle, Mehlman and GOP leaders talked a number of attractive black candidates into running for important seats: Michael Steele of Maryland, for the Senate; and Lynn Swann of Pennsylvania and Ken Blackwell of Ohio, for governor.
Scores of stories were written about the Republicans’ new plan to win tough seats with well-funded minority candidates.
Then they all lost badly. The election results in their respective states showed that they hardly made any inroads - even in the heavily African-American parts of the states they were running in. Swann was later asked to run for the House, and he declined.
Suddenly, the argument for minority outreach seemed to lack the underpinning of any successful political strategy: the ability to produce more votes.
The exit polling data for House races in 2006 showed the depth of the GOP’s outreach crisis. Republican candidates won 11 percent of the black vote and 30 percent of the Hispanic vote.
However, Watts, for one, rejects the argument that Republicans can’t compete for minority votes or successfully recruit minority candidates. He argues that the party simply hasn’t tried hard enough.
“Unless you have an infrastructure to build off of, it’s all throwing mud at the wall and hoping that some of it sticks,” said Watts. “There’s an entire infrastructure that needs to be thought through, and it seems to me no one is interested in building that.”
By Jim VandeHei and Josh Kraushaar
Copyright 2008 POLITICO
| We cover politics with enterprise, style, and impact. |
More From Politico
Michelle Obama tells how her role as the First Lady has changed her perspective.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 50 CommentsMichelle Obama is a window to all of that, so "chivalry" requires that we ignore her (except of course if you are a mesmerized Obamiac, in which case listen and send in more donations).
Posted by jack3213 at 8:56 AM : May 21, 2008
...and therefore blacks and other minorities should listen to who, Fox News, Hannity, or your hero Rush??? Jeremy speaks something folks like you will never understand, the truth.
You probably still drive a Chevy, tell your kids that Christopher Columbus discovered America, believe that the Japanese attacked Peral Harobor for now apparent reason, Iraqies were behind 9/11, and send your kids to a college that only teaches them how to steal better by using new accounting methods.
The "massa" race has failed...you morons have ruined this country both here and abroad. You idiots are, and will be, irrelevant for quite some time so get over it and go spew your irrelevant views on a Nazi channel somewhere cause this ain't it!
Now just a few short years later we said change and yet the neo cons told use they were the deciders. Now what would make these morons think that they were more important then their masters.
Neo cons in congress you are public servants the servants is tied to master / slave relationship. You do understand what happens to a bad slave don''t you!
The more we listen to her, the more we think of Jeremy Wright and wonder how Obama could have spent 20 years with the man, called him his intellectual mentor and yet not have picked up on, let alone agreed with, some of the most vile hatred masquerading as theology that you are likely to find in America today.
Michelle Obama is a window to all of that, so "chivalry" requires that we ignore her (except of course if you are a mesmerized Obamiac, in which case listen and send in more donations).
Posted by stn_sage at 04:14 PM : May 20, 2008
The answer to that is "the usual"...Mudsling, LIE, RIG the voting procedures and if all else FAILS....
PURCHASE the Supreme Court!
Posted by homespunlady at 05:07 PM : May 20, 2008
---------------
My response: I''m afraid you''re probably correct about that! That would be my guess, too! Afterall, there''s 9 billion dollars from Iraq that''s missing---so there''s plenty of money to ''spread around''!
Posted by vmcneal2
Yes.
And Loyalty over qualification.
Bush:
"Brownies doin'' a heck of a job."
Posted by vmcneal2
Yes.
And Loyal over qualification.
Bush:
"Brownies doin'' a heck of a job."
Posted by neoconslayer
True.
The Republicans have and will continue to take care of "minorities." I''m talking about the haves and have mores.
AFTER we have SHIPPED overseas our INDUSTRIAL CAPACITY which will take DECADES to rebuild here if needed - the country we shipped it to MOST is having it''s OWN PROBLEMS.
Most of what I was reading on that earthquake kept MENTIONING FACTORIES that have COLLAPSED.
Then there is the REBUILDING there that will JUSTIFIABLY take PRIORITY over shipping things to the US at a "cheaper price".
Expect a "readjustment" of currencies and a WHOLE LOT LESS of cheap "imports".
All of which portends "unhappy" voters.
DOW DOWN 237 points for all those "PRO-PRIVATIZATION" advocates of Social Security.
The OIL BUBBLE is REALLY taking off with PROFITEERS pushing it to NEW HIGHS close to 130 per barrel and EVERY indicator that it WILL go MUCH HIGHER.
Bush''s "Mideast trip" where his PRIORITY was CAMPAIGNING and RENEWING OLD TIES to the HOMELAND of OSAMA BIN LADEN.
HALIBURTON/BLACKWATER - Nuf said.
and oh by the way, the GOP has MORE than the "minority vote" to worry about
- THEY started and now have about COMPLETELY LOST even the "redneck" vote around here.
AT OVER 4 dollars a gallon for the gas and DIESEL they need for their WORK MACHINERY and NOT EATING so well because of FOOD PRICES - BLIND LOYALTY only goes SO FAR!
DEPRESSION here we come!
im speaking symbolically of course,
when you show Bigotry, it shows throughout the party.
How are they going to avoid ''''wipe-out'''' losses in November''''s election?
Posted by stn_sage at 04:14 PM : May 20, 2008
The answer to that is "the usual"...Mudsling, LIE, RIG the voting procedures and if all else FAILS....
PURCHASE the Supreme Court!
RICH WHITE MALES ARE, TECHNICALLY, A MINORITY...
The Rep political leaders---every now and then---when they get enough criticism for not having any minorities in their party---they bring a couple into the party to quiet the criticism. But, they''re TOKENS!
Being a Black in the Republican party is something akin to being a Jew in the Nazi party! Not a particularly philosophical match. And not anything a sane person would willingly enter into!
But, they have bigger problems than worrying about getting minority candidates for 2008 elections! They should be concerned about how they''re going to convince the public to vote for them after 8-14 years of the most irresponsible, corrupt, perverted, and evil GOP rule in American political history!?
How are they going to avoid ''wipe-out'' losses in November''s election?
This is the stupidity which we have married ourselves to: Being a minority is more important than being good at the job one is hired to do.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by sincityq at 02:35 PM : May 20, 2008
In the case of Bush/Cheney being White was more important than being good at the job they were hired to do.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 50 Comments