May 9, 2008

Obama Takes First Steps To Unify Dems

Washington Post: Campaign Seeks To Win Over Superdelegates As Clinton Gives No Hint She'll Surrender

  • Play CBS Video Video Obama Drops By U.S. Capitol

    "CBS News RAW": Barack Obama speaks to reporters and greets a few lucky tourists as he navigates the U.S. Capitol. The candidate says he wasn't campaigning on the Hill. "I was saying hello," he says.

  • Video Hillary Eyes West Virginia

    Hillary Clinton is looking to West Virginia as one of her final chances to trump Barack Obama's lead. But as Jim Axelrod reports, a Mountain State victory still might not be enough.

  • Video Can Clinton Hold On?

    Sen. Barack Obama is now within 200 delegates of what he needs to clinch a victory. Where does that leave Clinton? Jeff Greenfield analyzes the N.C. and Indiana contests by the numbers.

  • With numerous prominent Democrats believed to be waiting in the wings to endorse his candidacy, Barack Obama appears poised to win the pledged delegates and superdelegates he will need to claim the Democratic nomination as early as May 20, when Kentucky and Oregon vote.  (AP)

  • Photo Essay Barack Obama

    A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.

  • Timeline Democratic Campaign Trail

    Notable events in the race for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.

From Our Partner:
(Washingtonpost.com)  This story was written by Shailagh Murray and Perry Bacon Jr..


Sen. Barack Obama began taking the first steps to unify the fractured Democratic Party for a general-election battle against Sen. John McCain, even as Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton continued to insist that she has the backing of a broader coalition that could carry the party to victory in November.

Returning to Washington yesterday, Obama was mobbed by well-wishers as he walked onto the House floor. But behind the scenes, his campaign worked with a light touch to win over uncommitted superdelegates and allies of Clinton, mindful of not appearing overconfident and of the fact that they would need the backing of the candidate, her husband and their supporters in the fall.

With numerous prominent Democrats believed to be waiting in the wings to endorse his candidacy, Obama appears poised to win the pledged delegates and superdelegates he will need to claim the Democratic nomination as early as May 20, when Kentucky and Oregon vote. But although he appeared to lock down his lead on Tuesday with a strong win in North Carolina and a narrow loss in Indiana, he won only two new superdelegate endorsements yesterday, from Reps. Rick Larsen (Wash.) and Brad Miller (N.C.). Many other unaligned lawmakers said they are likely to remain on the sidelines for the time being, in deference to Clinton.

"Superdelegates understandably would prefer not to be seen as the deciding factor," Obama told reporters between meetings at the Capitol, brushing aside the suggestion that a mass endorsement is in the offing. "I think they respect the process, they respect Senator Clinton and myself."

As Clinton campaigned in West Virginia, which will hold its primary on Tuesday, her backers were also calling superdelegates, encouraging them to remain uncommitted until after the final two primaries on June 3 and touting poll numbers suggesting that Clinton would be a stronger nominee in key states such as Florida and Ohio. "Some people don't agree, but most people respect the argument," said Steve Grossman, a member of Clinton's national finance team.

In Charleston, W.Va., yesterday, Clinton argued that the coalition of voters backing her would make her more viable than Obama against McCain. "The delegate math may get complicated, but the electoral math is easy: We need 270 electoral votes to win in November," she said at a rally.

Clinton is expected to win the state by a hefty margin. Yesterday, she repeatedly referred to her appeal among "hardworking Americans," including "Catholic voters, Hispanic voters, blue-collar voters and seniors -- the kind of people who Senator McCain will be fighting for in the general election." She did not repeat the term "white voters," which she used in a USA Today interview published yesterday.

She also gave no hint of surrender in a letter to Obama about the delegate impasse involving Florida and Michigan. "Your commitment to the voters of these states must be clearly stated and your support for a fair and quick resolution must be clearly demonstrated," she wrote.

After Tuesday's primaries left Obama the clear Democratic front-runner, McCain's campaign refocused its attention on the senator from Illinois, preparing to question his experience on national security and his credentials on reform issues. Clinton, meanwhile, had become an afterthought for the presumptive GOP nominee.

"After I've been saying for a year, 'Don't count the Clintons out until they're out.' People are laughing at me," said Charles Black, a McCain campaign adviser. "I don't see how she does it."

Mark Salter, a senior McCain adviser, struck back sharply after Obama said on CNN that McCain was "losing his bearings" when he suggested that Hamas preferred that Obama be elected. Salter said Obama used the phrase "intentionally, a not particularly clever way of raising John McCain's age as an issue. This is typical of Obama's style of campaigning."

In Chicago, Obama's team worked to accelerate a transition to general-election mode that began weeks ago, only to be shelved as the primary showdown continued. In addition to competing in the six remaining contests, Obama will mix in stops to battleground states in the coming weeks, advisers said.

"We're not going to wake up in the morning after we become the nominee and be unprepared," said campaign manager David Plouffe.

The team is beginning two major grass-roots programs. "Vote for Change," a voter registration drive aimed at signing up millions of Democrats over the next six months, will begin tomorrow with 100 events in all 50 states. An army of "Organizing Fellows" is also being recruited -- full-time volunteers who will be deployed to swing states.

Obama spent the day in Washington courting uncommitted lawmakers. Former senator Thomas A. Daschle (S.D.), who helped organize the one-on-one and small-group sessions, said Obama is in striking distance of overtaking Clinton in superdelegate support, and may hit that mark in the next few days.

Obama's only public appearance was a lap around the House floor. He headed to a corner to visit Rep. John P. Murtha, the dean of the Pennsylvania delegation and a Clinton supporter, and Keystone State Reps. Mike Doyle, Paul E. Kanjorski, Jason Altmire and Robert A. Brady, all of whom are uncommitted.

Rep. Ellen O. Tauscher (Calif.), a Clinton supporter, waited her turn to shake Obama's hand, and uncommitted Rep. Bart Stupak (Mich.) chatted with the senator for a few minutes. House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (Md.), also officially neutral, hugged Obama.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) shrugged off the fuss, noting that "senators come to our floor all the time. Some attract more attention than others. I'm sure if Senator Clinton came, she would attract a great deal of attention, as well."

Obama advisers said a number of Democratic lawmakers are ready to sign on but want to speak with Clinton before making the leap.

"The writing is on the wall. They think he's the nominee, so there's no reason to rush," said one prominent uncommitted Democrat, referring to other lawmakers in the same situatin. "Then you don't have to offend anybody. The voters will issue their verdict soon enough."

Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (Del.), a former presidential candidate, said he will remain neutral. "I'm hopeful that there's some accommodation pretty soon," he said carefully. "The sooner the better." Sen. Ken Salazar (Colo.) said he will hang back, as well. "Let it play out," he said. Sen. Mary Landrieu (La.) said she will continue to "contemplate things" over the next few weeks.

Clinton supporters also urged restraint. "It's three more weeks, okay?" said Sen. Maria Cantwell (Wash.). "We want to have a very united party in November, and I take Senator Obama at his word when he says he doesn't want to do anything to tell her to get out of the race."

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.) said she spoke with Clinton by phone for 15 minutes yesterday morning, with Clinton doing most of the talking and sounding "very collected" in her determination to stay in the race. "She doesn't believe it's time," Feinstein said, adding that Clinton feels a bond with those who have supported her and does not want to let them down.

Said Daschle: "We're not going to pressure her in any way." If superdelegates express concerns about offending Clinton, "we respect those," he said, adding: "I don't know that anyone is getting any pressure to come forward."

Staff writers Paul Kane and Peter Slevin in Chicago contributed to this report.


By Shailagh Murray and Perry Bacon Jr.
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Add a Comment See all 450 Comments
by rufisgufis May 11, 2008 4:27 PM EDT
SO MUCH FOR EXPERIENCE

He had an array of experiences: Minister to Russia, Minister to Great Britain, ten years in the Senate, elected five times to the House of Representatives, Secretary of State for five years. While he was in office the nation increased size by 33%. Yet, when he was elected as president in 1856, James Buchanan soon acquired the reputation as the worst president in the history of the country. The man who followed him in office only had two terms in the Illinois State Legislature, but Abraham Lincoln had no problem being elected to the presidency.
Reply to this comment
by rufisgufis May 11, 2008 4:11 PM EDT


HILLARY HAS A WEALTH OF EXPERIENCE - AS A LIAR!!

