PEARISBURG, Va., May 9, 2008

Cops: Man Who Killed Hikers Strikes Again

Va. Man Who Murdered 2 Hikers In 1981 Charged With Shooting 2 More On Appalachian Trail

  •  (AP / CBS)

  • Interactive Crime Beat

    Statistics and specifics on crime in America.

(AP)  A convicted murderer is suspected of shooting and wounding two men on the Appalachian Trail a few miles from the spot where he killed two hikers in 1981, authorities said.

Randall Lee Smith, 54, will be charged with two counts of attempted capital murder, grand larceny and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, Lt. Ron Hamlin of the Giles County Sheriff's Office said Thursday.

Smith was taken to a Roanoke hospital after police said he crashed a pickup truck belonging to one of Tuesday's shooting victims while being followed by a state trooper. Investigators said Smith was in stable condition Thursday and being guarded by deputies.

Smith was released from prison in 1996 after serving 14 years for the deaths of two social workers from Maine who were hiking the Appalachian Trail. He pleaded guilty to second-degree murder.

Police have not released the names of Tuesday's shooting victims, but friends and family identified them as Sean Farmer, 33, of Tazewell, and Scott Johnston, 37, of Bluefield. A hospital spokesman said Johnston was in serious condition. Friends said Farmer has been released.

State police said a 2000 Ford Ranger driven by Smith ran off the road and overturned after a trooper pulled up behind it Tuesday night. They had been asked to be on the lookout for the truck, which belongs to Johnston, after the shooting.

On Thursday, authorities removed the crime scene tape that had cordoned off a 28-mile stretch of the trail during their investigation, and hikers began trekking through.

"Man, I'm out here having the time of my life," said Nathan Adcock, 31, of Asheville, N.C. "And then somebody's out there shooting."

Although the trail was reopened, investigators were still trying to find clues in the case, including a campsite where Smith may have stayed in the two months since he went missing from his home near Pearisburg, about 50 miles west of Roanoke.


© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 45 Comments
by ronrobbie September 28, 2009 5:34 PM EDT
I say the rabid killer was probably given 14 years for killing 2 people because he was white. When are we going to own up to the inequities in our so called criminal justice system. If a black man had committed those murders he would have been given the death penalty. This system works to put the poor and disenfranchised and the minorities in jail sometimes for minor or nonviolent offences. They are then scarred for life by these sentences and the criminal records and once they are released cannot find a job or function in the society and by this the criminal injustice system perpetuate itself. Oj was given many years for trying to "get his stuff back". The young black football player was recetly given 2 years for carrying a loaded firearm yet right wing extremists can go to town hall meetings with automatic weapons displayed openly. Where is the justice in all of this.
Reply to this comment
by milesbrown49 May 12, 2008 2:23 AM EDT
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated."

Hahahaha! That''''''''s royal. Gen. Ydmgoras Fuentes was a CIA creation and had US weapons and money to do that killing.


Posted by Nancy_Naive at 06:47 AM : May 11, 2008
______________________________________________________

I am curious too as to what point you are making. Gen. Ydmgoras Fuentes was president from 1958 till 1963 when he was overthrown in a coup. What did he have to do with the murders???? What is your point????

Also I want to say that gun control was enacted in the US in 1968 in answer to the Black Panther movement. The Black Panthers who exercised their rights to bear arms were considered by the FBI to be the number one enemy by J. Edgar Hoover the director of the FBI. Gun control would not have stopped this nut. Guns are merely a tool. If that man was going to attempt to kill someone to steal or what ever his passion, he would have found a way.
Reply to this comment
by May 11, 2008 8:47 PM EDT
atlanta30326, I am no fan of the NRA, they go too far the other way. Neither am I a fan of someone who tries to talk around facts to make their point. You are right about Saddam, but you forgot to mention that it was HIS faction that had the weapons. Also, Hitler%u2019s brown shirts didn%u2019t give up theirs, but my grandfather had to give up his hunting rifle.
Reply to this comment
by algoresarse May 11, 2008 4:44 PM EDT
So does life without parole.

