May 7, 2009 11:05 AM

48 Hours Mystery: Point Blank

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  The story was originally broadcast on May 17, 2008. It was updated on March 21, 2009.

On Oct. 15, 2003, police were called to the Brownsville, Texas, home of Scott and Traci Rhode. Inside, in the couple's bed, lay Scott with a gunshot wound to the head.

That morning, Traci says she rose early, went for a walk, took a shower, and then heard a moaning sound. It was then, she says, that she discovered her husband was wounded. Scott was still alive, but later died at the hospital.

Traci maintains Scott shot himself, but authorities charge she is a cold-blooded killer with a motive for murder.
Life, as Traci knew it, ended that October day. As Scott lay dying, Traci's ordeal was only just beginning. "I was shocked when they asked me to go to the police station. I had already told them all that I knew that had happened. I mean, I wasn't there, I didn't see it, I didn't hear it. I only know what I found," Traci tells correspondent Harold Dow.

"I moved the pillow back and I saw all the blood and his eye was all swollen and I touched his face and said 'Scott, can you hear me,'" Traci told police in a taped interview.

"So, I kept asking the police officers, 'Please let me go be with my husband. He's dying.' 'Can I please tell my children? My children don't know what happened,'" Traci remembers. "'Just a few more minutes and we'll let you go.'"

By mid-afternoon, it was clear Scott was brain dead and would not recover.

And something else was clear too: "These people think that I harmed the man I had loved for 20 years of my life, that I spent my life with… it's not even a possibility," she says.

Traci says she can barely remember a time without Scott. They met in their early teens and became high school sweethearts in Ft. Madison, Iowa.

The couple married in 1990, only a few years after Traci graduated high school. Scott put himself through college and became an engineer; Traci would go on to become a nurse, specializing in birth and delivery care.

The couple had three sons, Shane, Nicholas and Dalton.

The Rhodes seemed to be the picture-perfect family, with Scott being the picture-perfect dad. But Traci says there was another side to Scott which was slowly destroying their marriage: she says he was very jealous and often accused her of having affairs.

"He was obsessed. She was almost like a possession," notes Raina Kant, who along with her husband Kyle, has been close friends of the Rhodes for years. "She would always tell me that Scott was saying she was cheating and having an affair with the different doctors that she worked with."

Kant says there was no way Traci had an affair with any of these doctors.

But there was no convincing Scott, says Traci. She remembers one awful night when she had to stay a few hours late at work to help deliver a baby. "I get home, my husband's not there. My kids aren't there. As I'm calling the emergency room thinking the worst, I hear the garage door open and I go running out to the garage. 'What happened? What happened? Is everybody OK?' And he's screaming at me, 'You tramp. You whore. Where the hell have you been?' And he said he went looking for me so he could show our children what a tramp they had for a mother. And I lived like that for years."

Traci says she stayed in the marriage because she loved Scott. "As bad as our bad times were there were still good times. He was the father of my children. He was my husband. To me, it was worth working out," she says.

But according to Traci, Scott didn't make things any easier. She says Scott was so afraid of losing her to another man he moved the family five times in 13 years. There would be stops in Maryville, Tenn., Kennett, Mo., and Batesville, Ark. They finally ended up in Brownsville, Texas in 2003.

It was in Brownsville, far away from friends and family, that Traci really did meet somebody. His name was Shawn Michaels, a co-worker.

One afternoon they arranged to meet in a parking lot to talk. "We just stood there talking and then he gave me a hug to leave and he kissed me. I was shocked, but yet it was good to have somebody pay attention to me," she remembers.

And then, one week later, Scott confronted Traci in their bathroom, once again accusing her of cheating. In the heat of the moment Traci blurted out her feelings for Shawn.

"And I said for the first time in my life, there is somebody. And it's not about sex. Somebody is paying attention to me," she says. "He was very upset, and he just looked right through me and said 'You have no idea what you've just done.'"

But police didn't buy any of Traci's story. The truth, they say, is that she committed cold blooded murder.



Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 95 Comments
by anonyq July 5, 2011 11:56 AM EDT
It's unbelievable that anyone could think she's innocent just because she cries every time she's interviewed and does such an elaborate job portraying herself as the victim, and portraying the husband that she murdered in his sleep as the villain.

No one shoots himself through a pillow (and then wipes the fingerprints off the gun). Come on, people! Don't you find it odd that this happened the day after she met with his divorce lawyer and found out that he wanted custody of the kids? He obviously cared about his kids. Why would he suddenly kill himself? Where is the suicide note or any prior indication that he would do that?

And of course, she never had affairs, oh, except for the one time when she was caught.

And she stayed with her boyfriend in a motel shortly after her husband died. She didn't think anyone would find out because they met out of town. Then when people found out about it she tried to downplay that too.