NO MATTER WHAT THE ISSUE IS -

SHE''LL TRY SPIN IT TO WIN IT!!!

FIGURES DON%u2019T LIE BUT LIARS CAN FIGURE

ETHICS BE DAMNED.

SHE HAS A LOT OF CLASS - BUT IT%u2019S ALL LOW!!
Reply to this comment
by rufisgufis May 11, 2008 4:08 PM EDT
"We are the party of the people, the coal miner, the waitress, the truck driver. We don''''t need any elitists in our party. Therefore I am going to loan my campaign another 6.4 million in addition to the 5 million I''ve already lent them. After all, this is supposed to be the party of the working man."

Reply to this comment
by ar_morris May 11, 2008 1:51 PM EDT
In the beginning, there was only Iowa. So where is a %u2018Big Lie%u2019? Yes, it was in Iowa. It happened in December. It fell from the lips of the candidate who would later claim victory (albeit: the slimmest of victories, a meager third of the vote) in the Democratic Caucus. He said (and this is a quote from the NY Times), %u201C%u2026.the only nuclear legislation that I%u2019ve passed. I just did that last year%u2026.%u201D (The Big Lie). This was in response to a discussion on leaks in Illinois of nuclear plant groundwater contamination. Nuclear contamination.
Again, I quote the author, Mike McIntire from his February 3, 2008 article in the New York Times. Exelon (contributed over $225,000 to Obama) .It is %u2018The Big Lie%u2019 because he never passed the legislation, many in Iowa believed him, and the Illinois senator was never quizzed about it. He then moved forward basing a part of his entire campaign on something he didn%u2019t do, but said he did.
To base your first win on %u2018The Big Lie%u2019 is to have the rest of your wins cast in that shadow of your %u2018First Big Lie%u2019. Judgment is critical to Senator Obama%u2019s presidential hopes. He has little else, no bills or legislation of his own passed, no lengthy time in the US Senate, and maybe just his veracity as his only virtue. But where is that %u2018good judgment%u2019 if you told %u2018The Big Lie%u2019 first?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this comment
by wrightsdeman May 11, 2008 12:26 PM EDT
CBSNEWS,

why don''t you bring up the breaking story of the weekend.

Rob Malley, Obama''s chief Middle East adviser and an Israel hater from a family of such (father was an Islamic nut and buddy to Yasser Arafat, mommy was a Red Diaper Communist "Jewess" (in name only) from New York)was forced to resign after he admitted close contacts with Hamas.

So much for Obama''s professed pro-Israel policies. The reality is in the choice of advisers - Brezinzski, Lake, McPeak, Power and Malley - all Neo-Fascist Israel-hating scum (with the possible exception of Tony Lake, who is ambivalent). His advisers reflect who he really is.

Now, the prinzowhales, grazingjacka$$es, and tuckerhymeswithf on board here who already have demonstrated their David Duke-Rev. Wright connections will scream and holler, but this also proves that Obama will only choose those who blame America, who hate Israel, and who like he will suck up to Islamofascism.

CBSNEWS, it is time to expose the Malley story, or maybe it is because you support the stepin'' fetchit that you don''t wish to bring reality to some of fuzzy-eyed Libs still considering voting to him but are troubled by the company he keeps.
Reply to this comment
by ranger1948 May 11, 2008 5:06 AM EDT
Has anyone seen obamawhamma ? I have been looking under every rock.
Reply to this comment
by rufisgufis May 11, 2008 1:47 AM EDT
READ THE LATEST: CLINTON IS READY TO CONCEDE IF SHE CAN WORK OUT A DEAL WITH OBAMA TO HELP WITH HER CAMPAIGN DEBTS.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 May 11, 2008 1:19 AM EDT
Posted by ksh1022 at 07:39 PM : May 10, 2008

Well said!
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 May 11, 2008 1:18 AM EDT
Posted by enlightened- at 04:52 PM : May 10, 2008

Exactly! And that''s why Hillary Clinton will go to convention and get ''er done!

