Are Republicans Gloomy For Good Reason?

Weekly Standard: Prospects For Republicans In The 2008 Election Look Grim

(Weekly Standard) 
Democrats regard the unexpected victories in Republican territory as one more indication of a coming landslide. "There's never been a better climate, since 1932, for Democrats," says Bob Beckel, a Democratic consultant. "And the political environment usually prevails. It's impossible for me to conclude anything other than it's going to be a Democratic year."

Beckel cites, in particular, a huge increase in Democratic voters in 2008 that has widened the party's advantage in registration by millions of voters. "Republicans are facing a surge in new Democratic voters, and they are facing defections in a number of states," he says.

Indeed they are, which is why Republican expectations for 2008 are modest. There are three major goals: Hold the White House, avert sweeping House losses, and keep the Senate defeats to four or fewer.

McCain must overcome a "generic" presidential preference for a Democratic president of 51 percent to 33 percent (in the WSJ/NBC poll). He'll have to appeal more strongly than Obama to independents, moderates, and soft Democrats. The good news for McCain is that 20 percent of Clinton supporters in primary exit polls and other surveys say they'll vote for him over Obama.

In the House, Republicans want to stay within close range of Democrats, who currently have a 36-seat majority. Republicans hold 199 seats. The generic advantage for a Democratic House is 49 percent to 34 percent (again in the WSJ/NBC poll), which shows the headwind Republicans are running against. If the next president is a Democrat, Republicans figure they'll have a chance to win control of the House in 2010, so long as losses this year don't put them too far behind.

Republicans need a minimum of 45 senators to pursue a filibuster strategy and block or alter Democratic legislation. They currently hold 49 Senate seats, but at least 7 of those are in jeopardy this year. Only 41 votes are required for a successful filibuster, but a few Republicans always defect--thus the need for 45.

If the Conservative triumph in Britain last month has any relevance for America, Republicans shouldn't get their hopes up in 2008. It took Conservatives 11 years to recover from their landslide loss to Labour in 1997. The Republican recovery--what there is of one--is less than two years old.

[joyous88]

more dead american kids for the republicon greed machine

war for political and financial profit thats what we have here

bush belongs in prison and those who still support the republicon collabarators should be ashamed

[noloyalisti]

I''m sorry to tell you there are going to be other wars. This is quote from the chosen republican candidate, grampy mcBush. OH, MY, GOD!!!!! Aren''t we proud now?

[joyous88]

menmotoscutr,

you come off as just one more member of the republion noise machine,

the republicons are losing because they have supported every single thing that came out of the
mouth of bushRove, they still support bush by obstructing anything the democrats try to accomplish,

the big lie that you perpetuate is the one that states

the democrats control the government so its all thier fault, this is the same as saying the old republicon mantra ''its all clintons fault,

the democrats have a slim majority in congress,

but they do not have the votes to take control,

and make the decisions, if the democrats had the vote we would not be in Iraq, and our troops would not
be giving their lives for republicon greed

[stn_sage]

Bush can''''t cancel the elections because the federal government doesn''''t run the elections, the states do. To stop it would require a massive use of force and given that the military generally thinks Bush is incompetent
Posted by pdchapin at 09:26 AM : May 13, 2008
-------------------------------------------------
My response: WRONG, friend! It CAN be done. Bush has every right to declare a national emergency, and suspend or postpone all elections!

The point is: would he DARE to do it?! The consequences of doing it could be severe and damage the Rep party for generations to come!

"Beckel cites, in particular, a huge increase in Democratic voters in 2008 that has widened the party''s advantage in registration by millions of voters. "Republicans are facing a surge in new Democratic voters, and they are facing defections in a number of states." BUT "good news for McCain is that 20 percent of Clinton supporters in primary exit polls and other surveys say they''ll vote for him over Obama.