The jury must have been insane to let her go home to her kids. Sure she's the psychopathic murderer who shot their father to death in his sleep, but she cried in court so we'll let her move back in with the kids. It won't be long before something terrible happens there.
Reply to this comment
by namvet0527 July 3, 2011 11:51 PM EDT
I had a hard time watching the whole show. The stupid cops were so lazy & full of tunnel vision & did what most cops say not to do, make a conclusion from the beginning & BEND the facts to fit their ASSUMPTION. These cops made the TEXAS RANGERS look like a bunch of KEYSTONE COPS. These cops should go back to cop school. Harold Dow, the correspondent, did a lousy job of telling this story. I can't stand that fat faced ignorant cop that so much wanted to get a notch on his gun he exagerated the truth & bent the facts to fit his ASSUMPTION to what HE THOUGHT happened, damned the REAL FACTS. This guy reminds me of a stereotypical GOOD OLE BOY REDNECK SOUTHERN COP. These cops ought to sued & jailed for corruption. This guys put a VERY BIG BLACK SMUDGE on the reputation of the Texas Rangers. I had high regard for them until this story. I wish I could confront this Texas redneck hillbillie pigs. I have absolutely no respect for them whatsoever.
Reply to this comment
by debaw66 April 18, 2011 2:19 PM EDT
I have followed many news stories over the years and have always been right on when it came to being able to tell if someone was guilty or not. I have always had a good gut instinct as well, especially when it comes to maternal instincts.
I truely believe that with all my heart Tracey Rhodes did NOT kill her husband. She was genuinely upset and too upfront, open, and honest when she very easily could have lied. This is a mother who adores her children and stayed in a marriage because of them. Nieve maybe, but not a killer for sure and most definately not the town ***** as she was portrayed. But for argument sake, had she been an adultress, it still would not make her a killer.
My theory: Tracey's husband killed himself while she was in the shower and used a pillow to muffle the sound so that he would not wake the children and so that they wouldn't be the ones running to find him. Several people that know both of them, all believe he killed himself and that she is innocent. Not one person outside of law enforcement and the procecution thinks otherwise. Even the jury obviously had reasonable doubt or would not have gave her probation. Sadly she lost her nursing liscence and could lose her children if she trys to clear her name and loses. Why would she even consider clearing her name is she were not innocent? That is a huge risk for a guilty mom. I hope that she can clear her name someday for her childrens' sake, she deserves that much for all that she has been through.
Reply to this comment
by debaw66 April 18, 2011 2:23 PM EDT
PS, I do wonder if the palm print might match the other man involved at the time. Or did Scott in is paranoia, try to have the final revenge by framing his own wife, think about it, he wanted to strip everything away from her, including her children.
by lightsout1089 October 12, 2010 12:37 AM EDT
This was a very poorly written "48 hours". There was so much left out of the story, no one could possibly come to a informative decision. Did she or didn't she have an affair? Was the boyfriend's palm checked against the palm print? How did the husband find out about the boyfriend. Come on, guys! this is a great story told horribly.

I did notice that Traci never shed a tear. She cried a lot during the interview with "48 hours", but her face was dry.

Personally, I'm not sure if she actually pulled the trigger, but I do think she had something to do with it.
Reply to this comment
by chasm61 March 13, 2011 7:39 PM EDT
Actually, I'm nearly positive these were all mentioned.

-During an argument, in "the heat of the moment" she blurts out her feelings for Shawn.
-She and the boyfriend never had sex or anything while the husband was alive, it was just "mutual attraction."
-I think they only checked Traci and Scott's palms.
by Wildwood1966 February 19, 2010 11:02 AM EST
definitely makes you think - I am not sure she did it - If I had been on jury I could not say"beyond reasonable doubt" the husband ccertainly had issues why would she lose her license? If she was actually not charged that seems wrong God be with her and her family and their pain
Reply to this comment
by hercule1122 May 2, 2009 9:46 PM EDT
This case is baffling. The husband was clearly a paranoid, schizo who moved his family around like pawns on a chess board. From the details, he most clearly had the motivation to commit suicide. I know the jury found her guilty, but I also know that juries in this country usually are composed of people the defense and prosecution lawyers accept and they may be educated or not. Think about many high profile cases, like O.J. where the evidence was overwhelming and the jury acquitted since the glove didn't fit! I think there is much room for improvement in the system. I think this case was poorly handled.
Reply to this comment
by Tomcrews April 24, 2009 9:04 PM EDT
This case is a travesty! Traci Rhode is a cowardly murderer! Americans totally refuse to hold women ACCOUNTABLE for ANYTHING! Where women are killers, even first degree murder is completely excused. A man would have been executed by lethal injection for this! End of story!
Reply to this comment
by arn2485 April 12, 2009 11:51 PM EDT
I've noticed that on this story and others like it that I have read, they automatically stick to the one suspect. Why would there not have been any others? I'm not saying that they are innocent or guilty.
Reply to this comment
by angleeyes05 April 11, 2009 12:13 AM EDT
I find it very funny that msmithy thinks that this woman is guilty after reading this artical & not being there!!!!! And to so heartly wish she was dead when she has three little boy's that need her!!!! If you have any kid's I wonder if you show them the same compation & empathy when there going threw something tough as you have this womans three little boy's!!! You should be ashamed of your self!!!!!!!!!! No one really knows if this woman is guilty or not. No ones there when the man was shot! Only god and the people that were present. But reading this artical assuming that all the facts are true.... I can't believe that anyone would think that she was guilty. Guilty peopl usually usually stupid enough not to clean them selves and the crime sene that well that the police and forensic's can't find anything.
Reply to this comment
by wyo-kid March 27, 2009 9:16 PM EDT
I think the jury made good decisions, and Texas is a good state, but they do need to work on their politicians.
Reply to this comment
See all 95 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
48 Hours New iPad app A perfect companion to TV's most popular true-crime series.
48 Hours on Facebook