Go Hillary!
Reply to this comment
by ksh1022 May 10, 2008 10:39 PM EDT
The only unity Obama wants is all the super delegates unified on his side. Voting for him is a mistake. He has no resume. He has racist affiliations. He is too far left. My party has been hijacked by the far left. I have voted Dem every election since 1980. If Obama wins I will either write in Hillary or vote McCain. If the Dems put him up, they deserve to lose. Remember Mondale, Dukakis, Kerry?
Reply to this comment
by pepperwood2 May 10, 2008 9:33 PM EDT
n Charleston, W.Va., yesterday, Clinton argued that the coalition of voters backing her would make her more viable than Obama against McCain. "The delegate math may get complicated, but the electoral math is easy: We need 270 electoral votes to win in November," she said at a rally.

Hillary where have we heard you imply this before? Was it in your remarks to Gov. Richardson, when he saw the light and decided to support Obama?

It went something like this. Obama cannot, will not & must not win the presidential election. Its all about me. A team player or leader you''re certainly not.

You must be suffering from shell shock on the day you single handily defeated the rebels that surrounded Sarajevo, Bosnia. Sooooo sad - dear.
Reply to this comment
by omaar-101 May 10, 2008 9:19 PM EDT
Again, call me when Clinton EVENS or SURPASSES Obama..Please


Total Delegate Count

Democrats | 2,025 Needed to Clinch

OBAMA 1,861

CLINTON 1,690

EDWARDS 18

Republicans | 1,191 Needed to Clinch

MCCAIN 1,328

HUCKABEE 231

ROMNEY 149

CBS News estimates. Includes super delegates.
Reply to this comment
by omaar-101 May 10, 2008 9:13 PM EDT
NPR''s Ron Elving: By now, no one needs more rehashing of the numbers, but heres the short version: Barack Obama has a virtual lock on the Delegates he needs to be the 2008 Democratic Nominee for president.

Obama needs only about a 3RD of the Delegates at stake in the remaining primaries and about the same share of the uncommitted superdelegates.

Barring another outbreak of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama should do substantially better than that in both categories.

Big A!! Note: So Game Over. Even the Seating of the Full Delegations from the Outlaw Primaries in Florida and Michigan is no longer a Real Threat to Obama''s Nomination.
Reply to this comment
by omaar-101 May 10, 2008 9:11 PM EDT


Obama is going to agree on having both States Seated and Accounted for and this is what will Happen....


Hillary Clinton will have Sealed her Political Fate..


This will win Obama Favor in both those States & Clinton Followers....


1. Obama will be looked upon, as a man who said, to the Voters of Both States, Your Vote & Your Presence Count.

Note: The word (Leader) comes to mind.... ''The Uniter''


2. The Super Delegates representing Both states, will give him the Nod, because they know Hillary has been Unrelenting in her Negative campaign and he agreed to seat them and Account for their Votes.

3. Obama will reap the Benefits, by shutting up all the Clintonites, who have been lead to Believe, by Clinton, that Obama is Blocking the (2) States from Participating, in the Process.

4. Obama will then win in November, by doing this and All the Clinton people will Fairly and Justly Vote for him.

Result: Obama will become our Nations 1st Bi-Racial President
Reply to this comment
by liberty4you May 10, 2008 8:05 PM EDT
""She doesn''t believe it''s time," Feinstein said, adding that Clinton feels a bond with those who have supported her and does not want to let them down."

It is starting to look like Hillary wants to stay in the race... Good for her, she deserves to try to make her loans back through her donors contributions.

Anyone who donates to her campaign now is a complete idiot.

Support the millionaire Clintons and their "loans" to their own banks. They are their own banks...

Perhaps with the help of her supporters, they will repay their own pockets. What a concept. Please,

repay the Clinton machine so they won''t lose their Harlem $700,000 suite... What a shame if they did.