Regards,


Posted by Nancy_Naive at 06:42 AM : May 11, 2008
+ report abuse

***************

which does not work..each and every year these death row inmates tend to murder us again (financially)..care to donate some of your money for your cause???

thought so..
Reply to this comment
by algoresarse May 11, 2008 4:43 PM EDT
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated."

Hahahaha! That''''s royal. Gen. Ydmgoras Fuentes was a CIA creation and had US weapons and money to do that killing.


Posted by Nancy_Naive at 06:47 AM : May 11, 2008
+ report abuse
*************

and?? i miss your point..all those mayan killings are justified because it was a cia creation blah blah blah?? or are you just being a typical bleeding heart liberal who seems to derail the issue..
Reply to this comment
by jackp32 May 11, 2008 12:04 PM EDT
There is no such thing as life without parole. State governors and/or parole boards have the power to commute all sentences. When a death sentence is carried out, that is finality. At any time during a life without parole sentence, that person''s sentence may be commuted so that the inmate becomes eligible for parole or is immediately released. During the Bill Clinton pardon scandal, he could have issued a pardon, or commutation of sentence for Tim McVey. If the price had been right like it was with other cases, he may have done it.
Reply to this comment
by atlanta30326 May 11, 2008 2:47 AM EDT
Yikes! This board looks like it has been taken over by a bunch of NRA skinhead militia men. Numbers get very skewed and twisted.


MYTH:Gun ownership is a protection against political tyranny.
TRUTH: Private ownership of guns was very common under Saddam Hussein''s regime. It certainly didn''t protect the Iraqi people against political tyranny. Gun ownership was legalized in Germany in 1928, five years before Hitler rose to power. Despite the claims of pro-gun activists, gun ownership did nothing to stop a tyrant like Hitler from seizing power. In 1938, Germany''s gun laws were relaxed except in the case of Jews. Although the gun lobby has tried to associate racism with gun control, white supremacists have often praised the Nazis for being pro-gun and have opposed gun control. An example of that is this quote: "If you register your gun with anybody, you''re a nut! When the conspiracy comes for your firearm, give it to ''em like this grand dragon is going to - right between the eyes." -Klu Klux Klan (Richmond Times- Dispatch, July 5, 1967)


Reply to this comment
by rhs648 May 10, 2008 6:50 PM EDT
corrected

dome200q - Even horrifying facts such as those which you posted are unlikely to change the minds of anti-gun proponents. They do help the rest of us understand why con-control laws are dangerous.
Reply to this comment
by rhs648 May 10, 2008 6:48 PM EDT
dome200q - Even *********** facts such as those which you posted are unlikly to change the minds of anti-gun proponents. They do help the rest of us understand why con-control laws are dangerous.
Reply to this comment
by downsteamjim May 10, 2008 4:07 PM EDT
Capital punishment prevents repeat murders.
Reply to this comment
by fabrat1 May 10, 2008 2:16 PM EDT
closethippy1 Hey I''m with you all the way but of course that will never happen. More and more people are owning guns every year.Right here in my home town a 65 yo man got mad at his wife (of 10 years) children because he thought they wanted to take over on her medical care so he shot one killing her and shot the other in the arm. If he hadn''t had the gun in the first place that NEVER would have happened! My X brother in-law wouldn''t go anywhere without his gun and I used to tell him that since he has such a small p.e.n.i.s. I can understand why he needs the gun to feel like a man.
Reply to this comment
by kaffirboetie May 10, 2008 12:32 AM EDT
Hey guysdigdirt, go easy on closethippy, the poor little "lambkin" has probably spent his whole life living in some "love and flowers" commune making homespun and eating yoghurt
Reply to this comment
by May 9, 2008 10:33 PM EDT
And are you going to answer the question guysdigdirt asked you?
Reply to this comment
by May 9, 2008 10:30 PM EDT
It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars. The first year results are now in:

Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent
Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!