So, millions of voter registrations have swelled the Democratic Party ranks, thereby diluting the Republican ranks, but large numbers of whom in turn refuse to vote for the Democratic Party nominee. I agree with Mr. Beckel: "It''s impossible ... to
conclude anything other than it''s going to be a Democratic year." ;- This stimulating analysis failed to (1) include any numbers related to the Rush Limbaugh strategy, and (2) include the ONLY numberical tabulations that really counts, namely the electoral college numbers. It is not enough to tabulate the popular vote, as some Democrats are finding out. There is a "delegate" count of far greater importance.

First of all, this article was written by Fred Barnes, a total Republicah stooge. Then he quotes retiring Republican congressmen who say things aren''''t so bad - so why are they retiring ? No one retires from Congress unless he''''s been caught doing mischief or his party is DOOMED. Spinning the Iraq War is typical Republican denial - Americans are dying in Iraq at a regular rate - 4,076 as of today. Remember when 4,000 was just coming up ? These men are DEAD. For NOTHING but REPUBLICAN PRIDE. The Republicans lie to the American people, and they lie to themselves. SWEEP ALL REPUBLICANS OUT - into the trash heap of history.
Posted by superdem at 11:30 AM : May 13, 2008
----------------
Particide seems rather unfair. George W. Bush put US into the Iraq quagmire, not the Republican Party. The 4076(and counting) dead American soldiers answered the Commander-in-Chief''s call to service, not the Republican Party''s. Unless you are willing to concede that it is the Democratic Party''s fault for not getting US out of Iraq after they admitted it was wrongly conceived and wrongly entered, and unless you are willing to concede a Democratic Congress continues to fund an Iraq debacle of death and destruction long after that Congress has admitted the Mission Should Never Have Been Started, you need to be fair in whom you assign the blame. The Great Decider decided. Let the Great Decider take the heat.

[noloyalisti]

I am glad to start seeing so many people call a spade a spade and a republican a failure. It is time we told these violent extremists who care only for themselves who they are. Maybe if they received decent education and stopped listening to the propaganda so they could use the brain they were given, we could dig ourselves out. We could send the neocons to prison where they belong and keep people who don''t care about the government away from it.

[dmgenet]

Should any of them be surprised? When you take a *** on the ground and then fall back into it why are you surprised? It''s your *** and your fault.

[lochlan-2009]

Please don''''t equate the conservative party in the UK with republicans. The truth is a conservative in the UK would align very nicely with Obama and Clinton''''s philosophy. The Republican mentality in this country is virtually unheard of on the other side of the Pond.

Posted by USBrit

Thank you for pointing that out. They also have more parties and use them, and not like American politicians use them to pull votes away from another candidate.

[sjc_1]

Republicans exist to make their rich friends richer. Then they get nice big campaign checks to stay in power where they can work on making their rich friends even richer, while the tax payers get shafted at every turn. How anyone that works for a pay check can vote Republican is way beyond me to understand.

[usbrit-2009]

Maybe Republicans are winning in England because they have no problem with national healthcare and don''''t embrace indebtedness as a way to pay for their government.

Posted by ubrew12

Please don''t equate the conservative party in the UK with republicans. The truth is a conservative in the UK would align very nicely with Obama and Clinton''s philosophy. The Republican mentality in this country is virtually unheard of on the other side of the Pond.

[clestes-2009]

It is early yet, but depending on what happens this summer it could be a landslide victory for the democrats.

If the neocons succeed in attacking Iran, the reps are toast and they be toast even without it. Once the dems settle on Obama and he faces off with fossil John, it is over!

[noloyalisti]

The republicans have proven they stand for big business and big government through out of control spending and privatization conspiracies.

They have raised the cost of living through fees and inflation, ruined entire industries and reduced jobs in America. They have also proven to be obstructionist, anti-Constitution and self serving.

This does not even count their non-support of the troops and foreign policy fiascos. In short, complete failures. Don''t forget who the Weakly supports.

[ubrew12]

Maybe Republicans are winning in England because they have no problem with national healthcare and don''t embrace indebtedness as a way to pay for their government.