Americans who don''t pay up, are just anti-Hillary...
Reply to this comment
by enlightened- May 10, 2008 7:52 PM EDT
Omaar...you forgot to add that Obama ran commercials in Florida for at least one week prior to the primary...also breaking DNC rules. So, I would say the only option is to give Hillary her delegates won, and give Obama ZERO.
Reply to this comment
by davthewav1 May 10, 2008 5:45 PM EDT
The American Heritage Dictionary defines:

Liberalism; 1. Having, expreesing, or following political veiws or policies that favor civil liberties, democratic reforms, and the use of governmental power to promote social progress.

Conservativism; 1. The disposition in politics to maintain the exsisting order and to resist or oppose change and new ideas.

How did liberal ever become a dirty word?

The last thing this country needs is more politicians who fear change in office.

Hillary or Obama are infinitely better choices than McCain.

Vote Democrat !
Reply to this comment
by omaar-101 May 10, 2008 1:49 PM EDT
Call me, when Clinton EVENS Obamas NUMBERS Or SURPASSES Obamas NUMBERS...

Until that Mystical, Majical, Majestical Moment Happens...You Clintonites are Blowing Sand out of Your A!!''s !!


Total Delegate Count

Democrats | 2,025 Needed to Clinch

OBAMA (1,857)

CLINTON 1,690

EDWARDS 18

Republicans | 1,191 Needed to Clinch

MCCAIN 1,328

HUCKABEE 231
ROMNEY 149

CBS News estimates. Includes super delegates.
Reply to this comment
by omaar-101 May 10, 2008 1:44 PM EDT

Of course, the Obama campaign has its fair share of objections. For starters, there''''s that pesky, old-fashioned, admittedly absurd notion known as "following the rules." The Democratic Party prohibits any state other than Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina from holding its primary before Feb. 5. So when Florida and Michigan threatened in late 2007 to pull the trigger on Jan. 15 and Jan. 29, respectively, the DNC gave them a choice: reschedule--or lose your delegates. They refused, hence their current no-delegate status.

According to critics, reinstating those delegates now would undermine the DNC''''s authority over the nominating process; who will stop Guam, they say, when it schedules its primary for Thanksgiving 2012?

The second reason: last winter, both Clinton and Obama Deferred to the DNC and agreed not to "Campaign Or Participate" in either election; Obama even Removed his Name from the Michigan slate.

Big A!! Note: So while Clinton "Beat" her rival 50-33 in (Florida) and trounced "Uncommitted" 55-40 in the (Great Lakes State),

One can''''t help but suspect that Not Campaigning and/or not Appearing on the Ballot somewhat affected Obama''''s showing--not to mention that turnout has a way of declining when voters are told that the election doesn''''t matter.




Reply to this comment
by omaar-101 May 10, 2008 1:43 PM EDT
Big A!! Note: Clinton, Completely Opposed Recognizing (Michigan and Florida) until after the primaries--i.e., when she Realized she might need their Delegates to win the nomination.

"It''''s clear that this election they''''re having [in Michigan] is not going to count for Anything," she said during an interview with New Hampshire Public Radio in October 2007. She wasn''''t alone.


2 months earlier, Clinton adviser Harold Ickes actually voted to ''''Strip the Rogue States'''' of their Delegates as a member of the DNC''''s Rules and Bylaws committee--

"To prevent the gaming of the system," he said. Later than fall, Patti Solis Doyle, then Clinton''''s campaign manager, Pledged not to Compete in Either Contest--and was Unequivocal as well.


"We believe Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina play a unique and special role in the nominating process... and the ''DNC''s Rules and its Calendar'' provide the necessary structure to Respect and Honor that Role," she said.

"Thus, we will... adhere to the DNC-Approved Nominating Calendar."

And when (Michigan) pushed for an Early Vote in 2004, then-DNC chairman--and current Clinton aide--Terry McAuliffe put his foot down.

"If I allow you to do that, the whole system collapses," McAuliffe said (at least according to his memoir).

"The closest [Michigan''''s delegates will] get to Boston will be watching it on television. I will not let you Break this Entire Nominating Process for one state.

The rules are the rules."

Reply to this comment
See all 450 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications:

What do you think of President-elect Obama picking Hillary Clinton for his Cabinet?
 Brilliant
 Risky
 Awful