Rethinking HIV-Condom Strategy In Africa
Campaigns Promoting Safer Sex Ineffective In Africa, Experts Say
-
(CBS)
-
Interactive AIDS: The Modern Pandemic A history of AIDS, U.S. statistics, health facts and a look at how the epidemic has spread.
-
Interactive Fast Facts : Southern Africa Learn about the people, economy and history of Southern Africa.
-
Interactive Fast Facts : Central Africa Learn about the people, economy and history of Central Africa.
Millions of dollars were poured into the campaign led by U.N. health agencies and backed by governments around the world. But what seemed like a natural way to fight the disease had little impact in Africa, the region hardest hit by the epidemic.
Now, many experts are calling for an entirely new approach to fighting AIDS in Africa - saying there is little evidence current strategies work.
"Intuitively, things like condom promotion and HIV testing should work anywhere," said Daniel Halperin, an AIDS expert at Harvard University's School of Public Health.
"But if that were true, countries like Botswana (with Africa's highest prevalence of AIDS after Swaziland) should have wiped out their HIV epidemic by now. These approaches just haven't worked as well as we thought they would."
In a recent article published in the journal Science, Halperin and other AIDS experts argued that health officials are largely wasting money focusing on condoms, HIV testing and other strategies such as vaccine research as the main tools for preventing AIDS in Africa.
Condom use in Africa hasn't reached a high enough level to make a dent on AIDS transmission, and there is scant evidence to show that people change their sexual behavior even when they know their HIV status, according to studies.
In sub-Saharan Africa nearly 21 million people were infected in 2001, according to the UN. Last year, that figure was estimated to be 22.5 million.
And despite years of research into finding an AIDS vaccine, the most promising candidates have failed.
Halperin and his co-authors said health officials should radically boost funding for male circumcision, which can reduce HIV transmission by up to 60 percent, and for programs to educate people to reduce their number of sexual partners.
"Almost 99 percent of the AIDS prevention money is going to things that don't seem to work very well in Africa and almost none of it is going to things that would have a major impact," Halperin said.
U.N. health officials rejected the need for change and said there is some evidence in Asia that condom distribution programs reduce HIV transmission.
They also said they have been working on guidelines to introduce mass male circumcision, but that such a strategy will take years to implement.
"It's not right to say that our approaches have not worked," said Paul de Lay, an AIDS expert at UNAIDS. "We are seeing an impact in the epidemic's decline worldwide linked to our interventions."
Last year, the UN revised its global figures for the number of people with HIV or AIDS from nearly 40 million to 33 million. But that drop was mostly due to new ways of estimating the numbers of people with HIV.
Some experts suggest the decline is due more to a natural leveling off of the epidemic, with infected people dying, rather than to the success of the UN's anti-AIDS strategies.
Earlier this year, the United States, the biggest funder of AIDS efforts in Africa, agreed to triple its spending on combating AIDS on the continent, pledging $10 billion annually over the next five years. The U.N. estimates it will need more than $3 billion by 2010 for HIV prevention efforts in Africa and $15 billion worldwide.
But some experts argue that - more than two decades into the fight against AIDS - the epidemic would have tapered off more by now in the developing world if current methods were effective.
"At the beginning, people said that this was a public health emergency and that we should just get in there and do something," said David Mabey, an AIDS expert at London's School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
"But that was short-sighted. Some things are clearly not working in some countries."
©MMVIII, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- next
See all 32 CommentsMen that are circumcised are at a higher risk.
Are body(s) is apply suited in fighting off infections. The foreskin makes sense. There is a enzyme that is secreted that will kill germs and organisms that are foreign, including the HIV virus. And I''m sure the act of urinating will also flush out and keep clean this area. Urine can be above or below a ph of 7.0 (-acidic or +alkaline) 7 represents neutrality. Urine is sterile. It could be considered a antiseptic.
Anyway: nice gym (real men are not circumcised)
Caucasians have the highest circumcision rate, followed by African Americans and Hispanics. Geographically, the highest rates are found in the Midwest, followed by the Northeast, the South, and the West.
http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/HIV/
http://hivskeptic.wordpress.com/2008/02/03/rwanda-circumcise-all-men-even-if-it-means-more-hiv-infection/
Hmmmmm.... what in the world could be unique about Africa that might cause this sort of thing?
Perhaps it''s the lions?
Not sure... but according to my pastor, this is all part of the White Gov''t of America''s plan to rid the world of black people....
When did it go from survival of the fittest, to survival of the idiots?
Reducing the spread of HIVAIDS is also a means of preventing HIVAIDS from spreading. (The artical does use the word "prevention" in a other paragraph.
This is a serious problem. STD''s are plaguing our world. There are new strains of infections that are increasing disproportional with regard to what was typical, in past generations. I just read a report stating that "maybe" HIV does not trigger AIDS. We are also seeing a disproportional increase of infections in animals and vegetation. We are hearing reports of disease''s doctors have no idea what it is. Everything here seams to be accelerating, again disproportional to what past generation have seen. Lets stop blaming each other for our sexual habits. We are sexual people, and we like having s.ex - done, end of argument. We are facing a very dramatic problem, and perplexed - coming up with a solution.
The report doesn''t say that circumcision PREVENTS the transmission of AIDS.
It says that circumcision REDUCES THE RATE of transmission of AIDS.
...on another note: The Bill Gates foundation is pumping allot of money into Africa to help with AIDS education in this improvised nation. Although the problem is getting worst. I wonder just what TBGF is really doing? What contribution is it they are making?
...We have failed to find any means that can control the spread of AIDS. From making men wear condoms, to circumcision, to almost cutting off there .icks. I think it is time the scientific community considers sewing up the ladies until this problem is solved. Everything we men have tried, has not worked. Now is the time for the woman to enter the picture, and do their share for helping humanity solve this horrendous life threatening problem.
Posted by catlover912 at 01:28 PM
I thought your post was very funny.
Too bad the "post police" are out to
do sooo much good as to report a funny
comment.
-don''t tazer me bro''
BCBBKAKE, you might want to take your own advice about getting an education. Your remarks show how ignorant you are about AIDS and its transmission.
Because they don''t want to.
Men don''t like condoms anywhere, but while men in other countries will go along with it for disease control, in
Africa they''ll say f-you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by dragonwagon5 at 12:45 PM : May 19, 2008
dragonwagon5, that is pretty funny. I would think that the spermicide would give a funny taste. I should have asked some of my girlfriends back when I was single.
Anybody recall that scene from the 40-year-old V1rgin?
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 32 Comments