In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still
possess their guns!

It will never happen here? I bet the Aussies said that too!

While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.

There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the ELDERLY. Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns. The Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it.

Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.

Reply to this comment
by May 9, 2008 10:26 PM EDT
closethippy1, here is a little gun history lesson for you:

In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated

China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million ''educated'' people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded u p and exterminated.

Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.
Reply to this comment
by closethippy1 May 9, 2008 9:47 PM EDT
I repeat, even if criminals were the only ones to have guns in this country the number of gun deaths would be a fraction of what it is today.
Get it?
That way the only people I need to worry about are criminals who are mainly concern about turf wars and revenge killings.
That way I wouldn''t have to worry about anyone having a bad day and taking out their rage on fellow workers, or someone who cut them off on the road, or kill their own family, or commit suicide, or like that 63 year old i.diot who shot a nurese dead becuase his Mommy passed away at the hospital and then get into his car and shot dead this person who happened to park next to him, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, and freaking etc!!!
You gun owners have lost your minds! You just want to have the freedom to show your gun to anyone who gets you pissed and give them a dirty look, you neanderthals.
You don''t even care we''d be saving over 10,000 lives a years by banning guns.
It''s all about you, you and you and to hell with the rest of the country.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey May 9, 2008 7:56 PM EDT
[My question is how the heck did this guy get out in only 14 years for killing two people? Dumb liberals.]
[Posted by jboxton at 02:01 PM : May 09, 2008]

is this another case of all the worlds issues are the fault of liberals?

well ... since you can''t see the absudity of your own view ... i''ll help you out.

the reason why murders and rapist are ''out on the street'' is because all the ''throw them all in jail and throw away the key'' types (not liberals) insisted on all the people growing/possessing/tranporting/combusting certain types of plants (cannibas sativa) are incarcerated w/ mandatory minimums leaving no discretion for the judge to define appropriate sentences in veiw of circumstances. this also applies to other generally non-violent infractions involving other types of drugs ... where people w/ no criminal history at all are sent to prison for 10, 20, 30 or more years.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey May 9, 2008 7:46 PM EDT
[After all, I rather trust our superb police force for law enforcement and security. Thank you.]
[Posted by closethippy1 at 10:53 AM : May 09, 2008]

i got just the guys for ya ... they specialize in rapid discharge of their weapons whenever they see something questionable (and not neccesarily illegal):

Officers Michael Oliver, 36, and Gescard Isnora, 29, stood trial for manslaughter while Officer Marc Cooper, 40, was charged only with reckless endangerment. Two other shooters weren''t charged. Oliver squeezed off 31 shots; Isnora fired 11 rounds; and Cooper shot four times." [AP via MSNBC]
Reply to this comment
by glock4me May 9, 2008 7:13 PM EDT
The first 2 murders was just a couple of yankees. Now this Bubba''s in a whole steamin'' pile of trouble.
Reply to this comment
by bestillandno May 9, 2008 5:09 PM EDT
Read the article? He killed two social workers and pled guilty to 2 counts of 2d degree murder and did 14 years (the judge was probably his inred brother); these backwoods cuntry f***ks need to be taught lessons-- never turn your back on a hick and the second they start that backwoods intimidation stuff, you should just punch them in the mouth and knock their 3 remaining teeth down their throats.

Gerald Clough
http://www.savagerun.com

Posted by poedude99 at 09:40 AM : May 09, 2008



And here it is folks...7 whole posts into the thread before some idiot that thinks he is clever because he pulls out all of the stereotypes his pea brain can muster, gives his explanation for all to enjoy. Nice job man. If you have disdain for the killer, fine. We all do, but don''t be so ignorant as to think that his evil mind has anything to do with where he is from. Google all of the ax murdering, serial killers you can think of and see where they are all from. Evil comes from all walks of life just as good does.
Reply to this comment
See all 45 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: