ST. ALBANS, W.Va., May 16, 2008

McCain Courts Gun Owners At NRA

Presumptive GOP Nominee Suggests Obama, Clinton Would Undermine Gun Owners' Rights

  • Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., left, autographs Sportsmen for McCain t-shirts as he visits St. Albans Gun and Archery store with his wife Cindy, right, Friday, May 16, 2008, in Charleston, W. Va. Photo

    Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., left, autographs Sportsmen for McCain t-shirts as he visits St. Albans Gun and Archery store with his wife Cindy, right, Friday, May 16, 2008, in Charleston, W. Va.  (AP)

  • Interactive Guns In America

    State-by-state gun laws and death rates, maps of recent school and workplace shootings and facts on who's at risk.

  • Photo Essay John McCain

    Some call him a hero, some a maverick. Will Americans call him Mr. President?

(AP)  Courting his sometime critics within the gun lobby, John McCain told the National Rifle Association on Friday that Democrats Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton would both undermine the rights of gun owners.

"If either Senator Clinton or Senator Obama is elected president, the rights of law-abiding gun owners will be at risk my friends - and have no doubt about it," the Republican nominee-in-waiting told a crowd of several thousand.

McCain acknowledged he has been no darling of gun-rights advocates, having pushed through signature campaign finance legislation gun supporters say has muzzled free speech. The Arizona senator has also favored tighter restrictions for buying guns at gun shows.

Nonetheless, McCain said he expected the votes of gun owners in his general election campaign against either Obama or Clinton, the remaining Democratic presidential contenders.

"I supported campaign finance reform because I strongly believed our system of financial campaigns was influencing elected officials to put the interests of `soft money' ahead of the public interest," the senator said to silence. Softmoney is unlimited contributions from wealthy individuals corporations or unions.

"It is neither my purpose nor the purpose of the legislation to prevent gun owners or any other group of citizens from making their voices heard in the legislative process," he said.

"Those disagreements do not detract from my long record of support for the Second Amendment and the work we have done together to protect the rights of gun owners ...," he added.

Earlier, after visiting a gun store in St. Albans, W.Va., when he bought only a rod, bobbers and other fishing equipment, McCain said the only gun controls he favors are limits to keep guns from people with criminal backgrounds or indications of mental problems.

He added that, as president, he would sign a law that prohibited individuals from buying guns at a gun show without going through the same checks as those buying guns at regular stores.

McCain's visit to West Virginia, a general election battleground state, and his appearance at an NRA convention in Kentucky, were aimed at assuring gun owners a McCain administration would not infringe upon their rights.

In isolation, the questions about McCain's gun record could be troubling to a candidate vying for the votes of conservatives, former members of the military and residents in the South, where guns and hunting are prominent elements of the culture.

Yet in comparison to his potential Democratic rivals, McCain could be viewed as the most supportive of gun rights.

He told the NRA that Democrats have learned since the 2000 election between Al Gore and George Bush not to talk about gun control. He jabbed repeatedly at Obama, the Illinois senator who leads the Democratic delegate count, including deriding him for a recent comment about Pennsylvanians "clinging to guns and religion" amid economic stress.

Clinton also criticized Obama for the remark, prompting Obama to accuse the former first lady "like she's on the duck blind every Sunday, packin' a six-shooter!"

As the NRA audience laughed, McCain said: "Someone should tell Senator Obama that ducks are usually hunted with shotguns."

Obama spoke to reporters Friday in Watertown, S.D., and was asked about gun rights and whether Republicans would make it an issue in the general election campaign.

"They'll try, of course. They've got the same playbook in every election and guns is going to be one of those issues," the Illinois senator said. Describing his position, Obama said, "People have the right to lawfully bear arms. There's nothing inconsistent with also saying we can institute some common-sense gun laws so that we don't have kids being shot on the streets of cities like Chicago. Those are laws that I think a majority of Americans believe in."

Clinton, a senator from New York, made stricter gun control one of the themes of her first Senate campaign in 2000.

Also addressing the crowd of thousands was former GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney. Last year, Romney sought the support of gun owners by declaring himself a lifelong hunter, only to later step back and recast himself as a sporadic opponent of "small varmints." Romney assured the crowd that despite any differences they have with McCain, "I believe that he's right on issue after issue that counts."

© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Candidate Profiles & RSS Feeds


Video and Galleries from Politics

Add a Comment See all 82 Comments
by mcvet May 16, 2008 3:15 PM PDT
McWHO?? ROFLMAO With Bush out there who cares about McBush. Why poke fun at some tired old man who can''t stop flopping around when you got Bush?? ROFLMAO Sieg Heil Bush
Reply to this comment
by likeitis5050 May 16, 2008 3:48 PM PDT
MCain wouldn''t have to court anyone if he would just remember what party he''s running under. He acts like he can''t remember what the republican party is about...but then Congress is full of republicans who know but don''t care!!!
Reply to this comment
by cfin5 May 16, 2008 3:56 PM PDT
Senator "F-" McCain thinks he''s gonna court gun owners? Gotta mean something different like,....He''s gonna have the (wink) psychologists take us to court. Yeah, that''s what he really mean.
Reply to this comment
by newsjunky5 May 16, 2008 4:08 PM PDT
Republican policies have attacked freedom on many levels. McCain is more likely to trash the 2nd ammendment try to remove guns from the sheeple than anyone. Just like Republicans spend more than Democrats, but try to spin a web of erroneous common thought on the subject. I''m not just fishing here, he is.
Reply to this comment
by stevex47 May 16, 2008 4:14 PM PDT
"McCain Courts Gun Owners"

Wow, now this is truly a surprise.
Reply to this comment
by stevex47 May 16, 2008 4:15 PM PDT
Davicar,
"Anyone who likes guns, and shootin, and fishen, has got MY VOTE!"

Hitler liked these things too.
Reply to this comment
by newsjunky5 May 16, 2008 4:17 PM PDT
I know how we''re supposed to shower praise on former POWs (aren''t they simply the stupid ones who got caught?) But can they legally own a gun? I mean, you can''t if you''re mentally ill, or are a felon, or addicted to pot (heroin addiction is OK here, tho.)
Don''t give me this, "It''s fishing season, hunting season is over" stuff, groundhogs are always in season and targets are, too.
I think he''s a little bit jumpy around weapons since his residence at the Hanoi Hilton. Was he made to play Russian Roulette like in the movie? Maybe he should try this again, with an autoloader. It''s just one bullet, it holds 7, what are you worried about?
Reply to this comment
by newsjunky5 May 16, 2008 4:19 PM PDT
"McCain Courts Gun Owners"

What''s he gonna do if one submits to his advances?
He is a Republican, after all.
Reply to this comment
by moneymcbush May 16, 2008 4:22 PM PDT
Has anyone seen my lost Grandpa? He wandered off recently and we are very worried he cant find his way back home to Arizona.
He''s got white hair, combover, thinks everyone is one of his friends, likes to talk about war alot, sometimes a hundred years of it sometimes only five years.
Well if you see him, dont approach him, he looks cuddly but he''s got quite a temper. You should hear the things he says to his wife sometimes. But she''s so rich she doesnt care what he calls her, he''s her little pet on a leash.
Well please give us a call if you see Grampa John, we''re pretty sure he needs a diaper change by now.


