WASHINGTON, May 11, 2008
Edwards: Clinton Now A Stronger Candidate
But Former Senator Says Hillary Cannot Make A Case For Her Run Based On The Math
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Edwards On Clinton's Chances
Former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards tells Bob Schieffer that Hillary Clinton has put up a strong fight in this campaign race, but it seems unlikely that she will be the nominee.
-
Video
Clinton Campaigner Speaks Out
Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman, Terry McAuliffe, tells Bob Schieffer that this race will continue despite Clinton's near impossible chances of winning the Democratic presidential nomination.
-
Video
Special Mother's Day Tribute
In celebration of that special day, "Face The Nation" host Bob Schieffer discusses some interesting and perhaps unorthodox tips his mother had taught him during his adolescence.
-
Photo
Former presidential candidate John Edwards says Hillary Clinton has shown tremendous strength in continuing her hard-fought candidacy, and that a decision to drop out of the race puts her in "a very, very tough place." (CBS)
-
Timeline
Democratic Campaign Trail
Notable events in the race for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.
- Stories
- Remembering What Mom Taught Us
However, Edwards said, "The math is very, very hard for her," as Sen. Barack Obama continues to lead in pledged delegates (and now in superdelegates). "The problem is, I think, you can no longer make a compelling case for the math.”
Edwards, D-N.C., told Face The Nation host Bob Schieffer that his own reasons for pulling out of the race for the White House came out of both a recognition that he would not accumulate enough delegates to secure the nomination and that his continued candidacy would likely prolong the selection of a nominee.
"It's a hard judgment to make," he said. "The overwhelming likelihood was I would not be the nominee. And I believed, that if I got out of the race, it would accelerate the process of one person pulling away. Well, I was obviously dead wrong about that!"
When asked about the position Clinton is in right now, and the calls by many for her to withdraw from the race, Edwards said, "I think it's a judgment that she has to make. And I think she's in a very, very tough place.
"I have to tell you, I'm different than a lot of people. I actually admire some of the strength and fortitude that she's shown. I know how hard it is to get up and go out there every day, speak to the media, speak to crowds, when people are urging you to get out of the race. I mean, it's a very hard place to be in. But she's shown a lot of strength about that.
"I think the one thing that she has to be careful about - and she doesn't need my advice, she knows this full well - is that, if she makes the case for herself, which she's completely entitled to do, she has to be really careful that she's not damaging our prospects, the Democratic Party, and our cause, for the fall."
Clinton campaign chairman Terry McAuliffe reiterated the Senator's position that she would not pull out of the race until all states have had a chance to weigh in. "We still have 7 million Democrats yet to vote," he said, alluding to primaries in West Virginia and Kentucky, among others.
But he also admitted that with more superdelegates announcing their preferences, it was likely that the nominee would be decided in June after primary voting concludes, and the fate of Michigan and Florida delegates is resolved.
McAuliffe also dismissed concerns that the long primary season will create long-lasting divisions within the party. "This is a very close race, and we need to get everybody together at the end," he said.
"I disagree with a lot of these Democrats today that are saying we won't be unified. We will be very unified. George Bush has been the greatest unifying force in the history of the Democratic Party. He has brought us all together. We will be together."
Also appearing on the show was Jim VandeHei, executive editor of Politico, who said there are those within the Clinton campaign who admit that they need a miracle - or, perhaps a scandal.
"They need an imponderable," he said. "They know they can't just win it by collecting enough popular votes. ... But as long as she stays in there, anything can happen. And this is a family that has had a political career that's been built upon sort of defying expectations and coming back when people thought it was not possible to come back.
"Who knows? Politics is completely unpredictable. And as long as she's in it for another six weeks or four weeks or whatever it will be, she has a chance. And she just wants that chance."
Read the full "Face the Nation" transcript here.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Video and Galleries from Face The Nation
- Latest in Face The Nation
- A Little Context
- Separating Icons From Heroes
- A Guide To A Successful Father's Day



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 8
- next
See all 395 CommentsMaybe if people would have studied the real issues instead of getting caught up in the RAPTURE we might have a different presidential race right now. A good thing to remember is that if you can''t prove it don''t say it.
One of Barack Obama''s Middle East policy advisers disclosed yesterday that he had held meetings with the militant Palestinian group Hamas - prompting the likely Democratic nominee to sever all links with him.
