McGovern Urges Obama, Clinton To Unite

Former Democratic Nominee Outlines Plan For Candidates To Appear Together In Remaining Primaries

(AP)  Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton should stop beating up on each other in the remaining Democratic contests and focus their ire on the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, George McGovern said Tuesday.

In a letter published in the New York Times and at a news conference in Sioux Falls, the former Democratic senator from South Dakota and 1972 presidential nominee outlined what he called a formula to unify the party and defeat Sen. John McCain.

"We can reduce the danger of Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama criticizing each other for the next month and giving McCain a free ride," said McGovern, 85.

"They are constantly pointing out weaknesses in the opposing candidate, which is what politicians do when they run for office. You can't blame them for that. But meanwhile, McCain is free to go around the country talking about motherhood and the flag and all those non-controversial things and looking like a statesman who is above the hurly-burly of politics."

McGovern's proposal is for Obama, the front runner, and Clinton to appear together at least once in each of the five remaining primaries in Kentucky, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Montana and South Dakota. The plan also could be used in Michigan and Florida if the party reconsiders its decision not to count those states' delegates, he said.

Instead of condemning each other, each candidate would speak for 15 to 20 minutes about what he or she would do if elected and then talk about why President Bush's policies have failed and why they would continue to fail under McCain, especially regarding tax cuts and the war in Iraq, McGovern said.

After the speeches they would go to the largest public place in town for a reception that would cost each attendee a $50 donation to the state parties, which are strapped because of the high cost of campaigns.

"So you capitalize on the popularity of these two great candidates. And I think they are great candidates. I like both of these candidates. That's why I endorsed Hillary in October and Barack in May. I've got 'em both covered now," McGovern said.

"We'd go into that convention more united than we have been in years," he said of the party's August gathering in Denver.

McGovern said he developed the idea out of his own experience in 1972 when he won California's largesse of delegates but the party split them proportionately between the candidates instead of abiding by the winner-take-all tradition.

"That was totally unfair," he said.

Instead of choosing a running-mate and planning the convention, McGovern said he spent the time fighting to get back those delegates. He lost that November to Republican incumbent Richard Nixon, winning only Massachusetts.

McGovern said he doesn't want a divided party to create a similar scenario for Obama and Clinton.

"One of them is going to lose and this would send them out in harmony and place the party and country's interests above their own," he said.

McGovern said former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota with the Obama campaign and Terry McAuliffe with Clinton responded favorably when he told them about the proposal.

Jack Billion, chairman of the South Dakota Democratic Party said, "I think it would be a very positive thing."

The campaigns of Obama, Clinton and McCain did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

[crat3]

Part 1:

George McGovern needs to take his walking stick and take a hike.

McGovern sabotaged Sen Clinton''s campaign by flipping for Obama and it is galling that he is talking "unity" as an Obama surrogate.

The Democratic Party has a system to elect its presidential nominee in the Democratic primaries, dates are pre-determined for the state primaries. Our democracy calls for this system to unfold in selecting a Democratic presidential nominee.

The Democratic nomination process is still in progress with several states remaining for voters to express their presidential preference. In flipping to Obama, McGovern sought to disenfranchise millions of voters by the premature termination of the nomination process. If McGovern does not have the stomach for the Democratic primaries in selecting the presidential nominee, then he should have Obama, the candidate who is unqualified with impaired electability in the general, to stand down. Trying to protect and shield the weaknesses of a candidate to be discovered by the Republicans in the general election and then losing the general election is foolhardy.

[gaiaschild-2009]

If Senator Clinton had the wit and consciousness to listen to Sen. McGovern, she would long ago have found a higher road to operate as she campaigned. She''s already famously destructive and offensive to many who once applauded her, so why not just run the train right into the wall? After she gets her victim martyr points and the catharsis of Greek Tragedy, then she can get her bills paid by the guy she''s trying to kneecap.

[jack3213]

Well of course MCGOVERN would say all these things- it happened to HIM. The united Democratic party is one that is even more destitute and disgusting.

[crat3]

Part 2:


Sen. Clinton is the best qualified, electable presidential candidate who would win the general election hands down. Her campaign is not about her; it is about the future of America and all Americans. There is a compelling need, and, indeed, her patriotic duty to continue her campaigning and to challenge the morality and integrity of the Democratic nomination process to do the right thing in selecting the best qualified candidate for the presidential nominee.

The superdelegate system was created after the debacle of McGovern''s losing every single state except one state in the general election because he was a radical left wing liberal. Obama is McGovern''s clone as a radical left wing liberal. The superdelegate system was instituted as a check against an unelectable candidate like McGovern. Obviously, this system is inoperable if Obama gets the presidential nomination. McGovern is now interfering in, subverting, and sabotaging a system that was instituted because of him.

The role that George McGovern, an Obama surrogate, is trying to pull off now is as slick and sly as his candidate and simply seeks to wrap up the presidential nomination for Obama and pull the trap door on Sen Clinton''s campaign.

[crat3]

Part 3:

McGovern''s "unity" ploy isn''t going to save Obama in the general election if he swipes the nomination because of his skin color, fear of alienating the black vote, and Sharpton''s threat to unleash "massive demMcGovern''s "unity" ploy isn''t going to save Obama in the general election if he swipes the nomination because of his skin color, fear of alienating the black vote, and Sharpton''s threat to unleash "massive demonstrations." Obama will lose the general election hands down.

[larysinclair]

I don''t think Obama would be on the bottom,...at least with me he liked it!!
Barack, Call me when you get to the 58th state and we''ll get freaky again!!