Reply to this comment
by jcr103 May 16, 2008 4:22 PM PDT
McCain is not courting gun owners he is courting the idiot fringe who belong to the NRA. I own guns but I''m not a member of the NRA...the two are not synonymous. The NRA is for those un-educated, paranoid types who love to sit around talking about how the goverment is coming for their guns just because Congress passes legilation requiring a 5 day waiting period on hand gun sales.
Reply to this comment
by impeach_w May 16, 2008 4:25 PM PDT
Be able Protect your rights and Family. Only buy guns that are likely to be banned. They will only greatly increase in value. Stock up on ammo too. Nothing in our Constitution protecting that. Letting that Clinton ban expire may be the only thing Bush has ever done correctly.
Reply to this comment
by newsjunky5 May 16, 2008 4:27 PM PDT
"McCain is not courting gun owners he is courting the idiot fringe who belong to the NRA. I own guns but I''''m not a member of the NRA...the two are not synonymous."
--------------------
Well-put. Glad to hear someone else say it. I agree 100%. I was a member once (a gift I didn''t ask for) and they still phone me to rejoin. You can have a lot of fun with them when that happens.
Reply to this comment
by usbrit-2009 May 16, 2008 4:28 PM PDT
The NRA nuts will vote for Bob (I''ll sue you if you say anthing bad about guns) Barr. Figure that''s about 2 million GOPig votes we don''t have to worry about.
Reply to this comment
by newsjunky5 May 16, 2008 4:30 PM PDT
"Has anyone seen my lost Grandpa? He wandered off recently and we are very worried he cant find his way back home to Arizona.
He''''s got white hair, combover, thinks everyone is one of his friends, likes to talk about war alot, sometimes a hundred years of it sometimes only five years.
Well if you see him, dont approach him, he looks cuddly but he''''s got quite a temper. You should hear the things he says to his wife sometimes. But she''''s so rich she doesnt care what he calls her, he''''s her little pet on a leash.
Well please give us a call if you see Grampa John, we''''re pretty sure he needs a diaper change by now."

---------------------------

Maybe I''ve seen him, maybe not. But just hypothetically, is he safe around fishhooks?
Reply to this comment
by moneymcbush May 16, 2008 4:52 PM PDT
"Has anyone seen my lost Grandpa? He wandered off recently and we are very worried he cant find his way back home to Arizona.
He''s got white hair, combover, thinks everyone is one of his friends, likes to talk about war alot, sometimes a hundred years of it sometimes only five years.
Well if you see him, dont approach him, he looks cuddly but he''s got quite a temper. You should hear the things he says to his wife sometimes. But she''s so rich she doesnt care what he calls her, he''s her little pet on a leash.
Well please give us a call if you see Grampa John, we''re pretty sure he needs a diaper change by now."

---------------------------

Maybe I''''ve seen him, maybe not. But just hypothetically, is he safe around fishhooks?

--------------

It would probably be best if he wasnt around any sharp objects.
He often puts things in his mouth, such as his foot, but hes adapted to this and learned to talk out his rear end. Like when he rambles about the environment or who Hamas wants to be president or when he tries to make people believe that a Senator from Illinois is a secret undercover muslim who will travel back through time to appease Hitler and surrender to whatever Boogeyman he can dream up.
A mind is a terrible thing to lose.
Reply to this comment
by fairandbal May 16, 2008 4:57 PM PDT
Today Mike Huckabee makes a ''joke'' about assasinating Barak Obama. And McSame is courting the NRA.

How low are the morals of a party that actively advocates violence against ANYONE they disagree with? Sounds like the Nazi reference Bush was referring to yesterday was really meant for his own party.
Reply to this comment
by no_billary May 16, 2008 5:09 PM PDT
Mike Huckabee, You are disgusting.

%u201CThat was Barack Obama, he just tripped off a chair, he''s getting ready to speak,%u201D said the former Arkansas governor, to audience laughter. %u201CSomebody aimed a gun at him and he dove for the floor.%u201D

And youre a Minister? What a low life dirt bag you are. Perfect Running mate for McBush.
Reply to this comment
by kenbomc May 16, 2008 5:22 PM PDT
McFlip-Flop will say whatever it takes to get elected. Just look at his new policy for removing troops from Iraq. McFlip said it would be surrender to move troops out -now he sets a time table. He sets a time table for at least 4 years because he would only serve 1 term as prez meaning he would not have to deliver on that promise. How many times has Bush thrown promises out there? The only thing Bush and his protege McSame are doing are moving the goal posts. It worked for Bush as president -so McFlop is using the same tactics. I don''t think america will be fooled this time. The only thing McSame can promise is to continue the same failed Bush policies for another 4 years. The ironic thing is they both think they are right and that it is working -don''t be fooled.
Reply to this comment
by inventagod2 May 16, 2008 5:22 PM PDT

McBu$h seeking those oldfart Reagan supporters, just one more scared vote before they die off...
Reply to this comment
by newsjunky5 May 16, 2008 5:28 PM PDT
"Sounds like the Nazi reference Bush was referring to yesterday was really meant for his own party."
-------------------

It always is. It''s called projection of guilt.
Example: His spending is out of control, so he accuses Congress of being, "A teenager with a credit card" Now it''s out there. He feels better, no pent up guilt. And preemptively, anybody who says Bush himself is spending irresponsibly is ignored because, we''ve already heard it and they seem to be just throwing the same thing back.