Robert Malley told The Times that he had been in regular contact with Hamas, which controls Gaza and is listed by the US State Department as a terrorist organisation. Such talks, he stressed, were related to his work for a conflict resolution think-tank and had no connection with his position on Mr Obama''s Middle East advisory council.
"I''ve never hidden the fact that in my job with the International Crisis Group I meet all kinds of people," he added.
Ben LaBolt, a spokesman for Mr Obama, responded swiftly: "Rob Malley has, like hundreds of other experts, provided informal advice to the campaign in the past. He has no formal role in the campaign and he will not play any role in the future." The rapid departure of Mr Malley followed 48 hours of heated clashes between John McCain, the Republican nominee-elect, and Mr Obama over Middle East policy.
Malley''s cozy relationship with Hamas really should come as no surprise to Obama or anyone else. And Malley is far from the only advisor of Obama that should give those concerned with Israel''s survival pause before supporting Obama. Not to mention the candidate''s own announced intention to meet with the Iranian regime, certainly no less evil than Hamas.
You have to admire Clinton''s tenacity but her math skills are sorely lacking. It''s over.
How can you say that....he already has. He openly campaigned for his cousin Odinga in Kenya. Odinga was a murderous tyrant who fortunately lost the election; however, it doesn''t escape the fact that he was committed to instituting Sharia law if he won. I''m not implying that Obama is Muslim but he certainly has some explaining to do and unfortunately no one is holding him accountable for much. Don''t doubt that the Republicans will even if McCain maintains his commitment to not go negative. It is not going negative to question a candidates record of endorsements.
Over ramparts of hate and doubt we watched and scandal rockets red glare dirty politics bursting in media air gave proof through the night that our candidate was still there.
Oh say does that change spangled Obama yet wave
over the land of the free and the home of the brave.
On the shore dimly seen through mists of a nations growing discontent.
As campaign fitfully grows now it catches the gleam of voters first beam in full glory reflected now shines in popular political mainstream.
Tis the change spangled Obama oh long may he wave
over the land of the free and the home of the brave.
Blest with victory and peace may the change rescued land praise the democratic process of voter power that hath made and preserved us a new nation of hope and change.
Then conquer we must when our cause it is just and this be our motto in a new candidate we must trust.
And the change spangled Obama in triumph shall wave on January 21 2009 over the land of the free and the home of the brave.
I use to like John Edwards , before i saw a guy who is pretty much spineless, To think this guy at one time wanted to be president, His wife wear the pants in the family , you could tell he wants to support barack but i guess he needs permission from his Wife.
Was John around last week where Hillary got blown out in North carolina and it was a tie pretty much in Indiana.
What strength is he talking about???.
So she will win the next few states big deal!, its over , barack already setting up camp in the big states to take on Mc_bush.
For the 50 million time in November Barack will not be running against democrats.
And to think democrats in the general election will vote republican is insane , That means they were never democrats in the first place. So then one would beg to ask.. why they got involve in the voting process in the first place.
Come on John edwards you need to grow some %$^&
Posted by ccfsdca
As far as your argument goes, you could be right. But your argument only considers voters who participated in the previous elections. You fail to factor in changes in voter patterns since 2004/2006.
The deciding factor may be the voters, predominantly young and/or minority, who were previously unregistered and who have become engaged in this contest. If they turn out, and if they vote Democratic, which by all indications the majority will, your election math formula is seriously flawed.
I''ve always been a democrat, but let me tell you, it wouldn''t take much for me to jump tracks. You think Obama is the change we need your dead wrong. Better do some more research, the man wants to disarm us, that good considering how messed up this world is right now and many countries are fighting including us. When I say disarm I mean he wants all our nuclear weapons,spy satellights, yeah, that would be smart, he thinks he can convince the rest of the world to do the same, Our country would be crushed for sure.
Your forgetting one thing, the people who voted in these primaries are a very small portion of the people who will vote in the election. There are alot of people who do not vote to pick a nominee.
I use to like John Edwards , before i saw a guy who is pretty much spineless, To think this guy at one time wanted to be president, His wife wear the pants in the family , you could tell he wants to support barack but i guess he needs permission from his Wife.
Was John around last week where Hillary got blown out in North carolina and it was a tie pretty much in Indiana.
What strength is he talking about???.