[mysty22]

The Clintons dan''t HATE AMERICA like B. Husesin Obama and his wife and advisors do. The Clintons would never join hands with a man whose spiritual advisor tells him to sing "God *** America" and who launched his political career at a domestic terrorists home. Wake up America - OBAMA HATES YOU! That is why his middle east advisor has been secretly meeting with Hamas and why Hamas and Farakhan are endorsing him.

[votehillary]

We will unite when Hillary is on the ticket. Yes, the democrats need all of its mainstay. So far, Obama has united the African American & college kids. Hmm - who''s missing in this picture?

[joeysky1]

It''s too late now. Obama and his supporters could have been nice to HRC supporters 4 months ago. I won''t forget how HRC and me were relentlessly attacked. Even right now on CNN, Donna Brazile said we don''t need the white vote. Fine!

[crat3]

Part 3 of 3:

McGovern''s "unity" ploy isn''t going to save Obama in the general election if he swipes the nomination because of his skin color, fear of alienating the black vote, and Sharpton''s threat to unleash "massive demonstrations." Obama will lose the general election hands down.

[swannyj1]

What the pundits and evidently superdelegates don''t get is that people (not just women) will not vote for Obama because Hillary didn''t win but rather because they believe he is corrupt and will not fight for the middle class. It is my hope HRC would not under any circumstance join an Obama ticket. However if she does my vote will still not go for Obama.

[swannyj1]

What the pundits and evidently superdelegates don''t get is that people (not just women) will not vote for Obama because Hillary didn''t win but rather because they believe he is corrupt and will not fight for the middle class. It is my hope HRC would not under any circumstance join an Obama ticket. However if she does my vote will still not go for Obama.

[ridos-2009]

According to Rasmussen, McCain now leads both Obama and Clinton in Wisconsin and Michigan in polling for the general election. Those are two states that have voted solidly Democratic since the 90''s. McGovern may have lost big time when he was running for president but that doesn''t mean that his argument that disunity is hurting the Democrats is wrong.

[susansc2]

What Hilary''s supporters can not understand is that she has lost already! West Virginia is her last hurrah, well maybe Kentucky too, but she simply can not catch up.

I think that if the situation were reversed and Senator Clinton had more delegates, more popular vote, more states won, more superdelegates, then Senator Obama''s supporters would have the intelligence - or is that just common sense - to realize it was a lost cause.

I also don''t think Obama would continue to run if he were in a losing situation such as Hilary is.

[wolfi101]

Both Hillary and Obama have similar views on the future of our country. I hope, that we all look past our emotions and view this objectively and vote for the candidate who serves us best.

[crat3]

The Obama cultists are perverting the Democratic presidential nomination process to justify swiping the nomination from Sen Clinton.

Obama does not have the requisite number of delegates for the nomination, and he has no presumptive lock on the nomination. After all the primaries are done, the superdelegates are mandated to select the best qualified presidential candidate in the best interests of the Democratic Party and America using their independent judgment. Delegate count or delegate math has no relevance to the function of the superdelegates in selecting the best qualified presidential candidate using their independent judgment.

Sen Clinton has no catching up to do in delegates or votes to get the presidential nomination. The criteria for the superdelegates is simply the best qualified presidential candidate to win the general election. Clearly, Sen Clinton is the best qualified candidate to defeat McCain and win the general election.

[ghostdog8]

It''s going to be McCain 60% to 40% in November if Osama is the nominee.

[ranger1948]

jfk667
What do you think we have now ? Minor housekeeping probl;ems.

[ranger1948]

I would like to see the racism end but if sharpton wants to start a racial war let him bring it on. Then we can end him as a problem in this country.

[ranger1948]

I would like to vote for Hillary but if she goes on a joint ticket with obama she will lose my vote. She doesn''t need obama and America doesn''t need him.

[ranger1948]

susansc2
The difference between Hillary and obama is she is a fighter and he is a born loser.

[sjc_1]

I thought Obama was the great uniter. That is what he keeps talking about. If that were the case, this would all be done by now.

[joanm1956]

I hope the candidates do not take advice from someone who only knows how to lose a presidential election.

[blackmilitan]

I BLAME OBAMA WHITE MOTHER AND WHITE GRANDPARENTS, ITS THEIR FAULT.

1. His WHITE MOTHER taught Obama he could be anything he wants %u2013 how dare they do that to him %u2013 that was abuse
2. How dare his WHITE MOTHER love a black man and have a child with him at a time when the rest of white America hated blacks %u2013 how dare they do that to our UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
3. How dare his WHITE grandparents love him and teach him good values. What type of WHITE grandparents would do such a thing?
4. Why would his WHITE MOTHER allow this mixed child to even think he could one day be a lawyer or a doctor or a President? They should have raised him to be a thug, a criminal, a drug addict not a good person %u2013 Dayum them.
5. His WHITE MOTHER worked on her doctorate degree instead of staying on welfare,. Who do she think she is to make a better life for her son, dayum this WHITE WOMEN.
6. His WHITE MOTHER gave him a life experience by traveling the world, What is wrong with WHITE WOMEN?
7. His WHITE MOTHER left him at an early at dying from cancer, and he promised her he would make her proud. Why would a man love his mom that much?
8. His WHITE grandparents taught him values, loved him, yes he made some mistake but their values held out. Why would two WHITE grandparents love a black child so much %u2013 how dare them love a black child%u2026...who the hell, do they think they are?

I say we ban all WHITE WOMEN from raising black males to be anything, its wrong,

[lala0592]

to: tracymorgan0

You must be one of the uneducated types that support Hillary. You''re comment was just unnecessary and shows your ignorance! It''s sad that there are even more ignorant Americans like you preventing our country from progressing.

[lala0592]

To: Blackmilitan

That''s was awesome!