Another - "I will not engage in nation-building" - Nobody accused him of that first, he was defending what he would do later. Where did that comment come from?

I''ve met other disturbed individuals who do this sort of thing. Sometimes you can learn to read them, and tell what they''ve done/are planning to do this way.
Reply to this comment
by randynason May 16, 2008 5:29 PM PDT
Douch!bag cannot seem to keep his stories straight. It will be a very entertaining campaign season, watching the pasty-faced idiot squirm.
Reply to this comment
by newsjunky5 May 16, 2008 5:33 PM PDT
"It would probably be best if he wasnt around any sharp objects.
He often puts things in his mouth, such as his foot, but hes adapted to this and learned to talk out his rear end."
--------------------

Well then could we at least get him to drop his pants and grab his ankles, because I can''t understand a thing he''s saying.
Reply to this comment
by gorilla400lb May 16, 2008 5:58 PM PDT
I don''t even need to read this story!!! McCain is just sucking up to all the gun owners (including myself) which we have the Constitutional right to bear arms. McCain is an IDIOT! Let''s talk about Economic policy you moron!
Reply to this comment
by gorilla400lb May 16, 2008 6:04 PM PDT
Oh...and by the way, I''m a Ron Paul supporter. The only true American Patriot. The only real Republican conservative. People....do your homework!!!
Reply to this comment
by veteran72 May 16, 2008 6:17 PM PDT

House Republicans turned on themselves yesterday after a third straight loss of a GOP-held House seat in special elections this year left both parties contemplating widespread Democratic gains in November.

In huddles, closed-door meetings and hastily arranged conference calls, some Republicans demanded the head of their political chief, while others decried their leadership as out of touch with the political catastrophe they face.

GOP leaders sought yesterday to "re-brand" the party with a new slogan and renewed pledges of fiscal rectitude and limited government. But the slogan -- "The Change You Deserve" -- came under mocking fire, because it parallels Democratic presidential front-runner Barack Obama''s "Change We Can Believe In" motto and it mirrors the advertising slogan for the antidepressant Effexor.

McBushcain = Toast
Reply to this comment
by steeepe May 16, 2008 6:39 PM PDT
Anyone who thinks that Democrats want to take away everybody''s guns is an idiot. Hunters don''t need assault rifles or automatic weapons. Lines have already been drawn -- it''s illegal to have bazookas, machine guns, and anti-aircraft missiles. If everyone was conscientious and moral, we wouldn''t need any laws anyway, but there are plenty of people who shouldn''t have guns. Would the nation be safer if everybody was armed to the teeth? Since tempers seem to be shortening daily, I don''t think so. No none wants to take away legitimate hunting or self-protection weapons, but I don''t look forward to the day when we have shootouts in traffic jams across the country.
Reply to this comment
by tryhonesty May 16, 2008 6:40 PM PDT
Hey McSame(McBush)and idiot RepubliCONs...Its the ECONOMY stupid!
Reply to this comment
by greatdrivew May 16, 2008 6:42 PM PDT
McCain and the neo-cons actually think this election could be decided on the issue of gun ownership? LOL!! I certainly hope that''s what the DOA GOP thinks. LOL!!
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica May 16, 2008 6:43 PM PDT
Our founding fathers stood up for the right for mass murders to have access to assault weapons, that is what makes this country great!

