Bush Grudgingly Signs Oil Bill
Despite Strong Congressional Support, President Says Halting Reserve Purchases Is Bad Idea
-
President Bush, accompanied by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, speaks to reporters about the economy, May 19, 2008, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington. (AP)
-
Interactive Oil and Gas:
Fossil FuelsLearn more about energy costs and usage in your state and get the latest prices for gasoline.
"The president is not going to stand in their way on this bill," said deputy press secretary Scott Stanzel of Congress' overwhelming vote for the measure. Mr. Bush signed the measure without comment.
In a bipartisan rebuke, the Senate last week voted 97-1 and the House 385-25 for the legislation, margins suggesting that a veto could be easily overridden.
Earlier, the president and White House officials had spoken out strongly against the measure, although there wasn't a specific threat to veto it.
"He remains against it," Stanzel said. So why is he signing it? "I think he saw the overwhelming numbers of members of Congress who want to attempt to have an impact on prices by stopping the fill of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve."
"Congress keeps ... going from Band-Aid to Band-Aid that they think will have an impact but really won't," Stanzel said.
Sponsors of the bill said they hoped to lower energy prices. But the administration said the amount of oil involved was relatively small and would have no effect on gas prices.
The reserve, a system of salt caverns on the Louisiana and Texas Gulf coast, is 97 percent full, holding 701 million barrels of crude. The stockpile, currently sufficient to cover two months of oil imports, is kept as a cushion in case of a major disruption of oil supplies.
Not waiting for the bill to be enacted, the administration on Friday suspended oil deliveries into the reserve for the rest of the year.
The Energy Department said it would not sign six-month contracts, scheduled to have begun July 1, for the acceptance of 76,000 barrels of oil a day. The department also indicated it would defer deliveries under existing contracts once the legislation became law.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- chickens are coming home to roost. greed, excess, materialism. American''s should be proud.
- Reply to this comment
- If Bush had a real energy policy instead of tax breaks for the oil companies and making sure that they have a high price for their oil to increase profits, we might not be in the mess to begin with.
- Reply to this comment
- Any major refinery can process 76,000 barrels in around 6 to 10 hours so this will not have any effect on prices, just another token move by our idiotic congress and senate.
- Reply to this comment
- Liberals ??? The 97 senators or the 385 reps who''''d voted for this ??? Which are the liberals ??
Posted by parrot123 at 01:17 PM : May 20, 2008
Since bush took office, there is no such thing as a moderate or even a true conservative. There''s bush and then there''s everyone else who disagrees with him. Those who disagree are called Liberals and Traitors. I call them Patriots. - Reply to this comment
- WHEN ARE THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA GOING TO UNDERSTAND THE REASL FACT. IT IS NOT THE AMOUNYT OF OIL OR CRUDE THAT IS HURTING US (AMERICA OR THE WORLD) IT IS THE REFINERIES THAT IS THE PROBLEM, IN THE LATE 70 AND EARLY 80''S THE BIG OIL COMPANIES BOUGHT THE SMALL INDEPENDENT REF. AND CLOSED THEM JUST TO MAKE MORE MONEY BY SQUEEZING THE PUBLIC WITH SHORTAGES, BY REDUCING THE QUANITIES ON HAND OF FINISHED PRODUCT,
ignorance is ignorance AND IT IS THE PUBLIC IGNORANCE public demands the companies rebuild the refineries to refine more we will go on with the shortages and high prices.
Frank Bowers down in Austin, Tx - Reply to this comment
- SAID THIS 4 DAYS AGO, WHAT A JOKE PAULSON IS...
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said Friday that financial markets are "considerably calmer" now than they were two months ago. He predicted the economy will be rebounding by the second half of this year.
In a speech to business executives in Washington, Paulson said the drag from housing, which he characterized as still the biggest risk to the economy, will soon be lessened by nearly $100 billion in economic stimulus payments to U.S. households.
"The fiscal stimulus will provide support to the economy as we weather the housing correction, capital markets turmoil and higher energy and food prices," Paulson said in his prepared remarks.
The economy has been pushed to the brink of a recession by a prolonged housing slump, a credit crisis, soaring energy prices and more than a quarter-million job layoffs over the past four months. - Reply to this comment
- You sound like a communist?
Are you a Obama Supporter?
Posted by obama8years at 04:31 PM : May 20, 2008
Are YOU an idiot? Of course YOU are! - Reply to this comment
- Blame the gas guzzler SUV drivers and big car drivers. This nation needs to realize gas is not infinite! Americans have had their day of big cars and vehicles. Its time to drive something sensible and not show off vehicles that guzzle gas.
I have news for you who do, you do not look cool.
It is unAmerican to drive one of these guzzlers. Run them off the road. Refuse them service at any gas station.
We should ration gas, only 10 gallons a week per person.
-----------------------------------------
You sound like a communist?