So she will win the next few states big deal!, its over , barack already setting up camp in the big states to take on Mc_bush.
For the 50 million time in November Barack will not be running against democrats.
And to think democrats in the general election will vote republican is insane , That means they were never democrats in the first place. So then one would beg to ask.. why they got involve in the voting process in the first place.
Come on John edwards you need to grow some b#$%&
---------------------------------------------
Learn to separate truth from exaggeration, my friend.
If it were the truth, Hillary would be all over it like flies on ***.
First, only Odinga claims "cousinship" to Obama - not vice versa.
It has also been rumored that Obama gave a million dollars to Odinga through an organization called "Friends of BO". Guess what? This was yet another chain email hoax just like the one that claimed Obama is moslem. There is no organization called "Friends of BO". Nor any proof in any tax-records or any bank records of any such money being donated either by Obama or by any group related to Obama.
Obama did go to Kenya where he spoke at an opposition rally organized by Odinga. There he spoke about the need for resolving constitutional crisis in Kenya. But guess what? He said the same to Odinga''s opponent, Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki. This is what policiticians do when they visit foreign countries. Doesn''t mean Obama will turn the USA into an Islamic state.
Don''t you see? Iraq associated with Al Qaeda, Carter with Hamas, Obama with Kenyan Islamists - all ploys by Repubs to use xenophobia and fear to antagonize the public against those who would threaten the Repub''s money-making autocracy. And, you are buying it.
Your being blind like so many other Obama supporters. I know alot of people who have always been democrats whoalways voted democratic who now are going to vote for John McCain if Obama is elected. Believe me, this party is not united, it has never been since Obama thought to bring us all back to the 1960''s and the civil rights movement. I won''t vote for Obama, and I have always voted for the dem party. So you don''t know what you are talking about. I bet those older people, as I heard, will not vote for Obama either, hes to radical for the like of them.
nomination at the beginning of the primaries and now
she''s gone. No wonder nobody voted for this moron.
d33pthroat1
The truth is the real intelligent people don''t find Obama''s company or for that matter his wifes company very funny, not something we over look that easily like so many stupid americans. We can look at all those people who the Obama''s associates themselves with, we can look at all the dumb, careless, inconsiderate, hateful remarks they both made, and some of the stupid, and suspicious ideas that Obama comes up with thast would destroy this country. He''s a christian, right, very unlikely. Ever hear a terrorist say they will work from the inside out to destroy this country, there you see the destroyer. But don''t take my advice, you''ll see for yourself very soon.
Posted by croft777 at 04:57 PM : May 11, 2008
__________________________________________
Who you fooling you are a republican , in one of your text you were saying Obama was planning to ruin our army. And was spreading a whole bunch of scare slogans the republicans are known for , so please go to Foxnews , you are in the wrong place.
-
whats with the name calling. your all the same if someone doesnt support your chosen one then that person gets called names. what ashame
Posted by croft777 at 05:06 PM : May 11, 2008
------------------------------------------------------
Who you fooling you are a republican , in one of your text you were saying Obama was planning to ruin our army. And was spreading a whole bunch of scare slogans the republicans are known for , so please go to Foxnews , you are in the wrong place.
I am a democrat. Dont believe me. Obama is on a video, recent to, for about 50 some seconds talking about disarming the country. I saw it, it is his and his own mouth speaking on it. Now how creapy is that.
I will find that video again it you want to see it, many people have already seen it.
Posted by croft777 at 05:11 PM : May 11, 2008
_____________________________________________________
Yes this is such serious stuff and news worthy its all over every news outlet and around the world.
Ok i change my mind you are a hillary supporter, let me guess in the ~UNEDUCATED~ demographic.
I would luv to reason with you and try to make sense of it all..but your demographics wont let me.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by Dimmu19
People like you are the reason Obama won''t win.
Pull your head out! The principles of freedom was what... the fifth or sixth excuse they gave us for this debacle? They''re dying for oil and you''re a fool if you don''t know it. There''s nothing honorable in this war except the warriors devotion to each other and the principles they stand for, not the principles of the rich war mongers for profit that got us here. If you don''t know the real reason we went to war, then you don''t know how to end it let alone win it. We have our troops sitting in a meat grinder today because nobody had a plan to win... they planned to stay.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 8
- next
See all 395 Comments