[wakeup60]

"Gloomy"..."HELL" yeh!They have every right to be "GLOOMY".They are on the way ..."OUT"!
"8" years of this ***-is kinda like:"How long has it been since you''ve had a bowl of Wolf Brand Chili? Well, that''s too long"!At the expense of our sons,daughters,husbands,wives,brothers,sisters,friendsthat have DIED-BEEN...MAIMED,BURNED,DIS-FIGURED,HAVE BEEN PARALIZED,BRAIN-DAMAGED AND SENT HOME ...IN A BOX,GURNEY,WHEELCHAIR/TO FEND FOR THEMSELVES-TO BE DENIED BENEFITS FOR ONE REASON OR ANOTHER/OR CUT OFF BECAUSE OF SOME IDIOTIC REASONING/TO BE SENT TO A FILTHY, CRUMBLING BARRICKS, FILTHY, VARMINT INFESTED HOSPITAL TOO FAR AWAY FROM FAMILIES TO SUPPORT THEIR LOVED ONES. SHAME ON THESE JERKS/TO SAY THE LEAST. NOT IN EVERY CASE/BUT MUCH MORE THAN THE PUBLIC IS AWARE! HOW DARE THIS ADMINISTRATION STIR UP THIS HORNET''S NEST/WITH THE WRONG COUNTRY AND PEOPLE-POLARIZE AND PROJECT THIS INSANE MESS INTO A RIVER OF NO RETURN! MISSION ACCOMPLISHED-RIGHT!!!!!JANUARY CANNOT COME FAST ENOUGH FOR THESE KIDS ON THEIR 2ND,3RD,4TH,5TH TOUR...TO COME HOME IN "1" PIECE AND ALIVE!!!_BETTER GET THE BUSH-MANIA BUSH-WHACKED OUT OF A "3RD" TERM WITH MCBUSH-AND-GET READY FOR THE CHANGE THAT SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED LONG AGO & SAVED OUR TROOP''S LIVES..."OBAMA" IS GOING TO DELIVER THE CHANGE!

[superdem]

First of all, this article was written by Fred Barnes, a total Republicah stooge. Then he quotes retiring Republican congressmen who say things aren''t so bad - so why are they retiring ? No one retires from Congress unless he''s been caught doing mischief or his party is DOOMED. Spinning the Iraq War is typical Republican denial - Americans are dying in Iraq at a regular rate - 4,076 as of today. Remember when 4,000 was just coming up ? These men are DEAD. For NOTHING but REPUBLICAN PRIDE. The Republicans lie to the American people, and they lie to themselves. SWEEP ALL REPUBLICANS OUT - into the trash heap of history.

[davidlar2]

The Republican Party has walked away from its Libertarian roots to embrace neoconservatism, Wall Street socialism, and social conservatism.

As a Libertarian, I am more likely to vote for Obama or the Libertarian candidate than McCain. The Republicans have been corrupt and also need to learn that they abandon Libertarian voters at their own peril. I am not looking forward to 4 years of socialist protectionist redistributionist government from the Democrats, but the Republicans need to be voted out of power.

[briannorwood]

The GOP needs another winning position to recapture the hearts and minds of the electorate. May I suggest they find another Terry Schiavo to save?

[pdchapin]

Declare martial law, cancel the elections in November, Bush stays on as dictator and the neocons will be dancing in the street.

Posted by WogerWabbit at 08:18 AM : May 13, 2008

This idiot idea pops up every once in a while. Bush can''t cancel the elections because the federal government doesn''t run the elections, the states do. To stop it would require a massive use of force and given that the military generally thinks Bush is incompetent, they''re not about to follow illegal orders from a lame duck. And with a good chunk of our military deployed overseas, they don''t come close to having enough manpower to suppress a national election. All the attempt would do would be assure a Democratic victory.

they are un american , the republicon party has ruined our country and they should be destroyed

Wow...here''s an idea...why don''t you start a movement to deport all Repulicans and then the Democrats and Obama can create the utopia you are looking for. Only one problem....all the money and jobs will be gone that the so called "fat cats" and corporations provide. How are your farming and hunting skills? You''ll need them.