Are you a Obama Supporter? - Reply to this comment
- PAULSON WAS LOOKING LIKE HE WAS ENJOYING SUC/KING BUSH, WHAT A JOKE.ALL IN CONGRESS, LOOKING AND LAUGHING AT ALL AMERICANS FIGHTING TO STAY ALIVE.THEY LOVE IT..
- Reply to this comment
- Blame the gas guzzler SUV drivers and big car drivers. This nation needs to realize gas is not infinite! Americans have had their day of big cars and vehicles. Its time to drive something sensible and not show off vehicles that guzzle gas.
I have news for you who do, you do not look cool.
It is unAmerican to drive one of these guzzlers. Run them off the road. Refuse them service at any gas station.
We should ration gas, only 10 gallons a week per person. - Reply to this comment
- I think the Oil Companies should build a huge refinery in Crawford TX - there''''s a real friendly Oil man there, I''''m sure he wouldn''''t mind giving up some of his land to build one. If he grudgingly resists, we could get the Supreme Court to take it with Eminent Domain. 7 of those Justices were signed in by Republican Presidents, I''''m sure they won''''t mind.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by terikrause
I believe you have a great idea , We could also post web site showing Bushes ranch address as the location for accepting job applications for illegal immigrants to submit for the construction of the refinery. - Reply to this comment
- This is a bad idea but our wonderful President Bush will use this as a learning opportunity for liberals to find out how wrong they are.
Posted by faith_in_w
Liberals ??? The 97 senators or the 385 reps who''d voted for this ??? Which are the liberals ?? - Reply to this comment
- Still no gonads to open up the Reserves or the threat of such, in order to crush the price of crude - Cost to produce a barrel of Crude just went up to about $15.11/barrel - while it''s now being sold at $127/barrel ....... Why can''t dumbya just do the right thing ???
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by bullyforhim
You said it well. The only thing missing is that the American people should look to themselves -- driving big SUVs and trucks to go pick up a few things, speeding to make up a few minutes of poorly planned travel, and then looking to government to protect them. Entitlement reliant idiots always look for Democrats to come and help them out, which ain''''t gonna happen, folks, unless you believe in the Easter bunny. People, reduce the demand for big oil''''s product and the prices will fall.
At least someone out there gets it. Prices are caused by supply and demand. Since everyone started driving huge gas guzzlers starting around the turn of the century, prices have consistently rose. Now, the chinese population is doing the same thing. They have a huge SUV craze there as well, causing a high demand. Plus, with a weak dollar caused by the mortgage market, we must pay more for each gallon.
And don''t start thinking that if the government gets rid of the gas tax for the summer or puts a cap on cas prices that it will help out by any means. The cost will just be passed back through taxes.
Supply and Demand . . . Econ 101 - Reply to this comment
- [Thats funny because when gasoline was $2.10 a gallon in 2006 the Dimwitocrats were touting how that was outrageous and if elected to office they would fix it. LOL]
[Posted by thgdriver at 11:30 AM : May 20, 2008]
what''s most amusing is your complete distortion of the facts ... and i thought you ''right thinkers'' were such ''factual types''.
the price of gas was pretty much steady between the years 1990 and early 2000 (roughly $1.50). since then it''s been on a steady upward climb.
hmmm ... i wonder what the correlation is there. - Reply to this comment
- [And the democrat controlled congress since 2006 has done what to solve ANY problem?]
[Posted by LibH8er at 10:48 AM : May 20, 2008]
nearly every bill that passed by ''the shrub'' between 2000 - 2006 was rubber stamped ... responsible for increasing the national debt by nearly 30% in just 6 years.
nearly every bill that passed by ''the shrub'' between early 2007 and now has been vetoed ... responsible for complete gridlock in getting anything done.
so ... why didn''t ''your boys'' address the issue while they had the rubber stamp out?
this is the real ''inconvenient truth'' that none of you can answer ... for any issue you bring up. refineries, drilling, conservation, war, veterans, economic policy, ethics, etc.
replying with another question is not an answer to the initial question. - Reply to this comment
- Someone needs to tell him that NOTHING is going to lower fuel costs. As if he really cared. Only a few more months to deal with the worst presidency in history.
- Reply to this comment
- thgdriver, are you in one of those brainwashed fogs or just plain stupid? I am still trying to digest the part where you posted DEMS wanting to put a dimwit in the Whitehouse. The epitome of Dimwit, "W" and his loyal (brainwashed) followers. Instead of letting you idiots make my blood boil, I now feel genuinely sorry for you. Its not your fault. Get some counseling. I will pray for you.
- Reply to this comment
- If there''s one thing Bush really knows, it''s oil, and how to bankrupt things, like Harken Oil, the company his Daddy bought for him.
- Reply to this comment
- This is a bad idea but our wonderful President Bush will use this as a learning opportunity for liberals to find out how wrong they are.
Posted by faith_in_w
Our wonderful President? LOL :). Little lady, I have this terrific bridge in NYC that I would like to sell you dirt cheap. Or maybe you might be interested in buying my summer home that I call the Whitehouse on Pennsylvania Avenue that I could give you a great deal on. :) - Reply to this comment
How gold pays for 