******* straight! And the best place to for mass murders is the mass murder capital of the whole ***''n world! Them Muslims know how to kill their own kind better than anyone else. Where else to get the best lessons in mass murder than the vegetable markets in Baghdad. You go Iranian Shiits Muslims, you know how to dish out terror better than anyone else in the world.
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica May 16, 2008 6:45 PM PDT
In Iraq people are allowed to have machine guns and RPGs. I sure wish the US allowed its citizens the same freedom. I know what I''d do if they did.
Reply to this comment
by sunsetmom3 May 16, 2008 7:22 PM PDT
Defending the 2nd amendment is important. People who are so quick to want to do away with this right may just come after our other rights like freedom of speech and religion.
Reply to this comment
by obamaslady May 16, 2008 7:22 PM PDT
McSame is such a FOOL - he will pander to anyone who will stand around and listen! If he was unable to beat Bush whose intelligence rates right up there on the same level as his name, in the primary of 2004, how in the h*ll does he think he can beat Obama whose intellect is so far above his last-in-class status of WWII type? Let him pander all he wants; the public knows pandering when they see it as dispelled by the gas tax holiday that McSame and HRC supported! The public rejected it out of hand for the pandering it actually was!
Reply to this comment
by obamaslady May 16, 2008 7:24 PM PDT
I AM GOING TO ASK THE MSM AGAIN, WHERE ARE MCSAME''S MEDICAL RECORDS PROMISED IN APRIL???? WHERE IS THE MSM ON THIS STORY?????
Reply to this comment
by pvperson May 16, 2008 8:40 PM PDT
Why do republicans always trot out this old chestnut? To significantly change the 2nd admendment, a bill would need to pass both houses of the legislature, by a two-thirds majority. Do you really think that could be done? Are there no gun owners in the House, are there no gun owners in the Senate. Get real. Even if no republicans existed (god what a great idea) you would NEVER get that kind of majority vote.
Reply to this comment
by nathanealy May 16, 2008 8:47 PM PDT
Obama is at it again. He insists that law abiding citizens should be allowed to own guns, but he wants to pass laws that will take guns away from law abiding citizens. Is he a hypocrite, or is he just stupid?

Okay everyone, lets make a deal. Us "gun nuts" will give up the Second Amendment, if you give up the Fourth Amendment. Yeah, that''ll be perfect. The government will have the right to search your house AND you won''t have anyway to defend yourself.

"If we restrict liberty to attain security we will lose them both." - Ben Franklin didn''t really say it, but it is still true.
Reply to this comment
by naucoming4u May 16, 2008 8:53 PM PDT
Confusious says:

"Men with big guns, have small weapon."
Reply to this comment
by nathanealy May 16, 2008 8:54 PM PDT
"Why do republicans always trot out this old chestnut? To significantly change the 2nd admendment, a bill would need to pass both houses of the legislature, by a two-thirds majority. Do you really think that could be done? Are there no gun owners in the House, are there no gun owners in the Senate. Get real. Even if no republicans existed (god what a great idea) you would NEVER get that kind of majority vote. "

Republicans trot this "old chestnut" because *gasp* it is important to a lot of people! And, the Second Amendment is in danger of being ignored everytime a liberal wants to use a killing for political gain.
Reply to this comment
by moneymcbush May 16, 2008 8:57 PM PDT
--------------------

Well then could we at least get him to drop his pants and grab his ankles, because I can''''t understand a thing he''''s saying.

--------------------

Well he is a republican, so he should be comfortable assuming a wide stance and bending over for you if you tell him you are a lobbyist.
Reply to this comment
by byeneocons May 16, 2008 9:34 PM PDT
McCain is using the same old stale playbook to scare the ignorant into voting Republican.

Obama hasn''t said anything about taking your guns, or your swastikas, away.

Relax, Neocons. It will be over soon.
Reply to this comment
by jesterbelle May 16, 2008 10:15 PM PDT
I''m all for guns.It is MY business whether I want one or not.What I''m not for is a bunch of idiots that vote in facist jerks on the promise of not doing anything to take their guns away from them.Same is true with abortion.It is murder,and yet the people that are against it will vote in some bbastard that exploits his fellow man to death.WAKE UP,KNOTHEADS!THESE PEOPLE WILL BE THE ONES THAT TAKE YOUR GUNS AWAY WHEN THEY FEEL THAT YOU ARE A THREAT TO THEIR PLANS,AND MAY DO SOMETHING TO STOP THEM.
Reply to this comment
by glock4me May 16, 2008 10:21 PM PDT
It feels nice to have somebody "court" my vote. Nobody will win the general without kissing the a$$es of us white guys.

However, McCain is wasting his time because gun owners will almost certainly vote for him because of the horrible voting record of his opponent (either Clinton or Osama).
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 May 16, 2008 10:41 PM PDT
Guns, terrorism, ***. Republicans sure have figured out the push-button issues.

Unfortunately, they''re selling out America while they pander to peoples single-issues.
Reply to this comment
by allamr18 May 16, 2008 11:00 PM PDT
meh these are people he already has in his pocket. it was funny seeing the crowd though, 40 year old white men and older.
Reply to this comment
by glock4me May 16, 2008 11:03 PM PDT
Guns, terrorism, ***. Republicans sure have figured out the push-button issues.

Unfortunately, they''''re selling out America while they pander to peoples single-issues.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by ubrew12 at 10:41 PM : May 16, 2008


SINGLE ISSUE!!! The dems are wrong on almost every single issue. Pick an issue, figure out which side would harm America... that is the democrats side of that issue. Unfortunately, the libs cannot see this... when McCain wins in November it will, of course, be because America is mean and racist and have nothing to do with Obama being on the wrong side of every important issue.
Reply to this comment
by blackwater66-2009 May 16, 2008 11:04 PM PDT
Only the GOP''ers will let us keep our guns, we know what the other side will do once in office ! This is a very very important issue for us Republicans and so is the war on terror. The economy will take care of itself ! If you can''t afford gas, don''t buy it or ride a bike or walk and it will be healthy for you too !!
Reply to this comment
by haoli25 May 16, 2008 11:17 PM PDT
What a joke! McBush''s idea of courting the ''youth'' vote is attending an AARP convention.
Reply to this comment
by kesac4650 May 16, 2008 11:33 PM PDT
The threats to interpretation of the 2nd Amendment is very real. We have been disarmed enough. No policeman will ever protect you in the case of a violent crime. They only investigate later.
We began as a nation whose citizens protected themselves. We are rapidly losing that ability.
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 May 17, 2008 12:08 AM PDT
kesac4650 said: "We began as a nation whose citizens protected themselves. We are rapidly losing that ability. "

When we began, your weapon WAS our military. Now, our government can kill you remotely from 3000 feet in the air, and you''ll never meet the one who pulled the trigger. And, increasingly, the one ordering him to pull that trigger has NOTHING to do with American self-defense.

You can keep your pop gun if it makes you feel safer.

You aren''t.

It''s time for a different mentality than to appeal to a pioneer spirit 200 years old. We need controls that the same party prostituting itself for your vote on this ''lowest common denominator'' issue is working overtime to tear down.

If you keep voting Repub, in the future you''ll be able to protect yourself from the street gangs, but who''ll protect you from your own government (who, by the way, would prefer to keep the street gangs going, as long as it works at the ballot box).
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 May 17, 2008 12:44 AM PDT
Can Republicans ever take a political hit for being ''soft on crime''?

And, if not, WHY wouldn''t they be soft on crime? How does it actually HELP them for crime to go away?

Gun voters need to recognize that the CONDITIONS that breed violent crime are not necessary conditions Republicans want to do away with. Of course, once you actually COMMIT A CRIME, Republicans will spend whatevers necessary to put you behind bars. But actually doing away with the poverty and community disconnect that leads people to resort to VIOLENT CRIME? THOSE conditions are a Republican candidates BEST FRIEND. The LAST thing he/she would like to do, is to do away with the conditions that lead to violent crime.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 May 17, 2008 1:26 AM PDT
"don''''t buy it or ride a bike or walk and it will be healthy for you too !!" Posted by blackwater66

America has become a country of commuters. If you live in New york, or most other major cities, the business hubs are zoned non residential, meaning on the average you live 5 to 10 miles from where you might be employed, and much farther if you live in the suburbs, as most of the working population.

Walk? Bike? You''re dreaming.

I remember hearing the stories of previous generations, "when I was your age, I had to walk ten miles to work, etc." I used to think, "you must have had a job that didn''t mind if you smelled like you just walked ten miles."

The cure is re-planning and rebuilding cities. the jobs generated would end unemployment, and prepare America''s crumbling infrastructure for the future that we may still yet have.
Reply to this comment
See all 82 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs